BACKGROUND Cold polypectomy(CP)is a simple and safe procedure for polyps less than 10 mm in size;however,there is concern about local recurrence following CP because of unidentified margins of excised specimens and th...BACKGROUND Cold polypectomy(CP)is a simple and safe procedure for polyps less than 10 mm in size;however,there is concern about local recurrence following CP because of unidentified margins of excised specimens and the lack of tumor suppression effect by coagulation.Some clinical trials have evaluated local persistent recurrence;their results suggest that a higher rate of local recurrence has not been documented so far.There were few reports that observed the course over long periods of time after CP in clinical practice.AIM To evaluate the presence of local recurrence following CP and hot polypectomy(HP)using propensity score matching.METHODS We analyzed 275 patients who underwent polypectomy for non-pedunculated colorectal polyps less than 10 mm(959 Lesions)between October 2016 and 2017 and underwent follow-up endoscopy subsequently.We divided them into the CP group(706 Lesions),wherein CP was performed,and the HP group(253 Lesions),wherein HP was performed.Using propensity score matching,we extracted 215 Lesions in each group and evaluated the local recurrence and content of CP in the real clinic and adverse events using medical records.RESULTS After propensity score matching,there were no significant differences in the patients’and their endoscopic background(age,use of antithrombotics,indications,size,morphology,location of polyps,and polypectomy device)between the groups.The mean duration between colorectal polypectomy and the next follow-up colonoscopy was 17.5±7.1(range,6-39)mo in the CP group and 15.7±6.0(range,6-35)mo in the HP group,which was significantly longer in the CP group(P=0.005).The local recurrence rate was 0.93%in the CP group and 0.93%in the HP group,without a significant difference(P=0.688).Additionally,no differences were observed in the macroscopic en bloc resection rate,histopathological complete resection rate,and pathological results between the groups.Adverse events did not occur in either group.CONCLUSION Local recurrence after CP was equivalent to that following HP in clinical practice.CP is useful and safe in the treatment of non-pedunculated polyps of less than 10 mm.展开更多
BACKGROUND Although substantial evidence supports the advantages of cold snare polypectomy(CSP)in terms of polypectomy efficacy and reduced postoperative adverse events,few studies have examined the cost differences b...BACKGROUND Although substantial evidence supports the advantages of cold snare polypectomy(CSP)in terms of polypectomy efficacy and reduced postoperative adverse events,few studies have examined the cost differences between CSP and traditional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)for the treatment of intestinal polyps.AIM To compare the efficacy-cost of EMR and CSP in the treatment of intestinal polyps.METHODS A total of 100 patients with intestinal polyps were included in the retrospective data of our hospital from April 2022 to May 2023.According to the treatment methods,they were divided into EMR(n=46)group and CSP(n=54)group.The baseline data of the two groups were balanced by 1:1 propensity score matching(PSM),and the cost-effectiveness analysis was performed on the two groups after matching.The recurrence rate of the two groups of patients was followed up for 1 year,and they were divided into recurrence group and non-recurrence group according to whether they recurred.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen out the influencing factors affecting the recurrence of intestinal polyps after endoscopic resection.RESULTS Significant disparities were observed in the number of polyps and smoking background between the two groups before PSM(P<0.05).Following PSM,the number of polyps and smoking history were well balanced between the EMR and CSP groups.The direct cost incurred by the CSP group was markedly higher than that incurred by the EMR group.Concurrently,the cost-effectiveness ratio in the CSP group was substantially reduced when juxtaposed with that in the EMR group(P<0.05).Upon completion of the 1-year follow-up,the rate of recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy was 38.00%.Multivariate methods revealed that age≥60 years,male sex,number of polyps≥3,and pathological type of adenoma were risk factors for recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy(all P<0.05).CONCLUSION CSP was more cost-effective for the treatment of intestinal polyps.An age≥60 years,male sex,having a number of polyps≥3,and pathological type of adenoma are independent influencing factors for recurrence.展开更多
