The 18^th CEOS Plenary Meeting,the 20^th CEOS Anniversary Symposjum, Workshop on the technology and application for international earth observation and exhibition were held at World Trade Center in Beijing on Nov. 16,...The 18^th CEOS Plenary Meeting,the 20^th CEOS Anniversary Symposjum, Workshop on the technology and application for international earth observation and exhibition were held at World Trade Center in Beijing on Nov. 16, 2004.Over 600 officials and experts from organizations related to earth observation all over the world,展开更多
This article examines organizational crises and responses in Japan,focusing on chief executive officer(CEO)resignations to take responsibility and other punitive consequences as well as discussing the possible relatio...This article examines organizational crises and responses in Japan,focusing on chief executive officer(CEO)resignations to take responsibility and other punitive consequences as well as discussing the possible relationships between corporate crises and how CEOs accept their responsibilities,including resignation.A CEO’s voluntary step-down is sometimes regarded a Japanese custom.Even though CEOs are presumably the most influential members of firms,there have been few studies of this topic.Eighty-eight corporate crises that occurred in Japan over the past 10 years were examined,on the basis of which this study defines an explanation of how CEOs take responsibility using the following variables:the location of a crisis’s cause(origin),the degree to which a crisis could have been prevented(controllability),degree of damage,and the degree to which the crisis response was appropriate.Theoretical analyses of actual cases suggest that,besides the direct involvement of CEOs in intentional misconduct,problematic daily performance and poor crisis response influence their resignations and other penalty types.These findings imply that the consequences of how CEOs claim responsibility can be explained by several significant factors.Generally,the results show that CEOs do not take self-punitive actions,including resignations,because of Japanese custom but because of their performances and the degrees of damage the corresponding crises caused.展开更多
On October 8, shortly before the opening of this Commercial Festival, 100 CEOs from China and America helda face-to-face dialogue on the topic of “how to strengthen thekey competitiveness of developing-type enterpri...On October 8, shortly before the opening of this Commercial Festival, 100 CEOs from China and America helda face-to-face dialogue on the topic of “how to strengthen thekey competitiveness of developing-type enterprises”.展开更多
文摘1 概况 欧洲空间局（ESA：European Space Agency）于2007年6月19-20日在意大利罗马ESA总部召开了国际卫星对地观测委员会（CEOS：Commit-teeon Earth Observation Satellites）星座工作组会议以及CEOS战略工作组第20次会议（The 20th Meeting of the CEOS
文摘The 18^th CEOS Plenary Meeting,the 20^th CEOS Anniversary Symposjum, Workshop on the technology and application for international earth observation and exhibition were held at World Trade Center in Beijing on Nov. 16, 2004.Over 600 officials and experts from organizations related to earth observation all over the world,
文摘This article examines organizational crises and responses in Japan,focusing on chief executive officer(CEO)resignations to take responsibility and other punitive consequences as well as discussing the possible relationships between corporate crises and how CEOs accept their responsibilities,including resignation.A CEO’s voluntary step-down is sometimes regarded a Japanese custom.Even though CEOs are presumably the most influential members of firms,there have been few studies of this topic.Eighty-eight corporate crises that occurred in Japan over the past 10 years were examined,on the basis of which this study defines an explanation of how CEOs take responsibility using the following variables:the location of a crisis’s cause(origin),the degree to which a crisis could have been prevented(controllability),degree of damage,and the degree to which the crisis response was appropriate.Theoretical analyses of actual cases suggest that,besides the direct involvement of CEOs in intentional misconduct,problematic daily performance and poor crisis response influence their resignations and other penalty types.These findings imply that the consequences of how CEOs claim responsibility can be explained by several significant factors.Generally,the results show that CEOs do not take self-punitive actions,including resignations,because of Japanese custom but because of their performances and the degrees of damage the corresponding crises caused.
文摘On October 8, shortly before the opening of this Commercial Festival, 100 CEOs from China and America helda face-to-face dialogue on the topic of “how to strengthen thekey competitiveness of developing-type enterprises”.
