BACKGROUND Needle-knife precut papillotomy(NKP)is typically performed freehand.However,it remains unclear whether pancreatic stent(PS)placement can improve the outcomes of NKP.AIM To explore whether PS placement impro...BACKGROUND Needle-knife precut papillotomy(NKP)is typically performed freehand.However,it remains unclear whether pancreatic stent(PS)placement can improve the outcomes of NKP.AIM To explore whether PS placement improves the success rate of NKP in patients with difficult biliary cannulation.METHODS This single-center retrospective study included 190 patients who underwent NKP between January 2017 and December 2021 after failed conventional biliary cannulation.In cases with incidental pancreatic duct cannulation during conventional biliary cannulation,the decision for pre-NKP PS placement was made at the endoscopist's discretion.The primary outcome was the difference in the NKP success rate between patients with and without PS placement;the secondary outcome was the adverse event rate.RESULTS Among the 190 participants,82 received pre-NKP PS(PS-NKP group)whereas 108 did not[freehand or freehand NKP(FH-NKP)group].Post-NKP selective biliary cannulation was successful in 167(87.9%)patients,and the PS-NKP had a significantly higher success rate than the FH-NKP group(93.9%vs 83.3%,P=0.027).The overall adverse event rates were 7.3%and 11.1%in the PS-NKP and FH-NKP groups,respectively(P=0.493).A periampullary diverticulum(PAD)and significant intraoperative bleeding during NKP were independently associated with NKP failure;however,a pre-NKP PS was the only predictor of NKP success.Among the 44 participants with PADs,the PS-NKP group had a non-significantly higher NKP success rate than the FH-NKP group(87.5%and 65%,respectively;P=0.076).CONCLUSION PS significantly improved the success rate of NKP in patients with difficult biliary cannulation.展开更多
AIM: Prospective evaluation of repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for failed Schutz grade 1 biliary cannulation in a high-volume center. METHODS: Prospective intention-to-treat analysis of pa...AIM: Prospective evaluation of repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for failed Schutz grade 1 biliary cannulation in a high-volume center. METHODS: Prospective intention-to-treat analysis of patients referred for biliary cannulation following recent unsuccessful ERCP. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (35 female; mean age: 62.5 years; age range: 40-87 years) with previous failed biliary cannulation were referred for repeat ERCP. The indication for ERCP was primarily choledocholithiasis (45%) or pancreatic malignancy (18%). Successful biliary can- nulation was 100%. The precut needle knife sphincterotomy (NKS) rate was 27.4%. Complications occurred in 3.9% (post-ERCP pancreatitis). An identif iable reason for initial unsuccessful biliary cannulation was present in 55% of cases. Compared to a cohort of 940 nave pa-pilla patients (female 61%; mean age: 59.9 years; age range: 18-94 years) who required sphincterotomy over the same time period, there was no statistical difference in the cannulation success rate (100% vs 98%) or postERCP pancreatitis (3.1% vs 3.9%). Precut NKS use was more frequent (27.4% vs 12.7%) (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Referral to a high-volume center following unsuccessful ERCP is associated with high technical success, with a favorable complication rate, compared to routine ERCP procedures.展开更多
AIM: To investigate the frequency and risk factors for acute pancreatitis after pancreatic guidewire placement (P-GW) in achieving cannulation of the bile duct during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (E...AIM: To investigate the frequency and risk factors for acute pancreatitis after pancreatic guidewire placement (P-GW) in achieving cannulation of the bile duct during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: P-GW was performed in 113 patients in whom cannulation of the bile duct was difficult. The success rate of biliary cannulation, the frequency and risk factors of post-ERCP pancreatitis, and the frequency of spontaneous migration of the pancreatic duct stent were investigated. RESULTS: Selective biliary cannulation with P-GW was achieved in 73% of the patients. