In Mesozoic carbonates of the Tethyan Himalayas two characteristic remanent magnetisations(ChRM\-1 and ChRM\-2)were identified by their unblocking spectra.The ChRM\-1 is carried by pyrrhotite(unblocking spectra:270～...In Mesozoic carbonates of the Tethyan Himalayas two characteristic remanent magnetisations(ChRM\-1 and ChRM\-2)were identified by their unblocking spectra.The ChRM\-1 is carried by pyrrhotite(unblocking spectra:270～340℃),acquired as a secondary thermoremanent magnetisation (TRM) during exhumation and cooling.The ChRM\-2 is carried by magnetite (unblocking spectra:430～580℃).A primary origin is indicated by calcite twin geothermometry and remanences consistent with the expected direction.Along an E—W profile of 10km length the ratio of remanence intensity of pyrrhotite to magnetite ( R PYR/MAG )changes systematically (from 0 38 to 1 00,Fig.1).It is known that pyrrhotite is formed in marly carbonates during low\|grade metamorphism (Rochette 1987).This occurs at the expense of magnetite.Thus the ratio R PYR/MAG is related to metamorphic temperatures and can be used as a geothermometer for temperatures≤300℃ in low\|grade metamorphic carbonates where other methods are rare.Stable remanence directions were used to estimate the amount of block rotation around vertical and horizontal axes(i.e.Klootwijk et al.1985,Appel et al.1991 & 1995).In the Shiar area the pyrrhotite remanence directions follow a small\|circle distribution with a best fit parallel to the N—S direction(Fig.2).展开更多
In carboniferous and triassic metacarbonates (anchizone to lower greenschist facies) of the Tethyan Himalayas the characteristic remanent magnetisations are carried by magnetite (ChRM\-1) and pyrrhotite (ChRM\-2;Kloot...In carboniferous and triassic metacarbonates (anchizone to lower greenschist facies) of the Tethyan Himalayas the characteristic remanent magnetisations are carried by magnetite (ChRM\-1) and pyrrhotite (ChRM\-2;Klootwijk & Bingham,1980;Appel et al.,1991 & 1995;Schill et al.,1999).Magnetite may carry a primary remanent magnetisation whereas the pyrrhotite component is secondary and related to the last cooling event below 300℃. Pyrrhotite is formed in marly carbonates during low\|grade metamorphism.In Spiti the last cooling is represented by an 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age of 42～45Ma (Wiesmayr & Grasemann,1999).Five locations were sampled in the Spiti valley (Fig.1).Besides a present earth field direction,both remanent components (ChRM 1+2 ) are present in single specimens.The contribution to the total NRM is around 30% for the ChRM\-2 (coercivity of 20～100mT) and only around 8% for the ChRM\-2 (unblocking temperature of 250～330℃).Despite of the contribution stable remanence directions could be obtained for the ChRM\-2.For all sampling locations well grouping overall mean directions were obtained (Table 1,Fig.1).Results from Losar and the lower Pin valley are preliminary.They were estimated by great circle analyses or by taking the residual component after AF\|demagnetisation. Clockwise block rotations of around 10～40° in respect to stable India since 42 Ma are calculated by using the apparent polar wander path of Besse & Courtillot (1991).The α 95 \|angles show no overlapping (Fig.1 small figure).Therefore local rotations are not negligible.展开更多
文摘In Mesozoic carbonates of the Tethyan Himalayas two characteristic remanent magnetisations(ChRM\-1 and ChRM\-2)were identified by their unblocking spectra.The ChRM\-1 is carried by pyrrhotite(unblocking spectra:270～340℃),acquired as a secondary thermoremanent magnetisation (TRM) during exhumation and cooling.The ChRM\-2 is carried by magnetite (unblocking spectra:430～580℃).A primary origin is indicated by calcite twin geothermometry and remanences consistent with the expected direction.Along an E—W profile of 10km length the ratio of remanence intensity of pyrrhotite to magnetite ( R PYR/MAG )changes systematically (from 0 38 to 1 00,Fig.1).It is known that pyrrhotite is formed in marly carbonates during low\|grade metamorphism (Rochette 1987).This occurs at the expense of magnetite.Thus the ratio R PYR/MAG is related to metamorphic temperatures and can be used as a geothermometer for temperatures≤300℃ in low\|grade metamorphic carbonates where other methods are rare.Stable remanence directions were used to estimate the amount of block rotation around vertical and horizontal axes(i.e.Klootwijk et al.1985,Appel et al.1991 & 1995).In the Shiar area the pyrrhotite remanence directions follow a small\|circle distribution with a best fit parallel to the N—S direction(Fig.2).
文摘In carboniferous and triassic metacarbonates (anchizone to lower greenschist facies) of the Tethyan Himalayas the characteristic remanent magnetisations are carried by magnetite (ChRM\-1) and pyrrhotite (ChRM\-2;Klootwijk & Bingham,1980;Appel et al.,1991 & 1995;Schill et al.,1999).Magnetite may carry a primary remanent magnetisation whereas the pyrrhotite component is secondary and related to the last cooling event below 300℃. Pyrrhotite is formed in marly carbonates during low\|grade metamorphism.In Spiti the last cooling is represented by an 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age of 42～45Ma (Wiesmayr & Grasemann,1999).Five locations were sampled in the Spiti valley (Fig.1).Besides a present earth field direction,both remanent components (ChRM 1+2 ) are present in single specimens.The contribution to the total NRM is around 30% for the ChRM\-2 (coercivity of 20～100mT) and only around 8% for the ChRM\-2 (unblocking temperature of 250～330℃).Despite of the contribution stable remanence directions could be obtained for the ChRM\-2.For all sampling locations well grouping overall mean directions were obtained (Table 1,Fig.1).Results from Losar and the lower Pin valley are preliminary.They were estimated by great circle analyses or by taking the residual component after AF\|demagnetisation. Clockwise block rotations of around 10～40° in respect to stable India since 42 Ma are calculated by using the apparent polar wander path of Besse & Courtillot (1991).The α 95 \|angles show no overlapping (Fig.1 small figure).Therefore local rotations are not negligible.
