The evaluation of academic researchers often relies on quantitative metrics,despite their limitations.This paper examines the qualitative assessment approach used by the French National Center for Scientific Research(...The evaluation of academic researchers often relies on quantitative metrics,despite their limitations.This paper examines the qualitative assessment approach used by the French National Center for Scientific Research(CNRS)in Computer Science(Section 6),as presented by a National Committee for Scientific Research(CoNRS)committee president.Rejecting bibliometrics like impact factors,CNRS emphasizes in-depth peer review of research quality,diverse outputs(e.g.,software and datasets),and field-specific considerations.The process,aligned with the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment(DORA),faces challenges in scalability and subjectivity,addressed through committee diversity and structured deliberation.This work provides insights for institutions seeking fairer,more holistic research evaluation frameworks.展开更多
文摘The evaluation of academic researchers often relies on quantitative metrics,despite their limitations.This paper examines the qualitative assessment approach used by the French National Center for Scientific Research(CNRS)in Computer Science(Section 6),as presented by a National Committee for Scientific Research(CoNRS)committee president.Rejecting bibliometrics like impact factors,CNRS emphasizes in-depth peer review of research quality,diverse outputs(e.g.,software and datasets),and field-specific considerations.The process,aligned with the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment(DORA),faces challenges in scalability and subjectivity,addressed through committee diversity and structured deliberation.This work provides insights for institutions seeking fairer,more holistic research evaluation frameworks.