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 12% (14 patients: mild, 13; moderate, 1). Prophylactic pancreatic stenting was attempted in 59% of the patients. Of the 64 patients who successfully underwent stent placement, three developed mild pancreatitis (4.7%). Of the 49 patients without stent placement, 11 developed pancreatitis (22%: mild, 10; moderate, 1). Of the five patients in whom stent placement was unsuccessful, two developed mild pancreatitis. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed no pancreatic stenting to be the only significant risk factor for pancreatitis. Spontaneous migration of the stent was observed within two weeks in 92% of the patients who had undergone pancreatic duct stenting.CONCLUSION: P-GW is useful for achieving selective biliary cannulation. Pancreatic duct stenting after P-GW can reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis, which requires evaluation by means of prospective randomized controlled trials.展开更多
AIM： To compare the results and complications of early pre-cutting technique with standard technique. METHODS： From January 2003 to December 2004, a total of 426 consecutive therapeutic biliary ERCP procedures were ...AIM： To compare the results and complications of early pre-cutting technique with standard technique. METHODS： From January 2003 to December 2004, a total of 426 consecutive therapeutic biliary ERCP procedures were performed by one endoscopist （T.A.）. Data were retrospectively collected according to procedure indication and results. Of these, 293 procedures （70.4%） were done with standard technique （group A） and 223 procedures （29.6%） with early pre-cutting technique in case of difficult cannulation （group B）. The results and complications of ERCP were compared. RESULTS： Success rate of first attempt cannulation was 98.0% in group A and 87.8% in group 13. The overall incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis, hemorrhage, perforation and cholangitis was 0%, 0.2%, 0.5% and 0.5%, respectively. Morbidity rate was not significantly different. No procedure-related mortality was occurred. CONCLUSION： For an experienced hand, the early pre-cutting technique for biliary cannulation is safe and effective as standard technique.展开更多
Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)begins with successful biliary cannulation.However,it is not always be successful.The failure of the initial ERCP is attributed to two main aspects:the p...Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)begins with successful biliary cannulation.However,it is not always be successful.The failure of the initial ERCP is attributed to two main aspects:the papilla/biliary orifice is endoscopically accessible,or it is inaccessible.When the papilla/biliary orifice is accessible,bile duct cannulation failure can occur even with advanced cannulation techniques,including double guidewire techniques,transpancreatic sphincterotomy,needle-knife precut papillotomy,or fistulotomy.There is currently no consensus on the next steps of treatment in this setting.Therefore,this review aims to propose and discuss potential endoscopic options for patients who have failed ERCP due to difficult bile duct cannulation.These options include interval ERCP,percutaneous-transhepatic-endoscopic rendezvous procedures(PTE-RV),and endoscopic ultrasound-assisted rendezvous procedures(EUS-RV).The overall success rate for interval ERCP was 76.3%(68%-79% between studies),and the overall adverse event rate was 7.5%(0-15.9% between studies).The overall success rate for PTE-RV was 88.7%(80.4%-100%between studies),and the overall adverse event rate was 13.2%(4.9%-19.2% between studies).For EUS-RV,the overall success rate was 82%-86.1%,and the overall adverse event rate was 13%-15.6%.Because interval ERCP has an acceptably high success rate and lower adverse event rate and does not require additional expertise,facilities,or other specialists,it can be considered the first choice for salvage therapy.EUS-RV can also be considered if local experts are available.For patients in urgent need of biliary drainage,PTE-RV should be considered.展开更多
