BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy(ERAT)offers an appendix-pre-serving approach;however,visual and specificity challenges persist.Conversely,endoscopic direct appendicitis therapy(EDAT)provides dire...BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy(ERAT)offers an appendix-pre-serving approach;however,visual and specificity challenges persist.Conversely,endoscopic direct appendicitis therapy(EDAT)provides direct visual observation with diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities.AIM To assess the efficacy and feasibility of EDAT and compare them with those of ERAT in uncomplicated appendicitis.METHODS In this retrospective cohort study,patients diagnosed with uncomplicated appendicitis and treated with ERAT or EDAT between January 2021 and November 2024 were reviewed.The primary outcome was intervention success.Secondary outcomes were guidewire use,stent placement,hospitalization duration,recurrence,and endoscopic direct-view features.Outcomes were compared between groups via appropriate statistical tests.RESULTS Of 170 patients,136 underwent EDAT and 34 ERAT.EDAT showed higher intervention success than ERAT(99.3%vs 82.4%,P<0.001),with less guidewire assistance and fewer stent placements(both P<0.001).Hospital stay was shorter with EDAT(P=0.039).The overall cumulative recurrence rates at 1 year were 10%in EDAT and 24%in ERAT;in the appendicolith subgroup,the recurrence rates were 5%and 14%in EDAT and ERAT,respectively.Findings were consistent in the propensity score-matched(PSM)cohort.CONCLUSION EDAT was demonstrated to be a more effective and feasible approach than ERAT,with a lower overall cumulative recurrence risk and within the appendicolith subgroup.Consistent results after PSM further supported the robustness of these findings.展开更多
BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy(ERAT)is an emerging technique.However,its efficacy remains uncertain,and postoperative complications often exacerbate inflammation,thereby increasing the difficult...BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy(ERAT)is an emerging technique.However,its efficacy remains uncertain,and postoperative complications often exacerbate inflammation,thereby increasing the difficulty of surgery.The use of ERAT in appendicitis remains contentious,prompting the presentation of this case report.CASE SUMMARY We report the case of a 43-year-old female patient presenting with intermittent right lower abdominal pain for one day.The patient had undergone ERAT six months previously.Examination revealed stent impaction in the appendix,leading to exacerbated inflammation.Subsequently,a solo single-incision laparo-scopic appendectomy(SSLA)was performed.The ERAT-related complications increased surgical difficulty and prolonged the operation time.Post-SSLA,the patient was hospitalized for one day and showed favorable recovery upon follow-up.CONCLUSION This case highlights the risks of ERAT.Thorough preoperative assessment,proper stent placement during surgery and regular postoperative follow-up are crucial in preventing complications,as their occurrence can increase surgical difficulty.Compared to ERAT,SSLA remains more widely used in clinical practice.Both techniques require further clinical data and research to optimize their application.展开更多
Right iliac fossa pain remains a challenge for clinicians, since it requires considering several differential diagnoses. Acute appendicitis continues to be one of the most important diagnoses to confirm or to rule out...Right iliac fossa pain remains a challenge for clinicians, since it requires considering several differential diagnoses. Acute appendicitis continues to be one of the most important diagnoses to confirm or to rule out in acute abdominal pain, due to the associated morbidity and mortality. Currently, imaging studies contribute to increase diagnostic certainty, but sometimes reveal unexpected findings, which may further complicate the diagnosis and therapeutic decisions. We present the case of an unusual image finding in the right iliac fossa, a calcification suggestive of gallstone ileus, in the context of an acute abdomen with an unusual transoperative finding, whose definitive diagnosis by pathology, was also rare.展开更多
基金Supported by Guangdong Province Clinical Teaching Base Teaching Reform Research Project,No.2021JD086.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy(ERAT)offers an appendix-pre-serving approach;however,visual and specificity challenges persist.Conversely,endoscopic direct appendicitis therapy(EDAT)provides direct visual observation with diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities.AIM To assess the efficacy and feasibility of EDAT and compare them with those of ERAT in uncomplicated appendicitis.METHODS In this retrospective cohort study,patients diagnosed with uncomplicated appendicitis and treated with ERAT or EDAT between January 2021 and November 2024 were reviewed.The primary outcome was intervention success.Secondary outcomes were guidewire use,stent placement,hospitalization duration,recurrence,and endoscopic direct-view features.Outcomes were compared between groups via appropriate statistical tests.RESULTS Of 170 patients,136 underwent EDAT and 34 ERAT.EDAT showed higher intervention success than ERAT(99.3%vs 82.4%,P<0.001),with less guidewire assistance and fewer stent placements(both P<0.001).Hospital stay was shorter with EDAT(P=0.039).The overall cumulative recurrence rates at 1 year were 10%in EDAT and 24%in ERAT;in the appendicolith subgroup,the recurrence rates were 5%and 14%in EDAT and ERAT,respectively.Findings were consistent in the propensity score-matched(PSM)cohort.CONCLUSION EDAT was demonstrated to be a more effective and feasible approach than ERAT,with a lower overall cumulative recurrence risk and within the appendicolith subgroup.Consistent results after PSM further supported the robustness of these findings.
基金Supported by National Key R and D Program of China-Key Special Project on Diagnostic and Therapeutic Equipment and Biomedical Materials,No.2023YFC2412005。
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy(ERAT)is an emerging technique.However,its efficacy remains uncertain,and postoperative complications often exacerbate inflammation,thereby increasing the difficulty of surgery.The use of ERAT in appendicitis remains contentious,prompting the presentation of this case report.CASE SUMMARY We report the case of a 43-year-old female patient presenting with intermittent right lower abdominal pain for one day.The patient had undergone ERAT six months previously.Examination revealed stent impaction in the appendix,leading to exacerbated inflammation.Subsequently,a solo single-incision laparo-scopic appendectomy(SSLA)was performed.The ERAT-related complications increased surgical difficulty and prolonged the operation time.Post-SSLA,the patient was hospitalized for one day and showed favorable recovery upon follow-up.CONCLUSION This case highlights the risks of ERAT.Thorough preoperative assessment,proper stent placement during surgery and regular postoperative follow-up are crucial in preventing complications,as their occurrence can increase surgical difficulty.Compared to ERAT,SSLA remains more widely used in clinical practice.Both techniques require further clinical data and research to optimize their application.
文摘Right iliac fossa pain remains a challenge for clinicians, since it requires considering several differential diagnoses. Acute appendicitis continues to be one of the most important diagnoses to confirm or to rule out in acute abdominal pain, due to the associated morbidity and mortality. Currently, imaging studies contribute to increase diagnostic certainty, but sometimes reveal unexpected findings, which may further complicate the diagnosis and therapeutic decisions. We present the case of an unusual image finding in the right iliac fossa, a calcification suggestive of gallstone ileus, in the context of an acute abdomen with an unusual transoperative finding, whose definitive diagnosis by pathology, was also rare.
