With the increased attention on community sustainability and resilience, different poles have developed voicing similarities and/or differences of the two concepts. This study quantifies adaptive capacity of Jefferson...With the increased attention on community sustainability and resilience, different poles have developed voicing similarities and/or differences of the two concepts. This study quantifies adaptive capacity of Jefferson County, Texas, one of the coastal communities at the Gulf of Mexico having some of the worse adverse effects. Review of existing methods is presented. Analyses were conducted for the last ten years: from 2005 to 2014. Interestingly, statistical analyses showed that the County’s socio-economic profile or indicators have not changed throughout the ten years, but the environmental, institutional, and infrastructure indicators have. Focusing on one location magnifies the adaptive capacity of Jefferson County, the temporal aspect of both perspectives, and the relevance of existing methods to this community with its peculiarities. Future assessments need to be based on primary data collected through participatory engagement of all stakeholders. This calls for attempts to quantify adaptive capacity using the comparatively more challenging deductive reasoning, which would allow for incorporation of more risks and thus higher readiness.展开更多
目的探索舒缓医学教学培训对神经重症专科住院医师共情能力的影响。方法选取2021年9月―2022年12月在中日友好医院神经外科神经重症亚专科参加培训的30名医师作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为试验组和对照组,各15名。试验组进行基于...目的探索舒缓医学教学培训对神经重症专科住院医师共情能力的影响。方法选取2021年9月―2022年12月在中日友好医院神经外科神经重症亚专科参加培训的30名医师作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为试验组和对照组,各15名。试验组进行基于舒缓医学课程整合的神经重症医学培训,对照组按照常规神经重症医学内容进行培训。在培训前后采用杰弗逊共情量表(Jefferson scale of physician empathy,JSPE)对2组进行评分,评估舒缓医学教学培训对共情能力的影响。同时对试验组在培训结束后的3、6和12个月进行JSPE评分,观察共情能力的变化。结果试验组在观点采择,怜悯关怀,换位思考维度的JSPE量表评分分别为(50.00±3.21)分、(38.53±3.02)分和(9.60±1.63)分,均高于培训前的评分[(37.87±3.02)分、(27.60±1.64)分和(7.53±1.68)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组在培训后的随访时间内,JSPE的3个维度的评分仍有所提升,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论舒缓医学教学培训有助于提高神经重症专科住院医师的共情能力,其影响具有持续稳定性。展开更多
Aim: To compare empathic levels among dental students of five Dental Faculties in Chile. Material and Methods: Empathic orientation of dental students was measured using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, the S...Aim: To compare empathic levels among dental students of five Dental Faculties in Chile. Material and Methods: Empathic orientation of dental students was measured using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, the Spanish version for students (S version), validated in Chile and culturally adapted to dental students. The data were compared using analysis of variance trifactorial (model III) and by a discriminant analysis. Results: It was found that differences exist between universities empathic orientation, courses, and gender. Conclusions: The results showed a great variability of empathetic guidance values on the factors studied. Discriminant test confirm the similarity and differences found among faculties from the data matrix provided by the scale used. It is not possible in this investigation to explain the variability found.展开更多
目的研究杰弗逊共情量表学生版(the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Student Version,JSE-S)用于测量中国医学专业学生共情水平的信效度并评价其适用性。方法译制中文版JSE-S量表并制作为电子调查问卷,采用方便取样法纳入284名医学生完成...目的研究杰弗逊共情量表学生版(the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Student Version,JSE-S)用于测量中国医学专业学生共情水平的信效度并评价其适用性。方法译制中文版JSE-S量表并制作为电子调查问卷,采用方便取样法纳入284名医学生完成调查。采用分半信度和内部一致性信度评估量表信度,采用结构效度评估量表效度。结果中文版JSE-S量表的分半信度系数为0.832,内部一致性信度Cronbach sα系数为0.865,4个维度的Cronbach sα系数分别为0.868,0.829,0.695,0.770;结构效度检验显示取样适切性量数(KMO)统计量为0.876,Bartlett s球形检验P<0.001,提取4个公因子后累积方差贡献率为58.349%,因子负荷估计值为0.255~0.832。结论中译版JSE-S量表具有较好的信度和效度,适用于评估中国医学生的共情水平。展开更多
