Gefitinib,erlotinib,afatinib and osimertinib have been recommended as the first-line treatment for epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC),whereas no studies have comp...Gefitinib,erlotinib,afatinib and osimertinib have been recommended as the first-line treatment for epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC),whereas no studies have compared the cost-effectiveness of these four tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKIs)simultaneously in China.In the present study,we aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of erlotinib,gefitinib,afatinib and osimertinib for untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.A Markov model was constructed to compare the 10-year impact of four TKIs for patients with treatment-naive EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC from the perspective of the Chinese medical system.Clinical data and utility values were derived from published literature,and costs were obtained from Chinese official websites.The primary output indicator was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER).Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model.We found that afatinib was estimated to spend the lowest cost with minimum life-years(LYs),while osimertinib was the most expensive regimen with maximum LYs.The ICER of gefitinib versus afatinib was$732/quality-adjusted life-year(QALY),which was less than the willingness-to-pay(WTP)of$29382/QALY.Compared with gefitinib,erlotinib yielded a higher cost and a shorter lifetime,hence it was identified as a dominated strategy.Then,osimertinib was compared to gefitinib,which produced an ICER of$71330/QALY,exceeding the WTP.It suggested that gefitinib was the most cost-effective regimen as the first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.Decreasing the osimertinib price or increasing the WTP threshold to$68558/QALY might enhance the favorability of the outcome,by which osimertinib might become more cost-effective.One-way sensitivity analysis manifested that the model was robust.展开更多
Background:Elevated levels of circulating endothelial cells might reflect significant vascular damage and dysfunction.Recent studies have shown that circulating endothelial cells levels are related to therapeutic resp...Background:Elevated levels of circulating endothelial cells might reflect significant vascular damage and dysfunction.Recent studies have shown that circulating endothelial cells levels are related to therapeutic responses of tumors,and thus,could be used as an indicator to predict the efficacy of tumor treatments.The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation and impact of endothelial cells with and on the efficacy of first-line therapy(platinum-based or tyrosine kinase inhibitor drugs treatments)for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Methods:We analyzed 45 inpatients who met the inclusion criteria of diagnosis with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer stages III and IV,in the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from January 2019 to January 2020.The flow cytometry technique was adopted to detect pretreatment levels of circulating endothelial cells in peripheral blood of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.The pretreatment peripheral blood was collected to analyze the relations of circulating endothelial cells with different clinical characteristics and efficacy.Results:The level of pretreatment circulating endothelial cells was significantly correlated with the efficacy of treatment(P<0.05)but irrelevant to the patient’s physical conditions,pathological type,tumor stage,and pretreatment serum carcinoembryonic antigen(P>0.05).The comparison between the groups of response(complete response+partial response)and nonresponse(stable disease+progressive disease)showed a significant difference in circulating endothelial cells count.Compared with low levels of circulating endothelial cells,a high level of circulating endothelial cells led to a poor efficacy(P<0.05).Conclusion:The level of pretreatment circulating endothelial cells significantly correlated with the efficiency of first-line therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.Compared with low level of circulating endothelial cells,high level of circulating endothelial cells lead to poor efficacy.Therefore,circulating endothelial cell is indeed an effective indicator for predicting the efficacy of first-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.展开更多
Objective: The aim of this trial was to compare both the efficacy and the safety of a weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel(nab-paclitaxel) plus cisplatin vs. gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advance...Objective: The aim of this trial was to compare both the efficacy and the safety of a weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel(nab-paclitaxel) plus cisplatin vs. gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods: A total of 84 participants received either 100 mg/m^2 nab-paclitaxel each week on d 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle, as well as cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 on d 1 every three weeks(nab-TP arm); or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m^2 on d 1 and 8, plus cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 on d 1 every three weeks(GP arm). The primary end point was progression-free survival(PFS). The secondary end points were overall response rate(ORR) and overall survival(OS).Results: According to our analysis, the median PFS was 4.8 months for the nab-TP arm vs. 5.2 months for the GP arm(P=0.55). Analysis showed the median OS was 14.6 months for participants who were in the nab-TP arm vs. 15.1 months for those in the GP arm(P=0.94). Besides, nab-TP showed OS advantages over GP in patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) mutation(26.7 vs. 15.3 months, P=0.046) and patients with a performance status of 0(23.5 vs. 14.7 months, P=0.020). It was found that incidences of drug-related grade 3 or 4 toxicities were comparable between the two treatment arms.Conclusions: Therefore, it can be seen that weekly nab-TP treatment has a similar efficacy and tolerability to GP treatment for patients who are undergoing their first-line treatment for NSCLC. It could be that survival differences among platinum doublets in the context of both EGFR mutation and performance status have the potential to be the basis for our further clinical trials.展开更多
The main problem of Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection management is linked to antibiotic resistances. This phenomenon has grown in the last decade, inducing a dramatic decline in conventional regimen effectiven...The main problem of Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection management is linked to antibiotic resistances. This phenomenon has grown in the last decade, inducing a dramatic decline in conventional regimen effectiveness. The causes of resistance are point mutations in bacterial DNA, which interfere with antibiotic mechanism of action, especially clarithromycin and levofloxacin. Therefore, international guidelines have recently discouraged their use in areas with a relevant resistance percentage, suggesting first-line schedules with expected high eradication rates, i.e., bismuth containing or non-bismuth quadruple therapies. These regimens require the daily assumption of a large number of tablets. Consequently, a complete adherence is expected only in subjects who may be motivated by the presence of major disorders. However, an incomplete adherence to antibiotic therapies may lead to resistance onset, since sub-inhibitory concentrations could stimulate the selection of resistant mutants. Of note, a recent meta-analysis suggests that susceptibility tests may be more useful for the choice of first than second-line or rescue treatment. Additionally, susceptibility guided therapy has been demonstrated to be highly effective and superior to empiric treatments by both meta-analyses and recent clinical studies. Conventional susceptibility test is represented by culture and antibiogram. However, the method is not available everywhere mainly for methodology-related factors and fails to detect hetero-resistances. Polymerase chain reaction(PCR)-based, culture-free techniques on gastric biopsy samples are accurate in finding even minimal traces of genotypic resistant strains and hetero-resistant status by the identification of specific point mutations. The need for an invasive endoscopic procedure has been the most important limit to their spread. A further step has, moreover, been the detection of point mutations in bacterial DNA fecal samples. Few studies on clarithromycin susceptibility have shown an overall high sensitivity and specificity when compared with culture or PCR on gastric biopsies. On these bases, two commercial tests are now available although they have shown some controversial findings. A novel PCR method showed a full concordance between tissue and stool results in a preliminary experience. In conclusion, despite poor validation, there is increasing evidence of a potential availability of noninvasive investigations able to detect H. pylori resistances to antibiotics. These kinds of analysis are currently at a very early phase of development and caution should be paid about their clinical application. Only further studies aimed to evaluate their sensitivity and specificity will afford novel data for solid considerations. Nevertheless, noninvasive molecular tests may improve patient compliance, time/cost of infection management and therapeutic outcome. Moreover, the potential risk of a future increase of resistance to quadruple regimens as a consequence of their use on large scale and incomplete patient adherence could be avoided.展开更多
