Objective: To compare the efficacy of bladder neck incision (BNI) with transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) in the treatment of patients with urinary obstruction caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) on t...Objective: To compare the efficacy of bladder neck incision (BNI) with transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) in the treatment of patients with urinary obstruction caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) on the basis of short term follow up of 4 months. Patient and Methods: The study was conducted in Department of General Surgery in Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi. 60 men with proven clinical diagnosis of BPH of size 30 grams and less presenting with symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) were randomised prospectively to undergo either of the two operative modalities. Preoperatively size of the prostate, symptom scoring (IPSS), peak flow rate (Qmax) were assessed. Postoperatively and during 4 months follow up the following data were collected—operative time, catheterisation period, hospital stay, blood loss, Qmax and IPSS. Results: Preoperative parameters in both the groups showed no statistically significant differences with respect to prostate size, Qmax and IPSS Scoring. At 4 months follow up Qmax increased from (6.35 ± 4.49) to (16.41 ± 2.28) in TURP group and (4.51 ± 3.57) to (15.95 ± 2.58) in BNI group. IPSS decreased from 18.70 to 5.7 in TURP group and 18.90 to 6.00 in BNI group. All differences were statistically significant. There was a statistically significant difference in operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, catheterisation timing favouring BNI. Conclusion: TURP and BNI are equally effective in providing symptomatic improvement. BNI has an upper hand in reference to operative time, hospital stay, duration of catheterisation and blood loss.展开更多
Objective To study the role of bladder trabeculation found by B-mode ultrasound in evaluating the degree of bladder outlet obstruction ( BOO ) and the bladder function in benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH) patients. ...Objective To study the role of bladder trabeculation found by B-mode ultrasound in evaluating the degree of bladder outlet obstruction ( BOO ) and the bladder function in benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH) patients. Methods Conducted prospective research to determine differences in clinical data and urodynamic展开更多
Summary： We performed a retrospective, case-control study to evaluate whether the urine flow acceleration （UFA, mL/s2） is superior to maximum uroflow （Qmax, mL/s） in diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction （BOO） ...Summary： We performed a retrospective, case-control study to evaluate whether the urine flow acceleration （UFA, mL/s2） is superior to maximum uroflow （Qmax, mL/s） in diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction （BOO） in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH）. In this study, a total of 50 men with BPH （age： 58±12.5 years） and 50 controls （age： 59±13.0 years） were included. A pressure-flow study was used to determine the presence of BOO according to the recommendations of Incontinence Control Society （ICS）. The results showed that the UFA and Qmax in BPH group were much lower than those in the control group [（2.05±0.85） vs. （4.60±1.25） mL/s2 and （8.50±1.05） vs. （13.00±3.35） mL/s] （P〈0.001）. Accol;ding to the criteria （UFA〈2.05 mL/s2, Qmax〈10 mL/s）, the sensitivity and specificity of UFA vs. Qmax in diagnosing BOO were 88%, 75% vs. 81%, 63%. UFA vs. Omax, when compared with the results of P-Q chart （the kappa values in corresponding analysis）, was 0.55 vs. 0.35. The pros- tate volume, post void residual and detrusor pressure at Qmax between the two groups were 28.6±9.8 vs. 24.2±7.6 mL, 60.4±1.4 vs. 21.3±2.5 mL and 56.6±8.3 vs. 21.7±6.1 cmHzO, respectively （P〈0.05）. It was concluded that the UFA is a useful urodynamic parameter, and is superior to Qmax in diagnosing BOO in patients with BPH.展开更多
Introduction: The therapeutic approach to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has evolved profoundly. Surgical treatment is reserved for complicated cases and the reference surgical technique is transurethral resection...Introduction: The therapeutic approach to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has evolved profoundly. Surgical treatment is reserved for complicated cases and the reference surgical technique is transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). This work aims to study the epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects of monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate in our department. Materials and Methods: We conducted a descriptive study with retrospective data collection over a 12-month period from November 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024. The urology unit, an integral part of the surgery department, of the Sino-Guinean Friendship Hospital in Conakry served as the setting for this study. It included 27 patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy treated surgically by monopolar transurethral resection and having a usable medical record. The parameters studied were epidemiological, clinics and therapeutic. Results: The mean age of the patients was 68.57 ± 5.7 years with extremes from 50 to 79 years. The peak frequency was observed between 70 and 79 years (48.15%). All our patients had lower urinary tract disorders, i.e. 100% of cases. On digital rectal examination, an increase in the volume of the prostate of benign appearance was observed in all cases. The mean prostate volume was 43.7 cc on ultrasound with extremes from 34 cc to 58 cc. The total PSA level was less than 4 ng/ml in the majority of cases. The postoperative course was generally uncomplicated (n = 26) with removal of the urinary catheter on the second postoperative day (D2). However, one peroperative complication was observed in one patient;it was a bladder breach, leading to the passage of glycine into the peritoneum. Conclusion: Transurethral resection of the prostate has reduced the length of hospital stay of our patients, as well as the comorbidities associated with the treatment. The complications associated with it are rare but potentially serious. Its performance requires in-depth mastery of the endoscopic anatomy of the lower urinary tract as well as technical operative expertise.展开更多
