Although liver transplantation is theoretically the best treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),it is limited by the realities of perioperative complications,and the shortage of donor organs.Furthermore,in many c...Although liver transplantation is theoretically the best treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),it is limited by the realities of perioperative complications,and the shortage of donor organs.Furthermore,in many cases there are available alternative treatments such as resection or locoregional therapy.Deciding upon the best option for a patient with HCC is complicated,involving numerous ethical principles including:urgency,utility,intention-to-treat survival,transplant benefit,harm to candidates on waiting list,and harm to living donors.The potential contrast between different principles is particularly relevant for patients with HCC for several reasons:(1)HCC candidates to liver transplantation are increasing;(2)the great prognostic heterogeneity within the HCC population;(3)in HCC patients tumor progression before liver transplantation may significantly impair post transplant outcome;and(4)effective alternative therapies are often available for HCC candidates to liver transplantation.In this paper we suggest that allocating organs by transplant benefit could help balance these competing principles,and also introduce equity between patients with HCC and nonmalignant liver disease.We also propose a triangular equipoise model to help decide between deceased donor liver transplantation,living donor liver transplantation,or alternative therapies.展开更多
Randomised controlled trials(RCTs) are gold standard in the evaluation of treatment efficacy in medical investigations, only if well designed and implemented. Till date, distorted views and misapplications of statisti...Randomised controlled trials(RCTs) are gold standard in the evaluation of treatment efficacy in medical investigations, only if well designed and implemented. Till date, distorted views and misapplications of statistical procedures involved in RCTs are still in practice. Hence, clarification of concepts and acceptable practices related to certain statistical issues involved in the design, conduct and reporting of randomised controlled trials is needed. This narrative synthesis aimed at providing succinct but clear information on the concepts and practices of selected statistical issues in RCTs to inform correct applications. The use of tests of significance is no longer acceptable as means to compare baseline similarity between treatment groups and in determining which covariate(s) should be included in the model for adjustment. Distribution of baseline attributes simply presented in tabular form is however, rather preferred. Regarding covariate selection, such approach that makes use of information on the degree of correlation between the covariate(s) and the outcome variable is more in tandem with statistical principle(s) than that based on tests of significance. Stratification and minimisation are not alternatives to covariate adjusted analysis; in fact they establish the need for one. Intention-totreat is the preferred approach for the evaluation of primary outcome measures and researchers have responsibility to report whether or not the procedure was followed. A major use of results from subgroup analysis is to generate hypothesis for future clinical trials. Since RCTs are gold standard in the comparison of medical interventions, researchers cannot afford the practices of distorted allocation or statistical procedures in this all important experimental design method.展开更多
文摘Although liver transplantation is theoretically the best treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),it is limited by the realities of perioperative complications,and the shortage of donor organs.Furthermore,in many cases there are available alternative treatments such as resection or locoregional therapy.Deciding upon the best option for a patient with HCC is complicated,involving numerous ethical principles including:urgency,utility,intention-to-treat survival,transplant benefit,harm to candidates on waiting list,and harm to living donors.The potential contrast between different principles is particularly relevant for patients with HCC for several reasons:(1)HCC candidates to liver transplantation are increasing;(2)the great prognostic heterogeneity within the HCC population;(3)in HCC patients tumor progression before liver transplantation may significantly impair post transplant outcome;and(4)effective alternative therapies are often available for HCC candidates to liver transplantation.In this paper we suggest that allocating organs by transplant benefit could help balance these competing principles,and also introduce equity between patients with HCC and nonmalignant liver disease.We also propose a triangular equipoise model to help decide between deceased donor liver transplantation,living donor liver transplantation,or alternative therapies.
基金the Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, United Kingdom, for providing full funding through bursary and scholarship awards and an enabling environment for a successful completion of the PhD
文摘Randomised controlled trials(RCTs) are gold standard in the evaluation of treatment efficacy in medical investigations, only if well designed and implemented. Till date, distorted views and misapplications of statistical procedures involved in RCTs are still in practice. Hence, clarification of concepts and acceptable practices related to certain statistical issues involved in the design, conduct and reporting of randomised controlled trials is needed. This narrative synthesis aimed at providing succinct but clear information on the concepts and practices of selected statistical issues in RCTs to inform correct applications. The use of tests of significance is no longer acceptable as means to compare baseline similarity between treatment groups and in determining which covariate(s) should be included in the model for adjustment. Distribution of baseline attributes simply presented in tabular form is however, rather preferred. Regarding covariate selection, such approach that makes use of information on the degree of correlation between the covariate(s) and the outcome variable is more in tandem with statistical principle(s) than that based on tests of significance. Stratification and minimisation are not alternatives to covariate adjusted analysis; in fact they establish the need for one. Intention-totreat is the preferred approach for the evaluation of primary outcome measures and researchers have responsibility to report whether or not the procedure was followed. A major use of results from subgroup analysis is to generate hypothesis for future clinical trials. Since RCTs are gold standard in the comparison of medical interventions, researchers cannot afford the practices of distorted allocation or statistical procedures in this all important experimental design method.
