BACKGROUND Certain subgroups are at an increased risk of false fecal immunochemical test(FIT)results;however,related studies are limited,and the available evidence is conflicting.AIM To evaluate factors associated wit...BACKGROUND Certain subgroups are at an increased risk of false fecal immunochemical test(FIT)results;however,related studies are limited,and the available evidence is conflicting.AIM To evaluate factors associated with false-positive and false-negative FIT results.METHODS This retrospective study was based on the database of the Tianjin Colorectal Cancer Screening Program from 2012 to 2020.A total of 4129947 residents aged 40-74 years completed at least one FIT.Of these,24890 asymptomatic participants who underwent colonoscopy examinations and completed lifestyle questionnaires were included in the analysis.Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the factors associated with false FIT results.RESULTS Among the overall screening population,88687(2.15%)participants tested positive for FIT.The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of FIT for advanced neoplasms were 58.2%,44.8%,9.7%,and 91.3%,respectively.Older age,female sex,smoking,alcohol consumption,higher body mass index,and hemorrhoids were significantly associated with increased odds of false-positive and lower odds of falsenegative FIT results.Moreover,features of high-grade dysplasia or villous for advanced adenoma and the presence of cancer were also associated with lower odds of false-negative results,while irregular exercise and diverticulum were associated with higher odds of false-positive results.CONCLUSION FIT results may be inaccurate in certain subgroups.Our results provide important evidence for further individualization of screening strategies.展开更多
Colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide,under-scoring the importance of early and effective colorectal cancer screening to im-prove survival rates.Traditional colorectal cancer screeni...Colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide,under-scoring the importance of early and effective colorectal cancer screening to im-prove survival rates.Traditional colorectal cancer screening methods include non-invasive tests,such as the fecal immunochemical test(FIT),as well as diagnostic procedures like colonoscopy.Colonoscopy remains the gold standard for detec-ting and treating precancerous polyps and early-stage cancer,regardless of whe-ther it is used as the first screening test or the second test following a positive FIT.However,its effectiveness can be affected by factors such as operator skill,patient variability,and limited lesion visibility,resulting in a significant rate of missed lesion rates and highlighting the need for more efficient and accurate screening techniques.This review is aimed to assess the current challenges of traditional screening methods with the impact of artificial intelligence(AI)in the diagnostic flow.The literature on AI-powered tools for colorectal cancer screening,including novel applications,emerging programs,and recent guidelines,has been reviewed to highlight both the advantages and limitations of implementing this technology in healthcare.Recent advances in AI have introduced soft AI colonoscopy,with the purpose of improving lesion recognition(computer-aided detection)and/or improving optical diagnosis(computer-aided diagnosis).AI-powered colono-scopy systems employ deep learning algorithms to analyze real-time endoscopic images,enhancing detection rates for adenomas,serrated lesions and cancer by reducing human error.AI-assisted colonoscopy enhances adenoma detection,enabling earlier intervention and improved patient outcomes.The benefits are particularly pronounced for less-experienced practitioners,as the detection rates for AI-assisted colonoscopy are similar to experts.AI integration also helps in the teaching process,in developing standardized procedures,and improving screening procedure accuracy and efficiency across different healthcare providers.However,there are challenges and limitations,such as the cost of AI implementation,data privacy concerns,and the need for extensive clinical validation.As AI technology continues to evolve,its transformation of the colorectal cancer screening system could revolutionize the field,making early detection more accessible and reducing mortality,on the condition that the above issues are addressed before widespread use.展开更多
AIM:To investigate barriers to colorectal cancer(CRC) screening in a community population.METHODS:We conducted a community-based case-control study in an urban Chinese population by questionnaire.Cases were selected f...AIM:To investigate barriers to colorectal cancer(CRC) screening in a community population.METHODS:We conducted a community-based case-control study in an urban Chinese population by questionnaire.Cases were selected from those completing both a fecal occult blood test(FOBT) case and colonoscopy in a CRC screening program in 2004.Control groups were matched by gender, age group and community.Control 1 included those having a positive FOBT but refusing a colonoscopy.Control 2 included those who refused both an FOBT and colonoscopy.RESULTS:The impact of occupation on willingness to attend a colorectal screening program differed by gender.P for heterogeneity was 0.009 for case vs control group 1, 0.01 for case versus control group 2, and 0.80 for control group 1 vs 2.Poor awareness of CRC and its screening program, characteristics of screening tests, and lack of time affected the screening rate.Financial support, fear of pain and bowel preparation were barriers to a colonoscopy as a screening test.Eighty-two percent of control group 1 and 87.1% of control group 2 were willing attend if the colonoscopy was free, but only 56.3% and 53.1%, respectively, if it was self-paid.Multivariate odds ratios for case vs control group 1 were 0.10 among those unwilling to attend a free colonoscopy and 0.50 among those unwilling to attend a self-paid colonoscopy.CONCLUSION:Raising the public awareness of CRC and its screening, integrating CRC screening into the health care system, and using a painless colonoscopy would increase its screening rate.展开更多
Computed tomography colonography(CTC) in colorectal cancer(CRC) screening has two roles:one present and the other potential.The present role is,without any further discussion,the integration into established screening...Computed tomography colonography(CTC) in colorectal cancer(CRC) screening has two roles:one present and the other potential.The present role is,without any further discussion,the integration into established screening programs as a replacement for barium enema in the case of incomplete colonoscopy.The potential role is the use of CTC as a first-line screening method together with Fecal Occult Blood Test,sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy.However,despite the fact that CTC has been officially endorsed for CRC screening of average-risk individuals by different scientif ic societies including the American Cancer Society,the American College of Radiology,and the US Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer,other entities,such as the US Preventive Services Task Force,have considered the evidence insuff icient to justify its use as a mass screening method.Medicare has also recently denied reimbursement for CTC as a screening test.Nevertheless,multiple advantages exist for using CTC as a CRC screening test:high accuracy,full evaluation of the colon in virtually all patients,non-invasiveness,safety,patient comfort,detection of extracolonic findings and cost-effectiveness.The main potential drawback of a CTC screening is the exposure to ionizing radiation.However,this is not a major issue,since low-dose protocols are now routinely implemented,delivering a dose comparable or slightly superior to the annual radiation exposure of any individual.Indirect evidence exists that such a radiation exposure does not induce additional cancers.展开更多
AIM:To present a critical discussion of the efficacy of the faecal pyruvate kinase isoenzyme type M2(faecal M2-PK) test for colorectal cancer(CRC) screening based on the currently available studies.METHODS:A literatur...AIM:To present a critical discussion of the efficacy of the faecal pyruvate kinase isoenzyme type M2(faecal M2-PK) test for colorectal cancer(CRC) screening based on the currently available studies.METHODS:A literature search in PubMed and Embase was conducted using the following search terms:fecal Tumor M2-PK,faecal Tumour M2-PK,fecal M2-PK,faecal M2-PK,fecal pyruvate kinase,faecal pyruvate kinase,pyruvate kinase stool and M2-PK stool.RESULTS:Stool samples from 704 patients with CRC and from 11 412 healthy subjects have been investigated for faecal M2-PK concentrations in seventeen independent studies.The mean faecal M2-PK sensitivity was 80.3%;the specificity was 95.2%.Four studies compared faecal M2-PK head-to-head with guaiacbased faecal occult blood test(gFOBT).Faecal M2PK demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.1%,whereas the gFOBT detected only 36.9% of the CRCs.Eight independent studies investigated the sensitivity of faecal M2-PK for adenoma(n = 554),with the following sensitivities:adenoma < 1 cm in diameter:25%;adenoma > 1 cm:44%;adenoma of unspecified diameter:51%.In a direct comparison with gFOBT of adenoma > 1 cm in diameter,47% tested positive with the faecal M2-PK test,whereas the gFOBT detected only 27%.CONCLUSION:We recommend faecal M2-PK as a routine test for CRC screening.Faecal M2-PK closes a gap in clinical practice because it detects bleeding and nonbleeding tumors and adenoma with high sensitivity and specificity.展开更多
