BACKGROUND Colonic diverticular bleeding(CDB)is a leading cause of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage that has a high risk of recurrence.The endoscopic clipping and endoscopic band ligation(EBL)methods are widely used ...BACKGROUND Colonic diverticular bleeding(CDB)is a leading cause of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage that has a high risk of recurrence.The endoscopic clipping and endoscopic band ligation(EBL)methods are widely used for hemostasis in patients with CDB.Endoscopic detachable snare ligation(EDSL)has also become an increasingly common treatment option.The data remain inconsistent regarding the comparative efficacy of these endoscopic therapies in achieving initial hemostasis and reduction of early and late rebleeding rates.AIM To study the effectiveness and complications of endoscopic clipping,EBL,and EDSL for CDB.METHODS We conducted a systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE,Scopus,Web of Science,Embase,Google Scholar,and the Cochrane database for clinical trials to find studies that reported CDB and endoscopic clipping,EBL,or EDSL as treatment methods.The pooled estimates of initial hemostasis,early and late rebleeding,and the need for transarterial embolization or surgery between these groups were calculated.RESULTS We analyzed 28 studies with 5224 patients.Of these,4526 had active CDB and required one of the three endoscopic interventions.The pooled prevalence of early rebleeding was 23.5%,10.7%,and 10.6%in the endoscopic clipping,EBL,and EDSL groups,respectively.Patients who underwent endoscopic clipping had a significantly higher rate of early rebleeding compared to those who received EBL[odds ratio(OR)=3.76(95%CI:2.13-6.63)]and EDSL(OR=3.30,95%CI:1.28-8.53).There was no difference in the initial hemostasis between the three groups.The pooled prevalence of late rebleeding was 27.2%in the clipping,followed by 13.8%in the EBL and 2.7%in the EDSL group.Compared to 2.6%in the EBL group,4.0%of patients who received endoscopic clipping subsequently underwent surgery or transarterial embolization.These results were consistent in the network meta-analysis.Based on the ranking of the indirect comparison of modalities,the snare technique was better at achieving initial hemostasis and had a lower late rebleeding rate.CONCLUSION The findings of this direct and indirect pairwise comparison suggest that EDSL is superior to endoscopic clipping and EBL in achieving initial hemostasis and lowering the rate of late rebleeding in patients with CDB.展开更多
We herein report the rare complication of sepsis caused by endoscopic clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding. A 78-year-old man with a 12-h history of near syncope and painless hematochezia was admitted to our hos...We herein report the rare complication of sepsis caused by endoscopic clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding. A 78-year-old man with a 12-h history of near syncope and painless hematochezia was admitted to our hospital. Following the transfusion of 4 U of blood and continued hematochezia, a colonoscopy was performed. Active bleeding was seen as continuous arterial spurting from a single diverticulum located in the middle ascending colon. This diverticulum was seamed by four endoclips. The next day, the patient became febrile with a temperature of 39.2℃. Laboratory data included a white blood cell count of 18 100/mm3 and a C-reactive protein level of 3.4 mg/dL. He was diagnosed with sepsis since Escherichia coli was detected in the blood culture. Antibiotics were started. Four days later his fever had improved and laboratory data improved 9 d later.展开更多
BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend colonoscopy within 24 h for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding;however,the evidence in support for colonic diverticular hemorrhage(CDH)indications remains insufficient.AIM To...BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend colonoscopy within 24 h for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding;however,the evidence in support for colonic diverticular hemorrhage(CDH)indications remains insufficient.AIM To investigate the effectiveness of early colonoscopy on the length of hospital stay for CDH patients.METHODS We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study.Patients who underwent colonoscopy within 24 h of presentation(early group)were compared with those who underwent colonoscopy beyond 24 h of presentation(elective group).The primary outcome was the length of hospital stay,and secondary outcomes were the identification of stigmata of recent hemorrhage(SRH),rebleeding,red blood cell transfusion more than 4 units,and interventional radiology and abdominal surgery after colonoscopy.RESULTS We identified 574 