Objective： To analyze the outcomes of patients who received TKI immediately after the first-line without progression as maintenance treatment （immediate group） vs. those received delayed treatment upon disease prog...Objective： To analyze the outcomes of patients who received TKI immediately after the first-line without progression as maintenance treatment （immediate group） vs. those received delayed treatment upon disease progression as second-line therapy （delayed group）. Methods： The study included 159 no-small-cell lung cancer （NSCLC） patients who received gefitinib or erlotinib as maintenance treatment in the immediate group （85 patients） or as second-line therapy in the delayed group （74 patients）. The primary end point was progression-free survival （PFS）. EGFR mutation status was detected using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography （DHPLC）. Results： PFS was 17.3 and 16.4 months in the immediate and delayed groups, respectively （hazard ratio [HR], 0.99; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]： 0.69-1.42; P=0.947）. In a subgroup analysis that included only patients with EGFR mutation, however, PFS was significantly longer in the immediate group than in the delayed group （HR, 0.48; 95% CI： 0.27-0.85; P=0.012）. In patients with wild type EGFR, the risk for disease progression was comparable between the two groups （HR, 1.23; 95% CI： 0.61-2.51; P=0.564）. No significant difference was demonstrated between the immediate and delayed group in terms of the overall survival （OS） （26.1 months vs. 21.6 months, respectively; HR=0.53; 95% CI： 0.27 to 1.06; P=0.072）. There was also no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. Conclusions： EGFR TKI maintenance improves PFS in patients with EGFR mutation. Prospectively designed clinical studies that compare TKI immediate vs. delayed treatment after first-line chemotherapy upon disease progression are needed.展开更多
Liver transplantation(LT)is one of the leading curative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Despite recent optimization of transplant selection criteria,including alpha-feto protein,HCC recurrence after LT is ...Liver transplantation(LT)is one of the leading curative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Despite recent optimization of transplant selection criteria,including alpha-feto protein,HCC recurrence after LT is still the leading cause of death in these patients.During the last decades,effective systemic treatments for HCC,including tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy,have been approved.We describe the clinical scenario of a patient with recurrence of HCC five years after LT,who received lenvatinib as first-line systemic therapy to introduce systemic treatment options in this clinical setting.In this opinion review,we detail first and second-line systemic treatment options,focusing on those feasible for patients with recurrent HCC after LT.Several trials have evaluated new drugs to treat HCC patients in first and secondline therapy,but patients with recurrent HCC after LT have been excluded from these trials.Consequently,most of the evidence comes from observational retrospective studies.Whether tyrosine kinase inhibitors will remain the primary therapeutic approach in these patients,due to a relative contraindication for immunotherapy,may be clarified in the near future.展开更多
The global burden of Helicobacter pylori infection continues to drive the need for effective,well-tolerated,and regionally adaptable eradication regimens.Recently Han et al presented compelling results from a multicen...The global burden of Helicobacter pylori infection continues to drive the need for effective,well-tolerated,and regionally adaptable eradication regimens.Recently Han et al presented compelling results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial in China,demonstrating the non-inferiority and potential superiority of vonoprazan(VPZ)-based triple therapy over the standard 14-day bismuth quad-ruple regimen.Both the 10-day and 14-day VPZ-amoxicillin-clarithromycin regi-mens achieved eradication rates exceeding 90%per protocol,with similar or fewer adverse events,suggesting improved patient tolerability.This study reinforces the potential of VPZ to overcome the limitations of proton pump inhibitor-based regimens,particularly in populations with CYP2C19 polymorphisms and increa-sing clarithromycin resistance.These findings also lend support to shortened trea-tment durations,which could enhance adherence and reduce antimicrobial expo-sure.These data highlight an important shift in the therapeutic landscape,positio-ning VPZ as a strong candidate for first-line empirical therapies.However,broa-der implementation requires careful consideration of local resistance patterns,drug accessibility,and pharmacoeconomic implications.展开更多
BACKGROUND In recent years,emerging clinical research has prioritized assessment of combined therapeutic efficacy and safety parameters when programmed death 1 or its ligand(PD-1/L1)inhibitors are incorporated into fi...BACKGROUND In recent years,emerging clinical research has prioritized assessment of combined therapeutic efficacy and safety parameters when programmed death 1 or its ligand(PD-1/L1)inhibitors are incorporated into first-line standard-of-care(SOC)therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC).However,data obtained from these trials demonstrated conflicting evidence concerning survival benefits and clinical outcomes.AIM To evaluate the therapeutic impact and safety parameters of combining PD-1/L1 inhibitors with SOC protocols as first-line treatment for mCRC.METHODS Four biomedical databases(PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,Web of Science)were systematically interrogated to identify eligible studies published up to October 12,2024.The analysis focused on evaluating the primary outcome of overall survival(OS)in the mCRC population with secondary outcomes of progression-free survival(PFS),overall response rate(ORR),and incidence rate of grade≥3 adverse events.Additionally,we performed exploratory analyses in the microsatellite stable/mismatch repair-proficient(MSS/pMMR)subpopulation,based on a subset of the included studies.Subgroup analyses according to PD-1/L1 inhibitor use were conducted in both the overall population and the MSS/pMMR subgroup.RESULTS This pooled analysis incorporated six randomized controlled trials involving 675 patients with mCRC receiving first-line therapy.The combination of PD-1/L1 inhibitors with SOC regimens demonstrated a significant PFS advantage over SOC monotherapy in intention-to-treat populations[hazard ratio(HR)=0.8,95%confidence interval(CI):0.65-0.98,P=0.033].Nevertheless,the MSS/pMMR subgroup showed no PFS benefit(HR=0.83,95%CI:0.67-1.03,P=0.091),and no cohort exhibited OS improvement(intention-to-treat:HR=0.84,95%CI:0.66-1.05,P=0.124;MSS/pMMR:HR=0.79,95%CI:0.60-1.03,P=0.083).Comparable outcomes were observed for ORR(risk ratio=1.03,95%CI:0.90-1.17,P=0.711)and incidence rate of grade≥3 adverse events(risk ratio=1.12,95%CI:0.93-1.36,P=0.245)between treatment arms.CONCLUSION The findings indicated that integrating PD-1/L1 blocking agents with SOC regimens for mCRC as first-line treatment failed to demonstrate significant improvements in ORR.Existing clinical data remain inadequate to establish OS advantages,particularly in patients with MSS/pMMR,despite exhibiting manageable toxicity profiles.Subsequent confirmation through rigorously designed phase III clinical trials remains essential to verify these therapeutic outcomes.展开更多
AIM:To compare triple therapy vs quadruple therapy for 10 d as first-line treatment ofHelicobacter pylori(H.pylori) infection.METHODS:Consecutive H.pylori positive patients never treated in the past for this infection...AIM:To compare triple therapy vs quadruple therapy for 10 d as first-line treatment ofHelicobacter pylori(H.pylori) infection.METHODS:Consecutive H.pylori positive patients never treated in the past for this infection were randomly treated with triple therapy of pantoprazole(PAN) 20 mg bid,amoxicillin(AMO) 1 g bid and moxifloxacin(MOX) 400 mg bid for 10 d(PAM) or with quadruple therapy of PAN 20 mg bid,AMO 1 g bid,MOX 400 mg bid and bismuth subcitrate 240 mg bid for 10 d(PAMB).All patients were found positive at 13 C-Urea breath test(UBT) performed within ten days prior to the start of the study.A successful outcome was confirmed with an UBT performed 8 wk after the end of treatment.χ 2 analysis was used for statistical comparison.Per protocol(PP) and intention-to-treat(ITT) values were also calculated.RESULTS:Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the PAM group and 50 in the PAMB group.One patient in each group did not return for further assessment.Eradication was higher in the PAMB group(negative:46 and positive:3) vs the PAM group(negative:44 and positive:12).The H.pylori eradication rate was statistically significantly higher in the PAMB group vs the PAM group,both with the PP and ITT analyses(PP:PAMB 93.8%,PAM 78.5%,P < 0.02;ITT:PAMB 92%,PAM 77.1 %,P <0.03).CONCLUSION:The addition of bismuth subcitrate can be considered a valuable adjuvant to triple therapy in those areas where H.pylori shows a high resistance to fluoroquinolones.展开更多
BACKGROUND As a first-line treatment regimen for Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)infection,antibiotic therapy is widely used worldwide.However,the question of increasing antibiotic resistance must be considered.Given thi...BACKGROUND As a first-line treatment regimen for Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)infection,antibiotic therapy is widely used worldwide.However,the question of increasing antibiotic resistance must be considered.Given this issue,we need to find ways to reduce drug resistance.This study examined all currently available first-line regimens and compared them with standard triple treatment through a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials(RCTs).AIM To compare first-line treatment regimens for eradication of antibiotic-resistant H.pylori strains.METHODS To compare the effectiveness of the first-line regimens for treating H.pylori infection,a Bayesian network meta-analysis was applied to process data extracted from RCTs.The plausible ranking for each regimen was assessed by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA).In addition,we conducted a relevant search by reference citation analysis.RESULTS Twenty-five RCTs involving 12029 participants[including 1602 infected with clarithromycin(CAM)-resistant strains and 1716 infected with metronidazole(MNZ)-resistant strains]were included,in which a total of seven regimens were used for H.pylori eradication.The results showed that dual therapy containing a high-dose proton pump inhibitor(HDDT)[odds ratio(OR):4.20,95%confidence interval(CI):2.29-8.13]was superior to other therapies for all patients,including those with CAM/MNZ-resistant H.pylori infection.In the comparative effectiveness ranking,for CAM-resistant H.pylori,HDDT(OR:96.80,95%CI:22.46-521.9)had the best results,whereas standard triple therapy ranked last(SUCRA:98.7%vs 0.3%).In the subgroup of high cure rates(≥90%),HDDT was also generally better than other therapies.CONCLUSION For the eradication of CAM-and MNZ-resistant H.pylori strains,HDDT exhibited considerable advantages.The studies of CAM-resistant H.pylori were based on small samples due to a lack of antibiotic sensitivity tests in many RCTs,but the results showed that all patients,including those with CAM-resistant H.pylori infection,had a concordant trend.Overall,HDDT may be a reference for RCTs and other studies of H.pylori eradication.展开更多