AIM To investigate the possible long-term psychological harm of participating in colorectal cancer(CRC)screening in Norway.METHODS In a prospective, randomized trial, 14294 participants(aged 50-74 years) were invited ...AIM To investigate the possible long-term psychological harm of participating in colorectal cancer(CRC)screening in Norway.METHODS In a prospective, randomized trial, 14294 participants(aged 50-74 years) were invited to either flexible sigmoidoscopy(FS) screening, or a faecal immunochemical test(FIT)(1:1). In total, 4422 screening participants(32%) completed the questionnaire, which consisted of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the SF-12, a generic health-related quality of life(HRQOL) measurement, when invited to screening and one year after the invitation. A control group of 7650 individuals was invited to complete the questionnaire only, at baseline and one year after, and 1911(25%) completed the questionnaires.RESULTS Receiving a positive or negative screening result and participating in the two different screening modalities did not cause clinically relevant mean changes in anxiety, depression or HRQOL after one year. FS screening, but not FIT, was associated with an increased probability of being an anxiety case(score ≥ 8) at the one-year follow-up(5.6% of FS participants transitioned from being not anxious to anxious, while 3.0% experienced the reverse). This increase was moderately significantly different from the changes in the control group(in which the corresponding numbers were 4.8% and 4.5%, respectively), P = 0.06. CONCLUSION Most individuals do not experience psychological effects of CRC screening participation after one year, while FS participation is associated with increased anxiety for a smaller group.展开更多
Colorectal cancer(CRC) is the third most common cancer in males and second in females, and globally the fourth cause for cancer death worldwide. Oncological screening of CRC has a major role in the management of the d...Colorectal cancer(CRC) is the third most common cancer in males and second in females, and globally the fourth cause for cancer death worldwide. Oncological screening of CRC has a major role in the management of the disease and it is mostly performed by colonoscopy. Anyway, effectiveness of endoscopic screening for CRC strictly depends on adequate detection and removal of potentially precancerous lesions, and accuracy of colonoscopy in detection of adenomas is still suboptimal. For this reason, several technological advances have been implemented in order to improve the diagnostic sensitivity of colonoscopy in adenoma detection. Among these:(1) Visual technologies such as chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging;(2) optical innovation as high definition endoscopy, full-spectrum endoscopy or Third Eye Retroscope; and(3) mechanical advances as Cap assisted colonoscopy, Endocuff, Endoring and G-Eye endoscope. All these technologies advances have been tested over time by clinical studies with mixed results. Which of them is more likely to be successful in the next future?展开更多
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer(CRC)is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States.Still,1 in 3 adults aged 50 years to 75 years have not been screened for CRC....BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer(CRC)is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States.Still,1 in 3 adults aged 50 years to 75 years have not been screened for CRC.Early detection and management of precancerous or malignant lesions has been shown to improve overall mortality.AIM To determine the most significant facilitators and barriers to CRC screening in an outpatient clinic in rural North Carolina.The results of this study can then be used for quality improvement to increase the rate of patients ages 50 to 75 who are up to date on CRC screening.METHODS This retrospective study examined 2428 patients aged 50 years to 75 years in an outpatient clinic.Patients were up to date on CRC screening if they had fecal occult blood test or fecal immunochemical test in the past one year,Cologuard in the past three years,flexible sigmoidoscopy/virtual colonoscopy in the past five years,or colonoscopy in the past ten years.Data on patient socioeconomic status,comorbid conditions,and other determinants of health compliance were included as covariates.RESULTS Age[odds ratio(OR)=1.058;P=0.017],no-show rate percent(OR=0.962;P<0.05),patient history of obstructive sleep apnea(OR=1.875;P=0.025),compliance with flu vaccinations(OR=1.673;P<0.05),compliance with screening mammograms(OR=2.130;P<0.05),and compliance with screening pap smears(OR=2.708;P<0.05)were important factors in determining whether a patient will receive CRC screening.Race,gender,insurance or employment status,use of blood thinners,family history of CRC,or other comorbid conditions including diabetes,hypertension,congestive heart failure,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,and end-stage renal disease were not found to have a statistically significant effect on patient adherence to CRC screening.CONCLUSION Patient age,history of sleep apnea,and compliance with other health maintenance tests were significant facilitators to CRC screening,while no-show rate percent was a significant barrier in our patient population.This study will be of benefit to physicians in addressing and improving the CRC screening rates in our community.展开更多
AIM:To study the epidemiologic indicators of uptake and characteristic colonoscopic findings in the Croatian National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.METHODS:Colorectal cancer(CRC) was the second leading cause of ...AIM:To study the epidemiologic indicators of uptake and characteristic colonoscopic findings in the Croatian National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.METHODS:Colorectal cancer(CRC) was the second leading cause of cancer mortality in men(n = 1063,49.77/100 000),as well as women(n = 803,34.89/100 000) in Croatia in 2009.The Croatian National CRC Screening Program was established by the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare,and its implementation started in September,2007.The coordinators were recruited in each county institute of public health with an obligation to provide fecal occult blood testing(FOBT) to the participants,followed by colonoscopy in all positive cases.The FOBT was performed by hypersensitive guaiac-based Hemognost card test(Biognost,Zagreb).The test and short questionnaire were delivered to the home addresses of all citizens aged 50-74 years consecutively during a 3-year period.Each participant was required to complete the questionnaire and send it together with the stool specimen on three test cards back to the institute for further analysis.About 4% FOBT positive cases are expected in normal risk populations.A descriptive analysis was performed.RESULTS:A total of 1 056 694 individuals(born between 1933-1945 and 1952-1957) were invited to screening by the end of September 2011.In total,210 239(19.9%) persons returned the envelope with a completed questionnaire,and 181 102 of them returned it with a correctly placed stool specimen on FOBT cards.Until now,12 477(6.9%),FOBT-positive patients have been found,which is at the upper limit of the expected values in European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in CRC Screening and Diagnosis [European Union(EU) Guidelines].Colonoscopy was performed in 8541 cases(uptake 66%).Screening has identified CRC in 472 patients(5.5% of colonoscopied,3.8% of FOBT-positive,and 0.26% of all screened individuals).This is also in the expected range according to EU Guidelines.Polyps were found and removed in 3329(39% of colonoscopied) patients.The largest number of polyps were found in the left half of the colon:64%(19%,37% and 8% in the rectum,sigma,and descendens,respectively).The other 36% were detected in the proximal part(17% in the transverse colon and 19% in ceco-ascending colon).Small polyps in the rectum(5-10 mm in diameter),sigmoid and descending colon were histologically found to be tubular adenomas in 60% of cases,with a low degree of dysplasia,and 40% were classified as hyperplastic.Polyps of this size in the transverse or ceco-ascending colon in almost 20% had a histologically villous component,but still had a low degree of dysplasia.Polyps sized 10-20 mm in diameter were in 43% cases tubulovillous,and among them,32% had areas with a high degree of dysplasia,especially those polyps in the cecoascending or transverse part.The characteristics of the Croatian CRC Screening National Program in the first 3 years were as follows:relatively low percentage of returned FOBT,higher number of FOBT-positive persons but still in the range for population-based programs,and higher number of pathologic findings(polyps and cancers).CONCLUSION:These results suggest a need for intervention strategies that include organizational changes and educational activities to improve awareness of CRC screening usefulness and increase participation rates.展开更多
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer(CRC)remains a relevant public health problem.Current research suggests that racial,economic and geographic disparities impact access.Despite the expansion of Medicaid eligibility as a key ...BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer(CRC)remains a relevant public health problem.Current research suggests that racial,economic and geographic disparities impact access.Despite the expansion of Medicaid eligibility as a key component of the Affordable Care Act(ACA),there is a dearth of information on the utilization of newly gained access to CRC screening by low-income individuals.This study investigates the impact of the ACA’s Medicaid expansion on utilization of the various CRC screening modalities by low-income participants.Our working hypothesis is that Medicaid expansion will increase access and utilization of CRC screening by low-income participants.AIM To investigate the impact of the Affordable Care Act and in particular the effect of Medicaid expansion on access and utilization of CRC screening modalities by Medicaid state expansion status across the United States.METHODS This was a quasi-experimental study design using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System,a large health system survey for participants across the United States and with over 2.8 million responses.The period of the study was from 2011 to 2016 which was dichotomized as pre-ACA Medicaid expansion(2011-2013)and post-ACA Medicaid expansion(2014-2016).The change in utilization of access to CRC screening strategies between the expansion periods were analyzed as the dependent variables.Secondary analyses included stratification of the access by ethnicity/race,income,and education status.RESULTS A greater increase in utilization of access to CRC screening was observed in Medicaid expansion states than in nonexpansion states[+2.9%;95%confidence interval(95%CI):2.12,3.69].Low-income participants showed a+4.02%(95%CI:2.96,5.07)change between the expansion periods compared with higher income groups+3.19%(1.70,4.67).Non-Hispanic Whites and Hispanics[+3.01%(95%CI:2.16,3.85)vs+5.51%(95%CI:2.81,8.20)]showed a statistically significant increase in utilization of access but not in Non-Hispanic Blacks,or Multiracial.There was an increase in utilization across all educational levels.This was significant among those who reported having a high school graduate degree or more+4.26%(95%CI:3.16,5.35)compared to some high school or less+1.59%(95%CI:-1.37,4.55).CONCLUSION Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act led to an overall increase in self-reported use of CRC screening tests by adults aged 50-64 years in the United States.This finding was consistent across all low-income populations,but not all races or levels of education.展开更多
The coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic has caused detrimental effects on many aspects of healthcare practice.Screening programs for the commonest malignancies,namely colorectal cancer(CRC),breast cancer and ce...The coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic has caused detrimental effects on many aspects of healthcare practice.Screening programs for the commonest malignancies,namely colorectal cancer(CRC),breast cancer and cervical cancer have been discontinued or interrupted since the beginning of restriction measures aimed to limit transmission of the new coronavirus infection.Robust evidence exists in favour of the role of screening campaigns in reducing mortality from CRC.In fact,the majority of pre-malignant lesions of the colon and rectum can be diagnosed with colonoscopy and treated by endoscopic or surgical resection.Besides,colonoscopy screening allows the diagnosis of CRCs in their pre-clinical stage.Italy was one of the first European countries where a high level of COVID-19 infections and deaths was observed,and one of the first where lockdowns and strict measures were adopted to reduce the risk of COVID-19 diffusion among the population.A systematic review of the literature was performed,including the PubMed,Scopus,Web of Sciences,and Reference Citation Analysis databases,with the aim of critically evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CRC screening in Italy.We found that reduction of CRC screening activity surpassed 50%in most endoscopic units,with almost 600000 fewer CRC screening exams conducted in the first 5 mo of 2020 vs the same period of 2019.While the consequences of the discontinuation of endoscopy screening for the prognosis and mortality of CRC will be evident in the next few years,recent data confirm that CRC is currently treated at a more advanced stage than in the pre-COVID-19 era.Since delays in CRC prevention and early diagnosis may translate to increased CRC-specific mortality,world healthcare systems should adopt strategies to maintain the regularity of CRC screening during subsequent peaks of the COVID-19 pandemic,or future events that might hamper screening programs.展开更多
Currently,colorectal cancer(CRC)represents the third most common malignancy and the second most deadly cancer worldwide,with a higher incidence in developed countries.Like other solid tumors,CRC is a heterogeneous gen...Currently,colorectal cancer(CRC)represents the third most common malignancy and the second most deadly cancer worldwide,with a higher incidence in developed countries.Like other solid tumors,CRC is a heterogeneous genomic disease in which various alterations,such as point mutations,genomic rearrangements,gene fusions or chromosomal copy number alterations,can contribute to the disease development.However,because of its orderly natural history,easily accessible onset location and high lifetime incidence,CRC is ideally suited for preventive intervention,but the many screening efforts of the last decades have been compromised by performance limitations and low penetrance of the standard screening tools.The advent of next-generation sequencing(NGS)has both facilitated the identification of previously unrecognized CRC features such as its relationship with gut microbial pathogens and revolutionized the speed and throughput of cataloguing CRC-related genomic alterations.Hence,in this review,we summarized the several diagnostic tools used for CRC screening in the past and the present,focusing on recent NGS approaches and their revolutionary role in the identification of novel genomic CRC characteristics,the advancement of understanding the CRC carcinogenesis and the screening of clinically actionable targets for personalized medicine.展开更多
Screening for colorectal cancer(CRC)is among the mosteffective approaches to cancer prevention,yet achievinghigh adherence to effective screening offers is challenging[1].Blood-based tests that could be easily impleme...Screening for colorectal cancer(CRC)is among the mosteffective approaches to cancer prevention,yet achievinghigh adherence to effective screening offers is challenging[1].Blood-based tests that could be easily implemented inroutine medical practice might be a promising approachto achieve higher adherence rates than with conven-tional stool-based or endoscopic screening[2,3].However,neoplasm detection rates of previously developed and pro-posed blood-based tests have not been competitive tothose of modern stool-based tests[2],in particular fecalimmunochemical tests(FITs)that are meanwhile widelyused for CRC screening in an increasing number of coun-tries[4].Most recently,performance of a novel cell-freeDNA(cfDNA)blood-based test for detecting colorectalneoplasms was validated in the ECLIPSE study,a largescreening population undergoing screening colonoscopy[5],being the first of its kind to achieve FDA approval asa primary screening option for CRC.展开更多
Introduction:Individuals with excess body weight have elevated colorectal cancer(CRC)risk.This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and costeffectiveness of CRC screening strategies in populations with exces...Introduction:Individuals with excess body weight have elevated colorectal cancer(CRC)risk.This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and costeffectiveness of CRC screening strategies in populations with excess weight.Methods:A multistate Markov model was used to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of CRC screening.Three hypothetical cohorts were simulated based on body mass index(BMI)subgroups:normal,overweight,and obese.Screening strategies included colonoscopy(every 10 years)or an annual fecal immunochemical test,initiated at ages 45 and 50.Key outcomes included CRC cases,deaths,quality-adjusted life-year(QALY),lifetime costs,endoscopic resource use,and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.Results:QALY gains increased from 0.097[95%confidence interval(CI):0.091–0.102]in individuals with normal weight to 0.104(0.101–0.107)in those who were overweight and 0.108(0.105–0.111)in those who were obese.Individuals who were overweight or obese demonstrated 6%–14%greater colonoscopy efficiency compared with those of normal weight.All screening strategies were cost-effective(incremental cost-effectiveness ratio=USD 671–USD 949 per QALY gained),with a marginal decrease in cost per QALY gained observed at higher BMI.Despite improved cost-effectiveness,lifetime healthcare expenditures were higher in individuals who were overweight($845.19–$955.00)and obese($1,358.00–$1,467.37)than in those with normal weight($119.62–$229.20).Conclusion:CRC screening in China demonstrated effectiveness and cost-effectiveness across BMI groups,with populations with excess weight showing high colonoscopy resource efficiency.Amid rising lifetime healthcare costs attributable to high BMI,integrating weight management with CRC screening is critical for optimizing health and economic benefits.展开更多
In Italy,a nationwide population-based colorectal cancer(CRC)screening initiative has been in place since 2006.In recent years,there has been a growing interest in involving community pharmacies in this activity.This ...In Italy,a nationwide population-based colorectal cancer(CRC)screening initiative has been in place since 2006.In recent years,there has been a growing interest in involving community pharmacies in this activity.This commentary provides an insightful analysis of the integration between the screening program of the Local Health Authority(LHA)of Bologna(Northern Italy)and community pharmacies.A horizontal integration at the micro level with service and clinical integrations supported by meso-level policy(regional authority)was applied.Four types of integration such as normative,informational,financial and functional serving as enablers were implemented.A high level of depth of consensus,connectivity,communication,and trust was pursued.The program achieved large participation from community pharmacies,with 91.1%(n=234)of pharmacies in the LHA territory actively participating.On average,each pharmacy served 1,228(range,1,021-1,519)target citizens.Between 2021(the first full year under the community pharmacy model)and 2022,pharmacies delivered an annual mean of 68,295 kits(range,12-840).In 2021,there was a remarkably high level of screening completion,with 93.7%of fecal immunochemical tests being returned to pharmacies.This percentage increased by 3.3%in 2022.In our setting,pharmacy involvement improved service quality by introducing complete traceability of kits and specimen flow,as well as temperature control.It also led to a 4.6%increase in attendance rates compared to the previous organizational model(61.6%vs.57%;P<0.001).Finally,additional European experiences involving community pharmacies in organized CRC screening programs,resembling the Bologna setting,are reported.展开更多