CDH cases.Patients were divided into the early(n=328)and elective(n=226)groups.After propensity score matching,191 pairs were generated.The length of hospital stay did not significantly differ between the two groups(early group vs elective group;median,7 vs 8 d;P=0.10).The early group had a significantly high identification of SRH(risk difference,11.6%;95%CI:2.7 to 20.3;P=0.02).No significant differences were found in the rebleeding(risk difference,4.7%;95%CI:-4.1 to 13.5;P=0.35),red blood cell transfusion more than 4 units(risk difference,1.6%;95%CI:-7.5 to 10.6;P=0.82),and interventional radiology and abdominal surgery rate after colonoscopy(risk difference,0.5%;95%CI:-2.2 to 3.2;P=1.00).CONCLUSION Early colonoscopy within 24 h,on arrival for CDH,could not improve the length of hospital stay.展开更多
Colonoscopy with polypectomy has been shown to reduce the risk of colon cancer. The critical element in the quality of colonoscopy in terms of polyp detection and removal continues to be the performance of the endosco...Colonoscopy with polypectomy has been shown to reduce the risk of colon cancer. The critical element in the quality of colonoscopy in terms of polyp detection and removal continues to be the performance of the endoscopist, independent of patient-related factors. Improved results in terms of polyp detection and complete removal have implications regarding the development of screening and surveillance intervals and the reduction of interval cancers after negative colonoscopy. Advances in colonoscopy techniques such as high-definition colonoscopy, hood-assisted colonoscopy and dye-based chromoendoscopy have improved the detection of small and flat-type colorectal polyps. Virtual chromoendoscopy has not proven to improve polyp detection but may be useful to predict polyp pathology. The majority of polyps can be removed endoscopically. Available polypectomy techniques include cold forceps polypectomy, cold snare polypectomy, conventional polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection. The preferred choice depends on the polyp size and characteristics. Other useful techniques include colonoscopic hemostasis for acute colonic diverticular bleeding, endoscopic decompression using colonoscopic stenting, and transanal tube placement for colorectal obstruction. Here we review the current knowledge concerning the improvement of quality measures in colonoscopy and colonoscopy-related therapeutic interventions.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Colonic diverticular bleeding(CDB)is a leading cause of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage that has a high risk of recurrence.The endoscopic clipping and endoscopic band ligation(EBL)methods are widely used for hemostasis in patients with CDB.Endoscopic detachable snare ligation(EDSL)has also become an increasingly common treatment option.The data remain inconsistent regarding the comparative efficacy of these endoscopic therapies in achieving initial hemostasis and reduction of early and late rebleeding rates.AIM To study the effectiveness and complications of endoscopic clipping,EBL,and EDSL for CDB.METHODS We conducted a systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE,Scopus,Web of Science,Embase,Google Scholar,and the Cochrane database for clinical trials to find studies that reported CDB and endoscopic clipping,EBL,or EDSL as treatment methods.The pooled estimates of initial hemostasis,early and late rebleeding,and the need for transarterial embolization or surgery between these groups were calculated.RESULTS We analyzed 28 studies with 5224 patients.Of these,4526 had active CDB and required one of the three endoscopic interventions.The pooled prevalence of early rebleeding was 23.5%,10.7%,and 10.6%in the endoscopic clipping,EBL,and EDSL groups,respectively.Patients who underwent endoscopic clipping had a significantly higher rate of early rebleeding compared to those who received EBL[odds ratio(OR)=3.76(95%CI:2.13-6.63)]and EDSL(OR=3.30,95%CI:1.28-8.53).There was no difference in the initial hemostasis between the three groups.The pooled prevalence of late rebleeding was 27.2%in the clipping,followed by 13.8%in the EBL and 2.7%in the EDSL group.Compared to 2.6%in the EBL group,4.0%of patients who received endoscopic clipping subsequently underwent surgery or transarterial embolization.These results were consistent in the network meta-analysis.Based on the ranking of the indirect comparison of modalities,the snare technique was better at achieving initial hemostasis and had a lower late rebleeding rate.CONCLUSION The findings of this direct and indirect pairwise comparison suggest that EDSL is superior to endoscopic clipping and EBL in achieving initial hemostasis and lowering the rate of late rebleeding in patients with CDB.