Bevacizumab plus erlotinib prolonged patients＇ progression-free survive （PFS） versus bevacizumab alone for the maintenance treatment of none-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC） in phase III clinical trial ATLAS （Clin...Bevacizumab plus erlotinib prolonged patients＇ progression-free survive （PFS） versus bevacizumab alone for the maintenance treatment of none-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC） in phase III clinical trial ATLAS （ClinicalTrials. gov identifier NCT00257608）, which repealed a benefit outcome and acceptable side-effects, but whether its cost performance would be accepted by patients is blurry. The aim of our research is to figure out which strategy is the best option in clinic and would spread broadly. Markov Model was used to calculate incremental cost-utility radios （ICURs） and 10-year quality-adjusted life years （QALY） of both strategies. The clinical data were collected from phase III clinical trial ATLAS （ClinicalTrials. gov identifier NCT00257608）. The cost data were obtained from Chinese health care system. In the research, one-way sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis （PSA） and Monte-Carlo analysis were performed to test the stability of the results. The better strategy was bevacizumab alone strategy, and the cumulative costs of both strategies were $178 648.47 and $46 445.28, respectively, and the QALY was 12.506 and 10.643, respectively. The ICUR of combined application was $70 962.53/QALY, which was much higher than 3 times of mean gross domestic product （GDP） in China, suggesting that this strategy was no economical at all. In one-way analysis, the change of willingness-to-pay could not influence the consequence. In addition, in Monte-Carlo analysis, the probability distribution of cost, effectiveness and ICUR was in normal distribution. Taken together, bevacizumab alone strategy was the better strategy in terms of cost-effectiveness.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate the efficacy of 14-d moxifloxacinbased sequential therapy as first-line eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori) infection.METHODS:From December 2013 to August 2014, 161 patients with con...AIM:To evaluate the efficacy of 14-d moxifloxacinbased sequential therapy as first-line eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori) infection.METHODS:From December 2013 to August 2014, 161 patients with confirmed H.pylori infection randomly received 14 d of moxifloxacin-based sequential group(MOX-ST group, n = 80) or clarithromycin-based sequential group(CLA-ST group, n = 81) therapy.H.pylori infection was defined on the basis of at least one of the following three tests:a positive 13C-urea breath test; histologic evidence of H.pylori by modified Giemsa staining; or a positive rapid urease test(CLOtest; Delta West, Bentley, Australia) by gastric mucosal biopsy.Successful eradication therapy for H.pylori infection was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test four weeks after the end of eradication treatment.Compliance was defined as good when drug intake was at least 85%.H.pylori eradication rates, patient compliance with drug treatment, adverse event rates, and factors influencing the efficacy of eradication therapy were evaluated.RESULTS:The eradication rates by intention-to-treat analysis were 91.3%(73/80;95%CI:86.2%-95.4%)in the MOX-ST group and 71.6%(58/81;95%CI:65.8%-77.4%)in the CLA-ST group(P=0.014).The eradication rates by per-protocol analysis were 93.6%(73/78;95%CI:89.1%-98.1%)in the MOX-ST group and 75.3%(58/77;95%CI:69.4%-81.8%)in the CLAST group(P=0.022).Compliance was 100%in both groups.The adverse event rates were 12.8%(10/78)and 24.6%(19/77)in the MOX-ST and CLA-ST group,respectively(P=0.038).Most of the adverse events were mild-to-moderate in intensity;there was none serious enough to cause discontinuation of treatmentin either group.In multivariate analysis,advanced age(≥60 years)was a significant independent factor related to the eradication failure in the CLA-ST group(adjusted OR=2.13,95%CI:1.97-2.29,P=0.004),whereas there was no significance in the MOX-ST group.CONCLUSION:The 14-d moxifloxacin-based sequential therapy is effective.Moreover,it shows excellent patient compliance and safety compared to the 14-d clarithromycin-based sequential therapy.展开更多
Background:Both hormonal therapy(HT) and maintenance capecitabine monotherapy(MCT) have been shown to extend time to progression(TTP) in patients with metastatic breast cancer(MBC) after failure of taxanes and anthrac...Background:Both hormonal therapy(HT) and maintenance capecitabine monotherapy(MCT) have been shown to extend time to progression(TTP) in patients with metastatic breast cancer(MBC) after failure of taxanes and anthracycline?containing regimens.However,no clinical trials have directly compared the efficacy of MCT and HT after response to first?line capecitabine?based combination chemotherapy(FCCT) in patients with hormone receptor(HR)?positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)?negative breast cancer.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 138 HR?positive and HER2?negative MBC patients who were in non?progression status after FCCT and who were treated between 2003 and 2012 at the Cancer Institute and Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,in Beijing,China.The median number of first?line chemotherapy cycles was 6(range,4–8);combined agents included taxanes,vinorelbine,or gemcitabine.Of these 138 patients,79 received MCT,and 59 received HT.Single?agent capecitabine was administered at a dose of 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days,followed by a 7?day rest period,repeated every 3 weeks.Of the 59 patients who received HT,37 received aromatase inhibitors(AIs),8 received selective estrogen receptor modulators(SERMs),and 14 received goserelin plus either AIs or SERMs.We then compared the MCT group and HT group in terms of treatment efficacy.Results:With a median follow?up of 43 months,patients in the HT group had a much longer TTP than patients in the MCT group(13 vs.8 months,P ease?free surviv= 0.011).When TTP was adjusted for age,menopausal status,Karnofsky performance status score,disal,site of metastasis,number of metastatic sites,and response status after FCCT,extended TTP was still observed for patients in the HT group(hazard ratio:0.63;95% confidence interval:0.44–0.93;P = 0.020).We also observed a trend of overall survival advantage for patients in the HT group vs.patients in the MCT group,but the difference was not significant(43 vs.37 months,P tients in the MCT g= 0.400).In addition,patients in the HT group gen?erally tolerated the treatment well,whereas paroup experienced grades 3–4 adverse events,the most frequent of which were hand?foot syndrome(15.8%) and hematologic abnormalities(7.6%).Conclusion:For HR?positive and HER2?negative MBC patients,HT might be considered a treatment after response to FCCT but prior to MCT as a long?term administration.展开更多
AIM:To find the way to improve the eradication rate of first-line therapy in Japanese patients.METHODS:We prospectively compared the effectiveness of 7-d quadruple therapy to standard 7 d triple therapy in Japanese pa...AIM:To find the way to improve the eradication rate of first-line therapy in Japanese patients.METHODS:We prospectively compared the effectiveness of 7-d quadruple therapy to standard 7 d triple therapy in Japanese patients infected with Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori).One hundred and nineteen patients were randomly assigned to receive 7-d non-bismuth quadruple therapy with lansoprazole,amoxicillin,clarithromycin and metronidazole(LACM7) or 7-d triple therapy with lansoprazole,amoxicillin and clarithromycin(LAC7).After three months,H.pylori status was analyzed by 13C-urea breath test.Incidence rates of adverse events were evaluated by use of questionnaires.RESULTS:By intention-to-treat(ITT) analysis,the eradication rate in the LACM7 group was 94.9%,which was significantly higher than the LAC7 group(68.3%,P < 0.001).Per protocol analysis also showed a significantly higher eradication rate in the LACM7 group(98.3%) than the LAC7 group(73.2%,P < 0.001).Nevertheless,the incidence of serious adverse events did not differ between the two groups(RR:1.10,95% CI:0.70-1.73,P = 0.67).CONCLUSION:Seven day non-bismuth quadruple therapy(LACM7) was superior to standard 7-d triple therapy(LAC7) for first-line eradication.展开更多
