BACKGROUND Stapled hemorrhoidopexy(SH)is one of the most commonly used surgical techniques for hemorrhoidal disease,being particularly effective for grade III and IV hemorrhoids.The procedure is associated with better...BACKGROUND Stapled hemorrhoidopexy(SH)is one of the most commonly used surgical techniques for hemorrhoidal disease,being particularly effective for grade III and IV hemorrhoids.The procedure is associated with better short-term outcomes,including less postoperative pain,shorter operative time,faster return to work,and higher patient satisfaction.However,there is a risk-benefit debate surrounding SH due to significant complications from the procedure,such as anal stenosis,rectovaginal fistula,fecal incontinence,and recurrence.AIM To evaluate recurrence rates and factors influencing surgical outcomes following SH in patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids.METHODS This retrospective,single-center study enrolled a total of 77 patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids for analysis.Early(less than 7 days after SH)and late(7 or more days after SH)complications were analyzed.Recurrence rates were calculated as well.RESULTS Patients were categorized by hemorrhoid grade and showed no differences in demographic data between the two groups.Recurrence was observed in 4 patients(23.6%)with grade IV hemorrhoids,and no recurrence was noted in patients with grade III hemorrhoids.Postoperative bleeding,incomplete defecation,urgent defecation,incontinence,skin tags,and anal fissure were complications reported by both groups.CONCLUSION Due to the high recurrence rate,SH is not an appropriate treatment option for patients with grade IV hemorrhoids.Open surgery may be a more suitable option for these patients.展开更多
BACKGROUND Stapled hemorrhoidopexy(SH)is currently a widely accepted method for treating the prolapse of internal hemorrhoids.Postoperative anal stenosis is a critical complication of SH.A remedy for this involves the...BACKGROUND Stapled hemorrhoidopexy(SH)is currently a widely accepted method for treating the prolapse of internal hemorrhoids.Postoperative anal stenosis is a critical complication of SH.A remedy for this involves the removal of the circumferential staples of the anastomosis,followed by the creation of a hand-sewn anastomosis.Numerous studies have reported modified SH procedures to improve outcomes.We hypothesized that our modified SH technique may help reduce complications of anal stenosis after SH.AIM To compare outcomes of staple removal at the 3-and 9-o’clock positions during modified SH in patients with mixed hemorrhoids.METHODS This was a single-center,retrospective,observational study.Patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids who underwent standard or modified SH at our colorectal center between January 1,2015,and January 1,2020,were included.The operation time,blood loss,length of hospital stay,and incidence of minor or major complic-ations were recorded.RESULTS Patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids who underwent standard or modified SH at our colorectal center between January 1,2015 and January 1,2020,were included.Operation time,blood loss,length of hospital stay,and incidence of minor or major complications were recorded.We investigated 187 patients(mean age,50.9 years)who had undergone our modified SH and 313 patients(mean age,53.0 years)who had undergone standard SH.In the modified SH group,54%of patients had previously undergone surgical intervention for hemorrhoids,compared with the 40.3%of patients in the standard SH group.The modified SH group included five(2.7%)patients with anal stenosis,while 21(6.7%)patients in the standard SH group had complications of anal stenosis.There was a significant relationship between the rate of postoperative anal stenosis and the modified SH:0.251(0.085-0.741)and 0.211(0.069-0.641)in multiple regression analysis.The modified SH technique is a safe surgical method for advanced grade hemorrhoids and might result in a lower rate of postoperative anal stenosis than standard SH.CONCLUSION The modified SH technique is a safe surgical method for advanced grade hemorrhoids and might result in a lower rate of postoperative anal stenosis than standard SH.展开更多
