Objective: to explore the application value of routine urine test in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection for patients with urinary tract infection. Methods: 70 patients with suspected urinary tract infection in o...Objective: to explore the application value of routine urine test in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection for patients with urinary tract infection. Methods: 70 patients with suspected urinary tract infection in our hospital from March 2019 to April 2020 were selected as the research objects. The urine sediment method and urine dry chemistry method were used for examination. The pathological diagnosis results were taken as the gold standard to compare the accuracy of the two methods. Results: with the pathological diagnosis results as gold, whether using urine sediment method or urine dry chemistry method to compare the white blood cell count and red blood cell in urine, it was found that when P < 0.05, there was no statistical significance. The urine sediment method and the urine dry chemical method used in the examination of the patient were tested, and the indicators in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection, such as sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were compared and analyzed, P<0.05, there was no statistical significance. Comparing the two methods, both of them can effectively detect urinary tract infection and provide reference data for subsequent treatment. Conclusion: the urine routine test of patients with urinary tract infection can significantly improve the accuracy rate of patients. The urine dry chemistry method combined with urine sediment method is less different from the gold standard results, which can significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy of patients, which is worthy of extensive promotion.展开更多
文摘Objective: to explore the application value of routine urine test in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection for patients with urinary tract infection. Methods: 70 patients with suspected urinary tract infection in our hospital from March 2019 to April 2020 were selected as the research objects. The urine sediment method and urine dry chemistry method were used for examination. The pathological diagnosis results were taken as the gold standard to compare the accuracy of the two methods. Results: with the pathological diagnosis results as gold, whether using urine sediment method or urine dry chemistry method to compare the white blood cell count and red blood cell in urine, it was found that when P < 0.05, there was no statistical significance. The urine sediment method and the urine dry chemical method used in the examination of the patient were tested, and the indicators in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection, such as sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were compared and analyzed, P<0.05, there was no statistical significance. Comparing the two methods, both of them can effectively detect urinary tract infection and provide reference data for subsequent treatment. Conclusion: the urine routine test of patients with urinary tract infection can significantly improve the accuracy rate of patients. The urine dry chemistry method combined with urine sediment method is less different from the gold standard results, which can significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy of patients, which is worthy of extensive promotion.