Current guidelines recommend cold snare polypectomy for polyps less than 10 mm in size.Conversely,endoscopic mucosal resection is still the preferred technique for larger polyps.Concerns regarding cold snare polypecto...Current guidelines recommend cold snare polypectomy for polyps less than 10 mm in size.Conversely,endoscopic mucosal resection is still the preferred technique for larger polyps.Concerns regarding cold snare polypectomy for larger polyps revolve around the difficulty in conducting en-bloc resection(resulting in piecemeal removal),and the potential for local residual polyp tissue and a high rate of recurrence.On the other hand,cold snare technique has the advantages of shortening procedure time,reducing delayed bleeding risks and lowering cost of treatment.Numerous ongoing and recent studies are focused on evaluating the risks and benefits of this technique for polyps larger than 10 mm,with the goal of providing clear guidelines in the near future.The aim of this editorial is to provide our readers with an overview regarding this subject and the latest developments surrounding it.展开更多
AIM: To compare previously reported randomized controlled studies (RCTs) of cold and hot polypectomy, we systematically reviewed and clarify the utility of cold polypectomy over hot with respect to efficacy and advers...AIM: To compare previously reported randomized controlled studies (RCTs) of cold and hot polypectomy, we systematically reviewed and clarify the utility of cold polypectomy over hot with respect to efficacy and adverse events.METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the predominance of cold and hot polypectomy for removing colon polyps. Published articles and abstracts from worldwide conferences were searched using the keywords “cold polypectomy”. RCTs that compared either or both the effects or adverse events of cold polypectomy with those of hot polypectomy were collected. The patients’ demographics, endoscopic procedures, No. of examined lesions, lesion size, macroscopic and histologic findings, rates of incomplete resection, bleeding amount, perforation, and length of procedure were extracted from each study. A forest plot analysis was used to verify the relative strength of the effects and adverse events of each procedure. A funnel plot was generated to assess the possibility of publication bias.RESULTS: Ultimately, six RCTs were selected. No significant differences were noted in the average lesion size (less than 10 mm) between the cold and hot polypectomy groups in each study. Further, the rates of complete resection and adverse events, including delayed bleeding, did not differ markedly between cold and hot polypectomy. The average procedural time in the cold polypectomy group was significantly shorter than in the hot polypectomy group.CONCLUSION: Cold polypectomy is a time-saving procedure for removing small polyps with markedly similar curability and safety to hot polypectomy.展开更多
This is a comment on a meta-analysis of published studies comparing cold vs hot polypectomy. We believe that the conclusion of this meta-analysis that "cold polypectomy is a time-saving procedure for removing sma...This is a comment on a meta-analysis of published studies comparing cold vs hot polypectomy. We believe that the conclusion of this meta-analysis that "cold polypectomy is a time-saving procedure for removing small polyps with markedly similar curability and safety to hot polypectomy" needs more rigorous evidence.展开更多
AIMTo compare the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot forceps biopsy (HFB) for diminutive colorectal polyps.METHODSThis prospective, randomized single-center clinical trial included consecutive...AIMTo compare the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot forceps biopsy (HFB) for diminutive colorectal polyps.METHODSThis prospective, randomized single-center clinical trial included consecutive patients ≥ 20 years of age with diminutive colorectal polyps 3-5 mm from December 2014 to October 2015. The primary outcome measures were en-bloc resection (endoscopic evaluation) and complete resection rates (pathological evaluation). The secondary outcome measures were the immediate bleeding or immediate perforation rate after polypectomy, delayed bleeding or delayed perforation rate after polypectomy, use of clipping for bleeding or perforation, and polyp retrieval rate. Prophylactic clipping after polyp removal wasn’t routinely performed.RESULTSTwo hundred eight patients were randomized into the CSP (102), HFB (106) and 283 polyps were evaluated (CSP: 148, HFB: 135). The en-bloc resection rate was significantly higher with CSP than with HFB [99.3% (147/148) vs 80.0% (108/135), P < 0.0001]. The complete resection rate was significantly higher with CSP than with HFB [80.4% (119/148) vs 47.4% (64/135), P < 0.0001]. The immediate bleeding rate was similar between the groups [8.6% (13/148) vs 8.1% (11/135), P = 1.000], and endoscopic hemostasis with hemoclips was successful in all cases. No cases of perforation or delayed bleeding occurred. The rate of severe tissue injury to the pathological specimen was higher HFB than CSP [52.6% (71/135) vs 1.3% (2/148), P < 0.0001]. Polyp retrieval failure was encountered CSP (7), HFB (2).CONCLUSIONCSP is more effective than HFB for resecting diminutive polyps. Further long-term follow-up study is required.展开更多
