随着可伸缩视频编码SVC(Scalable Video Coding)的普及,针对可伸缩视频的安全问题也越来越受到重视。目前大部分加密方案都是针对H.264/AVC编码标准来设计的。分析SVC新采用的技术,并率先提出了一种针对其特点的新的分层加密方案。该方...随着可伸缩视频编码SVC(Scalable Video Coding)的普及,针对可伸缩视频的安全问题也越来越受到重视。目前大部分加密方案都是针对H.264/AVC编码标准来设计的。分析SVC新采用的技术,并率先提出了一种针对其特点的新的分层加密方案。该方案选取不同以往的视频关键信息,如层间预测运动向量,质量可分级关键帧等作为加密对象,根据所选信息的类型,结合用户所需求的安全等级,进行算法设计。试验结果表明该方案具有加密效果好、密钥量较低、实时性高等优点,并可以适应不同安全性需求的应用场合。展开更多
The scalable extension of H.264/AVC, known as scalable video coding or SVC, is currently the main focus of the Joint Video Team’s work. In its present working draft, the higher level syntax of SVC follows the design ...The scalable extension of H.264/AVC, known as scalable video coding or SVC, is currently the main focus of the Joint Video Team’s work. In its present working draft, the higher level syntax of SVC follows the design principles of H.264/AVC. Self-contained network abstraction layer units (NAL units) form natural entities for packetization. The SVC specification is by no means finalized yet, but nevertheless the work towards an optimized RTP payload format has already started. RFC 3984, the RTP payload specification for H.264/AVC has been taken as a starting point, but it became quickly clear that the scalable features of SVC require adaptation in at least the areas of capability/operation point signaling and documentation of the extended NAL unit header. This paper first gives an overview of the history of scalable video coding, and then reviews the video coding layer (VCL) and NAL of the latest SVC draft specification. Finally, it discusses different aspects of the draft SVC RTP payload format, in- cluding the design criteria, use cases, signaling and payload structure.展开更多
文摘随着可伸缩视频编码SVC(Scalable Video Coding)的普及,针对可伸缩视频的安全问题也越来越受到重视。目前大部分加密方案都是针对H.264/AVC编码标准来设计的。分析SVC新采用的技术,并率先提出了一种针对其特点的新的分层加密方案。该方案选取不同以往的视频关键信息,如层间预测运动向量,质量可分级关键帧等作为加密对象,根据所选信息的类型,结合用户所需求的安全等级,进行算法设计。试验结果表明该方案具有加密效果好、密钥量较低、实时性高等优点,并可以适应不同安全性需求的应用场合。
文摘The scalable extension of H.264/AVC, known as scalable video coding or SVC, is currently the main focus of the Joint Video Team’s work. In its present working draft, the higher level syntax of SVC follows the design principles of H.264/AVC. Self-contained network abstraction layer units (NAL units) form natural entities for packetization. The SVC specification is by no means finalized yet, but nevertheless the work towards an optimized RTP payload format has already started. RFC 3984, the RTP payload specification for H.264/AVC has been taken as a starting point, but it became quickly clear that the scalable features of SVC require adaptation in at least the areas of capability/operation point signaling and documentation of the extended NAL unit header. This paper first gives an overview of the history of scalable video coding, and then reviews the video coding layer (VCL) and NAL of the latest SVC draft specification. Finally, it discusses different aspects of the draft SVC RTP payload format, in- cluding the design criteria, use cases, signaling and payload structure.
