Background and Objective The morbidity of lower extremity atherosclerotic disease(LEAD)has increased year by year.Chronic stress attenuates the ability of angiogenesis and deteriorates the prognosis of LEAD.Chronic st...Background and Objective The morbidity of lower extremity atherosclerotic disease(LEAD)has increased year by year.Chronic stress attenuates the ability of angiogenesis and deteriorates the prognosis of LEAD.Chronic stress increases plasma and tissue DPP-4 activities in mice.DPP-4 plays an important role in angiogenesis.Therefore,we hypothesized that chronic stress exerted its cardiovascular effects by increasing DPP-4 activation.We investigated the role of DPP-4/GLP-1 axis in ischemiainduced neovascularization in mice under restraint stress.展开更多
目的对比胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂和二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂分别联合二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)的疗效及对其血清抗氧因子、炎症因子的影响。方法将2020年5月至2022年5月中国中医科学院广安门医院南区收治的120例T2DM患...目的对比胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂和二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂分别联合二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)的疗效及对其血清抗氧因子、炎症因子的影响。方法将2020年5月至2022年5月中国中医科学院广安门医院南区收治的120例T2DM患者纳入本次前瞻性研究,采用随机数字表法分成GLP-1联合组(n=40)、DPP-4联合组(n=40)和对照组(n=40)。GLP-1联合组患者治疗方案为二甲双胍治疗+利拉鲁肽,DPP-4联合组患者治疗方案为二甲双胍+沙格列汀,对照组患者仅口服二甲双胍治疗。治疗为期6个月。比较3组患者治疗前后的血糖相关指标[空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)]及胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)、氧化应激指标[超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和6-酮-前列环素F1α(6-Keto-PGF1α)]和炎症因子[肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)]表达情况。结果GLP-1联合组治疗后的空腹血糖、2 hPPG、HbA1c和HOMA-IR分别为(5.05±0.69)mmol/L、(7.42±0.98)mmol/L、(6.11±0.70)%和(3.20±0.45),DPP-4联合组分别为(5.58±0.61)mmol/L、(8.09±1.04)mmol/L、(6.65±0.76)%和(3.78±0.50),对照组分别为(6.50±0.75)mmol/L、(10.14±1.22)mmol/L、(7.80±0.81)%和(4.61±0.59),GLP-1联合组与DPP-4联合组治疗后的上述血糖相关指标及HOMA-IR均较对照组显著下降,且GLP-1联合组显著低于DPP-4联合组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。GLP-1联合组治疗后的SOD和6-Keto-PGF1α分别为(95.09±9.97)U/mL、(76.19±6.80)ng/L,DPP-4联合组分别为(85.17±10.18)U/mL、(67.32±6.39)ng/L,对照组分别为(76.89±9.06)U/mL、(60.46±6.02)ng/L,GLP-1联合组与DPP-4联合组治疗后的血清SOD、6-Keto-PGF1α均较对照组显著上升,且GLP-1联合组血清SOD、6-Keto-PGF1α均较DPP-4联合组显著上升,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。GLP-1联合组TNF-α、IL-6和hs-CRP分别为(7.05±1.16)ng/L、(5.01±1.35)pg/mL、(4.04±0.51)mg/L,DPP-4联合组为(7.93±1.29)ng/L、(5.97±1.40)pg/mL、(4.99±0.59)mg/L,对照组为(10.34±1.58)ng/L、(7.58±1.49)pg/mL、(5.94±0.64)mg/L,GLP-1联合组与DPP-4联合组治疗后的上述血清炎症因子均较对照组显著下降,且GLP-1联合组显著低于DPP-4联合组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论GLP-1受体激动剂联合二甲双胍治疗T2DM的降糖效果优于DPP-4受体抑制剂联合二甲双胍,在改善胰岛素抵抗和氧化应激,降低炎症反应方面同样优于DPP-4受体抑制剂联合二甲双胍治疗。展开更多
文摘Background and Objective The morbidity of lower extremity atherosclerotic disease(LEAD)has increased year by year.Chronic stress attenuates the ability of angiogenesis and deteriorates the prognosis of LEAD.Chronic stress increases plasma and tissue DPP-4 activities in mice.DPP-4 plays an important role in angiogenesis.Therefore,we hypothesized that chronic stress exerted its cardiovascular effects by increasing DPP-4 activation.We investigated the role of DPP-4/GLP-1 axis in ischemiainduced neovascularization in mice under restraint stress.
文摘目的对比胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂和二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂分别联合二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)的疗效及对其血清抗氧因子、炎症因子的影响。方法将2020年5月至2022年5月中国中医科学院广安门医院南区收治的120例T2DM患者纳入本次前瞻性研究,采用随机数字表法分成GLP-1联合组(n=40)、DPP-4联合组(n=40)和对照组(n=40)。GLP-1联合组患者治疗方案为二甲双胍治疗+利拉鲁肽,DPP-4联合组患者治疗方案为二甲双胍+沙格列汀,对照组患者仅口服二甲双胍治疗。治疗为期6个月。比较3组患者治疗前后的血糖相关指标[空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)]及胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)、氧化应激指标[超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和6-酮-前列环素F1α(6-Keto-PGF1α)]和炎症因子[肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)]表达情况。结果GLP-1联合组治疗后的空腹血糖、2 hPPG、HbA1c和HOMA-IR分别为(5.05±0.69)mmol/L、(7.42±0.98)mmol/L、(6.11±0.70)%和(3.20±0.45),DPP-4联合组分别为(5.58±0.61)mmol/L、(8.09±1.04)mmol/L、(6.65±0.76)%和(3.78±0.50),对照组分别为(6.50±0.75)mmol/L、(10.14±1.22)mmol/L、(7.80±0.81)%和(4.61±0.59),GLP-1联合组与DPP-4联合组治疗后的上述血糖相关指标及HOMA-IR均较对照组显著下降,且GLP-1联合组显著低于DPP-4联合组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。GLP-1联合组治疗后的SOD和6-Keto-PGF1α分别为(95.09±9.97)U/mL、(76.19±6.80)ng/L,DPP-4联合组分别为(85.17±10.18)U/mL、(67.32±6.39)ng/L,对照组分别为(76.89±9.06)U/mL、(60.46±6.02)ng/L,GLP-1联合组与DPP-4联合组治疗后的血清SOD、6-Keto-PGF1α均较对照组显著上升,且GLP-1联合组血清SOD、6-Keto-PGF1α均较DPP-4联合组显著上升,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。GLP-1联合组TNF-α、IL-6和hs-CRP分别为(7.05±1.16)ng/L、(5.01±1.35)pg/mL、(4.04±0.51)mg/L,DPP-4联合组为(7.93±1.29)ng/L、(5.97±1.40)pg/mL、(4.99±0.59)mg/L,对照组为(10.34±1.58)ng/L、(7.58±1.49)pg/mL、(5.94±0.64)mg/L,GLP-1联合组与DPP-4联合组治疗后的上述血清炎症因子均较对照组显著下降,且GLP-1联合组显著低于DPP-4联合组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论GLP-1受体激动剂联合二甲双胍治疗T2DM的降糖效果优于DPP-4受体抑制剂联合二甲双胍,在改善胰岛素抵抗和氧化应激,降低炎症反应方面同样优于DPP-4受体抑制剂联合二甲双胍治疗。
