AIM:To compare histological endpoint assessment using noninvasive alternatives to biopsy during treatment in a chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV)cohort.METHODS:Patients with chronic HCV were randomized to receive interfer...AIM:To compare histological endpoint assessment using noninvasive alternatives to biopsy during treatment in a chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV)cohort.METHODS:Patients with chronic HCV were randomized to receive interferon-based therapy for 24(genotypes 2/3)or 48(genotype 1)wk.FibroSURE～TM(FS)was assessed at baseline and at week-12 post-treatment follow-up.Baseline biopsy for METAVIR was assessed by a single pathologist.FibroScan～ transient elastogra-phy(TE)was performed during treatment in a patient subset.RESULTS:Two thousand and sixty patients(n = 253 in Asia)were classif ied as METAVIR F0-1(n = 1682)or F2-4(n = 378).For F2-4,FS(n = 2055)had sensitiv-ity and specif icity of 0.87 and 0.61,respectively,with area under the receiver-operating curve of 0.82;corre-sponding values for TE(n = 214)and combined FS/TE(n = 209)were 0.77,0.88 and 0.88,and 0.93,0.68 and 0.88.Overall FS/TE agreement for F2-4 was 71%(κ = 0.41)and higher in Asians vs non-Asians(κ = 0.86 vs 0.35;P < 0.001).Combined FS/TE had 97% accuracy in Asians(n = 33).Baseline FS(0.38 vs 0.51,P < 0.001)and TE(8.0 kPa vs 11.9 kPa,P = 0.006)scores were lower in patients with sustained virological response than in nonresponders,and were maintained through follow-up.CONCLUSION:FS and TE may reliably differentiate mild from moderate-advanced disease,with a potential for high diagnostic accuracy in Asians with chronic HCV.展开更多
BACKGROUND Noninvasive tests are crucial for the management and follow-up of patients with autoimmune hepatitis,but their validation is limited because of insufficient data.AIM To investigate the diagnostic performanc...BACKGROUND Noninvasive tests are crucial for the management and follow-up of patients with autoimmune hepatitis,but their validation is limited because of insufficient data.AIM To investigate the diagnostic performance of three fibrosis noninvasive tests[FibroTest,vibration-controlled transient elastography(VCTE),and the fibrosis-4 index(FIB-4)and two activity biomarkers(alanine aminotransferase(ALT)and ActiTest].METHODS This study enrolled 103 patients for whom liver biopsy,hepatic elastography results,and laboratory markers were available.Diagnostic performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves,the Obuchowski measure(OM),and the Bayesian latent class model.RESULTS FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 in cases of significant fibrosis(≥F2),with areas under the ROC curve of 0.83[95%confidence interval(CI):0.73-0.90],0.86(95%CI:0.77-0.92),and 0.71(95%CI:0.60-0.80),respectively.The mean(standard error)OM values were 0.92(0.01),0.93(0.01),and 0.88(0.02)for FibroTest,VCTE,and FIB-4,respectively;FibroTest and VCTE performed comparably,and both were superior to FIB-4(P=0.03 and P=0.005).The areas under the ROC curve values for activity biomarkers were 0.86(95%CI:0.76-0.92)for ActiTest and 0.84(95%CI:0.73-0.90)for ALT(P=0.06).The OM values for ActiTest and ALT were 0.92(0.02)and 0.90(0.02),respectively(P=0.005).CONCLUSION FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 according to the OM.FibroTest-ActiTest facilitated the evaluation of both fibrosis and activity.展开更多
基金Supported by Human Genome Sciences and Novartis Pharma AG,Basel,Switzerland
文摘AIM:To compare histological endpoint assessment using noninvasive alternatives to biopsy during treatment in a chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV)cohort.METHODS:Patients with chronic HCV were randomized to receive interferon-based therapy for 24(genotypes 2/3)or 48(genotype 1)wk.FibroSURE～TM(FS)was assessed at baseline and at week-12 post-treatment follow-up.Baseline biopsy for METAVIR was assessed by a single pathologist.FibroScan～ transient elastogra-phy(TE)was performed during treatment in a patient subset.RESULTS:Two thousand and sixty patients(n = 253 in Asia)were classif ied as METAVIR F0-1(n = 1682)or F2-4(n = 378).For F2-4,FS(n = 2055)had sensitiv-ity and specif icity of 0.87 and 0.61,respectively,with area under the receiver-operating curve of 0.82;corre-sponding values for TE(n = 214)and combined FS/TE(n = 209)were 0.77,0.88 and 0.88,and 0.93,0.68 and 0.88.Overall FS/TE agreement for F2-4 was 71%(κ = 0.41)and higher in Asians vs non-Asians(κ = 0.86 vs 0.35;P < 0.001).Combined FS/TE had 97% accuracy in Asians(n = 33).Baseline FS(0.38 vs 0.51,P < 0.001)and TE(8.0 kPa vs 11.9 kPa,P = 0.006)scores were lower in patients with sustained virological response than in nonresponders,and were maintained through follow-up.CONCLUSION:FS and TE may reliably differentiate mild from moderate-advanced disease,with a potential for high diagnostic accuracy in Asians with chronic HCV.
文摘BACKGROUND Noninvasive tests are crucial for the management and follow-up of patients with autoimmune hepatitis,but their validation is limited because of insufficient data.AIM To investigate the diagnostic performance of three fibrosis noninvasive tests[FibroTest,vibration-controlled transient elastography(VCTE),and the fibrosis-4 index(FIB-4)and two activity biomarkers(alanine aminotransferase(ALT)and ActiTest].METHODS This study enrolled 103 patients for whom liver biopsy,hepatic elastography results,and laboratory markers were available.Diagnostic performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves,the Obuchowski measure(OM),and the Bayesian latent class model.RESULTS FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 in cases of significant fibrosis(≥F2),with areas under the ROC curve of 0.83[95%confidence interval(CI):0.73-0.90],0.86(95%CI:0.77-0.92),and 0.71(95%CI:0.60-0.80),respectively.The mean(standard error)OM values were 0.92(0.01),0.93(0.01),and 0.88(0.02)for FibroTest,VCTE,and FIB-4,respectively;FibroTest and VCTE performed comparably,and both were superior to FIB-4(P=0.03 and P=0.005).The areas under the ROC curve values for activity biomarkers were 0.86(95%CI:0.76-0.92)for ActiTest and 0.84(95%CI:0.73-0.90)for ALT(P=0.06).The OM values for ActiTest and ALT were 0.92(0.02)and 0.90(0.02),respectively(P=0.005).CONCLUSION FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 according to the OM.FibroTest-ActiTest facilitated the evaluation of both fibrosis and activity.
