期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
污染条件下成都市PM_(2.5)干沉降速率的模拟分析 被引量:3
1
作者 周智敏 倪长健 孙欢欢 《环境工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第9期81-86,共6页
利用成都市三瓦窑、沙河铺国控环监站2015年9月—2016年8月逐时PM_(2.5)监测数据,结合同期双流国际机场公布的地面气象要素(风场、温度、湿度和压强)以及温江站风速探空资料,首先统计分析了成都市风场、温度和湿度的基本特征,然后计算... 利用成都市三瓦窑、沙河铺国控环监站2015年9月—2016年8月逐时PM_(2.5)监测数据,结合同期双流国际机场公布的地面气象要素(风场、温度、湿度和压强)以及温江站风速探空资料,首先统计分析了成都市风场、温度和湿度的基本特征,然后计算了污染条件下PM_(2.5)干沉降速率,并建立了适用于不同季节的GIFM模型和多元回归预测模型。结果表明:基本气象要素场的配置以及特殊地形导致了成都市PM_(2.5)干沉降环境恶劣,同时四季差异较大;污染条件下PM_(2.5)干沉降速率约为0.02~0.1 cm/s,表现为冬季<秋季<年<春季<夏季,四季的主要影响因子也不同,秋冬为湿度和压强,春季为温度,夏季为风速,且湿沉降强度过大时,会出现PM_(2.5)干沉降速率的"虚高"现象;GIFM模型和多元回归模型均能很好地预测污染条件下的PM_(2.5)干沉降速率,其预测能力均是夏季最好,冬季最差,春秋次之,通过对比分析表明GIFM模型的预测能力在各季节均优于多元回归模型。 展开更多
关键词 成都市 gifm模型 多元回归模型 PM2.5干沉降速率
原文传递
Buckling analysis of ring stiffened thin cylindrical shell under external pressure 被引量:3
2
作者 N.Rathinam B.Prabu N.Anbazhaghan 《Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science》 SCIE 2021年第4期360-366,共7页
Submarine pressure hulls,fire-tube boilers,vacuum tanks,oil well casings,submersibles,underground pipelines,tunnels,rocket motor casing,etc.,are some of the examples of thin cylindrical shell structures which collapse... Submarine pressure hulls,fire-tube boilers,vacuum tanks,oil well casings,submersibles,underground pipelines,tunnels,rocket motor casing,etc.,are some of the examples of thin cylindrical shell structures which collapse due to buckling under uniform pressure.To enhance the buckling strength of bare cylin-drical shells,one of the best solutions is to stiffen them with ring stiffeners.In this work in order to predict the shell instability failure mode(SIFM)and general instability failure mode(GIFM)FE models are generated and analysed using buckling analysis of general-purpose FE software ANSYS.The numeri-cal results obtained using FE analysis are compared with published analytical and experimental results.Hence in the present study effort s are taken to develop FE models to predict global and shell instability failure modes of externally ring stiffened cylindrical shells by using linear FE analysis.It is proposed to use full/half bare cylindrical shell FE models(L/R ratio upto 200)to determine SIFM and FE models with shell281-Beam189(for stiffeners)can be used to determine GIFM.The developed FE models are vali-dated by comparing numerical results with experimental results published by Seleim and Roorda[25].By using both proposed FE models it is possible to predict the failure modes namely SIFM and GIFM,comparing their values of critical buckling pressures.The lower pressure value can indicate the possible failure mode. 展开更多
关键词 Thin shell structures Critical buckling pressure(CBP) Lateral pressure gifm SIFM
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部