BACKGROUND Despite advancements,endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)poses challenges,including the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and difficulty of biliary cannulation.AIM To compare dome and tapered t...BACKGROUND Despite advancements,endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)poses challenges,including the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and difficulty of biliary cannulation.AIM To compare dome and tapered tip sphincterotomes,focusing on their efficacy in achieving successful biliary cannulation and reducing the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis.METHODS In this prospective,single-blind,randomized pilot study conducted at Inha Uni-versity Hospital,85 patients undergoing ERCP were equally divided into dome and tapered tip sphincterotome groups.The co-primary outcomes were the success rate of selective biliary cannulation and incidence of post-ERCP pancre-atitis.The secondary outcomes included biliary cannulation time,number of unintended pancreatic duct access events,and total procedure time.RESULTS The success rates of selective biliary cannulation were 74.4%and 85.7%in the dome and tapered tip groups,respectively,with no significant difference(P=0.20).Similarly,the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis did not differ significantly between the groups(5 cases in the tapered tip group vs 6 in the dome tip group,P=0.72).However,difficult cannulation was significantly more common in the dome tip group than in the tapered tip group(P=0.05).Selective biliary cannula-tion time emerged as a significant predictor of post-ERCP pancreatitis(multivariate odds ratio=9.33,95%confi-dence interval:1.31-66.44,P=0.03).CONCLUSION This study indicated that the sphincterotome tip type does not markedly affect biliary cannulation success or post-ERCP pancreatitis rates.However,cannulation duration is a key risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis.These findings provide preliminary insights that highlight the importance of refining ERCP practices,including sphinc-terotome selection,while underscoring the need for larger multicenter studies to improve procedure time and patient safety.展开更多
AIM： To clarify whether the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography （ERCP） pancreatitis （PEP） after pancreatic guidewire placement （PGW） can be reduced by using a different cannulation ...AIM： To clarify whether the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography （ERCP） pancreatitis （PEP） after pancreatic guidewire placement （PGW） can be reduced by using a different cannulation method. METHODS： BebNeen April 2001 and October 2009, PGW was performed in 142 patients with native papilla to overcome difficult biliary cannulation. Our cannulation method for ERCP was changed from contrast injection （CI） using a single-lumen catheter （April 2001-May 2008） to wire-guided cannulation （WGC） using a double-lumen catheter （June 2008-October 2009）. The CI protocol was also changed during the study period： in the first period it was used for routine pancreatography for detecting small pancreatic cancer （April 2001-November 2002）, whereas in the second period it was not （December 2002-May 2008）. In PGW with CI using a single- lumen catheter, the contrast medium in the catheter lumen was injected into the pancreatic duct. The success rate of biliary cannulation, the incidence of PEP according to the cannulation method, and the impact of CI using a single-lumen catheter on PEP in comparison with WGC using a double-lumen catheter were investigated.RESULTS： CI with routine pancreatography, CI without routine pancreatography, and WGC were performed in 27 patients, 77 patients and 38 patients, respectively. Routine pancreatography did not contribute to the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in our study period. In CI without routine pancreatography and WGC, diagnostic pancreatography was performed in 17 patients and no patients, respectively. The success rate of biliary cannulation by PGW alone was 69%, and the final success rate was increased to 80.3% by the addition of consecutive maneuvers or a second ERCP. PEP occurred in 22 patients （15.5%）, and the severity was mild in all cases. When analyzed according to cannulation method, the incidence of PEP was 37.0% （10/27） in the patients who underwent CI with routine pancreatography, 14.3% （11/77） in those who underwent CI without routine pancreatography, and 2.6% （1/38） in those who underwent WGC. In all patients who underwent CI using a singlelumen catheter, the incidence of PEP was 20% （21/104）, which was significantly higher than that in WGC using a double-lumen catheter. In univariate and multivariate analysis, CI using a single-lumen catheter showed a high, statistically significant, odds ratio for PEP after PGW. CONCLUSION： The practice of a cannulation method involving the use of a double-lumen catheter minimizes the CI dose administered to the pancreatic duct and reduces the incidence of PEP after PGW.展开更多