BACKGROUND Increasing levels of antibiotic resistance have reduced the Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)eradication rates afforded by the standard triple therapy.Thus,2-wk firstline four-drug regimens must be considered.A...BACKGROUND Increasing levels of antibiotic resistance have reduced the Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)eradication rates afforded by the standard triple therapy.Thus,2-wk firstline four-drug regimens must be considered.AIM To analyze the eradication rates of modified bismuth-containing quadruple therapy(mBCQT)and concomitant therapy(CT),the associated adverse events,and compliance.METHODS Patients infected with H.pylori were prospectively randomized to receive mBCQT or CT for 2 wk.mBCQT featured a proton pump inhibitor(PPI),bismuth,metronidazole,and tetracycline,taken twice daily.CT included a PPI,clarithromycin,metronidazole,and amoxicillin,taken twice daily.The 13C-urea breath test was performed no earlier than 4 wk after therapy concluded to confirm eradication.If either the histological or rapid urease test was positive,H.pylori infection was diagnosed.RESULTS The demographic characteristics of 68 patients who received mBCQT and 68 who received CT did not differ significantly.On intention-to-treat analysis,the eradication rate was 88.2%(60/68)in the mBCQT group and 79.4%(54/68)in the CT group(P=0.162).By per-protocol analysis,the respective eradication rates were 98.4%(60/61)and 93.1%(54/58)(P=0.199).More CT than mBCQT patients experienced adverse events[33.8%(23/68)mBCQT vs 51.5%(35/58)CT patients,respectively,P=0.037].All patients showed good compliance[85.3%(58/68)mBCQT vs 82.4%(56/68)CT patients,P=0.641].CONCLUSION The H.pylori eradication rates of the 2-wk mBCQT and CT regimens are high.Most patients show good compliance,and more CT than mBCQT patients experience adverse events.展开更多
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of moxifloxacin-based sequential therapy(MBST) versus hybrid therapy as a first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection.METHODS: From August 2014 to January 2015, 284 ...AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of moxifloxacin-based sequential therapy(MBST) versus hybrid therapy as a first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection.METHODS: From August 2014 to January 2015, 284 patients with confirmed H. pylori infection were randomized to receive a 14-d course of MBST(MBST group, n = 140) or hybrid(Hybrid group, n = 144) therapy. The MBST group received 20 mg rabeprazole and 1 g amoxicillin twice daily for 7 d, followed by 20 mg rabeprazole and 500 mg metronidazole twice daily, and 400 mg moxifloxacin once daily for 7 d. The Hybrid group received 20 mg rabeprazole and 1 g amoxicillin twice daily for 14 d. In addition, the Hybrid group received 500 mg metronidazole and 500 mg clarithromycin twice daily for the final 7 d. Successful eradication of H. pylori infection was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test 4 wk after the end of treatment. Patient compliance was defined as "good" if drug intake was at least 85%. H. pylori eradication rates, patient compliance with treatment, and adverse event rates were evaluated.RESULTS: The eradication rates in the intention-totreat(ITT) analysis were 91.4%(128/140; 95%CI: 90.2%-92.9%) in the MBST group and 79.2%(114/144; 95%CI: 77.3%-80.7%) in the Hybrid group(P = 0.013). The eradication rates in the perprotocol(PP) analysis were 94.1%(128/136; 95%CI: 92.9%-95.6%) in the MBST group and 82.6%(114/138; 95%CI: 80.6%-84.1%) in the Hybrid group(P = 0.003). The H. pylori eradication rate in the MBST group was significantly higher than that of the Hybrid group for both the ITT(P = 0.013) and the PP analyses(P = 0.003). Both groups exhibited full compliance with treatment(MBST/Hybrid group: 100%/100%). The rate of adverse events was 11.8%(16/136) and 19.6%(27/138) in the MBST and Hybrid group, respectively(P = 0.019). The majority of adverse events were mild-to-moderate in intensity; none were severe enough to cause discontinuation of treatment in either group.CONCLUSION: MBST was more effective and led to fewer adverse events than hybrid therapy as a first-line treatment for H. pylori infection.展开更多
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of capecitabine maintenance therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) patients.Methods:From June 2001 to November 2006,after they had achieved clinical response from...Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of capecitabine maintenance therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) patients.Methods:From June 2001 to November 2006,after they had achieved clinical response from first-line chemotherapy,patients with mCRC in our hospital received two different treatment strategies.Thirty-three patients in maintenance group were treated with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 po bid d1-14,q21d.Fifty-two patients in non-maintenance group did not receive any further chemotherapy.Results:Patients in maintenance group and non-maintenance group both received FOLFOX,FOLFIRI and XELOX as first-line therapy.The median chemotherapy cycles the two groups received were the same(6 vs 6).The response rates of first-line chemotherapy were 33.3% in maintenance group and 32.7% in non-maintenance group.Patients in maintenance group received 3-9 cycles of capecitabine therapy(median cycle 4).29/33(87.9%) patients in maintenance group and 47/52(90.4%) in non-maintenance group received following second-line chemotherapy,and no patients underwent targeted therapy.The median survival time and TTP were 40.4 months(95%CI:24.2-56.6) and 9.0 months(95%CI:6.7-11.3) in maintenance group,as compared with 21.5 months(95%CI:14.9-28.0,P=0.015) and 6.5 months(95%CI:4.4-8.5,P=0.007) in non-maintenance group.No severe adverse event was observed in the capecitabine maintenance group.Conclusion:mCRC patients could benefit from capecitabine maintenance therapy by prolonging survival time and TTP.展开更多
BACKGROUND The majority of clinical trials of first-line systemic treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)used placebo or sorafenib as comparators,and there are limited data providing a cross comparison of treatme...BACKGROUND The majority of clinical trials of first-line systemic treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)used placebo or sorafenib as comparators,and there are limited data providing a cross comparison of treatments in this setting,especially for newly-approved immune checkpoint inhibitor and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor combination treatments.AIM To systematically review and compare response rates,survival outcomes,and safety of first-line systemic therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.METHODS We searched PubMed,Science Direct,the Cochrane Database,Excerpta Medica Database,and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020 annual congress.Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials of systemic therapy enrolling adults with advanced/unresectable HCC.Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials.A network meta-analysis was used to synthesize data and perform direct and indirect comparisons between treatments.P value,a frequentist analog to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve,was used to rank treatments.RESULTS In total,1398 articles were screened and 27 included.Treatments compared were atezolizumab plus bevacizumab,brivanib,donafenib,dovitinib,FOLFOX4,lenvatinib,linifanib,nintedanib,nivolumab,sorafenib,sunitinib,vandetanib,11 sorafenib combination therapies,and three other combination therapies.For overall response rate,lenvatinib ranked 1/19,followed by atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and nivolumab.For progression-free survival(PFS),atezolizumab+bevacizumab was ranked 1/15,followed by lenvatinib.With the exception of atezolizumab+bevacizumab[hazard ratios(HR)PFS=0.90;95%confidence interval(CI):0.64-1.25],the estimated HRs for PFS for all included treatments vs lenvatinib were>1;however,the associated 95%CI passed through unity for bevacizumab plus erlotinib,linifanib,and FOLFOX4.For overall survival,atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was ranked 1/25,followed by vandetanib 100 mg/d and donafinib,with lenvatinib ranked 6/25.Atezolizumab+bevacizumab was associated with a lower risk of death vs lenvatinib(HRos=0.63;95%CI:0.44-0.89),while the HR for overall survival for most other treatments vs lenvatinib had associated 95%CIs that passed through unity.Vandetanib 300 mg/d and 100 mg/d were ranked 1/13 and 2/13,respectively,for the lowest incidence of treatment terminations due to adverse events,followed by sorafenib(5/13),lenvatinib(10/13),and atezolizumab+bevacizumab(13/13).CONCLUSION There is not one single first-line treatment for advanced HCC associated with superior outcomes across all outcome measurements.Therefore,first-line systemic treatment should be selected based on individualized treatment goals.展开更多
Objective： To investigate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib as maintenance therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC） patients who obtained disease control （DC） after first-line chemotherapy in Ch...Objective： To investigate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib as maintenance therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC） patients who obtained disease control （DC） after first-line chemotherapy in Chinese population. Methods： Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC treated with standard chemotherapy and obtained DC were assigned to receive gefitinib as maintenance treatment. The primary end point was overall survival time （OS）, the second end point was disease control rate （DCR） and progression-free survival time （PFS）. DCR included complete response （CR） plus partial response （PR） and plus stable disease （SD）. The impact of epidermal growth factor receptor （EGFR） mutation status on the treatment as exploratory point was also evaluated by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography （DHPLC）. Results： Among 75 enrolled patients, the overall response rate was 37% and the DCR （CR ＋ PR ＋SD） was 66%. The median PFS and OS were 17.13 months and 26.13 months respectively, with 1- and 2-year survival rates 89.3% and 34.7%. Patients harboring somatic EGFR mutations obtained a prolonged median PFS and OS compared with EGFR wide type （25.1 vs. 13.0 months, P=0.019 and 33.37 vs. 25.57 months, P=0.014, respectively）. In COX regression model, only EGFR mutation status was the independently factor influencing both PFS and OS （P=0.029 and 0.017, respectively）, however, rash status was the predictor in terms of PFS （P=0.027）. Conclusion： Gefitinib produced encouraging survival when delivered as maintenance therapy in Chinese patients obtaining DC after first-line chemotherapy, especially for patients carrying somatic EGFR mutations. EGFR mutation is an independently predictive factor of survival.展开更多