Colorectal cancer(CRC)is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world.The incidence and mortality show wide geographical variations.Screening is recommended to reduce both incidence and mortality.However,ther...Colorectal cancer(CRC)is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world.The incidence and mortality show wide geographical variations.Screening is recommended to reduce both incidence and mortality.However,there are significant differences among studies in implementation strategies and detection.This review aimed to present the results and strategies of different screening programs worldwide.We reviewed the literature on national and international screening programs published in Pub Med,on web pages,and in clinical guidelines.CRC Screening programs are currently underway in most European countries,Canada,specific regions in North and South America,Asia,and Oceania.The most extensive screening strategies were based on fecal occult blood testing,and more recently,the fecal immunochemical test(FIT).Participation in screening has varied greatly among different programs.The Netherlands showed the highest participation rate(68.2%)and some areas of Canada showed the lowest(16%).Participation rates were highest among women and in programs that used the FIT test.Men exhibited the greatest number of positive results.The FIT test has been the most widely used screening program worldwide.The advent of this test has increased participation rates and the detection of positive results.展开更多
AIM: To explore the value of serum M2-pyruvate kinase (M2-PK) in colorectal cancer (CRC) mass screening. METHODS: We conducted a molecular epidemiology study in Hangzhou, China, from year 2006 to year 2008. Serum samp...AIM: To explore the value of serum M2-pyruvate kinase (M2-PK) in colorectal cancer (CRC) mass screening. METHODS: We conducted a molecular epidemiology study in Hangzhou, China, from year 2006 to year 2008. Serum samples were collected from 93 CRC, 41 advanced adenomas, 137 adenomas, 47 non-adenomatous polyps, and 158 normal participants in a community setting. Serum M2-PK and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were measured using Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. SPSS 16.0 software was used to perform data analysis. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificities were estimated for serum M2-PK in diagnosis of colorectal lesions and compared with CEA. RESULTS: Average serum M2-PK value among 158 normal people was 2.96 U/mL and not affected by gender (P = 0.47) or age (P = 0.59). Average serum M2-PK (U/mL) was 14.75 among stage III and 13.10 among stage?I?and II CRC patients, about 4 times higher than that among normal people. Average serum M2-PK was 8.58, 6.70, 5.13 and 2.51 U/mL among advanced adenoma, adenomas, non-adenomatous polyps, and inflammatory bowel disease patients, respectively. AUC for serum M2-PK was greater than that for CEA among all colorectal lesions. AUC for serum M2-PK was 0.89 (0.84, 0.94) (95% confidence interval), higher than that for CEA [0.70 (0.62-0.79)] in CRC stage?I?and II, 0.89 (0.84-0.94) vs 0.73 (0.63-0.83) in CRC stage III, 0.81 (0.74-0.86) vs 0.63 (0.53 - 0.73) in advanced adenomas, 0.69 (0.64-0.76) vs 0.54 (0.47-0.60) in adenomas, and 0.69 (0.62-0.78) vs 0.58 (0.48-0.68) in non-adenomatous polyps. The diagnostic sensitivity for all colorectal lesions increased with decrease in the cut-off value of serum M2-PK. The diagnostic sensitivity (%) of serum M2-PK was 100.00 for CRC, 95.12 advanced adenoma, 82.48 adenoma, and 82.98 non-adenomatous polyp. There were no CRC cases missed and 40.51% of unnecessary colonoscopies were avoided when the cut-off value was 2.00 U/mL. CONCLUSION: Serum M2-PK can be used as a primary screening test in CRC mass screening. It may be a promising non-invasive biomarker for CRC early detection.展开更多
BACKGROUND Since its complete roll-out in 2009,the French colorectal cancer screening program(CRCSP)experienced 3 major constraints[use of a less efficient Guaiac-test(gFOBT),stopping the supply of Fecal-Immunochemica...BACKGROUND Since its complete roll-out in 2009,the French colorectal cancer screening program(CRCSP)experienced 3 major constraints[use of a less efficient Guaiac-test(gFOBT),stopping the supply of Fecal-Immunochemical-Test kits(FIT),and suspension of the program due to the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)]affecting its effectiveness.AIM To describe the impact of the constraints in terms of changes in the quality of screeningcolonoscopy(Quali-Colo).METHODS This retrospective cohort study included screening-colonoscopies performed by gastroenterologists between Jan-2010 and Dec-2020 in people aged 50-74 living in Ile-de-France(France).The changes in Quali-colo(Proportion of colonoscopies performed beyond 7 mo(Colo_7 mo),Frequency of serious adverse events(SAE)and Colonoscopy detection rate)were described in a cohort of Gastroenterologists who performed at least one colonoscopy over each of the four periods defined according to the chronology of the constraints[gFOBT:Normal progress of the CRCSP using gFOBT(2010-2014);FIT:Normal progress of the CRCSP using FIT(2015-2018);STOP-FIT:Year(2019)during which the CRCSP experienced the cessation of the supply of test kits;COVID:Program suspension due to the COVID-19 health crisis(2020)].The link between each dependent variable(Colo_7 mo;SAE occurrence,neoplasm detection rate)and the predictive factors was analyzed in a two-level multivariate hierarchical model.RESULTS The 533 gastroenterologists(cohort)achieved 21509 screening colonoscopies over gFOBT period,38352 over FIT,7342 over STOP-FIT and 7995 over COVID period.The frequency of SAE did not change between periods(gFOBT:0.3%;FIT:0.3%;STOP-FIT:0.3%;and COVID:0.2%;P=0.10).The risk of Colo_7 mo doubled between FIT[adjusted odds ratio(aOR):1.2(1.1;1.2)]and STOPFIT[aOR:2.4(2.1;2.6)];then,decreased by 40%between STOP-FIT and COVID[aOR:2.0(1.8;2.2)].Regardless of the period,this Colo_7 mo’s risk was twice as high for screening colonoscopy performed in a public hospital[aOR:2.1(1.3;3.6)]compared to screening-colonoscopy performed in a private clinic.The neoplasm detection,which increased by 60%between gFOBT and FIT[aOR:1.6(1.5;1.7)],decreased by 40%between FIT and COVID[aOR:1.1(1.0;1.3)].CONCLUSION The constraints likely affected the time-to-colonoscopy as well as the colonoscopy detection rate without impacting the SAE’s occurrence,highlighting the need for a respectable reference time-tocolonoscopy in CRCSP.展开更多
BACKGROUND For optimizing fecal immunochemical test(FIT)-based screening programs,reducing the rate of missed colorectal cancers(CRCs)by FIT(FIT-interval CRCs)is an important aspect.Knowledge of the molecular make-up ...BACKGROUND For optimizing fecal immunochemical test(FIT)-based screening programs,reducing the rate of missed colorectal cancers(CRCs)by FIT(FIT-interval CRCs)is an important aspect.Knowledge of the molecular make-up of these missed lesions could facilitate more accurate detection of all(precursor)lesions.AIM To compare the molecular make-up of FIT-interval CRCs to lesions that are detected by FIT[screen-detected CRCs(SD-CRCs)].METHODS FIT-interval CRCs observed in a Dutch pilot-program of FIT-based screening were compared to a control group of SD-CRCs in a 1:2 ratio,resulting in 27 FIT-interval CRC and 54 SD-CRCs.Molecular analyses included microsatellite instability(MSI),CpG island methylator phenotype(CIMP),DNA sequence mutations and copy number alterations(CNAs).RESULTS Although no significant differences were reached,FIT-interval CRCs were more often CIMP positive and MSI positive(33%CIMP in FIT-interval CRCs vs 21%in SD-CRCs(P=0.274);19%MSI in FIT-interval CRCs vs 12%in SD-CRCs(P=0.469)),and showed more often serrated pathway associated features such as BRAF(30%vs 12%,P=0.090)and PTEN(15%vs 2.4%,P=0.063)mutations.APC mutations,a classic feature of the adenoma-carcinoma-sequence,were more abundant in SD-CRCs(68%vs 40%in FIT-interval CRCs P=0.035).Regarding CNAs differences between the two groups;FIT-interval CRCs less often showed gains at the regions 8p11.22-q24.3(P=0.009),and more often gains at 20p13-p12.1(P=0.039).CONCLUSION Serrated pathway associated molecular features seem to be more common in FIT-interval CRCs,while classic adenoma carcinoma pathway associated molecular features seem to be more common in SD-CRCs.This indicates that proximal serrated lesions may be overrepresented among FITinterval CRCs.展开更多
BACKGROUND Designing a feasible risk prediction model for advanced colorectal neoplasia(ACN)can enhance colonoscopy screening efficiency.Abdominal obesity is associated with colorectal cancer development.AIM To propos...BACKGROUND Designing a feasible risk prediction model for advanced colorectal neoplasia(ACN)can enhance colonoscopy screening efficiency.Abdominal obesity is associated with colorectal cancer development.AIM To propose and evaluate a modified scoring model incorporating waist-hip ratio for the prediction of ACN.METHODS A total of 6483 patients who underwent their first screening or diagnostic colonoscopy in our center between 2020 and 2023 were recruited,in which 4592 were in the derivation cohort and 1891 formed a validation cohort.Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate the risk factors of ACN in the derivation cohort based on endoscopic findings,and a new scoring model for ACN prediction was developed.The discriminatory capability of the scoring model was validated by the validation cohort.RESULTS Age,male gender,smoking,and wait-to-hip ratio were identified as independent risk factors for ACN,and a 7-point scoring model was developed.The prevalence of ACN was 3.3%,9.3%and 18.5%in participants with scores of 0-2[low risk(LR)],3–4[moderate risk(MR)],and 5–7[high risk(HR)],respectively,in the derivation cohort.With the scoring model,49.9%,38.4%,and 11.7%of patients in the validation cohort were categorized as LR,MR,and HR,respectively.The corresponding prevalence rates of ACN were 5.0%,10.3%,and 17.6%,respectively.The C-statistic of the new scoring model was 0.66,which was higher than that of the Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening model(0.63).CONCLUSION A modified scoring model incorporating waist-hip ratio has an improved predictive performance in the prediction of ACN.展开更多
基金Supported by Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin,No.21JCZDJC00060 and No.21JCYBJC00180Tianjin Health and Medical Science and Technology Project,No.TJWJ2023QN040National Key Research and Development Program,No.2017YFC1700606 and No.2017YFC1700604.