AIM: To investigate the feasibility of cold snare polypectomy(CSP) in Japan.METHODS: The outcomes of 234 non-pedunculated polyps smaller than 10 mm in 61 patients who underwent CSP in a Japanese referral center were r...AIM: To investigate the feasibility of cold snare polypectomy(CSP) in Japan.METHODS: The outcomes of 234 non-pedunculated polyps smaller than 10 mm in 61 patients who underwent CSP in a Japanese referral center were retrospectively analyzed. The cold snare polypectomies were performed by nine endoscopists with no prior experience in CSP using an electrosurgical snare without electrocautery.RESULTS: CSPs were completed for 232 of the 234 polyps. Two(0.9%) polyps could not be removed without electrocautery. Immediate postpolypectomy bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis occurred in eight lesions(3.4%; 95%CI: 1.1%-5.8%), but all were easily managed. The incidence of immediate bleeding after CSP for small polyps(6-9 mm) was significantly higher than that of diminutive polyps(≤ 5 mm; 15% vs 1%, respectively). Three(5%) patients complained of minor bleeding after the procedure but required no intervention. The incidence of delayed bleeding requiringendoscopic intervention was 0.0%(95%CI: 0.0%-1.7%). In total, 12% of the resected lesions could not be retrieved for pathological examination. Tumor involvement in the lateral margin could not be histologically assessed in 70(40%) lesions.CONCLUSION: CSP is feasible in Japan. However, immediate bleeding, retrieval failure and uncertain assessment of the lateral tumor margin should not be underestimated. Careful endoscopic diagnosis before and evaluation of the tumor residue after CSP are recommended when implementing CSP in Japan.展开更多
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer remains a considerable challenge in healthcare nowadays.Approximately 60%-80%of colorectal cancer is caused by intestinal polyps,and resection of intestinal polyps has been proved to reduc...BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer remains a considerable challenge in healthcare nowadays.Approximately 60%-80%of colorectal cancer is caused by intestinal polyps,and resection of intestinal polyps has been proved to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer.The vast majority of intestinal polyps can be found during colonoscopy and removed endoscopically.Therefore,more attention has been paid to the development of endoscopic resection of intestinal polyps.In this study,we compared the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy(CSP)and hot snare polypectomy(HSP).AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of CSP and HSP for colorectal polyps.METHODS Between January and December 2020,301 patients with colorectal polyps 4-9 mm in diameter were treated with endoscopic therapy in our hospital,and were divided into the CSP group(n=154)and HSP group(n=147).The operating time,incidence of bleeding and perforation,use of titanium clips,and complete resection rate were compared between the two groups.RESULTS We included 249 patients(301 polyps).No differences in gender,age,and polyp size,location,shape and type were observed between the CSP and HSP groups,and the resection rates in these two groups were 93.4%and 94.5%,respectively,with no significant difference.The use of titanium clips was 15.6%and 95.9%,the operating time was 3.2±0.5 min and 5.6±0.8 min,the delayed bleeding rate was 0%and 2.0%,and delayed perforation was 0%and 0.7%,in the CSP and HSP groups,respectively.CONCLUSIONFor sessile colorectal polyps < 10 mm, CSP had the same resection rate of impaired tissue integrityas traditional HSP had. The rate of complications was lower in the CSP group. CSP is a safe andeffective method for polypectomy.展开更多
Due to the high risk of morbidity and mortality associated with surgical resection in this tract,endoscopic resection(ER)has taken the place of surgical resection as the first line treatment for non-ampullary duodenal...Due to the high risk of morbidity and mortality associated with surgical resection in this tract,endoscopic resection(ER)has taken the place of surgical resection as the first line treatment for non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.However,due to the anatomical characteristics of this area,which enhance the risk of post-ER problems,ER in the duodenum is particularly difficult.Due to a lack of data,no ER technique for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumours(SNADETs)has yet been backed by strong,high-quality evidence;yet,traditional hot snare-based techniques are still regarded as the standard treatment.Despite having a favourable efficiency profile,adverse events during duodenal hot snare polypectomy(HSP)and hot endoscopic mucosal resection,such as delayed bleeding and perforation,have been reported to be frequent.These events are primarily caused by electrocautery-induced damage.Thus,ER techniques with a better safety profile are needed to overcome these shortcomings.Cold snare polypectomy,which has already been shown as a safer,equally effective pro-cedure compared to HSP for treatment of small colorectal polyps,is being increasingly evaluated as a potential therapeutic option for non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.The aim of this review is to report and discuss the early outcomes of the first experiences with cold snaring for SNADETs.展开更多
