Objective： To investigate the clinical efficacy of point Houxi（SI 3） electroacupuncture for treating acute lumbar sprain. Methods： Three hundred patients with acute lumbar sprain were randomly grouped with a rando...Objective： To investigate the clinical efficacy of point Houxi（SI 3） electroacupuncture for treating acute lumbar sprain. Methods： Three hundred patients with acute lumbar sprain were randomly grouped with a random number table. The electroacupuncture group was treated by electro-acupuncture at point Houxi （SI 3） and the medication group, with meloxicam. Results： A comparison of the short-term effects showed that the efficacy rate was 97.3% in the electroacupuncture group and 89.3% in the medication group. The average rank of the short-term effect score was lower in the electroacupuncture group than in the medication group （P〈0.01）; there was a significant difference between the two groups. A comparison of the long-term effect showed that the efficacy rate was 99.3% in the electroacupuncture group and 93.2% in the medication group. The average rank of the long-term effect score was lower in the electroacupuncture group than in the medication group （P〈0.01）; there was a significant difference between the two groups, Conclusion： Both point Houxi （S1 3） electroacupuncture and meloxicam have a marked effect on acute lumbar sprain, but the short-term and long-term effects are better in the electroacupuncture group than in the medication group.展开更多
Objective： To assess the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture （EA） at Houxi （SI 3） in treating acute lumbar sprain. Methods： Randomized controlled trials （RCTs） involving EA at Houxi （SI 3） for acute lu...Objective： To assess the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture （EA） at Houxi （SI 3） in treating acute lumbar sprain. Methods： Randomized controlled trials （RCTs） involving EA at Houxi （SI 3） for acute lumbar sprain were retrieved from PubMed （1966-2014）, EMBASE （1980-2014）, Cochrane Library （Issue 1, 2014）, CO, VIP Database （1989-2014）, Wanfang Digital Journal （1998-2014）, the Chinese Biological Medical Literature Database （CBM, 1978-2014）, and China National Knowledge Internet （CNKI, 1979-2014）. The collection of data also adopted hand-search of the relevant journals from the Library of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. All of the data were first evaluated and extracted by two reviewers independently with a specially designed form. Then, the available data were analyzed by the Cochrane Collaboration＇s RevMan 5.2.0 software. Results： A total of 6 trials involving 1 288 patients were eligible. Meta-analysis showed that the total effectiveness rate in the EA group was significantly different when compared with Nimesulide [RR----1.33; 95% CI （1.19 to 1.49）] and Mobic [RR= 1.08; 95% Cl （1.03 to 1.14）], but similar to that of acupuncture at Yaotongdian （EX-UE 7） [RR=71.09; 95% Cl （1.00 to 1.19）] and Diclofenac Sodium [RR----1.08; （95% CI 0.96 to 1.21）]. The recovery rate in the EA group was significantly different when compared with Mobic [RR----1.67; （95% CI 1.45 to 1.92）] and Nimesulid [RR：1.37; （95% Cl 1.15 to 1.62）], but similar to that of acupuncture at Yaotongdian [（RR=1.35; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.84）] and Diclofenac Sodium [（RR=I.19; 95% Cl 0.88 to 1.61）]. Conclusion： Up to the search date, there are few high quality RCTs to evaluate the clinical efficacy of EA at Houxi （SI 3） for acute lumbar sprain, especially studies in English. Yet EA at Houxi （SI 3） still appeared to be an efficacious method for acute lumbar sprain, despite several inherent defects of the included studies. Further large scale trials are required to define the role of EA at Houxi （SI 3） in the treatment of this disease.展开更多
基金Finanacially supported by State Administration of TCM(03XDLZ24)
文摘Objective： To investigate the clinical efficacy of point Houxi（SI 3） electroacupuncture for treating acute lumbar sprain. Methods： Three hundred patients with acute lumbar sprain were randomly grouped with a random number table. The electroacupuncture group was treated by electro-acupuncture at point Houxi （SI 3） and the medication group, with meloxicam. Results： A comparison of the short-term effects showed that the efficacy rate was 97.3% in the electroacupuncture group and 89.3% in the medication group. The average rank of the short-term effect score was lower in the electroacupuncture group than in the medication group （P〈0.01）; there was a significant difference between the two groups. A comparison of the long-term effect showed that the efficacy rate was 99.3% in the electroacupuncture group and 93.2% in the medication group. The average rank of the long-term effect score was lower in the electroacupuncture group than in the medication group （P〈0.01）; there was a significant difference between the two groups, Conclusion： Both point Houxi （S1 3） electroacupuncture and meloxicam have a marked effect on acute lumbar sprain, but the short-term and long-term effects are better in the electroacupuncture group than in the medication group.
基金supported by Lu's Acupuncture Inheritance Study of Shanghai Schools of Traditional Chinese MedicineProject of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital~~
文摘Objective： To assess the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture （EA） at Houxi （SI 3） in treating acute lumbar sprain. Methods： Randomized controlled trials （RCTs） involving EA at Houxi （SI 3） for acute lumbar sprain were retrieved from PubMed （1966-2014）, EMBASE （1980-2014）, Cochrane Library （Issue 1, 2014）, CO, VIP Database （1989-2014）, Wanfang Digital Journal （1998-2014）, the Chinese Biological Medical Literature Database （CBM, 1978-2014）, and China National Knowledge Internet （CNKI, 1979-2014）. The collection of data also adopted hand-search of the relevant journals from the Library of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. All of the data were first evaluated and extracted by two reviewers independently with a specially designed form. Then, the available data were analyzed by the Cochrane Collaboration＇s RevMan 5.2.0 software. Results： A total of 6 trials involving 1 288 patients were eligible. Meta-analysis showed that the total effectiveness rate in the EA group was significantly different when compared with Nimesulide [RR----1.33; 95% CI （1.19 to 1.49）] and Mobic [RR= 1.08; 95% Cl （1.03 to 1.14）], but similar to that of acupuncture at Yaotongdian （EX-UE 7） [RR=71.09; 95% Cl （1.00 to 1.19）] and Diclofenac Sodium [RR----1.08; （95% CI 0.96 to 1.21）]. The recovery rate in the EA group was significantly different when compared with Mobic [RR----1.67; （95% CI 1.45 to 1.92）] and Nimesulid [RR：1.37; （95% Cl 1.15 to 1.62）], but similar to that of acupuncture at Yaotongdian [（RR=1.35; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.84）] and Diclofenac Sodium [（RR=I.19; 95% Cl 0.88 to 1.61）]. Conclusion： Up to the search date, there are few high quality RCTs to evaluate the clinical efficacy of EA at Houxi （SI 3） for acute lumbar sprain, especially studies in English. Yet EA at Houxi （SI 3） still appeared to be an efficacious method for acute lumbar sprain, despite several inherent defects of the included studies. Further large scale trials are required to define the role of EA at Houxi （SI 3） in the treatment of this disease.