AIM: To compare outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy (LH) by a meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane...AIM: To compare outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy (LH) by a meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Science Citation Index updated to December 2012, were searched. The main outcomes measured were operating time, early postoperative pain, postoperative urinary retention and bleeding, wound problems, gas or fecal incontinence, anal stenosis, length of hospital stay, residual skin tags, prolapse, and recurrence. The meta-analysis was performed using the free software Review Manager. Differences observed between the two groups were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) with 95%CI. A fixedeffects model was used to pool data when statistical heterogeneity was not present. If statistical heterogeneity was present (P < 0.05), a random-effects model was used. RESULTS: The initial search identified 10 publica-tions. After screening, five RCTs published as full articles were included in this meta-analysis. Among the five studies, all described a comparison of the patient baseline characteristics and showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Although most of the analyzed outcomes were similar between the two operative techniques, the operating time for SH was significantly longer than for LH (P < 0.00001; OR= -6.39, 95%CI: -7.68 -5.10). The incidence of residual skin tags and prolapse was significantly lower in the LH group than in the SH group [2/111 (1.8%) vs 16/105 (15.2%); P = 0.0004; OR= 0.17, 95%CI: 0.06-0.45). The incidence of recurrence after the procedures was significantly lower in the LH group than in the SH group [2/173 (1.2%) vs 13/174 (7.5%); P = 0.003; OR= 0.21, 95%CI: 0.07-0.59]. CONCLUSION: Both SH and LH are probably equally valuable techniques in modern hemorrhoid surgery. However, LigaSure might have slightly favorable immediate postoperative results and technical advantages.展开更多
Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a surgical procedure used worldwide for the treatment of grade Ⅲ and N hemorrhoids in all age groups. However, lifethreatening complications occur occasionally. The following case report de...Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a surgical procedure used worldwide for the treatment of grade Ⅲ and N hemorrhoids in all age groups. However, lifethreatening complications occur occasionally. The following case report describes the development of pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. A literature review of techniques used to manage major septic complications after stapled hemorrhoidopexy was performed. There is no standardized treatment currently available. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a safe, effective and time-efficient procedure in the hands of experienced colorectal surgeons.展开更多
After anorectal surgery,hemorrhoids frequently lead to chronic issues,partic-ularly in patients with mixed hemorrhoids.Liu et al investigated the outcomes of staple removal at the 3-and 9-o’clock positions following ...After anorectal surgery,hemorrhoids frequently lead to chronic issues,partic-ularly in patients with mixed hemorrhoids.Liu et al investigated the outcomes of staple removal at the 3-and 9-o’clock positions following modified stapled hemorrhoidopexy(SH)in patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids.This study included patients who underwent standard or modified SH between January 1,2015,and January 1,2020.Key metrics assessed included hospital stay duration,blood loss,operation time,and the incidence of minor or major complications.The findings indicated that the modified SH technique is a safe option for advanced-grade hemorrhoids,resulting in a lower rate of postoperative anal stenosis compared to standard SH.Notably,this technique also showed reduced anal stenosis rates in patients with prior hemorrhoid treatments.While the modified SH demonstrates immediate benefits,further research is necessary to evaluate long-term effects.Despite its advantages,the study’s limited sample size restricts the generalizability of the findings,underscoring the need for larger,long-term studies to validate these results.Clinically,the modified SH method appears to significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative anal stenosis,a common concern following typical surgeries.If confirmed by larger trials,this procedure may become the preferred surgical approach for hemorrhoids.In conclusion,the work of Liu et al signifies a meaningful advancement in hemorrhoid surgery,enhancing patient safety and outcomes.展开更多
Hemorrhoids are considered one of the most common anorectal diseases with a prevalence of 4.4% up to 36.4% of the general population, and a peak incidence between 45 and 65 years. Hemorrhoidal disease presents with a ...Hemorrhoids are considered one of the most common anorectal diseases with a prevalence of 4.4% up to 36.4% of the general population, and a peak incidence between 45 and 65 years. Hemorrhoidal disease presents with a prolapsed lump, painless bleeding, discomfort, discharge, hygiene problems, soiling, and pruritus. Sliding anal canal lining theory is the most accepted theory as a cause of hemorrhoidal disease; however, it is also associated with hyper-vascularity, and, recently, with several enzymes or mediators