According to the proposed hypothesis, graphic characters trigger the subcortical visual route. The reaction discussed is very weak. Yet, its very existence has an unusual importance: characters and (occluded) venomous...According to the proposed hypothesis, graphic characters trigger the subcortical visual route. The reaction discussed is very weak. Yet, its very existence has an unusual importance: characters and (occluded) venomous snakeskin patterns reveal themselves as conflatable. Furthermore, following tractogra<span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">- </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">phic research, a functional segregation of the subcortical pathway is to be <span>presupposed. Thus, there can’t be a later dissociation of two stimuli pre</span>viously associated. The outc</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">omes of lecture will gradually appear probabilistically <span>(much) more peaceful than encountering a venomous snake, though, and</span> thus a continuous lessening of the reaction is expectable. Here, on one hand, it is relevant that the subcortical visual pathway goes to the amygdala. The reactions we describe tap into goal-oriented processes, and they will do that un<span>fettered. On the other hand, in the case of characters, since the beginning,</span> fear has been converted into appetition to a great degree. This process should be fostered in the presence of light. In this way, luminosity might become a conditioned stimulus for attraction. In this case, a Pavlovian addiction for light <span>will foster, yet also—from the point of view of reward fee</span>ling—counterbalance the lessening of the stimulation elicited by characters. The addiction we refer to is one towards light accompanied by graphic signs. Yet, as opposed to the case of the luminous medium, the attention captured by the later ones taken for themselves is continuously reduced.</span></span></span>展开更多
文摘According to the proposed hypothesis, graphic characters trigger the subcortical visual route. The reaction discussed is very weak. Yet, its very existence has an unusual importance: characters and (occluded) venomous snakeskin patterns reveal themselves as conflatable. Furthermore, following tractogra<span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">- </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">phic research, a functional segregation of the subcortical pathway is to be <span>presupposed. Thus, there can’t be a later dissociation of two stimuli pre</span>viously associated. The outc</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">omes of lecture will gradually appear probabilistically <span>(much) more peaceful than encountering a venomous snake, though, and</span> thus a continuous lessening of the reaction is expectable. Here, on one hand, it is relevant that the subcortical visual pathway goes to the amygdala. The reactions we describe tap into goal-oriented processes, and they will do that un<span>fettered. On the other hand, in the case of characters, since the beginning,</span> fear has been converted into appetition to a great degree. This process should be fostered in the presence of light. In this way, luminosity might become a conditioned stimulus for attraction. In this case, a Pavlovian addiction for light <span>will foster, yet also—from the point of view of reward fee</span>ling—counterbalance the lessening of the stimulation elicited by characters. The addiction we refer to is one towards light accompanied by graphic signs. Yet, as opposed to the case of the luminous medium, the attention captured by the later ones taken for themselves is continuously reduced.</span></span></span>
