AIM:To investigate decisional conflict among patients diagnosed with primary angle-closure suspect(PACS)or primary angle-closure(PAC)who are considering laser peripheral iridotomy(LPI)treatment.METHODS:A total of 111 ...AIM:To investigate decisional conflict among patients diagnosed with primary angle-closure suspect(PACS)or primary angle-closure(PAC)who are considering laser peripheral iridotomy(LPI)treatment.METHODS:A total of 111 individuals diagnosed with PACS or PAC were selected through convenient sampling from March 2023 to December 2023.These participants then completed a general information questionnaire and the Decision Conflict Scale.Data analysis was performed using multiple linear regression to reveal factors influencing decisional conflict.RESULTS:The mean Decisional Conflict Score among patients with PACS or PAC was 48.58±10.01,with 99.1%of these individuals reporting experiencing decisional conflict.Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that females(P=0.002)and patients with a shorter duration of the disease(P=0.006)had higher levels of decisional conflict.Additionally,patients diagnosed during medical visits(P=0.049),those who refused LPI treatment(P=0.032),and individuals facing significant economic burdens related to medical expenses(P=0.005)exhibited higher levels of decisional conflict.Furthermore,patients who preferred to make medical decisions independently(P=0.023)and those who favored involving family members in decisionmaking(P=0.005)experienced increased levels of decisional conflict.CONCLUSION:Patients with PACS or PAC who undergo LPI treatment often encounter significant decisional conflict.Healthcare professionals should thoroughly assess a range of factors that influence this conflict,including gender,duration of disease,method of diagnosis acquisition,LPI treatment,economic burden of medical expenses,and patient preferences regarding medical decision-making.By considering these variables,tailored decision support can be developed to address individual patient needs,ultimately reducing decisional conflict and optimizing the quality of decisions made regarding treatment options.展开更多
Objective:To explore factors influencing decision regret among colorectal cancer patients undergoing intestinal ostomy.Methods:A questionnaire survey was conducted among 102 colorectal cancer patients who underwent in...Objective:To explore factors influencing decision regret among colorectal cancer patients undergoing intestinal ostomy.Methods:A questionnaire survey was conducted among 102 colorectal cancer patients who underwent intestinal ostomy surgery and visited the ostomy clinic at a tertiary hospital in Baoding from July to September 2025.The Chinese version of the Ostomy Adaptation Inventory(OAI-20),Decision Regret Scale(DRS),Decision Conflict Scale(DCS),and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal(FACT-C)were used to measure patients’adaptation to stoma,decision regret,decision conflict,and quality of life.The Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire(SDM-Q-9)assessed patient involvement in ostomy surgery decisions,while the SSUK-8 evaluated social support.Additional items explored perceptions related to decision-making,participation,and outcomes.Results:Among 134 eligible patients attending the clinic,120 participated in the questionnaire,with 102 completing all items.Stoma patients reported an average decision regret score of 60.83(SD 28.43),an average coping ability score of 54.26(SD 26.69),an average decision conflict score of 62.55(SD 25.95),and a quality of life score of 56.93(SD 27.46).In the multiple regression analysis,decision regret was associated with decision conflict,poor patient coping ability,low quality of life,and low social support.Conclusion:Decision regret is prevalent among Chinese CRC patients following ostomy surgery.Compared with similar studies in other regions,Chinese CRC patients exhibit a higher rate of regret.This may be related to lower patient involvement in decision-making,generally poorer quality of life,and heavier economic burdens.展开更多