BACKGROUND At our academic tertiary care medical center, we have noted patients referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) who increasingly require advanced cannulation techniques. This trend is...BACKGROUND At our academic tertiary care medical center, we have noted patients referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) who increasingly require advanced cannulation techniques. This trend is noted despite increased endoscopist experience and annual ERCP volume over the same period.AIM To evaluate this phenomenon of perceived escalation in complexity of cannulation at ERCP and assessed potential underlying factors.METHODS Demographic/clinical variables and records of ERCP patients at the beginning(2008), middle(2013) and end(2018) of the last decade were reviewed retrospectively. Cannulation approaches were classified as "standard" or "advanced" and duodenoscope position was labeled as "standard"(short position) or "non-standard"(e.g., long, semi-long).RESULTS Patients undergoing ERCP were older in 2018 compared to 2008(69.7 ± 15.2 years vs 55.1 ± 14.7, P < 0.05). Increased ampullary distortion and peri-ampullary diverticula were noted in 2018(P < 0.001). ERCPs were increasingly performed with a non-standard duodenoscope position, from 2.2%(2008) to 5.6%(2013) and 16.1%(2018)(P < 0.001). Utilization of more than one advanced cannulation technique for a given ERCP increased from 0.7%(2008) to 0.9%(2013) to 6.6%(2018)(P < 0.001). Primary mass size > 4 cm, pancreatic uncinate mass, and bilirubin > 10 mg/d L predicted use of advanced cannulation techniques(P < 0.03 for each).CONCLUSION Complexity of cannulation at ERCP has sharply increased over the past 5 years, with an increased proportion of elderly patients and those with malignancy requiring advanced cannulation approaches. These data suggest that complexity of cannulation at ERCP may be predicted based on patient/ampulla characteristics. This may inform selection of experienced, high-volume endoscopists to perform these complex procedures.展开更多
BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography involves selective bile duct cannulation,which is often challenging and associated with complications.In difficult cannulation cases,early precutting is freque...BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography involves selective bile duct cannulation,which is often challenging and associated with complications.In difficult cannulation cases,early precutting is frequently used.However,its efficacy and optimal indications require further evaluation.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of early precut(EP)in difficult bile duct cannulation.METHODS This retrospective analysis of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures was performed for bile duct cannulation in patients with naive papillae who required advanced cannulation techniques(ACTs).These patients were admitted between April 2020 and March 2024 and were analyzed for risk factors,success rates,and complications.Outcomes were compared between the EP group and the conventional other ACTs group,with a focus on cases with oral protrusion large(oral protrusion-L).RESULTS The need for ACTs was identified as an independent risk factor for complications[odds ratio(OR)=5.4;95%confidence interval:1.887-15.53].Malignant biliary strictures(OR=2.58)and oral protrusion-L(OR=2.77)were also identified as independent risk factors for requiring ACTs.The EP group had a significantly higher second-line cannulation success rate(97.9%vs 73.2%,P=0.001)and lower complication rate(8.3%vs 39.0%,P=0.001)than the other ACTs group.Additionally,similar benefits were observed in the oral protrusion-L cases.CONCLUSION This study provides compelling evidence that EP is a viable alternative and a superior strategy in cases requiring ACTs,particularly oral protrusion-L.展开更多