文摘BACKGROUND Certain subgroups are at an increased risk of false fecal immunochemical test(FIT)results;however,related studies are limited,and the available evidence is conflicting.AIM To evaluate factors associated with false-positive and false-negative FIT results.METHODS This retrospective study was based on the database of the Tianjin Colorectal Cancer Screening Program from 2012 to 2020.A total of 4129947 residents aged 40-74 years completed at least one FIT.Of these,24890 asymptomatic participants who underwent colonoscopy examinations and completed lifestyle questionnaires were included in the analysis.Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the factors associated with false FIT results.RESULTS Among the overall screening population,88687(2.15%)participants tested positive for FIT.The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of FIT for advanced neoplasms were 58.2%,44.8%,9.7%,and 91.3%,respectively.Older age,female sex,smoking,alcohol consumption,higher body mass index,and hemorrhoids were significantly associated with increased odds of false-positive and lower odds of falsenegative FIT results.Moreover,features of high-grade dysplasia or villous for advanced adenoma and the presence of cancer were also associated with lower odds of false-negative results,while irregular exercise and diverticulum were associated with higher odds of false-positive results.CONCLUSION FIT results may be inaccurate in certain subgroups.Our results provide important evidence for further individualization of screening strategies.
文摘Colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide,under-scoring the importance of early and effective colorectal cancer screening to im-prove survival rates.Traditional colorectal cancer screening methods include non-invasive tests,such as the fecal immunochemical test(FIT),as well as diagnostic procedures like colonoscopy.Colonoscopy remains the gold standard for detec-ting and treating precancerous polyps and early-stage cancer,regardless of whe-ther it is used as the first screening test or the second test following a positive FIT.However,its effectiveness can be affected by factors such as operator skill,patient variability,and limited lesion visibility,resulting in a significant rate of missed lesion rates and highlighting the need for more efficient and accurate screening techniques.This review is aimed to assess the current challenges of traditional screening methods with the impact of artificial intelligence(AI)in the diagnostic flow.The literature on AI-powered tools for colorectal cancer screening,including novel applications,emerging programs,and recent guidelines,has been reviewed to highlight both the advantages and limitations of implementing this technology in healthcare.Recent advances in AI have introduced soft AI colonoscopy,with the purpose of improving lesion recognition(computer-aided detection)and/or improving optical diagnosis(computer-aided diagnosis).AI-powered colono-scopy systems employ deep learning algorithms to analyze real-time endoscopic images,enhancing detection rates for adenomas,serrated lesions and cancer by reducing human error.AI-assisted colonoscopy enhances adenoma detection,enabling earlier intervention and improved patient outcomes.The benefits are particularly pronounced for less-experienced practitioners,as the detection rates for AI-assisted colonoscopy are similar to experts.AI integration also helps in the teaching process,in developing standardized procedures,and improving screening procedure accuracy and efficiency across different healthcare providers.However,there are challenges and limitations,such as the cost of AI implementation,data privacy concerns,and the need for extensive clinical validation.As AI technology continues to evolve,its transformation of the colorectal cancer screening system could revolutionize the field,making early detection more accessible and reducing mortality,on the condition that the above issues are addressed before widespread use.
基金Supported by The National Scientific and Technological Program in the 11th "Five-Year Plan", the Grant number is 2006BAI02A08
文摘AIM:To investigate barriers to colorectal cancer(CRC) screening in a community population.METHODS:We conducted a community-based case-control study in an urban Chinese population by questionnaire.Cases were selected from those completing both a fecal occult blood test(FOBT) case and colonoscopy in a CRC screening program in 2004.Control groups were matched by gender, age group and community.Control 1 included those having a positive FOBT but refusing a colonoscopy.Control 2 included those who refused both an FOBT and colonoscopy.RESULTS:The impact of occupation on willingness to attend a colorectal screening program differed by gender.P for heterogeneity was 0.009 for case vs control group 1, 0.01 for case versus control group 2, and 0.80 for control group 1 vs 2.Poor awareness of CRC and its screening program, characteristics of screening tests, and lack of time affected the screening rate.Financial support, fear of pain and bowel preparation were barriers to a colonoscopy as a screening test.Eighty-two percent of control group 1 and 87.1% of control group 2 were willing attend if the colonoscopy was free, but only 56.3% and 53.1%, respectively, if it was self-paid.Multivariate odds ratios for case vs control group 1 were 0.10 among those unwilling to attend a free colonoscopy and 0.50 among those unwilling to attend a self-paid colonoscopy.CONCLUSION:Raising the public awareness of CRC and its screening, integrating CRC screening into the health care system, and using a painless colonoscopy would increase its screening rate.
文摘Computed tomography colonography(CTC) in colorectal cancer(CRC) screening has two roles:one present and the other potential.The present role is,without any further discussion,the integration into established screening programs as a replacement for barium enema in the case of incomplete colonoscopy.The potential role is the use of CTC as a first-line screening method together with Fecal Occult Blood Test,sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy.However,despite the fact that CTC has been officially endorsed for CRC screening of average-risk individuals by different scientif ic societies including the American Cancer Society,the American College of Radiology,and the US Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer,other entities,such as the US Preventive Services Task Force,have considered the evidence insuff icient to justify its use as a mass screening method.Medicare has also recently denied reimbursement for CTC as a screening test.Nevertheless,multiple advantages exist for using CTC as a CRC screening test:high accuracy,full evaluation of the colon in virtually all patients,non-invasiveness,safety,patient comfort,detection of extracolonic findings and cost-effectiveness.The main potential drawback of a CTC screening is the exposure to ionizing radiation.However,this is not a major issue,since low-dose protocols are now routinely implemented,delivering a dose comparable or slightly superior to the annual radiation exposure of any individual.Indirect evidence exists that such a radiation exposure does not induce additional cancers.
文摘AIM:To present a critical discussion of the efficacy of the faecal pyruvate kinase isoenzyme type M2(faecal M2-PK) test for colorectal cancer(CRC) screening based on the currently available studies.METHODS:A literature search in PubMed and Embase was conducted using the following search terms:fecal Tumor M2-PK,faecal Tumour M2-PK,fecal M2-PK,faecal M2-PK,fecal pyruvate kinase,faecal pyruvate kinase,pyruvate kinase stool and M2-PK stool.RESULTS:Stool samples from 704 patients with CRC and from 11 412 healthy subjects have been investigated for faecal M2-PK concentrations in seventeen independent studies.The mean faecal M2-PK sensitivity was 80.3%;the specificity was 95.2%.Four studies compared faecal M2-PK head-to-head with guaiacbased faecal occult blood test(gFOBT).Faecal M2PK demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.1%,whereas the gFOBT detected only 36.9% of the CRCs.Eight independent studies investigated the sensitivity of faecal M2-PK for adenoma(n = 554),with the following sensitivities:adenoma < 1 cm in diameter:25%;adenoma > 1 cm:44%;adenoma of unspecified diameter:51%.In a direct comparison with gFOBT of adenoma > 1 cm in diameter,47% tested positive with the faecal M2-PK test,whereas the gFOBT detected only 27%.CONCLUSION:We recommend faecal M2-PK as a routine test for CRC screening.Faecal M2-PK closes a gap in clinical practice because it detects bleeding and nonbleeding tumors and adenoma with high sensitivity and specificity.