文摘We herein report the rare complication of sepsis caused by endoscopic clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding. A 78-year-old man with a 12-h history of near syncope and painless hematochezia was admitted to our hospital. Following the transfusion of 4 U of blood and continued hematochezia, a colonoscopy was performed. Active bleeding was seen as continuous arterial spurting from a single diverticulum located in the middle ascending colon. This diverticulum was seamed by four endoclips. The next day, the patient became febrile with a temperature of 39.2℃. Laboratory data included a white blood cell count of 18 100/mm3 and a C-reactive protein level of 3.4 mg/dL. He was diagnosed with sepsis since Escherichia coli was detected in the blood culture. Antibiotics were started. Four days later his fever had improved and laboratory data improved 9 d later.
文摘BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend colonoscopy within 24 h for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding;however,the evidence in support for colonic diverticular hemorrhage(CDH)indications remains insufficient.AIM To investigate the effectiveness of early colonoscopy on the length of hospital stay for CDH patients.METHODS We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study.Patients who underwent colonoscopy within 24 h of presentation(early group)were compared with those who underwent colonoscopy beyond 24 h of presentation(elective group).The primary outcome was the length of hospital stay,and secondary outcomes were the identification of stigmata of recent hemorrhage(SRH),rebleeding,red blood cell transfusion more than 4 units,and interventional radiology and abdominal surgery after colonoscopy.RESULTS We identified 574 CDH cases.Patients were divided into the early(n=328)and elective(n=226)groups.After propensity score matching,191 pairs were generated.The length of hospital stay did not significantly differ between the two groups(early group vs elective group;median,7 vs 8 d;P=0.10).The early group had a significantly high identification of SRH(risk difference,11.6%;95%CI:2.7 to 20.3;P=0.02).No significant differences were found in the rebleeding(risk difference,4.7%;95%CI:-4.1 to 13.5;P=0.35),red blood cell transfusion more than 4 units(risk difference,1.6%;95%CI:-7.5 to 10.6;P=0.82),and interventional radiology and abdominal surgery rate after colonoscopy(risk difference,0.5%;95%CI:-2.2 to 3.2;P=1.00).CONCLUSION Early colonoscopy within 24 h,on arrival for CDH,could not improve the length of hospital stay.
文摘Colonoscopy with polypectomy has been shown to reduce the risk of colon cancer. The critical element in the quality of colonoscopy in terms of polyp detection and removal continues to be the performance of the endoscopist, independent of patient-related factors. Improved results in terms of polyp detection and complete removal have implications regarding the development of screening and surveillance intervals and the reduction of interval cancers after negative colonoscopy. Advances in colonoscopy techniques such as high-definition colonoscopy, hood-assisted colonoscopy and dye-based chromoendoscopy have improved the detection of small and flat-type colorectal polyps. Virtual chromoendoscopy has not proven to improve polyp detection but may be useful to predict polyp pathology. The majority of polyps can be removed endoscopically. Available polypectomy techniques include cold forceps polypectomy, cold snare polypectomy, conventional polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection. The preferred choice depends on the polyp size and characteristics. Other useful techniques include colonoscopic hemostasis for acute colonic diverticular bleeding, endoscopic decompression using colonoscopic stenting, and transanal tube placement for colorectal obstruction. Here we review the current knowledge concerning the improvement of quality measures in colonoscopy and colonoscopy-related therapeutic interventions.
