[Objectives]To systematically evaluate the impact of interventions based on the Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation(CSM)on the psychosocial adaptation of young and middle-aged patients with acute coronary syndrome(A...[Objectives]To systematically evaluate the impact of interventions based on the Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation(CSM)on the psychosocial adaptation of young and middle-aged patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS),providing evidence-based support for clinical practice.[Methods]A systematic review was conducted using a literature search method,systematically searching through Chinese and English databases such as PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,CINAHL,China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),Wanfang Database,and VIP Database,from the database inception to December 31,2024.The search focused on studies related to the impact of the CSM on the psychosocial adaptation of young and middle-aged ACS patients.Two researchers independently performed literature screening,quality assessment,and data extraction.[Results]A total of 18 studies were included,comprising 12 randomized controlled trials,4 quasi-experimental studies,and 2 cohort studies,involving 2847 young and middle-aged ACS patients.Interventions based on the CSM significantly improved patients disease perception,emotional regulation,self-efficacy,and quality of life.Patients in the intervention group showed significant reductions in anxiety and depression levels,cardiac-related fear,and improvements in disease perception accuracy,treatment adherence,and social function recovery.[Conclusions]Interventions based on the CSM can effectively promote the psychosocial adaptation of young and middle-aged ACS patients,improve their disease perception and emotional state,and enhance their quality of life.It is recommended that this model be widely applied in the clinical care of young and middle-aged ACS patients.展开更多
The reader might rightly ask for a word on the origin of this special issue of Cultures of Science. The topic of ‘common sense’(CS) arose from an international workshop organized in September 2017 in Beijing by the ...The reader might rightly ask for a word on the origin of this special issue of Cultures of Science. The topic of ‘common sense’(CS) arose from an international workshop organized in September 2017 in Beijing by the then newly founded NAIS(National Academy of Innovation Strategy). As part of the developments, this very journal, Cultures of Science, was about to be launched, and the aim of the workshop was to explore future topics and issues that the journal seeks to address.展开更多
As background knowledge of geographic information retrieval(GIR),the gazetteers have their limitations.In this paper we propose to develop and implement a com-mon sense geographic knowledge base(CSGKB)instead of the g...As background knowledge of geographic information retrieval(GIR),the gazetteers have their limitations.In this paper we propose to develop and implement a com-mon sense geographic knowledge base(CSGKB)instead of the gazetteers.We define that CSGKB is concerned with the representation of geographic knowledge in human brain and the simulation of geographic reasoning in daily life.Traditional geographic information system(GIS)is based on the model of map with its data based on geographic coordinates and its computation based on geometry.However,CSGKB,which is made up of geographic features and relationships and is based on qualitative spatio-temporal reasoning,can be viewed as the direct model of geographic world.This paper also discusses the characters of CSGKB and pre-sents its structure which is composed of knowledge base,inference engine,geo-graphic ontology and learner.The applications using CSGKB include geographic information retrieval(GIR),natural language processing(NLP),named entity rec-ognition(NER),Semantic Web,etc.At present,our work focuses on the design of geographic ontology and the implementation of the CSGKB knowledge base.In this paper we describe the CSGKB ontology structure,top ontology,geographic loca-tion ontology,spatial relationship ontology,and domain ontologies.Finally,we in-troduce the current state of implementation of CSGKB and give an outlook on our future researches.展开更多
1.The general understanding of'common sense'in Chinese The English expression'common sense'is usually translated as'常识'(Changshi) in Chinese.However,there are two English translations of Chan...1.The general understanding of'common sense'in Chinese The English expression'common sense'is usually translated as'常识'(Changshi) in Chinese.However,there are two English translations of Changshi:·Common sense:Changshi refers more to facts,while'common sense'refers to the principles inherent in the facts (Chen and Zhou,2007).·General (elementary) knowledge:Standards and rules in a society that have long been observed and believed and are still valid(Chen,2007).展开更多
The lasting evolution of computing environment, software engineering and interaction methods leads to cloud computing. Cloud computing changes the configuration mode of resources on the Internet and all kinds of resou...The lasting evolution of computing environment, software engineering and interaction methods leads to cloud computing. Cloud computing changes the configuration mode of resources on the Internet and all kinds of resources are virtualized and provided as services. Mass participation and online interaction with social annotations become usual in human daily life. People who own similar interests on the Internet may cluster naturally into scalable and boundless communities and collective intelligence will emerge. Human is taken as an intelligent computing factor, and uncertainty becomes a basic property in cloud computing. Virtualization, soft computing and granular computing will become essential features of cloud computing. Compared with the engineering technological problems of IaaS (Infrastructure as a service), PaaS (Platform as a Service) and SaaS (Software as a Service), collective intelligence and uncertain knowledge representation will be more important frontiers in cloud computing for researchers within the community of intelligence science.展开更多
