Medical Ethics is no different to Ethics, but relates specifically to the doctor-patient relationship. This relationship is based on mutual trust—trust in the doctor’s expertise and knowledge and trust that the pati...Medical Ethics is no different to Ethics, but relates specifically to the doctor-patient relationship. This relationship is based on mutual trust—trust in the doctor’s expertise and knowledge and trust that the patient is consulting the doctor, for his/her/their own health, wellbeing and welfare, without agenda or bias. In other words, the basis of the doctor-patient relationship is one of mutual trust and confidence. Thus, what is imparted between them is held in the strictest confidence. The doctor must act within the law. No third party influence can be brought to bear on this relationship without the patient’s consent. In the case of minors the relationship is between the child’s guardians as well as the doctor who must act within the law. In the category of “elderly” or adult guardianship or advocacy, those appointed and in positions of trust must take the person’s wishes into account if the patient has capacity to make decisions or has indicated their wish prior to any such appointment. Capacity is defined as consistent belief or wish, awareness of what one does not wish for, satisfaction when wishes are respected and fulfilled and the opposite when they are not. Ethical practice is determined by taking context into account in decision-making and ensuring the sanctity of the patient’s rights and wishes. Abuse is just the opposite, where actions taken or not taken are against a person’s wishes. Personal wish determines best interest. Best interest may also be defined in terms of social functioning and psychological wellbeing. Discussion of ethics in terms of General Systems Theory is also addressed, and affects an action on the environment or others, i.e. ethics in the wider medical context may pertain if the person has a contagious disease and a period of quarantine or “isolation” or barrier” nursing is required, and where precedent is given to society’s best interest over the person’s wishes, as part of an educational process and as required for strategic disease management.展开更多
目的探讨佛山市13所医院肿瘤科护士伦理敏感性现状并分析其影响因素,为制定有效的干预措施提供依据。方法2023年7月—9月,采用整群抽样法选择广东省佛山市13所三级甲等综合医院574名肿瘤科护士作为研究对象,采用一般资料调查表、中文版...目的探讨佛山市13所医院肿瘤科护士伦理敏感性现状并分析其影响因素,为制定有效的干预措施提供依据。方法2023年7月—9月,采用整群抽样法选择广东省佛山市13所三级甲等综合医院574名肿瘤科护士作为研究对象,采用一般资料调查表、中文版护士道德敏感性调查问卷(revised moral sensitivity questionnaire,MSQ-R-CV)、关怀行为量表(caring behaviour inventory,CBI)、中文版情绪智力量表(wong and Law emotional intelligence scale,WLEIS)进行横断面研究,采用单因素与多元线性逐步回归分析筛选影响因素。结果524名护士完成研究。肿瘤科护士伦理敏感性总分为(44.57±7.63)分;护士伦理敏感性的关怀行为总分为(125.86±17.95)分,护士情绪智力总分为(86.82±14.37)分。多元线性逐步回归结果显示,在肿瘤科工作年限、近3年内是否参加医学伦理与叙事护理培训、关怀行为、情绪智力变量是肿瘤科护士伦理敏感性的影响因素(均P<0.05),共解释因变量总变异的70.5%(F=94.253,P<0.001)。结论佛山市肿瘤科护士伦理敏感性处于较高水平,在肿瘤科工作年限≤20年、近3年内未参加医学伦理与叙事护理培训、关怀行为不足、情绪智力水平较低的护士,其伦理敏感性水平较低,应引起护理管理者重视,通过适当干预提升其伦理敏感性。展开更多
文摘Medical Ethics is no different to Ethics, but relates specifically to the doctor-patient relationship. This relationship is based on mutual trust—trust in the doctor’s expertise and knowledge and trust that the patient is consulting the doctor, for his/her/their own health, wellbeing and welfare, without agenda or bias. In other words, the basis of the doctor-patient relationship is one of mutual trust and confidence. Thus, what is imparted between them is held in the strictest confidence. The doctor must act within the law. No third party influence can be brought to bear on this relationship without the patient’s consent. In the case of minors the relationship is between the child’s guardians as well as the doctor who must act within the law. In the category of “elderly” or adult guardianship or advocacy, those appointed and in positions of trust must take the person’s wishes into account if the patient has capacity to make decisions or has indicated their wish prior to any such appointment. Capacity is defined as consistent belief or wish, awareness of what one does not wish for, satisfaction when wishes are respected and fulfilled and the opposite when they are not. Ethical practice is determined by taking context into account in decision-making and ensuring the sanctity of the patient’s rights and wishes. Abuse is just the opposite, where actions taken or not taken are against a person’s wishes. Personal wish determines best interest. Best interest may also be defined in terms of social functioning and psychological wellbeing. Discussion of ethics in terms of General Systems Theory is also addressed, and affects an action on the environment or others, i.e. ethics in the wider medical context may pertain if the person has a contagious disease and a period of quarantine or “isolation” or barrier” nursing is required, and where precedent is given to society’s best interest over the person’s wishes, as part of an educational process and as required for strategic disease management.
文摘目的探讨佛山市13所医院肿瘤科护士伦理敏感性现状并分析其影响因素,为制定有效的干预措施提供依据。方法2023年7月—9月,采用整群抽样法选择广东省佛山市13所三级甲等综合医院574名肿瘤科护士作为研究对象,采用一般资料调查表、中文版护士道德敏感性调查问卷(revised moral sensitivity questionnaire,MSQ-R-CV)、关怀行为量表(caring behaviour inventory,CBI)、中文版情绪智力量表(wong and Law emotional intelligence scale,WLEIS)进行横断面研究,采用单因素与多元线性逐步回归分析筛选影响因素。结果524名护士完成研究。肿瘤科护士伦理敏感性总分为(44.57±7.63)分;护士伦理敏感性的关怀行为总分为(125.86±17.95)分,护士情绪智力总分为(86.82±14.37)分。多元线性逐步回归结果显示,在肿瘤科工作年限、近3年内是否参加医学伦理与叙事护理培训、关怀行为、情绪智力变量是肿瘤科护士伦理敏感性的影响因素(均P<0.05),共解释因变量总变异的70.5%(F=94.253,P<0.001)。结论佛山市肿瘤科护士伦理敏感性处于较高水平,在肿瘤科工作年限≤20年、近3年内未参加医学伦理与叙事护理培训、关怀行为不足、情绪智力水平较低的护士,其伦理敏感性水平较低,应引起护理管理者重视,通过适当干预提升其伦理敏感性。