BACKGROUND Icotinib could have potential effect and tolerability when used sequentially with chemotherapy for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).AIM To evaluate t...BACKGROUND Icotinib could have potential effect and tolerability when used sequentially with chemotherapy for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy followed by icotinib maintenance therapy as first-line treatment for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.METHODS This multicenter,open-label,pilot randomized controlled trial enrolled 68 EGFRmutated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients randomized 2:3 to the icotinib alone and chemotherapy+icotinib groups.RESULTS The median progression-free survival in the icotinib alone and chemotherapy+icotinib groups was 8.0 mo(95%CI:3.84-11.63)and 13.4 mo(95%CI:10.18-16.33),respectively(P=0.0249).No significant differences were found in the curative effect when considering different cycles of chemotherapy or chemotherapy regimen(all P>0.05).CONCLUSION A sequential combination of chemotherapy and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor is feasible for stage IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients.展开更多
文摘Gefitinib,erlotinib,afatinib and osimertinib have been recommended as the first-line treatment for epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC),whereas no studies have compared the cost-effectiveness of these four tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKIs)simultaneously in China.In the present study,we aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of erlotinib,gefitinib,afatinib and osimertinib for untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.A Markov model was constructed to compare the 10-year impact of four TKIs for patients with treatment-naive EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC from the perspective of the Chinese medical system.Clinical data and utility values were derived from published literature,and costs were obtained from Chinese official websites.The primary output indicator was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER).Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model.We found that afatinib was estimated to spend the lowest cost with minimum life-years(LYs),while osimertinib was the most expensive regimen with maximum LYs.The ICER of gefitinib versus afatinib was$732/quality-adjusted life-year(QALY),which was less than the willingness-to-pay(WTP)of$29382/QALY.Compared with gefitinib,erlotinib yielded a higher cost and a shorter lifetime,hence it was identified as a dominated strategy.Then,osimertinib was compared to gefitinib,which produced an ICER of$71330/QALY,exceeding the WTP.It suggested that gefitinib was the most cost-effective regimen as the first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.Decreasing the osimertinib price or increasing the WTP threshold to$68558/QALY might enhance the favorability of the outcome,by which osimertinib might become more cost-effective.One-way sensitivity analysis manifested that the model was robust.
基金This study was supported by Guangxi Medical and Health Appropriate Technology Development and Application Project(No.S2019075)Self-financed Program by Health and Family Planning Commission of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region(No.Z20180748).
文摘Background:Elevated levels of circulating endothelial cells might reflect significant vascular damage and dysfunction.Recent studies have shown that circulating endothelial cells levels are related to therapeutic responses of tumors,and thus,could be used as an indicator to predict the efficacy of tumor treatments.The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation and impact of endothelial cells with and on the efficacy of first-line therapy(platinum-based or tyrosine kinase inhibitor drugs treatments)for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Methods:We analyzed 45 inpatients who met the inclusion criteria of diagnosis with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer stages III and IV,in the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from January 2019 to January 2020.The flow cytometry technique was adopted to detect pretreatment levels of circulating endothelial cells in peripheral blood of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.The pretreatment peripheral blood was collected to analyze the relations of circulating endothelial cells with different clinical characteristics and efficacy.Results:The level of pretreatment circulating endothelial cells was significantly correlated with the efficacy of treatment(P<0.05)but irrelevant to the patient’s physical conditions,pathological type,tumor stage,and pretreatment serum carcinoembryonic antigen(P>0.05).The comparison between the groups of response(complete response+partial response)and nonresponse(stable disease+progressive disease)showed a significant difference in circulating endothelial cells count.Compared with low levels of circulating endothelial cells,a high level of circulating endothelial cells led to a poor efficacy(P<0.05).Conclusion:The level of pretreatment circulating endothelial cells significantly correlated with the efficiency of first-line therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.Compared with low level of circulating endothelial cells,high level of circulating endothelial cells lead to poor efficacy.Therefore,circulating endothelial cell is indeed an effective indicator for predicting the efficacy of first-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
文摘Objective: The aim of this trial was to compare both the efficacy and the safety of a weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel(nab-paclitaxel) plus cisplatin vs. gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods: A total of 84 participants received either 100 mg/m^2 nab-paclitaxel each week on d 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle, as well as cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 on d 1 every three weeks(nab-TP arm); or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m^2 on d 1 and 8, plus cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 on d 1 every three weeks(GP arm). The primary end point was progression-free survival(PFS). The secondary end points were overall response rate(ORR) and overall survival(OS).Results: According to our analysis, the median PFS was 4.8 months for the nab-TP arm vs. 5.2 months for the GP arm(P=0.55). Analysis showed the median OS was 14.6 months for participants who were in the nab-TP arm vs. 15.1 months for those in the GP arm(P=0.94). Besides, nab-TP showed OS advantages over GP in patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) mutation(26.7 vs. 15.3 months, P=0.046) and patients with a performance status of 0(23.5 vs. 14.7 months, P=0.020). It was found that incidences of drug-related grade 3 or 4 toxicities were comparable between the two treatment arms.Conclusions: Therefore, it can be seen that weekly nab-TP treatment has a similar efficacy and tolerability to GP treatment for patients who are undergoing their first-line treatment for NSCLC. It could be that survival differences among platinum doublets in the context of both EGFR mutation and performance status have the potential to be the basis for our further clinical trials.
文摘The main problem of Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection management is linked to antibiotic resistances. This phenomenon has grown in the last decade, inducing a dramatic decline in conventional regimen effectiveness. The causes of resistance are point mutations in bacterial DNA, which interfere with antibiotic mechanism of action, especially clarithromycin and levofloxacin. Therefore, international guidelines have recently discouraged their use in areas with a relevant resistance percentage, suggesting first-line schedules with expected high eradication rates, i.e., bismuth containing or non-bismuth quadruple therapies. These regimens require the daily assumption of a large number of tablets. Consequently, a complete adherence is expected only in subjects who may be motivated by the presence of major disorders. However, an incomplete adherence to antibiotic therapies may lead to resistance onset, since sub-inhibitory concentrations could stimulate the selection of resistant mutants. Of note, a recent meta-analysis suggests that susceptibility tests may be more useful for the choice of first than second-line or rescue treatment. Additionally, susceptibility guided therapy has been demonstrated to be highly effective and superior to empiric treatments by both meta-analyses and recent clinical studies. Conventional susceptibility test is represented by culture and antibiogram. However, the method is not available everywhere mainly for methodology-related factors and fails to detect hetero-resistances. Polymerase chain reaction(PCR)-based, culture-free techniques on gastric biopsy samples are accurate in finding even minimal traces of genotypic resistant strains and hetero-resistant status by the identification of specific point mutations. The need for an invasive endoscopic procedure has been the most important limit to their spread. A further step has, moreover, been the detection of point mutations in bacterial DNA fecal samples. Few studies on clarithromycin susceptibility have shown an overall high sensitivity and specificity when compared with culture or PCR on gastric biopsies. On these bases, two commercial tests are now available although they have shown some controversial findings. A novel PCR method showed a full concordance between tissue and stool results in a preliminary experience. In conclusion, despite poor validation, there is increasing evidence of a potential availability of noninvasive investigations able to detect H. pylori resistances to antibiotics. These kinds of analysis are currently at a very early phase of development and caution should be paid about their clinical application. Only further studies aimed to evaluate their sensitivity and specificity will afford novel data for solid considerations. Nevertheless, noninvasive molecular tests may improve patient compliance, time/cost of infection management and therapeutic outcome. Moreover, the potential risk of a future increase of resistance to quadruple regimens as a consequence of their use on large scale and incomplete patient adherence could be avoided.