BACKGROUND The interest in shared decision making has increased considerably over the last couple of decades.Decision aids(DAs)can help in shared decision making.Especially when there is more than one reasonable optio...BACKGROUND The interest in shared decision making has increased considerably over the last couple of decades.Decision aids(DAs)can help in shared decision making.Especially when there is more than one reasonable option and outcomes between treatments are comparable.AIM To investigate if the use of DAs decreases decisional conflict in patients when choosing treatment for knee or hip osteoarthritis(OA).METHODS In this multi-center unblinded randomized controlled trial of patients with knee or hip OA were included from four secondary and tertiary referral centers.Onehundred-thirty-one patients who consulted an orthopedic surgeon for the first time with knee or hip OA were included between December 2014 and January 2016.After the first consultation,patients were randomly assigned by a computer to the control group which was treated according to standard care,or to the intervention group which was treated with standard care and provided with a DA.After the first consultation,patients were asked to complete questionnaires about decisional conflict(DCS),satisfaction,anxiety(PASS-20),gained knowledge,stage of decision making and preferred treatment.Follow-up was carried out after 26 wk and evaluated decisional conflict,satisfaction,anxiety,health outcomes(HOOS/KOOS),quality of life(EQ5D)and chosen treatment.RESULTS After the first consultation,patients in the intervention group(mean DCS:25 out of 100,SD:13)had significantly(P value:0.00)less decisional conflict compared to patients in the control group(mean DCS:39 out of 100,SD 11).The mean satisfaction score for the given information(7.6 out of 10,SD:1.8 vs 8.6 out of 10,SD:1.1)(P value:0.00),mean satisfaction score with the physician(8.3 out of 10,SD:1.7 vs 8.9 out of 10,SD:0.9)(P value:0.01)and the mean knowledge score(3.3 out of 4,SD:0.9 vs 3.7 out of,SD:0.6)(P value:0.01)were all significantly higher in the intervention group.At 26-wk follow-up,only 75 of 131 patients(57%)were available for analysis.This sample is too small for meaningful analysis.CONCLUSION Providing patients with an additional DA may have a positive effect on decisional conflict after the first consultation.Due to loss to follow-up we are unsure if this effect remains over time.展开更多
This paper gives a few of classes of fundamental concepts that describe dynamic conflictdecision analysis and selection and applies dynamic conflict decision analysis in stock investment andbusiness.
In this,the decision problem in a large-scale system consisting of sevral subeys subeystm are considerde and the metheds for cofliect between the subsystems are explored.Based on the multiperson multiobjective conflic...In this,the decision problem in a large-scale system consisting of sevral subeys subeystm are considerde and the metheds for cofliect between the subsystems are explored.Based on the multiperson multiobjective conflict decision(MMCD) model proposed in Ref.[6],the concept,of bargaining solution for conflicts in large-scale systems is presented,and an approach to achieving th bargaining soltion is proposed.展开更多
基金Supported by Basic Scientific Research Projects of Wenzhou(No.Y20220155).
文摘AIM:To investigate decisional conflict among patients diagnosed with primary angle-closure suspect(PACS)or primary angle-closure(PAC)who are considering laser peripheral iridotomy(LPI)treatment.METHODS:A total of 111 individuals diagnosed with PACS or PAC were selected through convenient sampling from March 2023 to December 2023.These participants then completed a general information questionnaire and the Decision Conflict Scale.Data analysis was performed using multiple linear regression to reveal factors influencing decisional conflict.RESULTS:The mean Decisional Conflict Score among patients with PACS or PAC was 48.58±10.01,with 99.1%of these individuals reporting experiencing decisional conflict.Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that females(P=0.002)and patients with a shorter duration of the disease(P=0.006)had higher levels of decisional conflict.Additionally,patients diagnosed during medical visits(P=0.049),those who refused LPI treatment(P=0.032),and individuals facing significant economic burdens related to medical expenses(P=0.005)exhibited higher levels of decisional conflict.Furthermore,patients who preferred to make medical decisions independently(P=0.023)and those who favored involving family members in decisionmaking(P=0.005)experienced increased levels of decisional conflict.CONCLUSION:Patients with PACS or PAC who undergo LPI treatment often encounter significant decisional conflict.Healthcare professionals should thoroughly assess a range of factors that influence this conflict,including gender,duration of disease,method of diagnosis acquisition,LPI treatment,economic burden of medical expenses,and patient preferences regarding medical decision-making.By considering these variables,tailored decision support can be developed to address individual patient needs,ultimately reducing decisional conflict and optimizing the quality of decisions made regarding treatment options.