BACKGROUND Needle-knife fistulotomy(NKF)is used as a rescue technique for difficult cannulation.However,the data are limited regarding the use of NKF for primary biliary cannulation,especially when performed by beginn...BACKGROUND Needle-knife fistulotomy(NKF)is used as a rescue technique for difficult cannulation.However,the data are limited regarding the use of NKF for primary biliary cannulation,especially when performed by beginners.AIM To assess the effectiveness and safety of primary NKF for biliary cannulation,and the role of the endoscopist’s expertise level(beginner vs expert).METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the records of 542 patients with naïve prominent bulging papilla and no history of pancreatitis,who underwent bile duct cannulation at a tertiary referral center.The patients were categorized according to the endoscopist’s expertise level and the technique used for bile duct cannulation.We assessed the rates of successful cannulation and adverse events.RESULTS The baseline characteristics did not differ between the experienced and lessexperienced endoscopists.The incidence rate of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)pancreatitis(PEP)was significantly affected by the endoscopist’s expertise level in patients who received conventional cannulation with sphincterotomy(8.9%vs 3.4%for beginner vs expert,P=0.039),but not in those who received NKF.In the multivariable analysis,a lower expertise level of the biliary endoscopist(P=0.037)and longer total procedure time(P=0.026)were significant risk factor of PEP in patients who received conventional cannulation with sphincterotomy but only total procedure time(P=0.004)was significant risk factor of PEP in those who received NKF.CONCLUSION Primary NKF was effective and safe in patients with prominent and bulging ampulla,even when performed by less-experienced endoscopist.We need to confirm which level of endoscopist’s experience is needed for primary NKF through prospective randomized study.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Needle-knife precut papillotomy(NKP)is typically performed freehand.However,it remains unclear whether pancreatic stent(PS)placement can improve the outcomes of NKP.AIM To explore whether PS placement improves the success rate of NKP in patients with difficult biliary cannulation.METHODS This single-center retrospective study included 190 patients who underwent NKP between January 2017 and December 2021 after failed conventional biliary cannulation.In cases with incidental pancreatic duct cannulation during conventional biliary cannulation,the decision for pre-NKP PS placement was made at the endoscopist's discretion.The primary outcome was the difference in the NKP success rate between patients with and without PS placement;the secondary outcome was the adverse event rate.RESULTS Among the 190 participants,82 received pre-NKP PS(PS-NKP group)whereas 108 did not[freehand or freehand NKP(FH-NKP)group].Post-NKP selective biliary cannulation was successful in 167(87.9%)patients,and the PS-NKP had a significantly higher success rate than the FH-NKP group(93.9%vs 83.3%,P=0.027).The overall adverse event rates were 7.3%and 11.1%in the PS-NKP and FH-NKP groups,respectively(P=0.493).A periampullary diverticulum(PAD)and significant intraoperative bleeding during NKP were independently associated with NKP failure;however,a pre-NKP PS was the only predictor of NKP success.Among the 44 participants with PADs,the PS-NKP group had a non-significantly higher NKP success rate than the FH-NKP group(87.5%and 65%,respectively;P=0.076).CONCLUSION PS significantly improved the success rate of NKP in patients with difficult biliary cannulation.
文摘AIM: Prospective evaluation of repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for failed Schutz grade 1 biliary cannulation in a high-volume center. METHODS: Prospective intention-to-treat analysis of patients referred for biliary cannulation following recent unsuccessful ERCP. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (35 female; mean age: 62.5 years; age range: 40-87 years) with previous failed biliary cannulation were referred for repeat ERCP. The indication for ERCP was primarily choledocholithiasis (45%) or pancreatic malignancy (18%). Successful biliary can- nulation was 100%. The precut needle knife sphincterotomy (NKS) rate was 27.4%. Complications occurred in 3.9% (post-ERCP pancreatitis). An identif iable reason for initial unsuccessful biliary cannulation was present in 55% of cases. Compared to a cohort of 940 nave pa-pilla patients (female 61%; mean age: 59.9 years; age range: 18-94 years) who required sphincterotomy over the same time period, there was no statistical difference in the cannulation success rate (100% vs 98%) or postERCP pancreatitis (3.1% vs 3.9%). Precut NKS use was more frequent (27.4% vs 12.7%) (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Referral to a high-volume center following unsuccessful ERCP is associated with high technical success, with a favorable complication rate, compared to routine ERCP procedures.