Background: The incumbent of medical professional is expected to be socially responsible and emotionally empathetic along with good communication propensity to fasten the doctor-patient relationship. Whilst doctor’s ...Background: The incumbent of medical professional is expected to be socially responsible and emotionally empathetic along with good communication propensity to fasten the doctor-patient relationship. Whilst doctor’s proficiency to recognize a patient’s perspectives, and convey such an understanding back to the patient;in our case, the empathy and compassion level of promising medical professional is unknown in Nepal. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the compassion and empathy score of final year’s undergraduate students of four medical colleges in Nepal. Methods: Self-reported empathy measures were obtained using the Jefferson Scale of Physician-Student version. Results: The degree of empathy for the participants was 97.28 (SD = 14.44) with a median score of 96.00 and a range of 44 (min) to 133 (max). There was a significant difference on scores of the Jefferson scale of physician empathy between NMC Nepalgunj and BPKIHS (p = 0.00) and between NMC Nepalgunj and Manipal Pokhara (p = 0.00), as well as between UCMS and Manipal Pokhara (p = 0.044). These results were significant at the 95% confidence interval. Conclusions: The mean empathy score for the Nepali students is lower than medical students from developed countries but almost similar to medical students from other Asian medical students. The female Nepali medical students scored slightly higher than their male counterparts. Thus colleges have to develop academic programs to improve empathy and compassion among medical students through providing adequate time to consult with patient and faculties.展开更多
Objective: The aim of this study is to check whether there are differences in the distribution of empathy levels in dental students from nine faculties of dentistry Colombia, Panama, Costa Rica and Dominican Republic....Objective: The aim of this study is to check whether there are differences in the distribution of empathy levels in dental students from nine faculties of dentistry Colombia, Panama, Costa Rica and Dominican Republic. Methods: The levels of empathy and matrices of empathy construct matrices are estimated dental students by using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, the Spanish version for students (S version) culturally validated in Colombia, Panama, Costa Rica and Dominican Republic measured by arbitrator criteria. Cronbach α is estimated. Data of empathic orientation of the studied factors between faculties are analyzed and compared by ANOVA and Duncan test and matrices of empathy construct using discriminant analysis. Results: We find that there are differences in levels of empathy between universities, courses, gender and interaction between the Dental Faculty (University) and Course. The comparison between matrices shows unexplained variances and differences observed between the levels of empathy in student populations. Conclusions: Variability in empathy is observed in the studied factors and among student populations. The variability is an empirical finding, but is not possible in this work, to explain why.展开更多
文摘With the increased attention on community sustainability and resilience, different poles have developed voicing similarities and/or differences of the two concepts. This study quantifies adaptive capacity of Jefferson County, Texas, one of the coastal communities at the Gulf of Mexico having some of the worse adverse effects. Review of existing methods is presented. Analyses were conducted for the last ten years: from 2005 to 2014. Interestingly, statistical analyses showed that the County’s socio-economic profile or indicators have not changed throughout the ten years, but the environmental, institutional, and infrastructure indicators have. Focusing on one location magnifies the adaptive capacity of Jefferson County, the temporal aspect of both perspectives, and the relevance of existing methods to this community with its peculiarities. Future assessments need to be based on primary data collected through participatory engagement of all stakeholders. This calls for attempts to quantify adaptive capacity using the comparatively more challenging deductive reasoning, which would allow for incorporation of more risks and thus higher readiness.
