BACKGROUND In hemorrhoidal disease,despite the existence of numerous treatment options to alleviate symptoms,surgical intervention continues to be the gold standard.The advantages and disadvantages of many methods hav...BACKGROUND In hemorrhoidal disease,despite the existence of numerous treatment options to alleviate symptoms,surgical intervention continues to be the gold standard.The advantages and disadvantages of many methods have been shown in numerous studies However,only a few studies have compared the effectiveness of combined methods.AIM To compare the results of a coloproctology clinic that switched to the Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation(DG-HAL)+Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy(FH)technique from the FH in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.METHODS In this retrospective cohort,data from a total of 45 patients who underwent DG-HAL+FH(n=24)and FH(n=21)for grade III hemorrhoidal disease between 2020 and 2022 were analyzed.Demographic and clinical data,surgical duration,intraoperative blood loss,hospital stay,postoperative analgesic consumption,pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale(VAS),complications,time to return to normal activities,and the recurrence rate were compared in both groups.RESULTS The study included 45 patients,with 75.6%(n=34)male and 24.4%(n=11)female.The rate of intraoperative blood loss was higher in the FH group(P<0.05).The VAS scores and postoperative complication rates were similar in both groups.The need for postoperative analgesics was lower in the DG-HAL+FH group(2 vs 4 days,P<0.05),while the FH group showed a shorter time to return to normal activities(9.5 vs 6.0 days,P=0.02).The recurrence rate(16.7%vs 0%)and Clavien–Dindo Score-1 complications(20.8%vs 9.5%,P=0.29)were higher in the DG-HAL+FH group but were insignificant.CONCLUSION Our study revealed that the addition of the DG-HAL to classical hemorrhoidectomy caused less intraoperative bleeding and a lower postoperative analgesia requirement.展开更多
In the setting of Hemorrhoidal Disease treatment, the option of conventional hemorrhoidectomy is highly effective, but it is still associated with postoperative pain and discomfort. For this reason, technical alternat...In the setting of Hemorrhoidal Disease treatment, the option of conventional hemorrhoidectomy is highly effective, but it is still associated with postoperative pain and discomfort. For this reason, technical alternatives have been developed in order to reduce complications and to provide better postoperative recovery. To accomplish this aim, non-excisional techniques such as stapled hemorrhoidectomy and Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal ligation have been introduced into clinical practice with high expectations. The aim of this article is to revise the literature about transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization technique in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease, looking into its evolution, results and possible benefits over other modalities of surgical treatment. The literature review showed that Dopplerguided hemorrhoidal dearterialization is a safe and effective method to treat grades II to IV hemorrhoidal disease. Outcomes in patients presenting prolapse are satisfactory and the association of anopexy is an important aspect of this operation. Anal physiology disturbances are rarely observed and mainly transitory. This technique is an excellent option for every patient, especially in those with previous anal surgeries and in patients with previous alterations of fecal continence, when an additional procedure might represent a risk of definitive incontinence.展开更多
While debate continues as to which is the best surgical method for the treatment of hemorrhoids, none of the currently available surgical methods approach the ideal surgical option, which is one that is effective whil...While debate continues as to which is the best surgical method for the treatment of hemorrhoids, none of the currently available surgical methods approach the ideal surgical option, which is one that is effective while being safe and painless. In reality, the less painful the procedure, the more likely it is to be associated with recurrence post-op. Where hemorrhoids surgery is concerned, there isn’t a “one size fits all” option. Most of the randomized controlled trials performed to date include hemorrhoids of various grades and with a focus on only comparing surgical methods while failing to stratify the outcomes according to the grade of hemorrhoid. We believe that surgery needs to be tailored not only to the grade of the hemorrhoids, but also to the size, circumferential nature of the disease, and prevailing symptomatology.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND In hemorrhoidal disease,despite the existence of numerous treatment options to alleviate symptoms,surgical intervention continues to be the gold standard.The advantages and disadvantages of many methods have been shown in numerous studies However,only a few studies have compared the effectiveness of combined methods.AIM To compare the results of a coloproctology clinic that switched to the Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation(DG-HAL)+Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy(FH)technique from the FH in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.METHODS In this retrospective cohort,data from a total of 45 patients who underwent DG-HAL+FH(n=24)and FH(n=21)for grade III hemorrhoidal disease between 2020 and 2022 were analyzed.Demographic and clinical data,surgical duration,intraoperative blood loss,hospital stay,postoperative analgesic consumption,pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale(VAS),complications,time to return to normal activities,and the recurrence rate were compared in both groups.RESULTS The study included 45 patients,with 75.6%(n=34)male and 24.4%(n=11)female.The rate of intraoperative blood loss was higher in the FH group(P<0.05).The VAS scores and postoperative complication rates were similar in both groups.The need for postoperative analgesics was lower in the DG-HAL+FH group(2 vs 4 days,P<0.05),while the FH group showed a shorter time to return to normal activities(9.5 vs 6.0 days,P=0.02).The recurrence rate(16.7%vs 0%)and Clavien–Dindo Score-1 complications(20.8%vs 9.5%,P=0.29)were higher in the DG-HAL+FH group but were insignificant.CONCLUSION Our study revealed that the addition of the DG-HAL to classical hemorrhoidectomy caused less intraoperative bleeding and a lower postoperative analgesia requirement.
文摘In the setting of Hemorrhoidal Disease treatment, the option of conventional hemorrhoidectomy is highly effective, but it is still associated with postoperative pain and discomfort. For this reason, technical alternatives have been developed in order to reduce complications and to provide better postoperative recovery. To accomplish this aim, non-excisional techniques such as stapled hemorrhoidectomy and Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal ligation have been introduced into clinical practice with high expectations. The aim of this article is to revise the literature about transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization technique in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease, looking into its evolution, results and possible benefits over other modalities of surgical treatment. The literature review showed that Dopplerguided hemorrhoidal dearterialization is a safe and effective method to treat grades II to IV hemorrhoidal disease. Outcomes in patients presenting prolapse are satisfactory and the association of anopexy is an important aspect of this operation. Anal physiology disturbances are rarely observed and mainly transitory. This technique is an excellent option for every patient, especially in those with previous anal surgeries and in patients with previous alterations of fecal continence, when an additional procedure might represent a risk of definitive incontinence.
文摘While debate continues as to which is the best surgical method for the treatment of hemorrhoids, none of the currently available surgical methods approach the ideal surgical option, which is one that is effective while being safe and painless. In reality, the less painful the procedure, the more likely it is to be associated with recurrence post-op. Where hemorrhoids surgery is concerned, there isn’t a “one size fits all” option. Most of the randomized controlled trials performed to date include hemorrhoids of various grades and with a focus on only comparing surgical methods while failing to stratify the outcomes according to the grade of hemorrhoid. We believe that surgery needs to be tailored not only to the grade of the hemorrhoids, but also to the size, circumferential nature of the disease, and prevailing symptomatology.
