Objective: To report a case of intractable skin reactions caused by bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation to improve our under-standing and treatment of BAHA implantation-caused skin reactions. Methods:We repo...Objective: To report a case of intractable skin reactions caused by bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation to improve our under-standing and treatment of BAHA implantation-caused skin reactions. Methods:We reported a case of severe skin reactions caused by BAHA implantation. Related literature were also reviewed. Results:We found grade IV skin reactions, including hyperplasia around the implant, which led to the removal of the BAHA implant 10 months after implantation. The findings indicated poor skin hygiene, allergy to titanium and inadequate surgicals skills as the possible causes of the skin reaction. Conclusion: Skin adverse reactions, usually rare in BAHA implantation patients, may cause implant removal and implantation failure. We suggest to further investigate the mechanisms underlying titanium allergy. Copyright ? 2016, PLA General Hospital Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Production and hosting by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).展开更多
Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and patient-reported outcomes,and their correlation,after percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid(BAHA)implantation.Methods:A prospective study was con...Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and patient-reported outcomes,and their correlation,after percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid(BAHA)implantation.Methods:A prospective study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2020 in a tertiary care center.All adult patients who were implanted with a percutaneous BAHA device during this evaluation period were included in the study.Complete auditory function and patients reported outcome measures(PROMs)were assessed in the preoperative period and 6 months after the implant activation.The PROMs included a generic form(Medical Outcome Study 36 Short Form Healthy Survey(MOS SF-36)),and three disease-specific forms(Hearing Handicap Inventory(HHI),Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life Scale(SADLS),and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory(THI)).Results:Twenty-two patients with an average age of 53 years were included in the study.The overall functional gain with the BAHA in sound-field pure tone average(PTA)was 29 dB,with no statistically significant differences according to surgical indication(F(3,18)=2.319,p=0.110).The greater the preoperative air-bone gap,the greater the functional gain obtained(r=0.505,p<0.05).In the PROMs,we found a significant improvement in HHI scores(p<0.005)and a significant increase in overall SADLS scores(p<0.05)with the use of percutaneous BAHA devices.We did not verify any statistically significant correlation between functional and PROMs results.Conclusions:The BAHA is a safe and effective alternative hearing rehabilitation option in selected patients.The PROMs results prove patient's overall satisfaction.展开更多
Objective: Osseointegrated hearing implants have been readily available and extensively used in developed countries for over twenty years. Despite a great need for this technology, use of these implants in developing ...Objective: Osseointegrated hearing implants have been readily available and extensively used in developed countries for over twenty years. Despite a great need for this technology, use of these implants in developing countries has been limited due to the prohibitive cost of the surgical implant system as well as the implant devices themselves. To address this problem we have developed a drill and implant system that mimics the currently available instrumentation using materials that are readily available at a fraction of the cost. Study Design: Proof of Concept. Methods: The construction of the drill and implant system will be described. Testing of the system so that it adhered to Cochlear’sTM Bone anchored hearing aid system specifications including the drill speed and torque settings were measured. Temperature readings were also recorded during procedures performed on human cadaveric temporal bones. Results: The speed of the drill with the guide drill and countersink drill bits ranged from 1400 revolutions per minute (rpm) to 2300 rpm’s. The temperature change of the room temperature temporal bones varied from 0 degrees to +0.2 degrees Fahrenheit during the drilling process with both drill bits. All five implants were stable in the cadaver bone after being checked for initial stability. Conclusion: This low cost implant system may make the BAHA technology more easily available to developing countries pending future studies with animal models.展开更多
The objective of this study is to determine the auditory gain, quality of life, audiological benefits, in bone-anchored hearing device users (BAHA). It is a retrospective and concurrent evaluation of thirty patients f...The objective of this study is to determine the auditory gain, quality of life, audiological benefits, in bone-anchored hearing device users (BAHA). It is a retrospective and concurrent evaluation of thirty patients fitted unilaterally and seven fitted bilaterally for at least six months. Patients were assessed with audiometric testing and application of Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) and Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB). Regarding sound-field pure audiometry results, we found a statistically significant gain in all frequencies using the bone-anchored device. APHAB scores showed statistically significant subjective audiological gains in all subscales except for the aversiveness subscale. GBI mean scores for all items in both groups were all above 3, suggesting quality of life improvement in conductive and mixed hearing loss patients. BP100 users showed a greater clinical gain in the APHAB global score and subscales compared with Divino users. In conclusion the BAHA provides significant auditory gain, subjective audiological benefits and improves quality of life in all BAHA users. This study shows a significant clinical and statistical benefit of BAHA measured by audiometric testing and by the APHAB and GBI questionnaires.展开更多
