近年来,共享经济与数字平台的深度融合,推动旧书交易呈现出产业化发展态势。但梳理当前司法实践中的众多典型案例,可见当前C2C平台旧书流通领域存在显著的法律规制盲区。其核心矛盾体现在三个层面:一、作为特殊商品的旧书法律属性界定不...近年来,共享经济与数字平台的深度融合,推动旧书交易呈现出产业化发展态势。但梳理当前司法实践中的众多典型案例,可见当前C2C平台旧书流通领域存在显著的法律规制盲区。其核心矛盾体现在三个层面:一、作为特殊商品的旧书法律属性界定不清;二、个体经营者资质标准存在制度空白;三、平台对二手交易的监管存有问题。这种制度性缺位导致司法实践中法律适用陷入两难境地。破解这一制度性难题需要构建多维协同治理框架。具体路径包括:在立法层面增设旧书流通特别条款,建立小额偶发交易的豁免机制;在执法层面推行平台分级管理制度,根据交易规模设计差异化的合规义务;在司法层面完善指导性案例体系,明确内容审核的合理注意标准。同时,建议构建政府监管平台、平台约束用户的阶梯式责任体系。这种分层治理模式的创新,既有利于激发循环经济活力,也能为数字时代的出版物监管提供范式参考。In recent years, the deep integration of the sharing economy and digital platforms has promoted the industrialization of old book trading. However, typical events such as the administrative penalty case reveal that there are significant legal regulation blind spots in the circulation of old books on the current C2C platform. The core contradiction is reflected in three levels: First, as a special commodity, the legal attributes of the old book is not clearly defined;Second, the qualification of individual operators there are systemic gaps;Third, the platform of the second-hand trading of the regulatory problems. This systematic lack of judicial practice in the application of the law into a dilemma. To solve this institutional problem, it is necessary to build a coordinated governance framework. Specific paths include: adding special provisions for the circulation of used books at the legislative level, and establishing an exemption mechanism for small incidental transactions;implementing a hierarchical management system for platforms at the law enforcement level, and designing differentiated compliance obligations according to the scale of transactions;and perfecting the system of guiding cases at the judicial level, and clarifying the reasonable attention of content auditing. At the same time, it is recommended to build a laddered responsibility system to regulate platforms and platforms to bind users. This innovation of hierarchical governance is not only conducive to stimulating the vitality of the circular economy, but also provides a paradigm reference for the regulation of publications in the digital era.展开更多
数字经济浪潮下,网络交易受到消费者青睐。由于互联网天然的虚拟性和不对称性,网络交易评价成为消费者购买决策的考量因素。目前学理层面和司法实践越发重视评价的重要价值,寻求数字经济时代下消费者新型权益的法律构建。通过文献研究...数字经济浪潮下,网络交易受到消费者青睐。由于互联网天然的虚拟性和不对称性,网络交易评价成为消费者购买决策的考量因素。目前学理层面和司法实践越发重视评价的重要价值,寻求数字经济时代下消费者新型权益的法律构建。通过文献研究法和比较分析法,发现目前消费者网络交易评价权缺位,不正当评价行为此起彼伏;司法实践中消费者网络评价往往侵及商家名誉,法官的司法自由裁量权行使偏差大;网络交易平台自身的评价机制失衡,确保消费者评价权益的基础欠缺;需要采用“设权 + 行为规制”的入法路径保障消费者网络评价权益,界定评价规则的行使边界,完善网络交易评价自身机制;优化评价规范及算法模型,落实网络交易平台监管责任,积极引入第三方评价机构。Under the wave of digital economy, online transactions are favored by consumers. Due to the natural virtuality and asymmetry of the Internet, the evaluation of online transactions has become a factor for consumers to consider in their purchase decisions. At present, more and more attention is paid to the important value of evaluation at the academic level and judicial practice, and the legal construction of new consumer rights and interests in the era of digital economy is sought. Through literature research and comparative analysis, it is found that there is a lack of evaluation rights for consumers’ online transactions, and improper evaluation behaviors occur one after another. In judicial practice, consumer online evaluation often infringes on the reputation of merchants, and the exercise of judicial discretion by judges is greatly deviated. The evaluation mechanism of the online trading platform itself is unbalanced, and the basis for ensuring the evaluation rights and interests of consumers is lacking. It is necessary to adopt the legal path of “establishment of rights + behavior regulation” to protect the rights and interests of consumers in online evaluation, define the exercise boundary of evaluation rules, and improve the mechanism of online transaction evaluation. Additionally, it is crucial to optimize evaluation standards and algorithm models, fulfill the regulatory responsibilities of online trading platforms, and actively introduce third-party evaluation institutions.展开更多