BACKGROUND Cold snare polypectomy(CSP)is comparatively safe and effective for removing polyps less than 10 mm in size with lower rates of postpolypectomy syndrome and delayed postpolypectomy bleeding compared with hot...BACKGROUND Cold snare polypectomy(CSP)is comparatively safe and effective for removing polyps less than 10 mm in size with lower rates of postpolypectomy syndrome and delayed postpolypectomy bleeding compared with hot snare polypectomy(HSP).Recently,CSP is also expanded for removing polyps larger than 10 mm in size.AIM To compare the efficiency and safety of CSP and HSP in the management of 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.METHODS A total of 1686 inpatients with at least one 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyp,who underwent CSP(study group,n=843)or HSP(control group,n=843)at our Digestive Endoscopy Center between February 2020 and February 2024 were enrolled.The outcome measures including complete resection rate,intraoperative bleeding rate,and healthcare expenses such as procedure time and treatment cost were compared between the CSP vs HSP groups.RESULTS No statistically significant intergroup difference was observed in histological complete resection rates(P>0.05).Polyp resection time in the study group(76.5±23.6 seconds)was notably shorter than that in the control group(91.24±32.06 seconds;P<0.05).The immediate intraoperative bleeding rate was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group(12.7%vs 4.9%,P<0.05).No instances of delayed bleeding or perforation were documented in either group.Hospitalization duration was significantly reduced in the study group(2.42±0.61 days)compared to the control group(3.21±1.02 days;P<0.05).CONCLUSION For 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps,CSP demonstrates operational efficiency advantages over HSP in terms of procedure time,treatment cost,and length of hospital stay.Both techniques demonstrate robust safety profiles;however,CSP is associated with a higher intraoperative bleeding rate.Clinical decision-making should incorporate individualized assessment of these factors.展开更多
BACKGROUND Colorectal polypectomy is fundamental to the prevention of colorectal cancer,utilizing several endoscopic techniques.Robust comparative data regarding the efficacy and safety of these modalities in clinical...BACKGROUND Colorectal polypectomy is fundamental to the prevention of colorectal cancer,utilizing several endoscopic techniques.Robust comparative data regarding the efficacy and safety of these modalities in clinical practice are limited.AIM To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of three endoscopic polypectomy techniques,namely,high-frequency electroresection(HFE),cold snare polypectomy(CSP),and endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR),for the treatment of colonic polyps.METHODS This single-center retrospective cohort study included adults who underwent endoscopic resection of pathologically confirmed colorectal polyps at Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University between January 2015 and December 2023.Patients were grouped by technique:HFE(n=107),CSP(n=106),and EMR(n=108).Standardized preoperative,intraoperative,and postoperative protocols were applied.Outcome measures included resection status(en bloc,R0,R1,and Rx),adverse events(immediate/delayed bleeding,perforation,and post-polypectomy coagulation syndrome),postoperative pain(visual analog scale at 1,3,and 5 hours),and 12-month recurrence rate.RESULTS Baseline demographics and polyp characteristics,except for polyp diameter,were comparable among groups.CSP achieved the highest en bloc resection rate,whereas HFE had a higher R0 resection rate.Polyp diameter was largest in the EMR group.Procedure duration was shortest with HFE.Adverse reactions were more frequent with HFE,particularly post-polypectomy bleeding and delayed perforation,whereas CSP demonstrated a superior safety profile and the lowest incidence of complications.Postoperative pain diminished in all groups over time but was consistently low for CSP and EMR.Recurrence rates were significantly higher in the EMR group vs CSP group,with HFE showing intermediate recurrence.CONCLUSION CSP offers the best safety profile and lowest recurrence rate among patients undergoing endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps,whereas HFE confers a high R0 resection rate but increased risk of adverse events.EMR remains essential for large polyps despite elevated recurrence.Technique selection should be tailored according to polyp characteristics and patient risk factors to optimize outcomes.展开更多
基金the Ethical Review Board of the Nagoya University Hospital(2015-0449).