基金Supported by the Ministry of Health and Care Services in Norway
文摘AIM To investigate the possible long-term psychological harm of participating in colorectal cancer(CRC)screening in Norway.METHODS In a prospective, randomized trial, 14294 participants(aged 50-74 years) were invited to either flexible sigmoidoscopy(FS) screening, or a faecal immunochemical test(FIT)(1:1). In total, 4422 screening participants(32%) completed the questionnaire, which consisted of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the SF-12, a generic health-related quality of life(HRQOL) measurement, when invited to screening and one year after the invitation. A control group of 7650 individuals was invited to complete the questionnaire only, at baseline and one year after, and 1911(25%) completed the questionnaires.RESULTS Receiving a positive or negative screening result and participating in the two different screening modalities did not cause clinically relevant mean changes in anxiety, depression or HRQOL after one year. FS screening, but not FIT, was associated with an increased probability of being an anxiety case(score ≥ 8) at the one-year follow-up(5.6% of FS participants transitioned from being not anxious to anxious, while 3.0% experienced the reverse). This increase was moderately significantly different from the changes in the control group(in which the corresponding numbers were 4.8% and 4.5%, respectively), P = 0.06. CONCLUSION Most individuals do not experience psychological effects of CRC screening participation after one year, while FS participation is associated with increased anxiety for a smaller group.
文摘Colorectal cancer(CRC) is the third most common cancer in males and second in females, and globally the fourth cause for cancer death worldwide. Oncological screening of CRC has a major role in the management of the disease and it is mostly performed by colonoscopy. Anyway, effectiveness of endoscopic screening for CRC strictly depends on adequate detection and removal of potentially precancerous lesions, and accuracy of colonoscopy in detection of adenomas is still suboptimal. For this reason, several technological advances have been implemented in order to improve the diagnostic sensitivity of colonoscopy in adenoma detection. Among these:(1) Visual technologies such as chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging;(2) optical innovation as high definition endoscopy, full-spectrum endoscopy or Third Eye Retroscope; and(3) mechanical advances as Cap assisted colonoscopy, Endocuff, Endoring and G-Eye endoscope. All these technologies advances have been tested over time by clinical studies with mixed results. Which of them is more likely to be successful in the next future?
文摘BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer(CRC)is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States.Still,1 in 3 adults aged 50 years to 75 years have not been screened for CRC.Early detection and management of precancerous or malignant lesions has been shown to improve overall mortality.AIM To determine the most significant facilitators and barriers to CRC screening in an outpatient clinic in rural North Carolina.The results of this study can then be used for quality improvement to increase the rate of patients ages 50 to 75 who are up to date on CRC screening.METHODS This retrospective study examined 2428 patients aged 50 years to 75 years in an outpatient clinic.Patients were up to date on CRC screening if they had fecal occult blood test or fecal immunochemical test in the past one year,Cologuard in the past three years,flexible sigmoidoscopy/virtual colonoscopy in the past five years,or colonoscopy in the past ten years.Data on patient socioeconomic status,comorbid conditions,and other determinants of health compliance were included as covariates.RESULTS Age[odds ratio(OR)=1.058;P=0.017],no-show rate percent(OR=0.962;P<0.05),patient history of obstructive sleep apnea(OR=1.875;P=0.025),compliance with flu vaccinations(OR=1.673;P<0.05),compliance with screening mammograms(OR=2.130;P<0.05),and compliance with screening pap smears(OR=2.708;P<0.05)were important factors in determining whether a patient will receive CRC screening.Race,gender,insurance or employment status,use of blood thinners,family history of CRC,or other comorbid conditions including diabetes,hypertension,congestive heart failure,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,and end-stage renal disease were not found to have a statistically significant effect on patient adherence to CRC screening.CONCLUSION Patient age,history of sleep apnea,and compliance with other health maintenance tests were significant facilitators to CRC screening,while no-show rate percent was a significant barrier in our patient population.This study will be of benefit to physicians in addressing and improving the CRC screening rates in our community.
文摘AIM:To study the epidemiologic indicators of uptake and characteristic colonoscopic findings in the Croatian National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.METHODS:Colorectal cancer(CRC) was the second leading cause of cancer mortality in men(n = 1063,49.77/100 000),as well as women(n = 803,34.89/100 000) in Croatia in 2009.The Croatian National CRC Screening Program was established by the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare,and its implementation started in September,2007.The coordinators were recruited in each county institute of public health with an obligation to provide fecal occult blood testing(FOBT) to the participants,followed by colonoscopy in all positive cases.The FOBT was performed by hypersensitive guaiac-based Hemognost card test(Biognost,Zagreb).The test and short questionnaire were delivered to the home addresses of all citizens aged 50-74 years consecutively during a 3-year period.Each participant was required to complete the questionnaire and send it together with the stool specimen on three test cards back to the institute for further analysis.About 4% FOBT positive cases are expected in normal risk populations.A descriptive analysis was performed.RESULTS:A total of 1 056 694 individuals(born between 1933-1945 and 1952-1957) were invited to screening by the end of September 2011.In total,210 239(19.9%) persons returned the envelope with a completed questionnaire,and 181 102 of them returned it with a correctly placed stool specimen on FOBT cards.Until now,12 477(6.9%),FOBT-positive patients have been found,which is at the upper limit of the expected values in European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in CRC Screening and Diagnosis [European Union(EU) Guidelines].Colonoscopy was performed in 8541 cases(uptake 66%).Screening has identified CRC in 472 patients(5.5% of colonoscopied,3.8% of FOBT-positive,and 0.26% of all screened individuals).This is also in the expected range according to EU Guidelines.Polyps were found and removed in 3329(39% of colonoscopied) patients.The largest number of polyps were found in the left half of the colon:64%(19%,37% and 8% in the rectum,sigma,and descendens,respectively).The other 36% were detected in the proximal part(17% in the transverse colon and 19% in ceco-ascending colon).Small polyps in the rectum(5-10 mm in diameter),sigmoid and descending colon were histologically found to be tubular adenomas in 60% of cases,with a low degree of dysplasia,and 40% were classified as hyperplastic.Polyps of this size in the transverse or ceco-ascending colon in almost 20% had a histologically villous component,but still had a low degree of dysplasia.Polyps sized 10-20 mm in diameter were in 43% cases tubulovillous,and among them,32% had areas with a high degree of dysplasia,especially those polyps in the cecoascending or transverse part.The characteristics of the Croatian CRC Screening National Program in the first 3 years were as follows:relatively low percentage of returned FOBT,higher number of FOBT-positive persons but still in the range for population-based programs,and higher number of pathologic findings(polyps and cancers).CONCLUSION:These results suggest a need for intervention strategies that include organizational changes and educational activities to improve awareness of CRC screening usefulness and increase participation rates.
文摘BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer(CRC)remains a relevant public health problem.Current research suggests that racial,economic and geographic disparities impact access.Despite the expansion of Medicaid eligibility as a key component of the Affordable Care Act(ACA),there is a dearth of information on the utilization of newly gained access to CRC screening by low-income individuals.This study investigates the impact of the ACA’s Medicaid expansion on utilization of the various CRC screening modalities by low-income participants.Our working hypothesis is that Medicaid expansion will increase access and utilization of CRC screening by low-income participants.AIM To investigate the impact of the Affordable Care Act and in particular the effect of Medicaid expansion on access and utilization of CRC screening modalities by Medicaid state expansion status across the United States.METHODS This was a quasi-experimental study design using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System,a large health system survey for participants across the United States and with over 2.8 million responses.The period of the study was from 2011 to 2016 which was dichotomized as pre-ACA Medicaid expansion(2011-2013)and post-ACA Medicaid expansion(2014-2016).The change in utilization of access to CRC screening strategies between the expansion periods were analyzed as the dependent variables.Secondary analyses included stratification of the access by ethnicity/race,income,and education status.RESULTS A greater increase in utilization of access to CRC screening was observed in Medicaid expansion states than in nonexpansion states[+2.9%;95%confidence interval(95%CI):2.12,3.69].Low-income participants showed a+4.02%(95%CI:2.96,5.07)change between the expansion periods compared with higher income groups+3.19%(1.70,4.67).Non-Hispanic Whites and Hispanics[+3.01%(95%CI:2.16,3.85)vs+5.51%(95%CI:2.81,8.20)]showed a statistically significant increase in utilization of access but not in Non-Hispanic Blacks,or Multiracial.There was an increase in utilization across all educational levels.This was significant among those who reported having a high school graduate degree or more+4.26%(95%CI:3.16,5.35)compared to some high school or less+1.59%(95%CI:-1.37,4.55).CONCLUSION Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act led to an overall increase in self-reported use of CRC screening tests by adults aged 50-64 years in the United States.This finding was consistent across all low-income populations,but not all races or levels of education.