基金supported by the grants from the China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists (No. 81025012)the Capital Development Foundation (No. 30772472)
文摘Objective： To analyze the outcomes of patients who received TKI immediately after the first-line without progression as maintenance treatment （immediate group） vs. those received delayed treatment upon disease progression as second-line therapy （delayed group）. Methods： The study included 159 no-small-cell lung cancer （NSCLC） patients who received gefitinib or erlotinib as maintenance treatment in the immediate group （85 patients） or as second-line therapy in the delayed group （74 patients）. The primary end point was progression-free survival （PFS）. EGFR mutation status was detected using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography （DHPLC）. Results： PFS was 17.3 and 16.4 months in the immediate and delayed groups, respectively （hazard ratio [HR], 0.99; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]： 0.69-1.42; P=0.947）. In a subgroup analysis that included only patients with EGFR mutation, however, PFS was significantly longer in the immediate group than in the delayed group （HR, 0.48; 95% CI： 0.27-0.85; P=0.012）. In patients with wild type EGFR, the risk for disease progression was comparable between the two groups （HR, 1.23; 95% CI： 0.61-2.51; P=0.564）. No significant difference was demonstrated between the immediate and delayed group in terms of the overall survival （OS） （26.1 months vs. 21.6 months, respectively; HR=0.53; 95% CI： 0.27 to 1.06; P=0.072）. There was also no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. Conclusions： EGFR TKI maintenance improves PFS in patients with EGFR mutation. Prospectively designed clinical studies that compare TKI immediate vs. delayed treatment after first-line chemotherapy upon disease progression are needed.
文摘Liver transplantation(LT)is one of the leading curative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Despite recent optimization of transplant selection criteria,including alpha-feto protein,HCC recurrence after LT is still the leading cause of death in these patients.During the last decades,effective systemic treatments for HCC,including tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy,have been approved.We describe the clinical scenario of a patient with recurrence of HCC five years after LT,who received lenvatinib as first-line systemic therapy to introduce systemic treatment options in this clinical setting.In this opinion review,we detail first and second-line systemic treatment options,focusing on those feasible for patients with recurrent HCC after LT.Several trials have evaluated new drugs to treat HCC patients in first and secondline therapy,but patients with recurrent HCC after LT have been excluded from these trials.Consequently,most of the evidence comes from observational retrospective studies.Whether tyrosine kinase inhibitors will remain the primary therapeutic approach in these patients,due to a relative contraindication for immunotherapy,may be clarified in the near future.
基金Supported by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation,No.FGMF-2025-0003.
文摘The global burden of Helicobacter pylori infection continues to drive the need for effective,well-tolerated,and regionally adaptable eradication regimens.Recently Han et al presented compelling results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial in China,demonstrating the non-inferiority and potential superiority of vonoprazan(VPZ)-based triple therapy over the standard 14-day bismuth quad-ruple regimen.Both the 10-day and 14-day VPZ-amoxicillin-clarithromycin regi-mens achieved eradication rates exceeding 90%per protocol,with similar or fewer adverse events,suggesting improved patient tolerability.This study reinforces the potential of VPZ to overcome the limitations of proton pump inhibitor-based regimens,particularly in populations with CYP2C19 polymorphisms and increa-sing clarithromycin resistance.These findings also lend support to shortened trea-tment durations,which could enhance adherence and reduce antimicrobial expo-sure.These data highlight an important shift in the therapeutic landscape,positio-ning VPZ as a strong candidate for first-line empirical therapies.However,broa-der implementation requires careful consideration of local resistance patterns,drug accessibility,and pharmacoeconomic implications.
文摘BACKGROUND In recent years,emerging clinical research has prioritized assessment of combined therapeutic efficacy and safety parameters when programmed death 1 or its ligand(PD-1/L1)inhibitors are incorporated into first-line standard-of-care(SOC)therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC).However,data obtained from these trials demonstrated conflicting evidence concerning survival benefits and clinical outcomes.AIM To evaluate the therapeutic impact and safety parameters of combining PD-1/L1 inhibitors with SOC protocols as first-line treatment for mCRC.METHODS Four biomedical databases(PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,Web of Science)were systematically interrogated to identify eligible studies published up to October 12,2024.The analysis focused on evaluating the primary outcome of overall survival(OS)in the mCRC population with secondary outcomes of progression-free survival(PFS),overall response rate(ORR),and incidence rate of grade≥3 adverse events.Additionally,we performed exploratory analyses in the microsatellite stable/mismatch repair-proficient(MSS/pMMR)subpopulation,based on a subset of the included studies.Subgroup analyses according to PD-1/L1 inhibitor use were conducted in both the overall population and the MSS/pMMR subgroup.RESULTS This pooled analysis incorporated six randomized controlled trials involving 675 patients with mCRC receiving first-line therapy.The combination of PD-1/L1 inhibitors with SOC regimens demonstrated a significant PFS advantage over SOC monotherapy in intention-to-treat populations[hazard ratio(HR)=0.8,95%confidence interval(CI):0.65-0.98,P=0.033].Nevertheless,the MSS/pMMR subgroup showed no PFS benefit(HR=0.83,95%CI:0.67-1.03,P=0.091),and no cohort exhibited OS improvement(intention-to-treat:HR=0.84,95%CI:0.66-1.05,P=0.124;MSS/pMMR:HR=0.79,95%CI:0.60-1.03,P=0.083).Comparable outcomes were observed for ORR(risk ratio=1.03,95%CI:0.90-1.17,P=0.711)and incidence rate of grade≥3 adverse events(risk ratio=1.12,95%CI:0.93-1.36,P=0.245)between treatment arms.CONCLUSION The findings indicated that integrating PD-1/L1 blocking agents with SOC regimens for mCRC as first-line treatment failed to demonstrate significant improvements in ORR.Existing clinical data remain inadequate to establish OS advantages,particularly in patients with MSS/pMMR,despite exhibiting manageable toxicity profiles.Subsequent confirmation through rigorously designed phase III clinical trials remains essential to verify these therapeutic outcomes.
文摘AIM:To compare triple therapy vs quadruple therapy for 10 d as first-line treatment ofHelicobacter pylori(H.pylori) infection.METHODS:Consecutive H.pylori positive patients never treated in the past for this infection were randomly treated with triple therapy of pantoprazole(PAN) 20 mg bid,amoxicillin(AMO) 1 g bid and moxifloxacin(MOX) 400 mg bid for 10 d(PAM) or with quadruple therapy of PAN 20 mg bid,AMO 1 g bid,MOX 400 mg bid and bismuth subcitrate 240 mg bid for 10 d(PAMB).All patients were found positive at 13 C-Urea breath test(UBT) performed within ten days prior to the start of the study.A successful outcome was confirmed with an UBT performed 8 wk after the end of treatment.χ 2 analysis was used for statistical comparison.Per protocol(PP) and intention-to-treat(ITT) values were also calculated.RESULTS:Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the PAM group and 50 in the PAMB group.One patient in each group did not return for further assessment.Eradication was higher in the PAMB group(negative:46 and positive:3) vs the PAM group(negative:44 and positive:12).The H.pylori eradication rate was statistically significantly higher in the PAMB group vs the PAM group,both with the PP and ITT analyses(PP:PAMB 93.8%,PAM 78.5%,P < 0.02;ITT:PAMB 92%,PAM 77.1 %,P <0.03).CONCLUSION:The addition of bismuth subcitrate can be considered a valuable adjuvant to triple therapy in those areas where H.pylori shows a high resistance to fluoroquinolones.
文摘BACKGROUND As a first-line treatment regimen for Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)infection,antibiotic therapy is widely used worldwide.However,the question of increasing antibiotic resistance must be considered.Given this issue,we need to find ways to reduce drug resistance.This study examined all currently available first-line regimens and compared them with standard triple treatment through a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials(RCTs).AIM To compare first-line treatment regimens for eradication of antibiotic-resistant H.pylori strains.METHODS To compare the effectiveness of the first-line regimens for treating H.pylori infection,a Bayesian network meta-analysis was applied to process data extracted from RCTs.The plausible ranking for each regimen was assessed by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA).In addition,we conducted a relevant search by reference citation analysis.RESULTS Twenty-five RCTs involving 12029 participants[including 1602 infected with clarithromycin(CAM)-resistant strains and 1716 infected with metronidazole(MNZ)-resistant strains]were included,in which a total of seven regimens were used for H.pylori eradication.The results showed that dual therapy containing a high-dose proton pump inhibitor(HDDT)[odds ratio(OR):4.20,95%confidence interval(CI):2.29-8.13]was superior to other therapies for all patients,including those with CAM/MNZ-resistant H.pylori infection.In the comparative effectiveness ranking,for CAM-resistant H.pylori,HDDT(OR:96.80,95%CI:22.46-521.9)had the best results,whereas standard triple therapy ranked last(SUCRA:98.7%vs 0.3%).In the subgroup of high cure rates(≥90%),HDDT was also generally better than other therapies.CONCLUSION For the eradication of CAM-and MNZ-resistant H.pylori strains,HDDT exhibited considerable advantages.The studies of CAM-resistant H.pylori were based on small samples due to a lack of antibiotic sensitivity tests in many RCTs,but the results showed that all patients,including those with CAM-resistant H.pylori infection,had a concordant trend.Overall,HDDT may be a reference for RCTs and other studies of H.pylori eradication.