文摘BACKGROUND Cold polypectomy(CP)is a simple and safe procedure for polyps less than 10 mm in size;however,there is concern about local recurrence following CP because of unidentified margins of excised specimens and the lack of tumor suppression effect by coagulation.Some clinical trials have evaluated local persistent recurrence;their results suggest that a higher rate of local recurrence has not been documented so far.There were few reports that observed the course over long periods of time after CP in clinical practice.AIM To evaluate the presence of local recurrence following CP and hot polypectomy(HP)using propensity score matching.METHODS We analyzed 275 patients who underwent polypectomy for non-pedunculated colorectal polyps less than 10 mm(959 Lesions)between October 2016 and 2017 and underwent follow-up endoscopy subsequently.We divided them into the CP group(706 Lesions),wherein CP was performed,and the HP group(253 Lesions),wherein HP was performed.Using propensity score matching,we extracted 215 Lesions in each group and evaluated the local recurrence and content of CP in the real clinic and adverse events using medical records.RESULTS After propensity score matching,there were no significant differences in the patients’and their endoscopic background(age,use of antithrombotics,indications,size,morphology,location of polyps,and polypectomy device)between the groups.The mean duration between colorectal polypectomy and the next follow-up colonoscopy was 17.5±7.1(range,6-39)mo in the CP group and 15.7±6.0(range,6-35)mo in the HP group,which was significantly longer in the CP group(P=0.005).The local recurrence rate was 0.93%in the CP group and 0.93%in the HP group,without a significant difference(P=0.688).Additionally,no differences were observed in the macroscopic en bloc resection rate,histopathological complete resection rate,and pathological results between the groups.Adverse events did not occur in either group.CONCLUSION Local recurrence after CP was equivalent to that following HP in clinical practice.CP is useful and safe in the treatment of non-pedunculated polyps of less than 10 mm.
文摘BACKGROUND Although substantial evidence supports the advantages of cold snare polypectomy(CSP)in terms of polypectomy efficacy and reduced postoperative adverse events,few studies have examined the cost differences between CSP and traditional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)for the treatment of intestinal polyps.AIM To compare the efficacy-cost of EMR and CSP in the treatment of intestinal polyps.METHODS A total of 100 patients with intestinal polyps were included in the retrospective data of our hospital from April 2022 to May 2023.According to the treatment methods,they were divided into EMR(n=46)group and CSP(n=54)group.The baseline data of the two groups were balanced by 1:1 propensity score matching(PSM),and the cost-effectiveness analysis was performed on the two groups after matching.The recurrence rate of the two groups of patients was followed up for 1 year,and they were divided into recurrence group and non-recurrence group according to whether they recurred.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen out the influencing factors affecting the recurrence of intestinal polyps after endoscopic resection.RESULTS Significant disparities were observed in the number of polyps and smoking background between the two groups before PSM(P<0.05).Following PSM,the number of polyps and smoking history were well balanced between the EMR and CSP groups.The direct cost incurred by the CSP group was markedly higher than that incurred by the EMR group.Concurrently,the cost-effectiveness ratio in the CSP group was substantially reduced when juxtaposed with that in the EMR group(P<0.05).Upon completion of the 1-year follow-up,the rate of recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy was 38.00%.Multivariate methods revealed that age≥60 years,male sex,number of polyps≥3,and pathological type of adenoma were risk factors for recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy(all P<0.05).CONCLUSION CSP was more cost-effective for the treatment of intestinal polyps.An age≥60 years,male sex,having a number of polyps≥3,and pathological type of adenoma are independent influencing factors for recurrence.