文摘AIM: To investigate the frequency and risk factors for acute pancreatitis after pancreatic guidewire placement (P-GW) in achieving cannulation of the bile duct during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: P-GW was performed in 113 patients in whom cannulation of the bile duct was difficult. The success rate of biliary cannulation, the frequency and risk factors of post-ERCP pancreatitis, and the frequency of spontaneous migration of the pancreatic duct stent were investigated. RESULTS: Selective biliary cannulation with P-GW was achieved in 73% of the patients. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 12% (14 patients: mild, 13; moderate, 1). Prophylactic pancreatic stenting was attempted in 59% of the patients. Of the 64 patients who successfully underwent stent placement, three developed mild pancreatitis (4.7%). Of the 49 patients without stent placement, 11 developed pancreatitis (22%: mild, 10; moderate, 1). Of the five patients in whom stent placement was unsuccessful, two developed mild pancreatitis. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed no pancreatic stenting to be the only significant risk factor for pancreatitis. Spontaneous migration of the stent was observed within two weeks in 92% of the patients who had undergone pancreatic duct stenting.CONCLUSION: P-GW is useful for achieving selective biliary cannulation. Pancreatic duct stenting after P-GW can reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis, which requires evaluation by means of prospective randomized controlled trials.
文摘AIM： To compare the results and complications of early pre-cutting technique with standard technique. METHODS： From January 2003 to December 2004, a total of 426 consecutive therapeutic biliary ERCP procedures were performed by one endoscopist （T.A.）. Data were retrospectively collected according to procedure indication and results. Of these, 293 procedures （70.4%） were done with standard technique （group A） and 223 procedures （29.6%） with early pre-cutting technique in case of difficult cannulation （group B）. The results and complications of ERCP were compared. RESULTS： Success rate of first attempt cannulation was 98.0% in group A and 87.8% in group 13. The overall incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis, hemorrhage, perforation and cholangitis was 0%, 0.2%, 0.5% and 0.5%, respectively. Morbidity rate was not significantly different. No procedure-related mortality was occurred. CONCLUSION： For an experienced hand, the early pre-cutting technique for biliary cannulation is safe and effective as standard technique.
文摘Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)begins with successful biliary cannulation.However,it is not always be successful.The failure of the initial ERCP is attributed to two main aspects:the papilla/biliary orifice is endoscopically accessible,or it is inaccessible.When the papilla/biliary orifice is accessible,bile duct cannulation failure can occur even with advanced cannulation techniques,including double guidewire techniques,transpancreatic sphincterotomy,needle-knife precut papillotomy,or fistulotomy.There is currently no consensus on the next steps of treatment in this setting.Therefore,this review aims to propose and discuss potential endoscopic options for patients who have failed ERCP due to difficult bile duct cannulation.These options include interval ERCP,percutaneous-transhepatic-endoscopic rendezvous procedures(PTE-RV),and endoscopic ultrasound-assisted rendezvous procedures(EUS-RV).The overall success rate for interval ERCP was 76.3%(68%-79% between studies),and the overall adverse event rate was 7.5%(0-15.9% between studies).The overall success rate for PTE-RV was 88.7%(80.4%-100%between studies),and the overall adverse event rate was 13.2%(4.9%-19.2% between studies).For EUS-RV,the overall success rate was 82%-86.1%,and the overall adverse event rate was 13%-15.6%.Because interval ERCP has an acceptably high success rate and lower adverse event rate and does not require additional expertise,facilities,or other specialists,it can be considered the first choice for salvage therapy.EUS-RV can also be considered if local experts are available.For patients in urgent need of biliary drainage,PTE-RV should be considered.
基金Supported by the Shihwa Medical Center Research Fund.