This article revisits the concept of epistemological rupture by questioning the stark division between scientific and non-scientific thought. Drawing on the theory of representation, it contends that both forms of kno...This article revisits the concept of epistemological rupture by questioning the stark division between scientific and non-scientific thought. Drawing on the theory of representation, it contends that both forms of knowledge are socially constructed, moulded by communication, norms and group dynamics. Rather than labelling non-scientific thought as flawed or regressive, the discussion shows how decontextualization and recontextualization processes apply equally to everyday ‘natural' knowledge and formal science,exposing the social and historical contingencies shaping concepts. Consequently, rupture appears less a sudden break than a gradual threshold reached through dialectical transformations in cognition and society. Rather than conferring total superiority on science, ruptures highlight how certain discourses gain legitimacy while others become ‘non-knowledge'. The article concludes that science's dominance reflects broader power relationships and evolving modes of production and validation. By situating epistemological rupture within these processes, it illuminates how different knowledge forms coexist, evolve and sometimes conflict in stratified social fields—ultimately challenging a simplistic binary between scientific progress and supposedly primitive or natural thought. This viewpoint opens new possibilities for examining the shifting boundaries between rational explanations and the shared beliefs shaping collective reality and daily life.展开更多
This paper considers the notions of common sense and interobjectivity to articulate an understanding of how different cultural realities give rise to different construals of scientific phenomena across distinct cultur...This paper considers the notions of common sense and interobjectivity to articulate an understanding of how different cultural realities give rise to different construals of scientific phenomena across distinct cultures. Our main focus in this paper is on the social sciences. We propose a quadrant of different cultural–scientific stances from which the study of social phenomena is possible, based on the emic–etic dimension pertaining to the study of culture from contrasting perspectives. Although the emic–etic distinction is normal y applied in fields within the science of culture, it is proposed here that the distinction is in some ways germane to scientific practice in general, making it amenable for use in a culture of science(CoS) programme. The four perspectives that emerge from the quadrant are illustrated using exemplars. Different aspects of CoS—that is, scientific practice, scientific conventions and representations of science—are then discussed in further detail, including in two tables illustrating points of convergence and divergence between the East and West when it comes to different aspects of CoS.展开更多
In common sense reasoning two typical types of defaults are encoun- tered. One is of the form 'All birds can fly except b1, b2,…, and bm(m>1)' , and the other 'All birds can fly, but there exist except...In common sense reasoning two typical types of defaults are encoun- tered. One is of the form 'All birds can fly except b1, b2,…, and bm(m>1)' , and the other 'All birds can fly, but there exist exceptiona' . The first type of defaults is readily formalized but the other, as some researchers have noticed, is difficult to deal witb. This paper establisbes a geaeral scheme for formalising defaults of the two typea, the key to which is the introduction of a two-argument predicate ab(I,S) to represent exceptional objects.展开更多
基金Supported by Philosophy and Social Sciences Research Project of Hubei Provincial Department of Education(22Q149,19Y090).
文摘[Objectives]To systematically evaluate the impact of interventions based on the Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation(CSM)on the psychosocial adaptation of young and middle-aged patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS),providing evidence-based support for clinical practice.[Methods]A systematic review was conducted using a literature search method,systematically searching through Chinese and English databases such as PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,CINAHL,China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),Wanfang Database,and VIP Database,from the database inception to December 31,2024.The search focused on studies related to the impact of the CSM on the psychosocial adaptation of young and middle-aged ACS patients.Two researchers independently performed literature screening,quality assessment,and data extraction.[Results]A total of 18 studies were included,comprising 12 randomized controlled trials,4 quasi-experimental studies,and 2 cohort studies,involving 2847 young and middle-aged ACS patients.Interventions based on the CSM significantly improved patients disease perception,emotional regulation,self-efficacy,and quality of life.Patients in the intervention group showed significant reductions in anxiety and depression levels,cardiac-related fear,and improvements in disease perception accuracy,treatment adherence,and social function recovery.[Conclusions]Interventions based on the CSM can effectively promote the psychosocial adaptation of young and middle-aged ACS patients,improve their disease perception and emotional state,and enhance their quality of life.It is recommended that this model be widely applied in the clinical care of young and middle-aged ACS patients.
文摘The reader might rightly ask for a word on the origin of this special issue of Cultures of Science. The topic of ‘common sense’(CS) arose from an international workshop organized in September 2017 in Beijing by the then newly founded NAIS(National Academy of Innovation Strategy). As part of the developments, this very journal, Cultures of Science, was about to be launched, and the aim of the workshop was to explore future topics and issues that the journal seeks to address.