文摘近年来,共享经济与数字平台的深度融合,推动旧书交易呈现出产业化发展态势。但梳理当前司法实践中的众多典型案例,可见当前C2C平台旧书流通领域存在显著的法律规制盲区。其核心矛盾体现在三个层面:一、作为特殊商品的旧书法律属性界定不清;二、个体经营者资质标准存在制度空白;三、平台对二手交易的监管存有问题。这种制度性缺位导致司法实践中法律适用陷入两难境地。破解这一制度性难题需要构建多维协同治理框架。具体路径包括:在立法层面增设旧书流通特别条款,建立小额偶发交易的豁免机制;在执法层面推行平台分级管理制度,根据交易规模设计差异化的合规义务;在司法层面完善指导性案例体系,明确内容审核的合理注意标准。同时,建议构建政府监管平台、平台约束用户的阶梯式责任体系。这种分层治理模式的创新,既有利于激发循环经济活力,也能为数字时代的出版物监管提供范式参考。In recent years, the deep integration of the sharing economy and digital platforms has promoted the industrialization of old book trading. However, typical events such as the administrative penalty case reveal that there are significant legal regulation blind spots in the circulation of old books on the current C2C platform. The core contradiction is reflected in three levels: First, as a special commodity, the legal attributes of the old book is not clearly defined;Second, the qualification of individual operators there are systemic gaps;Third, the platform of the second-hand trading of the regulatory problems. This systematic lack of judicial practice in the application of the law into a dilemma. To solve this institutional problem, it is necessary to build a coordinated governance framework. Specific paths include: adding special provisions for the circulation of used books at the legislative level, and establishing an exemption mechanism for small incidental transactions;implementing a hierarchical management system for platforms at the law enforcement level, and designing differentiated compliance obligations according to the scale of transactions;and perfecting the system of guiding cases at the judicial level, and clarifying the reasonable attention of content auditing. At the same time, it is recommended to build a laddered responsibility system to regulate platforms and platforms to bind users. This innovation of hierarchical governance is not only conducive to stimulating the vitality of the circular economy, but also provides a paradigm reference for the regulation of publications in the digital era.
文摘数字经济浪潮下,网络交易受到消费者青睐。由于互联网天然的虚拟性和不对称性,网络交易评价成为消费者购买决策的考量因素。目前学理层面和司法实践越发重视评价的重要价值,寻求数字经济时代下消费者新型权益的法律构建。通过文献研究法和比较分析法,发现目前消费者网络交易评价权缺位,不正当评价行为此起彼伏;司法实践中消费者网络评价往往侵及商家名誉,法官的司法自由裁量权行使偏差大;网络交易平台自身的评价机制失衡,确保消费者评价权益的基础欠缺;需要采用“设权 + 行为规制”的入法路径保障消费者网络评价权益,界定评价规则的行使边界,完善网络交易评价自身机制;优化评价规范及算法模型,落实网络交易平台监管责任,积极引入第三方评价机构。Under the wave of digital economy, online transactions are favored by consumers. Due to the natural virtuality and asymmetry of the Internet, the evaluation of online transactions has become a factor for consumers to consider in their purchase decisions. At present, more and more attention is paid to the important value of evaluation at the academic level and judicial practice, and the legal construction of new consumer rights and interests in the era of digital economy is sought. Through literature research and comparative analysis, it is found that there is a lack of evaluation rights for consumers’ online transactions, and improper evaluation behaviors occur one after another. In judicial practice, consumer online evaluation often infringes on the reputation of merchants, and the exercise of judicial discretion by judges is greatly deviated. The evaluation mechanism of the online trading platform itself is unbalanced, and the basis for ensuring the evaluation rights and interests of consumers is lacking. It is necessary to adopt the legal path of “establishment of rights + behavior regulation” to protect the rights and interests of consumers in online evaluation, define the exercise boundary of evaluation rules, and improve the mechanism of online transaction evaluation. Additionally, it is crucial to optimize evaluation standards and algorithm models, fulfill the regulatory responsibilities of online trading platforms, and actively introduce third-party evaluation institutions.
