This work interrogates why certain real-world events that meet criteria for being considered causative events cannot be expressed using Hupa’s morphological or syntactic causative constructions,but must be encoded us...This work interrogates why certain real-world events that meet criteria for being considered causative events cannot be expressed using Hupa’s morphological or syntactic causative constructions,but must be encoded using one of two periphrastic constructions in which the Causer or cause is not marked as an argument.Based on fieldwork with a native speaker,I probe into these two periphrastic constructions in depth,accounting for their distributions through an appeal to Næss’s(2007)account of semantic transitivity.展开更多
文摘This work interrogates why certain real-world events that meet criteria for being considered causative events cannot be expressed using Hupa’s morphological or syntactic causative constructions,but must be encoded using one of two periphrastic constructions in which the Causer or cause is not marked as an argument.Based on fieldwork with a native speaker,I probe into these two periphrastic constructions in depth,accounting for their distributions through an appeal to Næss’s(2007)account of semantic transitivity.