文摘The coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic has caused detrimental effects on many aspects of healthcare practice.Screening programs for the commonest malignancies,namely colorectal cancer(CRC),breast cancer and cervical cancer have been discontinued or interrupted since the beginning of restriction measures aimed to limit transmission of the new coronavirus infection.Robust evidence exists in favour of the role of screening campaigns in reducing mortality from CRC.In fact,the majority of pre-malignant lesions of the colon and rectum can be diagnosed with colonoscopy and treated by endoscopic or surgical resection.Besides,colonoscopy screening allows the diagnosis of CRCs in their pre-clinical stage.Italy was one of the first European countries where a high level of COVID-19 infections and deaths was observed,and one of the first where lockdowns and strict measures were adopted to reduce the risk of COVID-19 diffusion among the population.A systematic review of the literature was performed,including the PubMed,Scopus,Web of Sciences,and Reference Citation Analysis databases,with the aim of critically evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CRC screening in Italy.We found that reduction of CRC screening activity surpassed 50%in most endoscopic units,with almost 600000 fewer CRC screening exams conducted in the first 5 mo of 2020 vs the same period of 2019.While the consequences of the discontinuation of endoscopy screening for the prognosis and mortality of CRC will be evident in the next few years,recent data confirm that CRC is currently treated at a more advanced stage than in the pre-COVID-19 era.Since delays in CRC prevention and early diagnosis may translate to increased CRC-specific mortality,world healthcare systems should adopt strategies to maintain the regularity of CRC screening during subsequent peaks of the COVID-19 pandemic,or future events that might hamper screening programs.
基金Supported by MICAfrica Project,which is funded by The European Commission Programme 2020-WIDE SPREAD-05-2020-Twinning Grant Agreement,No.952583.
文摘Currently,colorectal cancer(CRC)represents the third most common malignancy and the second most deadly cancer worldwide,with a higher incidence in developed countries.Like other solid tumors,CRC is a heterogeneous genomic disease in which various alterations,such as point mutations,genomic rearrangements,gene fusions or chromosomal copy number alterations,can contribute to the disease development.However,because of its orderly natural history,easily accessible onset location and high lifetime incidence,CRC is ideally suited for preventive intervention,but the many screening efforts of the last decades have been compromised by performance limitations and low penetrance of the standard screening tools.The advent of next-generation sequencing(NGS)has both facilitated the identification of previously unrecognized CRC features such as its relationship with gut microbial pathogens and revolutionized the speed and throughput of cataloguing CRC-related genomic alterations.Hence,in this review,we summarized the several diagnostic tools used for CRC screening in the past and the present,focusing on recent NGS approaches and their revolutionary role in the identification of novel genomic CRC characteristics,the advancement of understanding the CRC carcinogenesis and the screening of clinically actionable targets for personalized medicine.
基金funded by grants from the GermanResearch Council(DFG,grant No.BR1704/16-1)the Fed-eral Ministry of Education and Research(BMBF,grantno.01GL1712 and 01KD2104A)the German CancerAid(No.70113330).
文摘Screening for colorectal cancer(CRC)is among the mosteffective approaches to cancer prevention,yet achievinghigh adherence to effective screening offers is challenging[1].Blood-based tests that could be easily implemented inroutine medical practice might be a promising approachto achieve higher adherence rates than with conven-tional stool-based or endoscopic screening[2,3].However,neoplasm detection rates of previously developed and pro-posed blood-based tests have not been competitive tothose of modern stool-based tests[2],in particular fecalimmunochemical tests(FITs)that are meanwhile widelyused for CRC screening in an increasing number of coun-tries[4].Most recently,performance of a novel cell-freeDNA(cfDNA)blood-based test for detecting colorectalneoplasms was validated in the ECLIPSE study,a largescreening population undergoing screening colonoscopy[5],being the first of its kind to achieve FDA approval asa primary screening option for CRC.
基金Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(grant number:82404340)Peking Union Medical College Union Youth Research Fund(grant number:3332024216)CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Science(grant numbers:2021-I2M-1-067 and 2021-I2M-1-011).
文摘Introduction:Individuals with excess body weight have elevated colorectal cancer(CRC)risk.This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and costeffectiveness of CRC screening strategies in populations with excess weight.Methods:A multistate Markov model was used to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of CRC screening.Three hypothetical cohorts were simulated based on body mass index(BMI)subgroups:normal,overweight,and obese.Screening strategies included colonoscopy(every 10 years)or an annual fecal immunochemical test,initiated at ages 45 and 50.Key outcomes included CRC cases,deaths,quality-adjusted life-year(QALY),lifetime costs,endoscopic resource use,and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.Results:QALY gains increased from 0.097[95%confidence interval(CI):0.091–0.102]in individuals with normal weight to 0.104(0.101–0.107)in those who were overweight and 0.108(0.105–0.111)in those who were obese.Individuals who were overweight or obese demonstrated 6%–14%greater colonoscopy efficiency compared with those of normal weight.All screening strategies were cost-effective(incremental cost-effectiveness ratio=USD 671–USD 949 per QALY gained),with a marginal decrease in cost per QALY gained observed at higher BMI.Despite improved cost-effectiveness,lifetime healthcare expenditures were higher in individuals who were overweight($845.19–$955.00)and obese($1,358.00–$1,467.37)than in those with normal weight($119.62–$229.20).Conclusion:CRC screening in China demonstrated effectiveness and cost-effectiveness across BMI groups,with populations with excess weight showing high colonoscopy resource efficiency.Amid rising lifetime healthcare costs attributable to high BMI,integrating weight management with CRC screening is critical for optimizing health and economic benefits.
文摘In Italy,a nationwide population-based colorectal cancer(CRC)screening initiative has been in place since 2006.In recent years,there has been a growing interest in involving community pharmacies in this activity.This commentary provides an insightful analysis of the integration between the screening program of the Local Health Authority(LHA)of Bologna(Northern Italy)and community pharmacies.A horizontal integration at the micro level with service and clinical integrations supported by meso-level policy(regional authority)was applied.Four types of integration such as normative,informational,financial and functional serving as enablers were implemented.A high level of depth of consensus,connectivity,communication,and trust was pursued.The program achieved large participation from community pharmacies,with 91.1%(n=234)of pharmacies in the LHA territory actively participating.On average,each pharmacy served 1,228(range,1,021-1,519)target citizens.Between 2021(the first full year under the community pharmacy model)and 2022,pharmacies delivered an annual mean of 68,295 kits(range,12-840).In 2021,there was a remarkably high level of screening completion,with 93.7%of fecal immunochemical tests being returned to pharmacies.This percentage increased by 3.3%in 2022.In our setting,pharmacy involvement improved service quality by introducing complete traceability of kits and specimen flow,as well as temperature control.It also led to a 4.6%increase in attendance rates compared to the previous organizational model(61.6%vs.57%;P<0.001).Finally,additional European experiences involving community pharmacies in organized CRC screening programs,resembling the Bologna setting,are reported.
文摘Colorectal cancer(CRC)is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world.The incidence and mortality show wide geographical variations.Screening is recommended to reduce both incidence and mortality.However,there are significant differences among studies in implementation strategies and detection.This review aimed to present the results and strategies of different screening programs worldwide.We reviewed the literature on national and international screening programs published in Pub Med,on web pages,and in clinical guidelines.CRC Screening programs are currently underway in most European countries,Canada,specific regions in North and South America,Asia,and Oceania.The most extensive screening strategies were based on fecal occult blood testing,and more recently,the fecal immunochemical test(FIT).Participation in screening has varied greatly among different programs.The Netherlands showed the highest participation rate(68.2%)and some areas of Canada showed the lowest(16%).Participation rates were highest among women and in programs that used the FIT test.Men exhibited the greatest number of positive results.The FIT test has been the most widely used screening program worldwide.The advent of this test has increased participation rates and the detection of positive results.
