Objective: To investigate the current situation and influencing factors of care giving burden among family caregivers with dementia and to analyze the Positive Aspect of caregivers between Social Capital and Caregiver...Objective: To investigate the current situation and influencing factors of care giving burden among family caregivers with dementia and to analyze the Positive Aspect of caregivers between Social Capital and Caregiver Burden. Methods: A total of 205 elderly dementia patients and family caregivers were select from 3 tertiary hospital by convenience sampling method in Zhengzhou. The general information questionnaire. The Social Capital Scale for Caregiver of People with Dementia, The Positive Aspect of Care giving scale and The Caregiver Burden Inventory were utilized for investigation. Results: In this study the scores of the Social Capital Scale of Caregivers with dementia were (48.76 ± 6.44), the scores of the Positive Aspect of Care giving scale were (37.41 ± 4.29), and the scores of the Caregiver Burden Inventory were (64.43 ± 10.89). The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that patient’s age, patient’s disease duration, social capital, and positive feelings were the main influencing factors of caregiver’s burden of care (P Conclusion: The burden of family caregivers is at a medium-high level, and it is recommended that the medical, social levels fully mobilize the social support system of caregivers from the caregivers’ conditions, increase the level of the caregivers’ social capital, and pay attention to the positive feelings of the caregivers and regulate them in time social alleviate the burden of their care giving.展开更多
give是核心的三元谓词,遵循there is a Z from X to Y的运动路径,描述人类经验中最基本的给予行为。其内部关系的相互影响,不一定完全是从X到Y(giver-receiver),有时候giver也受到Z(thing given)的影响。这些不同类型的Z在具体的翻译中...give是核心的三元谓词,遵循there is a Z from X to Y的运动路径,描述人类经验中最基本的给予行为。其内部关系的相互影响,不一定完全是从X到Y(giver-receiver),有时候giver也受到Z(thing given)的影响。这些不同类型的Z在具体的翻译中需要使用不同的概念化范畴来表达。运用事件域认知模式,可以将give三元谓词中的述元与谓词之间的关系区分清楚,同时也为翻译过程中对give的不同处理提出了理论依据。展开更多
基于概念整合理论,从British National Corpus语料库中检索并人工筛选英语give it a(n)Vn结构实例,对比give it a(n)Vn结构与其对应的非虚化动词结构Vit中施事者意愿范畴的具体体现,解读主观态度的概念化对语言表达的制约作用。旨在证...基于概念整合理论,从British National Corpus语料库中检索并人工筛选英语give it a(n)Vn结构实例,对比give it a(n)Vn结构与其对应的非虚化动词结构Vit中施事者意愿范畴的具体体现,解读主观态度的概念化对语言表达的制约作用。旨在证明该结构的内部词素give的语义特征并非完全虚化,其激活的给予行为事件空间与a(n)Vn成分激活的有界行为事件空间整合后体现施事者意愿范畴的层级性。展开更多
近些年来对于轻动词结构的研究越来越多,许多学者亦对GIVE轻动词结构进行了讨论,但少有学者对GIVE轻动词结构的句法结构予以全面分析。文章明确GIVE轻动词结构成分包含的结构成员主要为以下三类:"give a/an N(v)"结构、"...近些年来对于轻动词结构的研究越来越多,许多学者亦对GIVE轻动词结构进行了讨论,但少有学者对GIVE轻动词结构的句法结构予以全面分析。文章明确GIVE轻动词结构成分包含的结构成员主要为以下三类:"give a/an N(v)"结构、"give X a/an N(v)"结构,以及处于边缘的"give a/an Gerund"结构。对于GIVE轻动词结构句法特征的讨论则主要集中于:允许添加修饰语、接受被动和主题化操作、体态特征三个方面。最后对比分析了"give a Gerund"结构与"give a N(v)"结构在语义上的差异。展开更多
轻动词,也称“弱语义动词”,语义内容含量少,无法独立充当谓语,需要其他实词补充语义内容,共同构成谓语成分。英语中常见的轻动词短语结构是“轻动词+不定冠词+名词(由动词转化派生)”,例如:GIVE A N(V),然而,GIVE同时也是一个语义内容...轻动词,也称“弱语义动词”,语义内容含量少,无法独立充当谓语,需要其他实词补充语义内容,共同构成谓语成分。英语中常见的轻动词短语结构是“轻动词+不定冠词+名词(由动词转化派生)”,例如:GIVE A N(V),然而,GIVE同时也是一个语义内容充足的‘强语义动词’,可构成表“给予事件”的双及物结构。认知语言学认为语言形式与概念结构有仿拟关系,二者同构程度越高,越易存储和提取。这种仿拟可以是语码对经验的直接模仿,也可以是语码对图式化的其他语码的仿拟,本文认为轻动词短语GIVE A N(V)的形成机制就是对实义动词GIVE双及物结构的仿拟。仿拟一个语言结构必然会受到该结构概念的影响,本文认为轻动词短语GIVE A N(V)的认知原理是(GIVE)给予事件模型和N(V)中谓词事件模型整合生成的新事件模型。展开更多
Distinguishing the meanings of near synonyms always seems to be a challenging task for Chinese EFL learners,as is the case with bring about and give rise to be exemplified in the paper.I will use a corpus approach to ...Distinguishing the meanings of near synonyms always seems to be a challenging task for Chinese EFL learners,as is the case with bring about and give rise to be exemplified in the paper.I will use a corpus approach to unveil some implied semantic patterns and pragmatic features of the two phrases,and generalize their semantic prosodies as used by native English speakers by analyzing what kinds of nouns tend to co-occur with them,and also discuss whether there is a transfer of negative semantic prosody from the word cause to the two phrases under discussion.展开更多
