期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
The Outpatient Burch-Sling Procedure: A Nerve-Sparing Method for Correcting Female Urinary Incontinence
1
作者 Daryoosh Samimi John S. Samimi 《Open Journal of Urology》 2017年第12期243-251,共9页
Conventional methods to treat urinary stress incontinence, including the Sling, Burch, and Pereyra modification methods, are limited by several shortcomings due to disrupted nerve and vaginal wall integrity. The nerve... Conventional methods to treat urinary stress incontinence, including the Sling, Burch, and Pereyra modification methods, are limited by several shortcomings due to disrupted nerve and vaginal wall integrity. The nerve-sparing Burch-Sling method represents a surgical advancement through the use of a nerve-sparing sling to treat genuine stress urinary incontinence. The procedure involves retropubic urethropexy using the FDA-approved Burch-Sling device. In this technique, the vagina is elevated bilaterally at the urethrovesical junction to the mid-urethra toward Cooper’s ligament above the base of the bladder. Then, the anterior vaginal wall and fascia are used as an endogenous suburethral sling without dissection. Two hundred twenty cases were included in this study;two hundred patients underwent the outpatient nerve-sparing sling method, and the other twenty underwent the novel abdominal Burch method. There were no major complications. The follow-up duration ranged from 6 months to eight years. All procedures were performed at the U.S. Women’s Institute at a 400-bed hospital in Fountain Valley, CA. 展开更多
关键词 OUTPATIENT SLING PROCEDURE burch-sling Device “FDA” Novel Burch PROCEDURE NERVE-SPARING Method PRESERVATION of Vaginal NERVE Plexus PRESERVATION of External NERVE of Urethra Minimizing Complications Reduce Financial Burden
暂未订购
改良型经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带术与经腹腔镜Burch术治疗女性压力性尿失禁临床应用对比 被引量:3
2
作者 秦建琴 候刚剑 郭恒辉 《新疆医学》 2020年第6期568-571,共4页
目的探讨改良型经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带术(改良型TVT-O)与经腹腔镜Burch术治疗女性压力性尿失禁临床应用对比。方法研究对象选取我院2017年8月到2019年8月间收治的女性压力性尿失禁患者104例,采用随机数字法将其分为A组与B组,每组各52例。... 目的探讨改良型经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带术(改良型TVT-O)与经腹腔镜Burch术治疗女性压力性尿失禁临床应用对比。方法研究对象选取我院2017年8月到2019年8月间收治的女性压力性尿失禁患者104例,采用随机数字法将其分为A组与B组,每组各52例。A组行改良型TVT-O术,B组行经腹腔镜Burch术。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后导尿管留置时间、Grouts-Blaivas评分、治疗有效率及并发症发生率。结果术后1月、6月、12月,A组Grouts-Blaivas评分均显著优于B组,差异均具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。术后1年,A组治疗有效率显著高于B组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。A组并发症发生率为7.69%。B组并发症发生率为23.08%,A组并发症发生率显著高于B组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。两组术中出血量、术后导尿管留置时间比较,差异均无统计学意义。A组手术时间显著低于B组,差异具有统计学意义。结论综上所述,改良型TVT-O术与经腹腔镜Burch术均可有效治疗女性压力性尿失禁,改良型TVT-O术的临床效果更为明显,同时安全性更高,值得在临床推广。 展开更多
关键词 改良型经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带术 经腹腔镜Burch术 压力性尿失禁
暂未订购
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部