对《谟区查抄本》的研究源于英国学者谟区查(Charles Ralph Boxer)。目前对于该抄本的研究可以分为四大类别,分别是转写与翻译、综合性研究、专题性研究以及在跨学科视野下的研究与利用。专题性研究在四个方面展开,一是关于《抄本》图...对《谟区查抄本》的研究源于英国学者谟区查(Charles Ralph Boxer)。目前对于该抄本的研究可以分为四大类别,分别是转写与翻译、综合性研究、专题性研究以及在跨学科视野下的研究与利用。专题性研究在四个方面展开,一是关于《抄本》图像的研究,二是《抄本》相关问题的考证研究,三是分析《抄本》中的多种文化元素,四是《抄本》内容的个案研究。其他研究中对于该抄本的运用与讨论聚焦于16世纪东南亚与东亚地区的多学科研究中。从这些研究中可以发现,《抄本》所提供的丰富内容在学术界引起了广泛关注,其价值不仅限于特定领域,还有助于拓展多领域的研究议题。展开更多
The central–local government relationship has always been an important topic for political research of the Late Qing period.Former researchers focused mainly on political systems,finding historical archives to explai...The central–local government relationship has always been an important topic for political research of the Late Qing period.Former researchers focused mainly on political systems,finding historical archives to explain how the Qing Court decentralized or centralized its power.These approaches fail to consider how local officials in fact reacted to central command.This research is an attempt to apply the social science method to a classical historical study.I firstly examine the various political decisions of governors when they were faced with a series of big events during the Boxer Uprising(1900–1901).After arranging them using strict criteria,I will conduct spatial and structural analysis on their diversity,and furthermore explore the internal and external influencing factors.Statistics indicate that governors of coastal provinces and of the provinces along the Yangtze River were more likely to express their opinions to the Qing court,while the North and Northeastern provinces tended to obey the central orders.Regional differences mainly have a positive correlation with provincial structural factors,such as revenue and relations with foreign powers.The correlations are also determined by personal political experience and resources of governors.展开更多
文摘对《谟区查抄本》的研究源于英国学者谟区查(Charles Ralph Boxer)。目前对于该抄本的研究可以分为四大类别,分别是转写与翻译、综合性研究、专题性研究以及在跨学科视野下的研究与利用。专题性研究在四个方面展开,一是关于《抄本》图像的研究,二是《抄本》相关问题的考证研究,三是分析《抄本》中的多种文化元素,四是《抄本》内容的个案研究。其他研究中对于该抄本的运用与讨论聚焦于16世纪东南亚与东亚地区的多学科研究中。从这些研究中可以发现,《抄本》所提供的丰富内容在学术界引起了广泛关注,其价值不仅限于特定领域,还有助于拓展多领域的研究议题。
基金support of the China Scholarship Council and advises and helps from Professor James Tong in University of California,Los Angeles(Grant no.201406010081).
文摘The central–local government relationship has always been an important topic for political research of the Late Qing period.Former researchers focused mainly on political systems,finding historical archives to explain how the Qing Court decentralized or centralized its power.These approaches fail to consider how local officials in fact reacted to central command.This research is an attempt to apply the social science method to a classical historical study.I firstly examine the various political decisions of governors when they were faced with a series of big events during the Boxer Uprising(1900–1901).After arranging them using strict criteria,I will conduct spatial and structural analysis on their diversity,and furthermore explore the internal and external influencing factors.Statistics indicate that governors of coastal provinces and of the provinces along the Yangtze River were more likely to express their opinions to the Qing court,while the North and Northeastern provinces tended to obey the central orders.Regional differences mainly have a positive correlation with provincial structural factors,such as revenue and relations with foreign powers.The correlations are also determined by personal political experience and resources of governors.