文摘Bevacizumab plus erlotinib prolonged patients＇ progression-free survive （PFS） versus bevacizumab alone for the maintenance treatment of none-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC） in phase III clinical trial ATLAS （ClinicalTrials. gov identifier NCT00257608）, which repealed a benefit outcome and acceptable side-effects, but whether its cost performance would be accepted by patients is blurry. The aim of our research is to figure out which strategy is the best option in clinic and would spread broadly. Markov Model was used to calculate incremental cost-utility radios （ICURs） and 10-year quality-adjusted life years （QALY） of both strategies. The clinical data were collected from phase III clinical trial ATLAS （ClinicalTrials. gov identifier NCT00257608）. The cost data were obtained from Chinese health care system. In the research, one-way sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis （PSA） and Monte-Carlo analysis were performed to test the stability of the results. The better strategy was bevacizumab alone strategy, and the cumulative costs of both strategies were $178 648.47 and $46 445.28, respectively, and the QALY was 12.506 and 10.643, respectively. The ICUR of combined application was $70 962.53/QALY, which was much higher than 3 times of mean gross domestic product （GDP） in China, suggesting that this strategy was no economical at all. In one-way analysis, the change of willingness-to-pay could not influence the consequence. In addition, in Monte-Carlo analysis, the probability distribution of cost, effectiveness and ICUR was in normal distribution. Taken together, bevacizumab alone strategy was the better strategy in terms of cost-effectiveness.
文摘AIM:To evaluate the efficacy of 14-d moxifloxacinbased sequential therapy as first-line eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori) infection.METHODS:From December 2013 to August 2014, 161 patients with confirmed H.pylori infection randomly received 14 d of moxifloxacin-based sequential group(MOX-ST group, n = 80) or clarithromycin-based sequential group(CLA-ST group, n = 81) therapy.H.pylori infection was defined on the basis of at least one of the following three tests:a positive 13C-urea breath test; histologic evidence of H.pylori by modified Giemsa staining; or a positive rapid urease test(CLOtest; Delta West, Bentley, Australia) by gastric mucosal biopsy.Successful eradication therapy for H.pylori infection was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test four weeks after the end of eradication treatment.Compliance was defined as good when drug intake was at least 85%.H.pylori eradication rates, patient compliance with drug treatment, adverse event rates, and factors influencing the efficacy of eradication therapy were evaluated.RESULTS:The eradication rates by intention-to-treat analysis were 91.3%(73/80;95%CI:86.2%-95.4%)in the MOX-ST group and 71.6%(58/81;95%CI:65.8%-77.4%)in the CLA-ST group(P=0.014).The eradication rates by per-protocol analysis were 93.6%(73/78;95%CI:89.1%-98.1%)in the MOX-ST group and 75.3%(58/77;95%CI:69.4%-81.8%)in the CLAST group(P=0.022).Compliance was 100%in both groups.The adverse event rates were 12.8%(10/78)and 24.6%(19/77)in the MOX-ST and CLA-ST group,respectively(P=0.038).Most of the adverse events were mild-to-moderate in intensity;there was none serious enough to cause discontinuation of treatmentin either group.In multivariate analysis,advanced age(≥60 years)was a significant independent factor related to the eradication failure in the CLA-ST group(adjusted OR=2.13,95%CI:1.97-2.29,P=0.004),whereas there was no significance in the MOX-ST group.CONCLUSION:The 14-d moxifloxacin-based sequential therapy is effective.Moreover,it shows excellent patient compliance and safety compared to the 14-d clarithromycin-based sequential therapy.
基金This work was sup-ported by National Natural Sclence Foundatlon of China(no.81202108)
文摘Background:Both hormonal therapy(HT) and maintenance capecitabine monotherapy(MCT) have been shown to extend time to progression(TTP) in patients with metastatic breast cancer(MBC) after failure of taxanes and anthracycline?containing regimens.However,no clinical trials have directly compared the efficacy of MCT and HT after response to first?line capecitabine?based combination chemotherapy(FCCT) in patients with hormone receptor(HR)?positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)?negative breast cancer.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 138 HR?positive and HER2?negative MBC patients who were in non?progression status after FCCT and who were treated between 2003 and 2012 at the Cancer Institute and Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,in Beijing,China.The median number of first?line chemotherapy cycles was 6(range,4–8);combined agents included taxanes,vinorelbine,or gemcitabine.Of these 138 patients,79 received MCT,and 59 received HT.Single?agent capecitabine was administered at a dose of 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days,followed by a 7?day rest period,repeated every 3 weeks.Of the 59 patients who received HT,37 received aromatase inhibitors(AIs),8 received selective estrogen receptor modulators(SERMs),and 14 received goserelin plus either AIs or SERMs.We then compared the MCT group and HT group in terms of treatment efficacy.Results:With a median follow?up of 43 months,patients in the HT group had a much longer TTP than patients in the MCT group(13 vs.8 months,P ease?free surviv= 0.011).When TTP was adjusted for age,menopausal status,Karnofsky performance status score,disal,site of metastasis,number of metastatic sites,and response status after FCCT,extended TTP was still observed for patients in the HT group(hazard ratio:0.63;95% confidence interval:0.44–0.93;P = 0.020).We also observed a trend of overall survival advantage for patients in the HT group vs.patients in the MCT group,but the difference was not significant(43 vs.37 months,P tients in the MCT g= 0.400).In addition,patients in the HT group gen?erally tolerated the treatment well,whereas paroup experienced grades 3–4 adverse events,the most frequent of which were hand?foot syndrome(15.8%) and hematologic abnormalities(7.6%).Conclusion:For HR?positive and HER2?negative MBC patients,HT might be considered a treatment after response to FCCT but prior to MCT as a long?term administration.
文摘AIM:To find the way to improve the eradication rate of first-line therapy in Japanese patients.METHODS:We prospectively compared the effectiveness of 7-d quadruple therapy to standard 7 d triple therapy in Japanese patients infected with Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori).One hundred and nineteen patients were randomly assigned to receive 7-d non-bismuth quadruple therapy with lansoprazole,amoxicillin,clarithromycin and metronidazole(LACM7) or 7-d triple therapy with lansoprazole,amoxicillin and clarithromycin(LAC7).After three months,H.pylori status was analyzed by 13C-urea breath test.Incidence rates of adverse events were evaluated by use of questionnaires.RESULTS:By intention-to-treat(ITT) analysis,the eradication rate in the LACM7 group was 94.9%,which was significantly higher than the LAC7 group(68.3%,P < 0.001).Per protocol analysis also showed a significantly higher eradication rate in the LACM7 group(98.3%) than the LAC7 group(73.2%,P < 0.001).Nevertheless,the incidence of serious adverse events did not differ between the two groups(RR:1.10,95% CI:0.70-1.73,P = 0.67).CONCLUSION:Seven day non-bismuth quadruple therapy(LACM7) was superior to standard 7-d triple therapy(LAC7) for first-line eradication.
文摘BACKGROUND Increasing levels of antibiotic resistance have reduced the Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)eradication rates afforded by the standard triple therapy.Thus,2-wk firstline four-drug regimens must be considered.AIM To analyze the eradication rates of modified bismuth-containing quadruple therapy(mBCQT)and concomitant therapy(CT),the associated adverse events,and compliance.METHODS Patients infected with H.pylori were prospectively randomized to receive mBCQT or CT for 2 wk.mBCQT featured a proton pump inhibitor(PPI),bismuth,metronidazole,and tetracycline,taken twice daily.CT included a PPI,clarithromycin,metronidazole,and amoxicillin,taken twice daily.The 13C-urea breath test was performed no earlier than 4 wk after therapy concluded to confirm eradication.If either the histological or rapid urease test was positive,H.pylori infection was diagnosed.RESULTS The demographic characteristics of 68 patients who received mBCQT and 68 who received CT did not differ significantly.On intention-to-treat analysis,the eradication rate was 88.2%(60/68)in the mBCQT group and 79.4%(54/68)in the CT group(P=0.162).By per-protocol analysis,the respective eradication rates were 98.4%(60/61)and 93.1%(54/58)(P=0.199).More CT than mBCQT patients experienced adverse events[33.8%(23/68)mBCQT vs 51.5%(35/58)CT patients,respectively,P=0.037].All patients showed good compliance[85.3%(58/68)mBCQT vs 82.4%(56/68)CT patients,P=0.641].CONCLUSION The H.pylori eradication rates of the 2-wk mBCQT and CT regimens are high.Most patients show good compliance,and more CT than mBCQT patients experience adverse events.
