期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Virtue Education: Josef Pieper's Vita Contemplativa as Pedagogical Ground
1
作者 Annette M. Holba 《Journal of Philosophy Study》 2014年第8期537-545,共9页
Virtue education in the United States has lost its clout while the corporatization of higher education may be at its peak. The focus of traditional education has shifted from ideas, wisdom, and the love of learning to... Virtue education in the United States has lost its clout while the corporatization of higher education may be at its peak. The focus of traditional education has shifted from ideas, wisdom, and the love of learning to having a corporate mindset on progress and skills-based knowledge. In many cases, the focus of attention is on remaining viable/sustainable in times of economic decline rather than learning itself, so the resources supporting institutions of higher education are directed into marketing and public relations practices instead of the infrastructure for thinking and learning. This essay draws together three coordinates to make a case for a return to virtue education in the United States. First, the current condition of higher education is shown to have dubiously strayed from a virtue model. Second, the re-emergence of philosophy as a preferred major and its growth in the academy suggest that people realize that something has to change in higher education as they revert back to a broad liberal arts emphasis. Third, a discussion of virtue education from the lens of Josef Pieper's virtue philosophy, grounded in the lSta Contemplativa, offers renewed possibility to reengaged higher education for a sustainable future. Together, I suggest that the tradition of higher education in the United States is no longer viable and return to a virtue education model is an alternative that might make higher education sustainable. 展开更多
关键词 VIRTUE EDUCATION CONTEMPLATION Vita contemplativa aesthetic education
在线阅读 下载PDF
政治哲学:“有历史的”抑或“非历史的”?
2
作者 陈德中 《新文科教育研究》 2024年第3期62-76,142,共16页
接续近代历史主义传统,当代政治哲学出现了“有历史的”和“非历史的”两种进路的分野。以政治理论中的剑桥学派和施特劳斯学派为例,分歧集中于以下三个问题。第一,存在终极永恒的真理,还是说历史之外无真理?第二,是向上追求智慧和至善... 接续近代历史主义传统,当代政治哲学出现了“有历史的”和“非历史的”两种进路的分野。以政治理论中的剑桥学派和施特劳斯学派为例,分歧集中于以下三个问题。第一,存在终极永恒的真理,还是说历史之外无真理?第二,是向上追求智慧和至善,还是向下照顾平庸和人的欲望?第三,是将政治哲学锚定于“积极生活”,还是坚持认为政治哲学乃是一种“消极生活”?分歧最终表现为:是在有朽的世俗世界谈论世俗化的政治,还是从全能者视角出发追求超越性的恒久真理与至善?凡此种种,最终造就了两条进路的理论差异,同时也必将涉及两者对于人的欲望动机、理性筹划等观念,以及灵性和信仰在人类生活中的地位和作用等问题的判摄差异。 展开更多
关键词 有/非历史的(政治哲学) 永恒真理 历史语境 行动/沉思(生活) 高阶/低阶(心智)
原文传递
阿伦特“沉思生活”的政治理念及逻辑 被引量:1
3
作者 曾祥耿 《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期47-51,126,共6页
汉娜·阿伦特认为"沉思生活"是以人自身为目的的活动方式,其政治内涵在于:一方面,用思维、意志和判断的内在心理活动的逻辑演进,揭示出"沉思生活"的政治自由意蕴;另一方面,依据"沉思生活"自由性、隐... 汉娜·阿伦特认为"沉思生活"是以人自身为目的的活动方式,其政治内涵在于:一方面,用思维、意志和判断的内在心理活动的逻辑演进,揭示出"沉思生活"的政治自由意蕴;另一方面,依据"沉思生活"自由性、隐匿性和主观性等外显性质,从时空角度,借用理解的判断方式,寻求人自身、人与自身赖以存在的世界、人与人之间的意义,进而彰显"沉思生活"的政治自由理念。 展开更多
关键词 阿伦特 沉思生活 政治理念 逻辑 政治自由
在线阅读 下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部