基金the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.40701134)the National Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China(Grant No.2007AA12Z216)
文摘As background knowledge of geographic information retrieval(GIR),the gazetteers have their limitations.In this paper we propose to develop and implement a com-mon sense geographic knowledge base(CSGKB)instead of the gazetteers.We define that CSGKB is concerned with the representation of geographic knowledge in human brain and the simulation of geographic reasoning in daily life.Traditional geographic information system(GIS)is based on the model of map with its data based on geographic coordinates and its computation based on geometry.However,CSGKB,which is made up of geographic features and relationships and is based on qualitative spatio-temporal reasoning,can be viewed as the direct model of geographic world.This paper also discusses the characters of CSGKB and pre-sents its structure which is composed of knowledge base,inference engine,geo-graphic ontology and learner.The applications using CSGKB include geographic information retrieval(GIR),natural language processing(NLP),named entity rec-ognition(NER),Semantic Web,etc.At present,our work focuses on the design of geographic ontology and the implementation of the CSGKB knowledge base.In this paper we describe the CSGKB ontology structure,top ontology,geographic loca-tion ontology,spatial relationship ontology,and domain ontologies.Finally,we in-troduce the current state of implementation of CSGKB and give an outlook on our future researches.
文摘1.The general understanding of'common sense'in Chinese The English expression'common sense'is usually translated as'常识'(Changshi) in Chinese.However,there are two English translations of Changshi:·Common sense:Changshi refers more to facts,while'common sense'refers to the principles inherent in the facts (Chen and Zhou,2007).·General (elementary) knowledge:Standards and rules in a society that have long been observed and believed and are still valid(Chen,2007).
基金supported by National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) under Grant No.2007CB310804China Post-doctoral Science Foundation under Grants No.20090460107, 201003794
文摘The lasting evolution of computing environment, software engineering and interaction methods leads to cloud computing. Cloud computing changes the configuration mode of resources on the Internet and all kinds of resources are virtualized and provided as services. Mass participation and online interaction with social annotations become usual in human daily life. People who own similar interests on the Internet may cluster naturally into scalable and boundless communities and collective intelligence will emerge. Human is taken as an intelligent computing factor, and uncertainty becomes a basic property in cloud computing. Virtualization, soft computing and granular computing will become essential features of cloud computing. Compared with the engineering technological problems of IaaS (Infrastructure as a service), PaaS (Platform as a Service) and SaaS (Software as a Service), collective intelligence and uncertain knowledge representation will be more important frontiers in cloud computing for researchers within the community of intelligence science.
文摘This article revisits the concept of epistemological rupture by questioning the stark division between scientific and non-scientific thought. Drawing on the theory of representation, it contends that both forms of knowledge are socially constructed, moulded by communication, norms and group dynamics. Rather than labelling non-scientific thought as flawed or regressive, the discussion shows how decontextualization and recontextualization processes apply equally to everyday ‘natural' knowledge and formal science,exposing the social and historical contingencies shaping concepts. Consequently, rupture appears less a sudden break than a gradual threshold reached through dialectical transformations in cognition and society. Rather than conferring total superiority on science, ruptures highlight how certain discourses gain legitimacy while others become ‘non-knowledge'. The article concludes that science's dominance reflects broader power relationships and evolving modes of production and validation. By situating epistemological rupture within these processes, it illuminates how different knowledge forms coexist, evolve and sometimes conflict in stratified social fields—ultimately challenging a simplistic binary between scientific progress and supposedly primitive or natural thought. This viewpoint opens new possibilities for examining the shifting boundaries between rational explanations and the shared beliefs shaping collective reality and daily life.
文摘This paper considers the notions of common sense and interobjectivity to articulate an understanding of how different cultural realities give rise to different construals of scientific phenomena across distinct cultures. Our main focus in this paper is on the social sciences. We propose a quadrant of different cultural–scientific stances from which the study of social phenomena is possible, based on the emic–etic dimension pertaining to the study of culture from contrasting perspectives. Although the emic–etic distinction is normal y applied in fields within the science of culture, it is proposed here that the distinction is in some ways germane to scientific practice in general, making it amenable for use in a culture of science(CoS) programme. The four perspectives that emerge from the quadrant are illustrated using exemplars. Different aspects of CoS—that is, scientific practice, scientific conventions and representations of science—are then discussed in further detail, including in two tables illustrating points of convergence and divergence between the East and West when it comes to different aspects of CoS.
文摘In common sense reasoning two typical types of defaults are encoun- tered. One is of the form 'All birds can fly except b1, b2,…, and bm(m>1)' , and the other 'All birds can fly, but there exist exceptiona' . The first type of defaults is readily formalized but the other, as some researchers have noticed, is difficult to deal witb. This paper establisbes a geaeral scheme for formalising defaults of the two typea, the key to which is the introduction of a two-argument predicate ab(I,S) to represent exceptional objects.
