期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Assessment of Different Digestion Procedures for Mo Isotope Measurements of Black and Grey Shales Using the Double Spike Technique 被引量:1
1
作者 Jin Li Xiangkun Zhu Suohan Tang 《Journal of Earth Science》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2022年第1期76-81,共6页
This study investigates the behavior of Mo and Mo isotopes (δ^(98)Mo) in shales following leaching with HCl and HNO_(3) with the aim of simplifying the shale dissolution procedure.Up to 6%of the Mo was lost and the M... This study investigates the behavior of Mo and Mo isotopes (δ^(98)Mo) in shales following leaching with HCl and HNO_(3) with the aim of simplifying the shale dissolution procedure.Up to 6%of the Mo was lost and the Mo isotopes were unaffected when shales were leached using 9 M HCl after ashing.Bulk sample digestion or leaching by 4 M or more concentrated HCl after ashing were all found to be acceptable and reliable approaches to the analysis of Mo isotopes in shales.After black shale (CAGS-BS) was leached with 2 M HCl,1 M HCl,and 9 M HNO_(3),the Mo concentration ([Mo]) in the leachate was lower and δ^(98)Mo was heavier than that obtained from bulk digestion.A Mo isotope mass-balance model showed that the δ^(98)Mo in the residues was lighter than the δ^(98)Mo from the bulk digestion of CAGS-BS and of crustal igneous rocks.No more Mo was lost,nor did Mo isotope fractionation,if the double spike was added before rather than after ashing and followed by bulk digestion or leaching with 9 M HCl.For efficiency,leaching using 4 M or more concentrated HCl after ashing is preferred for Mo isotope measurements. 展开更多
关键词 Mo isotopes double spike ASHING bulk digestion LEACHING
原文传递
Iron isotopic analyses of geological reference materials on MC-ICP-MS with instrumental mass bias corrected by three independent methods 被引量:2
2
作者 Chuanwei Zhu Wenning Lu +3 位作者 Yongsheng He Shan Ke Hongjie Wu Linan Zhang 《Acta Geochimica》 EI CAS CSCD 2018年第5期691-700,共10页
Here we report iron(Fe) isotopic data of three pure Fe solution standards(IRMM-014, GSB Fe, and NIST3126a) and five widely used geological reference materials(RMs) from the United States Geological Survey and Geologic... Here we report iron(Fe) isotopic data of three pure Fe solution standards(IRMM-014, GSB Fe, and NIST3126a) and five widely used geological reference materials(RMs) from the United States Geological Survey and Geological Survey of Japan obtained on a Neptune Plus multi-collector–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometer(MC-ICP-MS) in our laboratory over the past 3 years. The instrumental mass bias was corrected by three independent methods: sample-standard bracketing(SSB),Ni doping + SSB, and ^(57)Fe–^(58)Fe double spike + SSB.Measurements reveal that both the Ni doping and double spike methods helped calibrate short-term fluctuations in mass bias. Collectively, almost all measurements of RMs yielded δ^(56)Fe within ± 0.05 of recommended values,provided that each sample was measured four times on MC-ICP-MS. For the first time, new recommended values for NIST SRM3126a are reported(δ^(56)Fe = 0.363 ± 0.006,2SE, 95% CI; and δ^(57)Fe = 0.534 ± 0.010, 2SE). 展开更多
关键词 Iron isotopic analyses Sample-standardbracketing double spike Ni doping Referencematerials Precision and accuracy
在线阅读 下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部