文摘Current guidelines recommend cold snare polypectomy for polyps less than 10 mm in size.Conversely,endoscopic mucosal resection is still the preferred technique for larger polyps.Concerns regarding cold snare polypectomy for larger polyps revolve around the difficulty in conducting en-bloc resection(resulting in piecemeal removal),and the potential for local residual polyp tissue and a high rate of recurrence.On the other hand,cold snare technique has the advantages of shortening procedure time,reducing delayed bleeding risks and lowering cost of treatment.Numerous ongoing and recent studies are focused on evaluating the risks and benefits of this technique for polyps larger than 10 mm,with the goal of providing clear guidelines in the near future.The aim of this editorial is to provide our readers with an overview regarding this subject and the latest developments surrounding it.
文摘AIM: To compare previously reported randomized controlled studies (RCTs) of cold and hot polypectomy, we systematically reviewed and clarify the utility of cold polypectomy over hot with respect to efficacy and adverse events.METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the predominance of cold and hot polypectomy for removing colon polyps. Published articles and abstracts from worldwide conferences were searched using the keywords “cold polypectomy”. RCTs that compared either or both the effects or adverse events of cold polypectomy with those of hot polypectomy were collected. The patients’ demographics, endoscopic procedures, No. of examined lesions, lesion size, macroscopic and histologic findings, rates of incomplete resection, bleeding amount, perforation, and length of procedure were extracted from each study. A forest plot analysis was used to verify the relative strength of the effects and adverse events of each procedure. A funnel plot was generated to assess the possibility of publication bias.RESULTS: Ultimately, six RCTs were selected. No significant differences were noted in the average lesion size (less than 10 mm) between the cold and hot polypectomy groups in each study. Further, the rates of complete resection and adverse events, including delayed bleeding, did not differ markedly between cold and hot polypectomy. The average procedural time in the cold polypectomy group was significantly shorter than in the hot polypectomy group.CONCLUSION: Cold polypectomy is a time-saving procedure for removing small polyps with markedly similar curability and safety to hot polypectomy.
文摘This is a comment on a meta-analysis of published studies comparing cold vs hot polypectomy. We believe that the conclusion of this meta-analysis that "cold polypectomy is a time-saving procedure for removing small polyps with markedly similar curability and safety to hot polypectomy" needs more rigorous evidence.
文摘AIMTo compare the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot forceps biopsy (HFB) for diminutive colorectal polyps.METHODSThis prospective, randomized single-center clinical trial included consecutive patients ≥ 20 years of age with diminutive colorectal polyps 3-5 mm from December 2014 to October 2015. The primary outcome measures were en-bloc resection (endoscopic evaluation) and complete resection rates (pathological evaluation). The secondary outcome measures were the immediate bleeding or immediate perforation rate after polypectomy, delayed bleeding or delayed perforation rate after polypectomy, use of clipping for bleeding or perforation, and polyp retrieval rate. Prophylactic clipping after polyp removal wasn’t routinely performed.RESULTSTwo hundred eight patients were randomized into the CSP (102), HFB (106) and 283 polyps were evaluated (CSP: 148, HFB: 135). The en-bloc resection rate was significantly higher with CSP than with HFB [99.3% (147/148) vs 80.0% (108/135), P < 0.0001]. The complete resection rate was significantly higher with CSP than with HFB [80.4% (119/148) vs 47.4% (64/135), P < 0.0001]. The immediate bleeding rate was similar between the groups [8.6% (13/148) vs 8.1% (11/135), P = 1.000], and endoscopic hemostasis with hemoclips was successful in all cases. No cases of perforation or delayed bleeding occurred. The rate of severe tissue injury to the pathological specimen was higher HFB than CSP [52.6% (71/135) vs 1.3% (2/148), P < 0.0001]. Polyp retrieval failure was encountered CSP (7), HFB (2).CONCLUSIONCSP is more effective than HFB for resecting diminutive polyps. Further long-term follow-up study is required.