文摘Objective:To explore factors influencing decision regret among colorectal cancer patients undergoing intestinal ostomy.Methods:A questionnaire survey was conducted among 102 colorectal cancer patients who underwent intestinal ostomy surgery and visited the ostomy clinic at a tertiary hospital in Baoding from July to September 2025.The Chinese version of the Ostomy Adaptation Inventory(OAI-20),Decision Regret Scale(DRS),Decision Conflict Scale(DCS),and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal(FACT-C)were used to measure patients’adaptation to stoma,decision regret,decision conflict,and quality of life.The Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire(SDM-Q-9)assessed patient involvement in ostomy surgery decisions,while the SSUK-8 evaluated social support.Additional items explored perceptions related to decision-making,participation,and outcomes.Results:Among 134 eligible patients attending the clinic,120 participated in the questionnaire,with 102 completing all items.Stoma patients reported an average decision regret score of 60.83(SD 28.43),an average coping ability score of 54.26(SD 26.69),an average decision conflict score of 62.55(SD 25.95),and a quality of life score of 56.93(SD 27.46).In the multiple regression analysis,decision regret was associated with decision conflict,poor patient coping ability,low quality of life,and low social support.Conclusion:Decision regret is prevalent among Chinese CRC patients following ostomy surgery.Compared with similar studies in other regions,Chinese CRC patients exhibit a higher rate of regret.This may be related to lower patient involvement in decision-making,generally poorer quality of life,and heavier economic burdens.
文摘BACKGROUND The interest in shared decision making has increased considerably over the last couple of decades.Decision aids(DAs)can help in shared decision making.Especially when there is more than one reasonable option and outcomes between treatments are comparable.AIM To investigate if the use of DAs decreases decisional conflict in patients when choosing treatment for knee or hip osteoarthritis(OA).METHODS In this multi-center unblinded randomized controlled trial of patients with knee or hip OA were included from four secondary and tertiary referral centers.Onehundred-thirty-one patients who consulted an orthopedic surgeon for the first time with knee or hip OA were included between December 2014 and January 2016.After the first consultation,patients were randomly assigned by a computer to the control group which was treated according to standard care,or to the intervention group which was treated with standard care and provided with a DA.After the first consultation,patients were asked to complete questionnaires about decisional conflict(DCS),satisfaction,anxiety(PASS-20),gained knowledge,stage of decision making and preferred treatment.Follow-up was carried out after 26 wk and evaluated decisional conflict,satisfaction,anxiety,health outcomes(HOOS/KOOS),quality of life(EQ5D)and chosen treatment.RESULTS After the first consultation,patients in the intervention group(mean DCS:25 out of 100,SD:13)had significantly(P value:0.00)less decisional conflict compared to patients in the control group(mean DCS:39 out of 100,SD 11).The mean satisfaction score for the given information(7.6 out of 10,SD:1.8 vs 8.6 out of 10,SD:1.1)(P value:0.00),mean satisfaction score with the physician(8.3 out of 10,SD:1.7 vs 8.9 out of 10,SD:0.9)(P value:0.01)and the mean knowledge score(3.3 out of 4,SD:0.9 vs 3.7 out of,SD:0.6)(P value:0.01)were all significantly higher in the intervention group.At 26-wk follow-up,only 75 of 131 patients(57%)were available for analysis.This sample is too small for meaningful analysis.CONCLUSION Providing patients with an additional DA may have a positive effect on decisional conflict after the first consultation.Due to loss to follow-up we are unsure if this effect remains over time.
文摘This paper gives a few of classes of fundamental concepts that describe dynamic conflictdecision analysis and selection and applies dynamic conflict decision analysis in stock investment andbusiness.
文摘In this,the decision problem in a large-scale system consisting of sevral subeys subeystm are considerde and the metheds for cofliect between the subsystems are explored.Based on the multiperson multiobjective conflict decision(MMCD) model proposed in Ref.[6],the concept,of bargaining solution for conflicts in large-scale systems is presented,and an approach to achieving th bargaining soltion is proposed.