文摘BACKGROUND Despite advancements,endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)poses challenges,including the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and difficulty of biliary cannulation.AIM To compare dome and tapered tip sphincterotomes,focusing on their efficacy in achieving successful biliary cannulation and reducing the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis.METHODS In this prospective,single-blind,randomized pilot study conducted at Inha Uni-versity Hospital,85 patients undergoing ERCP were equally divided into dome and tapered tip sphincterotome groups.The co-primary outcomes were the success rate of selective biliary cannulation and incidence of post-ERCP pancre-atitis.The secondary outcomes included biliary cannulation time,number of unintended pancreatic duct access events,and total procedure time.RESULTS The success rates of selective biliary cannulation were 74.4%and 85.7%in the dome and tapered tip groups,respectively,with no significant difference(P=0.20).Similarly,the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis did not differ significantly between the groups(5 cases in the tapered tip group vs 6 in the dome tip group,P=0.72).However,difficult cannulation was significantly more common in the dome tip group than in the tapered tip group(P=0.05).Selective biliary cannula-tion time emerged as a significant predictor of post-ERCP pancreatitis(multivariate odds ratio=9.33,95%confi-dence interval:1.31-66.44,P=0.03).CONCLUSION This study indicated that the sphincterotome tip type does not markedly affect biliary cannulation success or post-ERCP pancreatitis rates.However,cannulation duration is a key risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis.These findings provide preliminary insights that highlight the importance of refining ERCP practices,including sphinc-terotome selection,while underscoring the need for larger multicenter studies to improve procedure time and patient safety.
文摘AIM： To clarify whether the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography （ERCP） pancreatitis （PEP） after pancreatic guidewire placement （PGW） can be reduced by using a different cannulation method. METHODS： BebNeen April 2001 and October 2009, PGW was performed in 142 patients with native papilla to overcome difficult biliary cannulation. Our cannulation method for ERCP was changed from contrast injection （CI） using a single-lumen catheter （April 2001-May 2008） to wire-guided cannulation （WGC） using a double-lumen catheter （June 2008-October 2009）. The CI protocol was also changed during the study period： in the first period it was used for routine pancreatography for detecting small pancreatic cancer （April 2001-November 2002）, whereas in the second period it was not （December 2002-May 2008）. In PGW with CI using a single- lumen catheter, the contrast medium in the catheter lumen was injected into the pancreatic duct. The success rate of biliary cannulation, the incidence of PEP according to the cannulation method, and the impact of CI using a single-lumen catheter on PEP in comparison with WGC using a double-lumen catheter were investigated.RESULTS： CI with routine pancreatography, CI without routine pancreatography, and WGC were performed in 27 patients, 77 patients and 38 patients, respectively. Routine pancreatography did not contribute to the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in our study period. In CI without routine pancreatography and WGC, diagnostic pancreatography was performed in 17 patients and no patients, respectively. The success rate of biliary cannulation by PGW alone was 69%, and the final success rate was increased to 80.3% by the addition of consecutive maneuvers or a second ERCP. PEP occurred in 22 patients （15.5%）, and the severity was mild in all cases. When analyzed according to cannulation method, the incidence of PEP was 37.0% （10/27） in the patients who underwent CI with routine pancreatography, 14.3% （11/77） in those who underwent CI without routine pancreatography, and 2.6% （1/38） in those who underwent WGC. In all patients who underwent CI using a singlelumen catheter, the incidence of PEP was 20% （21/104）, which was significantly higher than that in WGC using a double-lumen catheter. In univariate and multivariate analysis, CI using a single-lumen catheter showed a high, statistically significant, odds ratio for PEP after PGW. CONCLUSION： The practice of a cannulation method involving the use of a double-lumen catheter minimizes the CI dose administered to the pancreatic duct and reduces the incidence of PEP after PGW.