文摘AIM: To investigate the feasibility of cold snare polypectomy(CSP) in Japan.METHODS: The outcomes of 234 non-pedunculated polyps smaller than 10 mm in 61 patients who underwent CSP in a Japanese referral center were retrospectively analyzed. The cold snare polypectomies were performed by nine endoscopists with no prior experience in CSP using an electrosurgical snare without electrocautery.RESULTS: CSPs were completed for 232 of the 234 polyps. Two(0.9%) polyps could not be removed without electrocautery. Immediate postpolypectomy bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis occurred in eight lesions(3.4%; 95%CI: 1.1%-5.8%), but all were easily managed. The incidence of immediate bleeding after CSP for small polyps(6-9 mm) was significantly higher than that of diminutive polyps(≤ 5 mm; 15% vs 1%, respectively). Three(5%) patients complained of minor bleeding after the procedure but required no intervention. The incidence of delayed bleeding requiringendoscopic intervention was 0.0%(95%CI: 0.0%-1.7%). In total, 12% of the resected lesions could not be retrieved for pathological examination. Tumor involvement in the lateral margin could not be histologically assessed in 70(40%) lesions.CONCLUSION: CSP is feasible in Japan. However, immediate bleeding, retrieval failure and uncertain assessment of the lateral tumor margin should not be underestimated. Careful endoscopic diagnosis before and evaluation of the tumor residue after CSP are recommended when implementing CSP in Japan.
文摘BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer remains a considerable challenge in healthcare nowadays.Approximately 60%-80%of colorectal cancer is caused by intestinal polyps,and resection of intestinal polyps has been proved to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer.The vast majority of intestinal polyps can be found during colonoscopy and removed endoscopically.Therefore,more attention has been paid to the development of endoscopic resection of intestinal polyps.In this study,we compared the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy(CSP)and hot snare polypectomy(HSP).AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of CSP and HSP for colorectal polyps.METHODS Between January and December 2020,301 patients with colorectal polyps 4-9 mm in diameter were treated with endoscopic therapy in our hospital,and were divided into the CSP group(n=154)and HSP group(n=147).The operating time,incidence of bleeding and perforation,use of titanium clips,and complete resection rate were compared between the two groups.RESULTS We included 249 patients(301 polyps).No differences in gender,age,and polyp size,location,shape and type were observed between the CSP and HSP groups,and the resection rates in these two groups were 93.4%and 94.5%,respectively,with no significant difference.The use of titanium clips was 15.6%and 95.9%,the operating time was 3.2±0.5 min and 5.6±0.8 min,the delayed bleeding rate was 0%and 2.0%,and delayed perforation was 0%and 0.7%,in the CSP and HSP groups,respectively.CONCLUSIONFor sessile colorectal polyps < 10 mm, CSP had the same resection rate of impaired tissue integrityas traditional HSP had. The rate of complications was lower in the CSP group. CSP is a safe andeffective method for polypectomy.
文摘Due to the high risk of morbidity and mortality associated with surgical resection in this tract,endoscopic resection(ER)has taken the place of surgical resection as the first line treatment for non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.However,due to the anatomical characteristics of this area,which enhance the risk of post-ER problems,ER in the duodenum is particularly difficult.Due to a lack of data,no ER technique for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumours(SNADETs)has yet been backed by strong,high-quality evidence;yet,traditional hot snare-based techniques are still regarded as the standard treatment.Despite having a favourable efficiency profile,adverse events during duodenal hot snare polypectomy(HSP)and hot endoscopic mucosal resection,such as delayed bleeding and perforation,have been reported to be frequent.These events are primarily caused by electrocautery-induced damage.Thus,ER techniques with a better safety profile are needed to overcome these shortcomings.Cold snare polypectomy,which has already been shown as a safer,equally effective pro-cedure compared to HSP for treatment of small colorectal polyps,is being increasingly evaluated as a potential therapeutic option for non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.The aim of this review is to report and discuss the early outcomes of the first experiences with cold snaring for SNADETs.