involved in the disintegration of the tissues supporting the anal cushions, such as matrix metalloproteinase. A comprehensive search in published English-language literature till 2013 involving hemorrhoids was performed to construct this review article, which discusses advances in the management of hemorrhoids. This includes conservative treatment(life style modification, oral medications, and topical treatment), office procedures(rubber band ligation, injection sclerotherapy, infrared and radiofrequency coagulation, bipolar diathermy and direct-current electrotherapy, cryosurgery, and laser therapy), as well as surgical procedures including diathermy hemorrhoidectomy, Liga Sure hemorrhoidectomy, Harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy, hemorrhoidal artery ligation, stapled hemorrhoidopexy(SH), and double SH. Results, merits and demerits of the different modalities of treatment of hemorrhoids are presented, in addition to the cost of the recent innovations.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Stapled hemorrhoidopexy(SH)is one of the most commonly used surgical techniques for hemorrhoidal disease,being particularly effective for grade III and IV hemorrhoids.The procedure is associated with better short-term outcomes,including less postoperative pain,shorter operative time,faster return to work,and higher patient satisfaction.However,there is a risk-benefit debate surrounding SH due to significant complications from the procedure,such as anal stenosis,rectovaginal fistula,fecal incontinence,and recurrence.AIM To evaluate recurrence rates and factors influencing surgical outcomes following SH in patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids.METHODS This retrospective,single-center study enrolled a total of 77 patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids for analysis.Early(less than 7 days after SH)and late(7 or more days after SH)complications were analyzed.Recurrence rates were calculated as well.RESULTS Patients were categorized by hemorrhoid grade and showed no differences in demographic data between the two groups.Recurrence was observed in 4 patients(23.6%)with grade IV hemorrhoids,and no recurrence was noted in patients with grade III hemorrhoids.Postoperative bleeding,incomplete defecation,urgent defecation,incontinence,skin tags,and anal fissure were complications reported by both groups.CONCLUSION Due to the high recurrence rate,SH is not an appropriate treatment option for patients with grade IV hemorrhoids.Open surgery may be a more suitable option for these patients.
文摘BACKGROUND Stapled hemorrhoidopexy(SH)is currently a widely accepted method for treating the prolapse of internal hemorrhoids.Postoperative anal stenosis is a critical complication of SH.A remedy for this involves the removal of the circumferential staples of the anastomosis,followed by the creation of a hand-sewn anastomosis.Numerous studies have reported modified SH procedures to improve outcomes.We hypothesized that our modified SH technique may help reduce complications of anal stenosis after SH.AIM To compare outcomes of staple removal at the 3-and 9-o’clock positions during modified SH in patients with mixed hemorrhoids.METHODS This was a single-center,retrospective,observational study.Patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids who underwent standard or modified SH at our colorectal center between January 1,2015,and January 1,2020,were included.The operation time,blood loss,length of hospital stay,and incidence of minor or major complic-ations were recorded.RESULTS Patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids who underwent standard or modified SH at our colorectal center between January 1,2015 and January 1,2020,were included.Operation time,blood loss,length of hospital stay,and incidence of minor or major complications were recorded.We investigated 187 patients(mean age,50.9 years)who had undergone our modified SH and 313 patients(mean age,53.0 years)who had undergone standard SH.In the modified SH group,54%of patients had previously undergone surgical intervention for hemorrhoids,compared with the 40.3%of patients in the standard SH group.The modified SH group included five(2.7%)patients with anal stenosis,while 21(6.7%)patients in the standard SH group had complications of anal stenosis.There was a significant relationship between the rate of postoperative anal stenosis and the modified SH:0.251(0.085-0.741)and 0.211(0.069-0.641)in multiple regression analysis.The modified SH technique is a safe surgical method for advanced grade hemorrhoids and might result in a lower rate of postoperative anal stenosis than standard SH.CONCLUSION The modified SH technique is a safe surgical method for advanced grade hemorrhoids and might result in a lower rate of postoperative anal stenosis than standard SH.