文摘BACKGROUND At our academic tertiary care medical center, we have noted patients referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) who increasingly require advanced cannulation techniques. This trend is noted despite increased endoscopist experience and annual ERCP volume over the same period.AIM To evaluate this phenomenon of perceived escalation in complexity of cannulation at ERCP and assessed potential underlying factors.METHODS Demographic/clinical variables and records of ERCP patients at the beginning(2008), middle(2013) and end(2018) of the last decade were reviewed retrospectively. Cannulation approaches were classified as "standard" or "advanced" and duodenoscope position was labeled as "standard"(short position) or "non-standard"(e.g., long, semi-long).RESULTS Patients undergoing ERCP were older in 2018 compared to 2008(69.7 ± 15.2 years vs 55.1 ± 14.7, P < 0.05). Increased ampullary distortion and peri-ampullary diverticula were noted in 2018(P < 0.001). ERCPs were increasingly performed with a non-standard duodenoscope position, from 2.2%(2008) to 5.6%(2013) and 16.1%(2018)(P < 0.001). Utilization of more than one advanced cannulation technique for a given ERCP increased from 0.7%(2008) to 0.9%(2013) to 6.6%(2018)(P < 0.001). Primary mass size > 4 cm, pancreatic uncinate mass, and bilirubin > 10 mg/d L predicted use of advanced cannulation techniques(P < 0.03 for each).CONCLUSION Complexity of cannulation at ERCP has sharply increased over the past 5 years, with an increased proportion of elderly patients and those with malignancy requiring advanced cannulation approaches. These data suggest that complexity of cannulation at ERCP may be predicted based on patient/ampulla characteristics. This may inform selection of experienced, high-volume endoscopists to perform these complex procedures.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography involves selective bile duct cannulation,which is often challenging and associated with complications.In difficult cannulation cases,early precutting is frequently used.However,its efficacy and optimal indications require further evaluation.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of early precut(EP)in difficult bile duct cannulation.METHODS This retrospective analysis of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures was performed for bile duct cannulation in patients with naive papillae who required advanced cannulation techniques(ACTs).These patients were admitted between April 2020 and March 2024 and were analyzed for risk factors,success rates,and complications.Outcomes were compared between the EP group and the conventional other ACTs group,with a focus on cases with oral protrusion large(oral protrusion-L).RESULTS The need for ACTs was identified as an independent risk factor for complications[odds ratio(OR)=5.4;95%confidence interval:1.887-15.53].Malignant biliary strictures(OR=2.58)and oral protrusion-L(OR=2.77)were also identified as independent risk factors for requiring ACTs.The EP group had a significantly higher second-line cannulation success rate(97.9%vs 73.2%,P=0.001)and lower complication rate(8.3%vs 39.0%,P=0.001)than the other ACTs group.Additionally,similar benefits were observed in the oral protrusion-L cases.CONCLUSION This study provides compelling evidence that EP is a viable alternative and a superior strategy in cases requiring ACTs,particularly oral protrusion-L.
基金Korea Medical Device Development Fund Grant Funded by the Korea Government the Ministry of Trade,Industry and Energy(Project Number:9991007196),No.KMDF_PR_20200901_0066.
文摘BACKGROUND Needle-knife fistulotomy(NKF)is used as a rescue technique for difficult cannulation.However,the data are limited regarding the use of NKF for primary biliary cannulation,especially when performed by beginners.AIM To assess the effectiveness and safety of primary NKF for biliary cannulation,and the role of the endoscopist’s expertise level(beginner vs expert).METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the records of 542 patients with naïve prominent bulging papilla and no history of pancreatitis,who underwent bile duct cannulation at a tertiary referral center.The patients were categorized according to the endoscopist’s expertise level and the technique used for bile duct cannulation.We assessed the rates of successful cannulation and adverse events.RESULTS The baseline characteristics did not differ between the experienced and lessexperienced endoscopists.The incidence rate of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)pancreatitis(PEP)was significantly affected by the endoscopist’s expertise level in patients who received conventional cannulation with sphincterotomy(8.9%vs 3.4%for beginner vs expert,P=0.039),but not in those who received NKF.In the multivariable analysis,a lower expertise level of the biliary endoscopist(P=0.037)and longer total procedure time(P=0.026)were significant risk factor of PEP in patients who received conventional cannulation with sphincterotomy but only total procedure time(P=0.004)was significant risk factor of PEP in those who received NKF.CONCLUSION Primary NKF was effective and safe in patients with prominent and bulging ampulla,even when performed by less-experienced endoscopist.We need to confirm which level of endoscopist’s experience is needed for primary NKF through prospective randomized study.