文摘BACKGROUND Cold snare polypectomy(CSP)is comparatively safe and effective for removing polyps less than 10 mm in size with lower rates of postpolypectomy syndrome and delayed postpolypectomy bleeding compared with hot snare polypectomy(HSP).Recently,CSP is also expanded for removing polyps larger than 10 mm in size.AIM To compare the efficiency and safety of CSP and HSP in the management of 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.METHODS A total of 1686 inpatients with at least one 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyp,who underwent CSP(study group,n=843)or HSP(control group,n=843)at our Digestive Endoscopy Center between February 2020 and February 2024 were enrolled.The outcome measures including complete resection rate,intraoperative bleeding rate,and healthcare expenses such as procedure time and treatment cost were compared between the CSP vs HSP groups.RESULTS No statistically significant intergroup difference was observed in histological complete resection rates(P>0.05).Polyp resection time in the study group(76.5±23.6 seconds)was notably shorter than that in the control group(91.24±32.06 seconds;P<0.05).The immediate intraoperative bleeding rate was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group(12.7%vs 4.9%,P<0.05).No instances of delayed bleeding or perforation were documented in either group.Hospitalization duration was significantly reduced in the study group(2.42±0.61 days)compared to the control group(3.21±1.02 days;P<0.05).CONCLUSION For 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps,CSP demonstrates operational efficiency advantages over HSP in terms of procedure time,treatment cost,and length of hospital stay.Both techniques demonstrate robust safety profiles;however,CSP is associated with a higher intraoperative bleeding rate.Clinical decision-making should incorporate individualized assessment of these factors.
文摘BACKGROUND Colorectal polypectomy is fundamental to the prevention of colorectal cancer,utilizing several endoscopic techniques.Robust comparative data regarding the efficacy and safety of these modalities in clinical practice are limited.AIM To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of three endoscopic polypectomy techniques,namely,high-frequency electroresection(HFE),cold snare polypectomy(CSP),and endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR),for the treatment of colonic polyps.METHODS This single-center retrospective cohort study included adults who underwent endoscopic resection of pathologically confirmed colorectal polyps at Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University between January 2015 and December 2023.Patients were grouped by technique:HFE(n=107),CSP(n=106),and EMR(n=108).Standardized preoperative,intraoperative,and postoperative protocols were applied.Outcome measures included resection status(en bloc,R0,R1,and Rx),adverse events(immediate/delayed bleeding,perforation,and post-polypectomy coagulation syndrome),postoperative pain(visual analog scale at 1,3,and 5 hours),and 12-month recurrence rate.RESULTS Baseline demographics and polyp characteristics,except for polyp diameter,were comparable among groups.CSP achieved the highest en bloc resection rate,whereas HFE had a higher R0 resection rate.Polyp diameter was largest in the EMR group.Procedure duration was shortest with HFE.Adverse reactions were more frequent with HFE,particularly post-polypectomy bleeding and delayed perforation,whereas CSP demonstrated a superior safety profile and the lowest incidence of complications.Postoperative pain diminished in all groups over time but was consistently low for CSP and EMR.Recurrence rates were significantly higher in the EMR group vs CSP group,with HFE showing intermediate recurrence.CONCLUSION CSP offers the best safety profile and lowest recurrence rate among patients undergoing endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps,whereas HFE confers a high R0 resection rate but increased risk of adverse events.EMR remains essential for large polyps despite elevated recurrence.Technique selection should be tailored according to polyp characteristics and patient risk factors to optimize outcomes.