基金supported by Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Project:2013B022000046
文摘Objective: To report a case of intractable skin reactions caused by bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation to improve our under-standing and treatment of BAHA implantation-caused skin reactions. Methods:We reported a case of severe skin reactions caused by BAHA implantation. Related literature were also reviewed. Results:We found grade IV skin reactions, including hyperplasia around the implant, which led to the removal of the BAHA implant 10 months after implantation. The findings indicated poor skin hygiene, allergy to titanium and inadequate surgicals skills as the possible causes of the skin reaction. Conclusion: Skin adverse reactions, usually rare in BAHA implantation patients, may cause implant removal and implantation failure. We suggest to further investigate the mechanisms underlying titanium allergy. Copyright ? 2016, PLA General Hospital Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Production and hosting by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
文摘Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and patient-reported outcomes,and their correlation,after percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid(BAHA)implantation.Methods:A prospective study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2020 in a tertiary care center.All adult patients who were implanted with a percutaneous BAHA device during this evaluation period were included in the study.Complete auditory function and patients reported outcome measures(PROMs)were assessed in the preoperative period and 6 months after the implant activation.The PROMs included a generic form(Medical Outcome Study 36 Short Form Healthy Survey(MOS SF-36)),and three disease-specific forms(Hearing Handicap Inventory(HHI),Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life Scale(SADLS),and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory(THI)).Results:Twenty-two patients with an average age of 53 years were included in the study.The overall functional gain with the BAHA in sound-field pure tone average(PTA)was 29 dB,with no statistically significant differences according to surgical indication(F(3,18)=2.319,p=0.110).The greater the preoperative air-bone gap,the greater the functional gain obtained(r=0.505,p<0.05).In the PROMs,we found a significant improvement in HHI scores(p<0.005)and a significant increase in overall SADLS scores(p<0.05)with the use of percutaneous BAHA devices.We did not verify any statistically significant correlation between functional and PROMs results.Conclusions:The BAHA is a safe and effective alternative hearing rehabilitation option in selected patients.The PROMs results prove patient's overall satisfaction.
文摘Objective: Osseointegrated hearing implants have been readily available and extensively used in developed countries for over twenty years. Despite a great need for this technology, use of these implants in developing countries has been limited due to the prohibitive cost of the surgical implant system as well as the implant devices themselves. To address this problem we have developed a drill and implant system that mimics the currently available instrumentation using materials that are readily available at a fraction of the cost. Study Design: Proof of Concept. Methods: The construction of the drill and implant system will be described. Testing of the system so that it adhered to Cochlear’sTM Bone anchored hearing aid system specifications including the drill speed and torque settings were measured. Temperature readings were also recorded during procedures performed on human cadaveric temporal bones. Results: The speed of the drill with the guide drill and countersink drill bits ranged from 1400 revolutions per minute (rpm) to 2300 rpm’s. The temperature change of the room temperature temporal bones varied from 0 degrees to +0.2 degrees Fahrenheit during the drilling process with both drill bits. All five implants were stable in the cadaver bone after being checked for initial stability. Conclusion: This low cost implant system may make the BAHA technology more easily available to developing countries pending future studies with animal models.
文摘The objective of this study is to determine the auditory gain, quality of life, audiological benefits, in bone-anchored hearing device users (BAHA). It is a retrospective and concurrent evaluation of thirty patients fitted unilaterally and seven fitted bilaterally for at least six months. Patients were assessed with audiometric testing and application of Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) and Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB). Regarding sound-field pure audiometry results, we found a statistically significant gain in all frequencies using the bone-anchored device. APHAB scores showed statistically significant subjective audiological gains in all subscales except for the aversiveness subscale. GBI mean scores for all items in both groups were all above 3, suggesting quality of life improvement in conductive and mixed hearing loss patients. BP100 users showed a greater clinical gain in the APHAB global score and subscales compared with Divino users. In conclusion the BAHA provides significant auditory gain, subjective audiological benefits and improves quality of life in all BAHA users. This study shows a significant clinical and statistical benefit of BAHA measured by audiometric testing and by the APHAB and GBI questionnaires.