基金Supported by The National 11th 5-Year Key Programs for Department of Science and Technology of China, No. 2006BAI02A08
文摘AIM: To explore the value of serum M2-pyruvate kinase (M2-PK) in colorectal cancer (CRC) mass screening. METHODS: We conducted a molecular epidemiology study in Hangzhou, China, from year 2006 to year 2008. Serum samples were collected from 93 CRC, 41 advanced adenomas, 137 adenomas, 47 non-adenomatous polyps, and 158 normal participants in a community setting. Serum M2-PK and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were measured using Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. SPSS 16.0 software was used to perform data analysis. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificities were estimated for serum M2-PK in diagnosis of colorectal lesions and compared with CEA. RESULTS: Average serum M2-PK value among 158 normal people was 2.96 U/mL and not affected by gender (P = 0.47) or age (P = 0.59). Average serum M2-PK (U/mL) was 14.75 among stage III and 13.10 among stage?I?and II CRC patients, about 4 times higher than that among normal people. Average serum M2-PK was 8.58, 6.70, 5.13 and 2.51 U/mL among advanced adenoma, adenomas, non-adenomatous polyps, and inflammatory bowel disease patients, respectively. AUC for serum M2-PK was greater than that for CEA among all colorectal lesions. AUC for serum M2-PK was 0.89 (0.84, 0.94) (95% confidence interval), higher than that for CEA [0.70 (0.62-0.79)] in CRC stage?I?and II, 0.89 (0.84-0.94) vs 0.73 (0.63-0.83) in CRC stage III, 0.81 (0.74-0.86) vs 0.63 (0.53 - 0.73) in advanced adenomas, 0.69 (0.64-0.76) vs 0.54 (0.47-0.60) in adenomas, and 0.69 (0.62-0.78) vs 0.58 (0.48-0.68) in non-adenomatous polyps. The diagnostic sensitivity for all colorectal lesions increased with decrease in the cut-off value of serum M2-PK. The diagnostic sensitivity (%) of serum M2-PK was 100.00 for CRC, 95.12 advanced adenoma, 82.48 adenoma, and 82.98 non-adenomatous polyp. There were no CRC cases missed and 40.51% of unnecessary colonoscopies were avoided when the cut-off value was 2.00 U/mL. CONCLUSION: Serum M2-PK can be used as a primary screening test in CRC mass screening. It may be a promising non-invasive biomarker for CRC early detection.
文摘BACKGROUND Since its complete roll-out in 2009,the French colorectal cancer screening program(CRCSP)experienced 3 major constraints[use of a less efficient Guaiac-test(gFOBT),stopping the supply of Fecal-Immunochemical-Test kits(FIT),and suspension of the program due to the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)]affecting its effectiveness.AIM To describe the impact of the constraints in terms of changes in the quality of screeningcolonoscopy(Quali-Colo).METHODS This retrospective cohort study included screening-colonoscopies performed by gastroenterologists between Jan-2010 and Dec-2020 in people aged 50-74 living in Ile-de-France(France).The changes in Quali-colo(Proportion of colonoscopies performed beyond 7 mo(Colo_7 mo),Frequency of serious adverse events(SAE)and Colonoscopy detection rate)were described in a cohort of Gastroenterologists who performed at least one colonoscopy over each of the four periods defined according to the chronology of the constraints[gFOBT:Normal progress of the CRCSP using gFOBT(2010-2014);FIT:Normal progress of the CRCSP using FIT(2015-2018);STOP-FIT:Year(2019)during which the CRCSP experienced the cessation of the supply of test kits;COVID:Program suspension due to the COVID-19 health crisis(2020)].The link between each dependent variable(Colo_7 mo;SAE occurrence,neoplasm detection rate)and the predictive factors was analyzed in a two-level multivariate hierarchical model.RESULTS The 533 gastroenterologists(cohort)achieved 21509 screening colonoscopies over gFOBT period,38352 over FIT,7342 over STOP-FIT and 7995 over COVID period.The frequency of SAE did not change between periods(gFOBT:0.3%;FIT:0.3%;STOP-FIT:0.3%;and COVID:0.2%;P=0.10).The risk of Colo_7 mo doubled between FIT[adjusted odds ratio(aOR):1.2(1.1;1.2)]and STOPFIT[aOR:2.4(2.1;2.6)];then,decreased by 40%between STOP-FIT and COVID[aOR:2.0(1.8;2.2)].Regardless of the period,this Colo_7 mo’s risk was twice as high for screening colonoscopy performed in a public hospital[aOR:2.1(1.3;3.6)]compared to screening-colonoscopy performed in a private clinic.The neoplasm detection,which increased by 60%between gFOBT and FIT[aOR:1.6(1.5;1.7)],decreased by 40%between FIT and COVID[aOR:1.1(1.0;1.3)].CONCLUSION The constraints likely affected the time-to-colonoscopy as well as the colonoscopy detection rate without impacting the SAE’s occurrence,highlighting the need for a respectable reference time-tocolonoscopy in CRCSP.
基金Supported by Foundation of Population Screening Mid-West Netherlands,Amsterdam,The Netherlands(BoMW)Foundation of Population Screening South-West Netherlands,Rotterdam,The Netherlands(BoZW)+2 种基金Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization(IKNL)Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development of the Dutch Ministry of Health(ZonMW)PALGA,the Nationwide Network and Registry of Histo-and Cytopathology in the Netherlands.
文摘BACKGROUND For optimizing fecal immunochemical test(FIT)-based screening programs,reducing the rate of missed colorectal cancers(CRCs)by FIT(FIT-interval CRCs)is an important aspect.Knowledge of the molecular make-up of these missed lesions could facilitate more accurate detection of all(precursor)lesions.AIM To compare the molecular make-up of FIT-interval CRCs to lesions that are detected by FIT[screen-detected CRCs(SD-CRCs)].METHODS FIT-interval CRCs observed in a Dutch pilot-program of FIT-based screening were compared to a control group of SD-CRCs in a 1:2 ratio,resulting in 27 FIT-interval CRC and 54 SD-CRCs.Molecular analyses included microsatellite instability(MSI),CpG island methylator phenotype(CIMP),DNA sequence mutations and copy number alterations(CNAs).RESULTS Although no significant differences were reached,FIT-interval CRCs were more often CIMP positive and MSI positive(33%CIMP in FIT-interval CRCs vs 21%in SD-CRCs(P=0.274);19%MSI in FIT-interval CRCs vs 12%in SD-CRCs(P=0.469)),and showed more often serrated pathway associated features such as BRAF(30%vs 12%,P=0.090)and PTEN(15%vs 2.4%,P=0.063)mutations.APC mutations,a classic feature of the adenoma-carcinoma-sequence,were more abundant in SD-CRCs(68%vs 40%in FIT-interval CRCs P=0.035).Regarding CNAs differences between the two groups;FIT-interval CRCs less often showed gains at the regions 8p11.22-q24.3(P=0.009),and more often gains at 20p13-p12.1(P=0.039).CONCLUSION Serrated pathway associated molecular features seem to be more common in FIT-interval CRCs,while classic adenoma carcinoma pathway associated molecular features seem to be more common in SD-CRCs.This indicates that proximal serrated lesions may be overrepresented among FITinterval CRCs.
基金Supported by The Guangdong Medical Research Foundation of China,No.A2020603.
文摘BACKGROUND Designing a feasible risk prediction model for advanced colorectal neoplasia(ACN)can enhance colonoscopy screening efficiency.Abdominal obesity is associated with colorectal cancer development.AIM To propose and evaluate a modified scoring model incorporating waist-hip ratio for the prediction of ACN.METHODS A total of 6483 patients who underwent their first screening or diagnostic colonoscopy in our center between 2020 and 2023 were recruited,in which 4592 were in the derivation cohort and 1891 formed a validation cohort.Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate the risk factors of ACN in the derivation cohort based on endoscopic findings,and a new scoring model for ACN prediction was developed.The discriminatory capability of the scoring model was validated by the validation cohort.RESULTS Age,male gender,smoking,and wait-to-hip ratio were identified as independent risk factors for ACN,and a 7-point scoring model was developed.The prevalence of ACN was 3.3%,9.3%and 18.5%in participants with scores of 0-2[low risk(LR)],3–4[moderate risk(MR)],and 5–7[high risk(HR)],respectively,in the derivation cohort.With the scoring model,49.9%,38.4%,and 11.7%of patients in the validation cohort were categorized as LR,MR,and HR,respectively.The corresponding prevalence rates of ACN were 5.0%,10.3%,and 17.6%,respectively.The C-statistic of the new scoring model was 0.66,which was higher than that of the Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening model(0.63).CONCLUSION A modified scoring model incorporating waist-hip ratio has an improved predictive performance in the prediction of ACN.
