Digital survival and development is not only an important part of the theory and practice of human rights in the digital society but also the purpose of protecting the digitally disadvantaged.Today,the rights approach...Digital survival and development is not only an important part of the theory and practice of human rights in the digital society but also the purpose of protecting the digitally disadvantaged.Today,the rights approach to protecting the digitally disadvantaged ignores individual differences,the process of action,the quality of rights,and digital capability development which are of greatest concern to the capabilities approach.Therefore,it is inferior to the latter in terms of both content and effectiveness.From the perspective of the capabilities approach,the digitally disadvantaged manifest a combined state of weakened digital rights and digital disability.The exclusion of individual rights by technological rights,the lack of inherent capabilities due to individual differences,and the weak combination of structural imbalances are the essential logic of the problem of the digitally disadvantaged.Therefore,it is necessary to embed the capabilities approach as a value principle into the legal protection of the digitally disadvantaged and enhance the intrinsic capabilities by cultivating digital literacy within the dimension of rights.Additionally,it is also necessary to develop a comprehensive capability by combining digital power constraints and responsible allocation,diversified collaborative digital capability assessment,promotion and assistance,and national standardized,motivational,and preferential empowerment to ensure that the digitally disadvantaged unleash and develop their capabilities.展开更多
To explore the process mechanism of digital innovation in manufacturing enterprises to promote enterprise performance and to reveal its synergistic,diffusion,and value-added effects,as well as the contextual effects o...To explore the process mechanism of digital innovation in manufacturing enterprises to promote enterprise performance and to reveal its synergistic,diffusion,and value-added effects,as well as the contextual effects of continuous digital investment,this study categorizes digital innovation into three types:efficiency-based,novelty-driven,and convergence-oriented.Furthermore,digital capability is classified into three dimensions:digital collaboration capability,digital innovation diffusion capability,and digital value-added capability.An empirical study is conducted based on a sample of 251 Chinese manufacturing enterprises.The following conclusions are drawn.(1)Digital innovation can significantly improve enterprise performance.(2)Digital innovation can promote enterprise performance by promoting the reconfiguration of digital capabilities.(3)Different types of key digital capabilities play a mediating role between digital innovation and enterprise performance.Specifically,digital innovation diffusion capability plays a mediating role between novelty-driven digital innovation and enterprise performance,while digital value-added capability plays an intermediary role between convergence-oriented digital innovation and enterprise performance.(4)The continuity of digital investment plays an important role in the digital innovation process of enterprises,which can positively moderate the relationship between digital innovation and enterprise performance,as well as the relationship between digital innovation and digital capabilities.In addition,it also positively moderates the relationship between efficiency-based digital innovation and digital collaboration capability.In summary,this study provides theoretical guidance and practical inspiration for manufacturing enterprises to successfully carry out digital innovation.展开更多
基金a phased result of the “Research onthe Regulatory System of Digital Rights”(Project Number CYB240176)an innovation project of graduateprograms in Chongqing in 2024。
文摘Digital survival and development is not only an important part of the theory and practice of human rights in the digital society but also the purpose of protecting the digitally disadvantaged.Today,the rights approach to protecting the digitally disadvantaged ignores individual differences,the process of action,the quality of rights,and digital capability development which are of greatest concern to the capabilities approach.Therefore,it is inferior to the latter in terms of both content and effectiveness.From the perspective of the capabilities approach,the digitally disadvantaged manifest a combined state of weakened digital rights and digital disability.The exclusion of individual rights by technological rights,the lack of inherent capabilities due to individual differences,and the weak combination of structural imbalances are the essential logic of the problem of the digitally disadvantaged.Therefore,it is necessary to embed the capabilities approach as a value principle into the legal protection of the digitally disadvantaged and enhance the intrinsic capabilities by cultivating digital literacy within the dimension of rights.Additionally,it is also necessary to develop a comprehensive capability by combining digital power constraints and responsible allocation,diversified collaborative digital capability assessment,promotion and assistance,and national standardized,motivational,and preferential empowerment to ensure that the digitally disadvantaged unleash and develop their capabilities.
基金supported by the Major Project of the National Social Science Fund of China(No.18ZDA062).
文摘To explore the process mechanism of digital innovation in manufacturing enterprises to promote enterprise performance and to reveal its synergistic,diffusion,and value-added effects,as well as the contextual effects of continuous digital investment,this study categorizes digital innovation into three types:efficiency-based,novelty-driven,and convergence-oriented.Furthermore,digital capability is classified into three dimensions:digital collaboration capability,digital innovation diffusion capability,and digital value-added capability.An empirical study is conducted based on a sample of 251 Chinese manufacturing enterprises.The following conclusions are drawn.(1)Digital innovation can significantly improve enterprise performance.(2)Digital innovation can promote enterprise performance by promoting the reconfiguration of digital capabilities.(3)Different types of key digital capabilities play a mediating role between digital innovation and enterprise performance.Specifically,digital innovation diffusion capability plays a mediating role between novelty-driven digital innovation and enterprise performance,while digital value-added capability plays an intermediary role between convergence-oriented digital innovation and enterprise performance.(4)The continuity of digital investment plays an important role in the digital innovation process of enterprises,which can positively moderate the relationship between digital innovation and enterprise performance,as well as the relationship between digital innovation and digital capabilities.In addition,it also positively moderates the relationship between efficiency-based digital innovation and digital collaboration capability.In summary,this study provides theoretical guidance and practical inspiration for manufacturing enterprises to successfully carry out digital innovation.