文摘目的探索舒缓医学教学培训对神经重症专科住院医师共情能力的影响。方法选取2021年9月―2022年12月在中日友好医院神经外科神经重症亚专科参加培训的30名医师作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为试验组和对照组,各15名。试验组进行基于舒缓医学课程整合的神经重症医学培训,对照组按照常规神经重症医学内容进行培训。在培训前后采用杰弗逊共情量表(Jefferson scale of physician empathy,JSPE)对2组进行评分,评估舒缓医学教学培训对共情能力的影响。同时对试验组在培训结束后的3、6和12个月进行JSPE评分,观察共情能力的变化。结果试验组在观点采择,怜悯关怀,换位思考维度的JSPE量表评分分别为(50.00±3.21)分、(38.53±3.02)分和(9.60±1.63)分,均高于培训前的评分[(37.87±3.02)分、(27.60±1.64)分和(7.53±1.68)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组在培训后的随访时间内,JSPE的3个维度的评分仍有所提升,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论舒缓医学教学培训有助于提高神经重症专科住院医师的共情能力,其影响具有持续稳定性。
文摘Aim: To compare empathic levels among dental students of five Dental Faculties in Chile. Material and Methods: Empathic orientation of dental students was measured using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, the Spanish version for students (S version), validated in Chile and culturally adapted to dental students. The data were compared using analysis of variance trifactorial (model III) and by a discriminant analysis. Results: It was found that differences exist between universities empathic orientation, courses, and gender. Conclusions: The results showed a great variability of empathetic guidance values on the factors studied. Discriminant test confirm the similarity and differences found among faculties from the data matrix provided by the scale used. It is not possible in this investigation to explain the variability found.
文摘目的研究杰弗逊共情量表学生版(the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Student Version,JSE-S)用于测量中国医学专业学生共情水平的信效度并评价其适用性。方法译制中文版JSE-S量表并制作为电子调查问卷,采用方便取样法纳入284名医学生完成调查。采用分半信度和内部一致性信度评估量表信度,采用结构效度评估量表效度。结果中文版JSE-S量表的分半信度系数为0.832,内部一致性信度Cronbach sα系数为0.865,4个维度的Cronbach sα系数分别为0.868,0.829,0.695,0.770;结构效度检验显示取样适切性量数(KMO)统计量为0.876,Bartlett s球形检验P<0.001,提取4个公因子后累积方差贡献率为58.349%,因子负荷估计值为0.255~0.832。结论中译版JSE-S量表具有较好的信度和效度,适用于评估中国医学生的共情水平。
文摘Background: The incumbent of medical professional is expected to be socially responsible and emotionally empathetic along with good communication propensity to fasten the doctor-patient relationship. Whilst doctor’s proficiency to recognize a patient’s perspectives, and convey such an understanding back to the patient;in our case, the empathy and compassion level of promising medical professional is unknown in Nepal. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the compassion and empathy score of final year’s undergraduate students of four medical colleges in Nepal. Methods: Self-reported empathy measures were obtained using the Jefferson Scale of Physician-Student version. Results: The degree of empathy for the participants was 97.28 (SD = 14.44) with a median score of 96.00 and a range of 44 (min) to 133 (max). There was a significant difference on scores of the Jefferson scale of physician empathy between NMC Nepalgunj and BPKIHS (p = 0.00) and between NMC Nepalgunj and Manipal Pokhara (p = 0.00), as well as between UCMS and Manipal Pokhara (p = 0.044). These results were significant at the 95% confidence interval. Conclusions: The mean empathy score for the Nepali students is lower than medical students from developed countries but almost similar to medical students from other Asian medical students. The female Nepali medical students scored slightly higher than their male counterparts. Thus colleges have to develop academic programs to improve empathy and compassion among medical students through providing adequate time to consult with patient and faculties.
文摘Objective: The aim of this study is to check whether there are differences in the distribution of empathy levels in dental students from nine faculties of dentistry Colombia, Panama, Costa Rica and Dominican Republic. Methods: The levels of empathy and matrices of empathy construct matrices are estimated dental students by using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, the Spanish version for students (S version) culturally validated in Colombia, Panama, Costa Rica and Dominican Republic measured by arbitrator criteria. Cronbach α is estimated. Data of empathic orientation of the studied factors between faculties are analyzed and compared by ANOVA and Duncan test and matrices of empathy construct using discriminant analysis. Results: We find that there are differences in levels of empathy between universities, courses, gender and interaction between the Dental Faculty (University) and Course. The comparison between matrices shows unexplained variances and differences observed between the levels of empathy in student populations. Conclusions: Variability in empathy is observed in the studied factors and among student populations. The variability is an empirical finding, but is not possible in this work, to explain why.