The research sets out to illustrate how Winston Churchill resorted to the three modes of persuasion,i.e,logos,pathos,and ethos,to make his speech Never Give in,Never,Never,Never a classic.In order to achieve this goal...The research sets out to illustrate how Winston Churchill resorted to the three modes of persuasion,i.e,logos,pathos,and ethos,to make his speech Never Give in,Never,Never,Never a classic.In order to achieve this goal,at first the theoretical framework is established.And then examples and details of the speech are selected out to be analyzed based on the theories mentioned above.At the end of the paper,a conclusion is made.It is found that to explore the effectiveness and the art of a political speech,three appeals are of great help and power.展开更多
文摘Objective: To investigate the current situation and influencing factors of care giving burden among family caregivers with dementia and to analyze the Positive Aspect of caregivers between Social Capital and Caregiver Burden. Methods: A total of 205 elderly dementia patients and family caregivers were select from 3 tertiary hospital by convenience sampling method in Zhengzhou. The general information questionnaire. The Social Capital Scale for Caregiver of People with Dementia, The Positive Aspect of Care giving scale and The Caregiver Burden Inventory were utilized for investigation. Results: In this study the scores of the Social Capital Scale of Caregivers with dementia were (48.76 ± 6.44), the scores of the Positive Aspect of Care giving scale were (37.41 ± 4.29), and the scores of the Caregiver Burden Inventory were (64.43 ± 10.89). The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that patient’s age, patient’s disease duration, social capital, and positive feelings were the main influencing factors of caregiver’s burden of care (P Conclusion: The burden of family caregivers is at a medium-high level, and it is recommended that the medical, social levels fully mobilize the social support system of caregivers from the caregivers’ conditions, increase the level of the caregivers’ social capital, and pay attention to the positive feelings of the caregivers and regulate them in time social alleviate the burden of their care giving.
文摘give是核心的三元谓词,遵循there is a Z from X to Y的运动路径,描述人类经验中最基本的给予行为。其内部关系的相互影响,不一定完全是从X到Y(giver-receiver),有时候giver也受到Z(thing given)的影响。这些不同类型的Z在具体的翻译中需要使用不同的概念化范畴来表达。运用事件域认知模式,可以将give三元谓词中的述元与谓词之间的关系区分清楚,同时也为翻译过程中对give的不同处理提出了理论依据。
文摘基于概念整合理论,从British National Corpus语料库中检索并人工筛选英语give it a(n)Vn结构实例,对比give it a(n)Vn结构与其对应的非虚化动词结构Vit中施事者意愿范畴的具体体现,解读主观态度的概念化对语言表达的制约作用。旨在证明该结构的内部词素give的语义特征并非完全虚化,其激活的给予行为事件空间与a(n)Vn成分激活的有界行为事件空间整合后体现施事者意愿范畴的层级性。
基金黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究扶持项目:英语轻动词短语结构研究,项目编号:19YYE302黑龙江省外语教育学术交流基地科研项目:英语轻动词“give a N(V)”结构分析研究,项目编号:S2020019。
文摘近些年来对于轻动词结构的研究越来越多,许多学者亦对GIVE轻动词结构进行了讨论,但少有学者对GIVE轻动词结构的句法结构予以全面分析。文章明确GIVE轻动词结构成分包含的结构成员主要为以下三类:"give a/an N(v)"结构、"give X a/an N(v)"结构,以及处于边缘的"give a/an Gerund"结构。对于GIVE轻动词结构句法特征的讨论则主要集中于:允许添加修饰语、接受被动和主题化操作、体态特征三个方面。最后对比分析了"give a Gerund"结构与"give a N(v)"结构在语义上的差异。
文摘轻动词,也称“弱语义动词”,语义内容含量少,无法独立充当谓语,需要其他实词补充语义内容,共同构成谓语成分。英语中常见的轻动词短语结构是“轻动词+不定冠词+名词(由动词转化派生)”,例如:GIVE A N(V),然而,GIVE同时也是一个语义内容充足的‘强语义动词’,可构成表“给予事件”的双及物结构。认知语言学认为语言形式与概念结构有仿拟关系,二者同构程度越高,越易存储和提取。这种仿拟可以是语码对经验的直接模仿,也可以是语码对图式化的其他语码的仿拟,本文认为轻动词短语GIVE A N(V)的形成机制就是对实义动词GIVE双及物结构的仿拟。仿拟一个语言结构必然会受到该结构概念的影响,本文认为轻动词短语GIVE A N(V)的认知原理是(GIVE)给予事件模型和N(V)中谓词事件模型整合生成的新事件模型。
文摘Distinguishing the meanings of near synonyms always seems to be a challenging task for Chinese EFL learners,as is the case with bring about and give rise to be exemplified in the paper.I will use a corpus approach to unveil some implied semantic patterns and pragmatic features of the two phrases,and generalize their semantic prosodies as used by native English speakers by analyzing what kinds of nouns tend to co-occur with them,and also discuss whether there is a transfer of negative semantic prosody from the word cause to the two phrases under discussion.
文摘The research sets out to illustrate how Winston Churchill resorted to the three modes of persuasion,i.e,logos,pathos,and ethos,to make his speech Never Give in,Never,Never,Never a classic.In order to achieve this goal,at first the theoretical framework is established.And then examples and details of the speech are selected out to be analyzed based on the theories mentioned above.At the end of the paper,a conclusion is made.It is found that to explore the effectiveness and the art of a political speech,three appeals are of great help and power.