文摘AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of moxifloxacin-based sequential therapy(MBST) versus hybrid therapy as a first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection.METHODS: From August 2014 to January 2015, 284 patients with confirmed H. pylori infection were randomized to receive a 14-d course of MBST(MBST group, n = 140) or hybrid(Hybrid group, n = 144) therapy. The MBST group received 20 mg rabeprazole and 1 g amoxicillin twice daily for 7 d, followed by 20 mg rabeprazole and 500 mg metronidazole twice daily, and 400 mg moxifloxacin once daily for 7 d. The Hybrid group received 20 mg rabeprazole and 1 g amoxicillin twice daily for 14 d. In addition, the Hybrid group received 500 mg metronidazole and 500 mg clarithromycin twice daily for the final 7 d. Successful eradication of H. pylori infection was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test 4 wk after the end of treatment. Patient compliance was defined as "good" if drug intake was at least 85%. H. pylori eradication rates, patient compliance with treatment, and adverse event rates were evaluated.RESULTS: The eradication rates in the intention-totreat(ITT) analysis were 91.4%(128/140; 95%CI: 90.2%-92.9%) in the MBST group and 79.2%(114/144; 95%CI: 77.3%-80.7%) in the Hybrid group(P = 0.013). The eradication rates in the perprotocol(PP) analysis were 94.1%(128/136; 95%CI: 92.9%-95.6%) in the MBST group and 82.6%(114/138; 95%CI: 80.6%-84.1%) in the Hybrid group(P = 0.003). The H. pylori eradication rate in the MBST group was significantly higher than that of the Hybrid group for both the ITT(P = 0.013) and the PP analyses(P = 0.003). Both groups exhibited full compliance with treatment(MBST/Hybrid group: 100%/100%). The rate of adverse events was 11.8%(16/136) and 19.6%(27/138) in the MBST and Hybrid group, respectively(P = 0.019). The majority of adverse events were mild-to-moderate in intensity; none were severe enough to cause discontinuation of treatment in either group.CONCLUSION: MBST was more effective and led to fewer adverse events than hybrid therapy as a first-line treatment for H. pylori infection.
文摘Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of capecitabine maintenance therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) patients.Methods:From June 2001 to November 2006,after they had achieved clinical response from first-line chemotherapy,patients with mCRC in our hospital received two different treatment strategies.Thirty-three patients in maintenance group were treated with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 po bid d1-14,q21d.Fifty-two patients in non-maintenance group did not receive any further chemotherapy.Results:Patients in maintenance group and non-maintenance group both received FOLFOX,FOLFIRI and XELOX as first-line therapy.The median chemotherapy cycles the two groups received were the same(6 vs 6).The response rates of first-line chemotherapy were 33.3% in maintenance group and 32.7% in non-maintenance group.Patients in maintenance group received 3-9 cycles of capecitabine therapy(median cycle 4).29/33(87.9%) patients in maintenance group and 47/52(90.4%) in non-maintenance group received following second-line chemotherapy,and no patients underwent targeted therapy.The median survival time and TTP were 40.4 months(95%CI:24.2-56.6) and 9.0 months(95%CI:6.7-11.3) in maintenance group,as compared with 21.5 months(95%CI:14.9-28.0,P=0.015) and 6.5 months(95%CI:4.4-8.5,P=0.007) in non-maintenance group.No severe adverse event was observed in the capecitabine maintenance group.Conclusion:mCRC patients could benefit from capecitabine maintenance therapy by prolonging survival time and TTP.
文摘BACKGROUND The majority of clinical trials of first-line systemic treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)used placebo or sorafenib as comparators,and there are limited data providing a cross comparison of treatments in this setting,especially for newly-approved immune checkpoint inhibitor and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor combination treatments.AIM To systematically review and compare response rates,survival outcomes,and safety of first-line systemic therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.METHODS We searched PubMed,Science Direct,the Cochrane Database,Excerpta Medica Database,and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020 annual congress.Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials of systemic therapy enrolling adults with advanced/unresectable HCC.Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials.A network meta-analysis was used to synthesize data and perform direct and indirect comparisons between treatments.P value,a frequentist analog to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve,was used to rank treatments.RESULTS In total,1398 articles were screened and 27 included.Treatments compared were atezolizumab plus bevacizumab,brivanib,donafenib,dovitinib,FOLFOX4,lenvatinib,linifanib,nintedanib,nivolumab,sorafenib,sunitinib,vandetanib,11 sorafenib combination therapies,and three other combination therapies.For overall response rate,lenvatinib ranked 1/19,followed by atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and nivolumab.For progression-free survival(PFS),atezolizumab+bevacizumab was ranked 1/15,followed by lenvatinib.With the exception of atezolizumab+bevacizumab[hazard ratios(HR)PFS=0.90;95%confidence interval(CI):0.64-1.25],the estimated HRs for PFS for all included treatments vs lenvatinib were>1;however,the associated 95%CI passed through unity for bevacizumab plus erlotinib,linifanib,and FOLFOX4.For overall survival,atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was ranked 1/25,followed by vandetanib 100 mg/d and donafinib,with lenvatinib ranked 6/25.Atezolizumab+bevacizumab was associated with a lower risk of death vs lenvatinib(HRos=0.63;95%CI:0.44-0.89),while the HR for overall survival for most other treatments vs lenvatinib had associated 95%CIs that passed through unity.Vandetanib 300 mg/d and 100 mg/d were ranked 1/13 and 2/13,respectively,for the lowest incidence of treatment terminations due to adverse events,followed by sorafenib(5/13),lenvatinib(10/13),and atezolizumab+bevacizumab(13/13).CONCLUSION There is not one single first-line treatment for advanced HCC associated with superior outcomes across all outcome measurements.Therefore,first-line systemic treatment should be selected based on individualized treatment goals.
基金supported by the grants from the National "863" High Technology Research and Development Program of China (No.2006AA02A401)the Capital Development Foundation of Beijing (No.30772472)
文摘Objective： To investigate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib as maintenance therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC） patients who obtained disease control （DC） after first-line chemotherapy in Chinese population. Methods： Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC treated with standard chemotherapy and obtained DC were assigned to receive gefitinib as maintenance treatment. The primary end point was overall survival time （OS）, the second end point was disease control rate （DCR） and progression-free survival time （PFS）. DCR included complete response （CR） plus partial response （PR） and plus stable disease （SD）. The impact of epidermal growth factor receptor （EGFR） mutation status on the treatment as exploratory point was also evaluated by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography （DHPLC）. Results： Among 75 enrolled patients, the overall response rate was 37% and the DCR （CR ＋ PR ＋SD） was 66%. The median PFS and OS were 17.13 months and 26.13 months respectively, with 1- and 2-year survival rates 89.3% and 34.7%. Patients harboring somatic EGFR mutations obtained a prolonged median PFS and OS compared with EGFR wide type （25.1 vs. 13.0 months, P=0.019 and 33.37 vs. 25.57 months, P=0.014, respectively）. In COX regression model, only EGFR mutation status was the independently factor influencing both PFS and OS （P=0.029 and 0.017, respectively）, however, rash status was the predictor in terms of PFS （P=0.027）. Conclusion： Gefitinib produced encouraging survival when delivered as maintenance therapy in Chinese patients obtaining DC after first-line chemotherapy, especially for patients carrying somatic EGFR mutations. EGFR mutation is an independently predictive factor of survival.
文摘BACKGROUND Icotinib could have potential effect and tolerability when used sequentially with chemotherapy for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy followed by icotinib maintenance therapy as first-line treatment for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.METHODS This multicenter,open-label,pilot randomized controlled trial enrolled 68 EGFRmutated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients randomized 2:3 to the icotinib alone and chemotherapy+icotinib groups.RESULTS The median progression-free survival in the icotinib alone and chemotherapy+icotinib groups was 8.0 mo(95%CI:3.84-11.63)and 13.4 mo(95%CI:10.18-16.33),respectively(P=0.0249).No significant differences were found in the curative effect when considering different cycles of chemotherapy or chemotherapy regimen(all P>0.05).CONCLUSION A sequential combination of chemotherapy and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor is feasible for stage IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients.