文摘Objective: To compare the efficacy of bladder neck incision (BNI) with transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) in the treatment of patients with urinary obstruction caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) on the basis of short term follow up of 4 months. Patient and Methods: The study was conducted in Department of General Surgery in Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi. 60 men with proven clinical diagnosis of BPH of size 30 grams and less presenting with symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) were randomised prospectively to undergo either of the two operative modalities. Preoperatively size of the prostate, symptom scoring (IPSS), peak flow rate (Qmax) were assessed. Postoperatively and during 4 months follow up the following data were collected—operative time, catheterisation period, hospital stay, blood loss, Qmax and IPSS. Results: Preoperative parameters in both the groups showed no statistically significant differences with respect to prostate size, Qmax and IPSS Scoring. At 4 months follow up Qmax increased from (6.35 ± 4.49) to (16.41 ± 2.28) in TURP group and (4.51 ± 3.57) to (15.95 ± 2.58) in BNI group. IPSS decreased from 18.70 to 5.7 in TURP group and 18.90 to 6.00 in BNI group. All differences were statistically significant. There was a statistically significant difference in operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, catheterisation timing favouring BNI. Conclusion: TURP and BNI are equally effective in providing symptomatic improvement. BNI has an upper hand in reference to operative time, hospital stay, duration of catheterisation and blood loss.
文摘Objective To study the role of bladder trabeculation found by B-mode ultrasound in evaluating the degree of bladder outlet obstruction ( BOO ) and the bladder function in benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH) patients. Methods Conducted prospective research to determine differences in clinical data and urodynamic
文摘Summary： We performed a retrospective, case-control study to evaluate whether the urine flow acceleration （UFA, mL/s2） is superior to maximum uroflow （Qmax, mL/s） in diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction （BOO） in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH）. In this study, a total of 50 men with BPH （age： 58±12.5 years） and 50 controls （age： 59±13.0 years） were included. A pressure-flow study was used to determine the presence of BOO according to the recommendations of Incontinence Control Society （ICS）. The results showed that the UFA and Qmax in BPH group were much lower than those in the control group [（2.05±0.85） vs. （4.60±1.25） mL/s2 and （8.50±1.05） vs. （13.00±3.35） mL/s] （P〈0.001）. Accol;ding to the criteria （UFA〈2.05 mL/s2, Qmax〈10 mL/s）, the sensitivity and specificity of UFA vs. Qmax in diagnosing BOO were 88%, 75% vs. 81%, 63%. UFA vs. Omax, when compared with the results of P-Q chart （the kappa values in corresponding analysis）, was 0.55 vs. 0.35. The pros- tate volume, post void residual and detrusor pressure at Qmax between the two groups were 28.6±9.8 vs. 24.2±7.6 mL, 60.4±1.4 vs. 21.3±2.5 mL and 56.6±8.3 vs. 21.7±6.1 cmHzO, respectively （P〈0.05）. It was concluded that the UFA is a useful urodynamic parameter, and is superior to Qmax in diagnosing BOO in patients with BPH.
文摘Introduction: The therapeutic approach to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has evolved profoundly. Surgical treatment is reserved for complicated cases and the reference surgical technique is transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). This work aims to study the epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects of monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate in our department. Materials and Methods: We conducted a descriptive study with retrospective data collection over a 12-month period from November 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024. The urology unit, an integral part of the surgery department, of the Sino-Guinean Friendship Hospital in Conakry served as the setting for this study. It included 27 patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy treated surgically by monopolar transurethral resection and having a usable medical record. The parameters studied were epidemiological, clinics and therapeutic. Results: The mean age of the patients was 68.57 ± 5.7 years with extremes from 50 to 79 years. The peak frequency was observed between 70 and 79 years (48.15%). All our patients had lower urinary tract disorders, i.e. 100% of cases. On digital rectal examination, an increase in the volume of the prostate of benign appearance was observed in all cases. The mean prostate volume was 43.7 cc on ultrasound with extremes from 34 cc to 58 cc. The total PSA level was less than 4 ng/ml in the majority of cases. The postoperative course was generally uncomplicated (n = 26) with removal of the urinary catheter on the second postoperative day (D2). However, one peroperative complication was observed in one patient;it was a bladder breach, leading to the passage of glycine into the peritoneum. Conclusion: Transurethral resection of the prostate has reduced the length of hospital stay of our patients, as well as the comorbidities associated with the treatment. The complications associated with it are rare but potentially serious. Its performance requires in-depth mastery of the endoscopic anatomy of the lower urinary tract as well as technical operative expertise.