文摘AIM: To compare outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy (LH) by a meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Science Citation Index updated to December 2012, were searched. The main outcomes measured were operating time, early postoperative pain, postoperative urinary retention and bleeding, wound problems, gas or fecal incontinence, anal stenosis, length of hospital stay, residual skin tags, prolapse, and recurrence. The meta-analysis was performed using the free software Review Manager. Differences observed between the two groups were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) with 95%CI. A fixedeffects model was used to pool data when statistical heterogeneity was not present. If statistical heterogeneity was present (P < 0.05), a random-effects model was used. RESULTS: The initial search identified 10 publica-tions. After screening, five RCTs published as full articles were included in this meta-analysis. Among the five studies, all described a comparison of the patient baseline characteristics and showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Although most of the analyzed outcomes were similar between the two operative techniques, the operating time for SH was significantly longer than for LH (P < 0.00001; OR= -6.39, 95%CI: -7.68 -5.10). The incidence of residual skin tags and prolapse was significantly lower in the LH group than in the SH group [2/111 (1.8%) vs 16/105 (15.2%); P = 0.0004; OR= 0.17, 95%CI: 0.06-0.45). The incidence of recurrence after the procedures was significantly lower in the LH group than in the SH group [2/173 (1.2%) vs 13/174 (7.5%); P = 0.003; OR= 0.21, 95%CI: 0.07-0.59]. CONCLUSION: Both SH and LH are probably equally valuable techniques in modern hemorrhoid surgery. However, LigaSure might have slightly favorable immediate postoperative results and technical advantages.
文摘Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a surgical procedure used worldwide for the treatment of grade Ⅲ and N hemorrhoids in all age groups. However, lifethreatening complications occur occasionally. The following case report describes the development of pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. A literature review of techniques used to manage major septic complications after stapled hemorrhoidopexy was performed. There is no standardized treatment currently available. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a safe, effective and time-efficient procedure in the hands of experienced colorectal surgeons.
文摘After anorectal surgery,hemorrhoids frequently lead to chronic issues,partic-ularly in patients with mixed hemorrhoids.Liu et al investigated the outcomes of staple removal at the 3-and 9-o’clock positions following modified stapled hemorrhoidopexy(SH)in patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids.This study included patients who underwent standard or modified SH between January 1,2015,and January 1,2020.Key metrics assessed included hospital stay duration,blood loss,operation time,and the incidence of minor or major complications.The findings indicated that the modified SH technique is a safe option for advanced-grade hemorrhoids,resulting in a lower rate of postoperative anal stenosis compared to standard SH.Notably,this technique also showed reduced anal stenosis rates in patients with prior hemorrhoid treatments.While the modified SH demonstrates immediate benefits,further research is necessary to evaluate long-term effects.Despite its advantages,the study’s limited sample size restricts the generalizability of the findings,underscoring the need for larger,long-term studies to validate these results.Clinically,the modified SH method appears to significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative anal stenosis,a common concern following typical surgeries.If confirmed by larger trials,this procedure may become the preferred surgical approach for hemorrhoids.In conclusion,the work of Liu et al signifies a meaningful advancement in hemorrhoid surgery,enhancing patient safety and outcomes.
文摘Hemorrhoids are considered one of the most common anorectal diseases with a prevalence of 4.4% up to 36.4% of the general population, and a peak incidence between 45 and 65 years. Hemorrhoidal disease presents with a prolapsed lump, painless bleeding, discomfort, discharge, hygiene problems, soiling, and pruritus. Sliding anal canal lining theory is the most accepted theory as a cause of hemorrhoidal disease; however, it is also associated with hyper-vascularity, and, recently, with several enzymes or mediators involved in the disintegration of the tissues supporting the anal cushions, such as matrix metalloproteinase. A comprehensive search in published English-language literature till 2013 involving hemorrhoids was performed to construct this review article, which discusses advances in the management of hemorrhoids. This includes conservative treatment(life style modification, oral medications, and topical treatment), office procedures(rubber band ligation, injection sclerotherapy, infrared and radiofrequency coagulation, bipolar diathermy and direct-current electrotherapy, cryosurgery, and laser therapy), as well as surgical procedures including diathermy hemorrhoidectomy, Liga Sure hemorrhoidectomy, Harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy, hemorrhoidal artery ligation, stapled hemorrhoidopexy(SH), and double SH. Results, merits and demerits of the different modalities of treatment of hemorrhoids are presented, in addition to the cost of the recent innovations.
