The forming of sheet metal in a desired and attractive shape is a process that requires an understanding of materials, mechanics and manufacturing principles. Manufacturing a consistent sheet metal component is challe...The forming of sheet metal in a desired and attractive shape is a process that requires an understanding of materials, mechanics and manufacturing principles. Manufacturing a consistent sheet metal component is challenging due to the nonlinear interactions of various material and process parameters. One of the major issues in the manufacturing of inconsistent?sheet metal?parts is springback. Springback is the elastic strain recovery in the material after the tooling is removed and the final shape of the product depends on the springback amount formed. In this study according to the result of simulation the inverted compensation method is adopted to optimize die surface design. Similarly, to predict and compensate the springback error this study presented an analytical approach of forming process in a stepwise modification of the automobile roof panel. Moreover, based on?Dynaform?and?finite element analysis of sheet metal stamping simulation the sprinback in automobile roof panel is predicted and compensated.?In addition, this study examines the significant requirements of the sheet metal forming precision of automobile body and the simulation of forming, stamping and springback of automobile roof panel is carried out, and the result of simulation also is analyzed.展开更多
A comparison research about the implicit and explicit solutions of sheet forming simulation was presented. On the platform of Autoform and Ls dyna3D, a dynamic forming simulation of a sideframe, of Santana 2000 was do...A comparison research about the implicit and explicit solutions of sheet forming simulation was presented. On the platform of Autoform and Ls dyna3D, a dynamic forming simulation of a sideframe, of Santana 2000 was done, and the engineering strain, the thickness distribution and the FLD between the two softwares were compared. It indicates that their results coincide with each other very much and the areas of the wrinkle and failure are the same roughly. Further, the characteristics of the two softwares in geometric model and preprocessing of the finite element were discussed and the questions which need attention provided.展开更多
文摘The forming of sheet metal in a desired and attractive shape is a process that requires an understanding of materials, mechanics and manufacturing principles. Manufacturing a consistent sheet metal component is challenging due to the nonlinear interactions of various material and process parameters. One of the major issues in the manufacturing of inconsistent?sheet metal?parts is springback. Springback is the elastic strain recovery in the material after the tooling is removed and the final shape of the product depends on the springback amount formed. In this study according to the result of simulation the inverted compensation method is adopted to optimize die surface design. Similarly, to predict and compensate the springback error this study presented an analytical approach of forming process in a stepwise modification of the automobile roof panel. Moreover, based on?Dynaform?and?finite element analysis of sheet metal stamping simulation the sprinback in automobile roof panel is predicted and compensated.?In addition, this study examines the significant requirements of the sheet metal forming precision of automobile body and the simulation of forming, stamping and springback of automobile roof panel is carried out, and the result of simulation also is analyzed.
文摘A comparison research about the implicit and explicit solutions of sheet forming simulation was presented. On the platform of Autoform and Ls dyna3D, a dynamic forming simulation of a sideframe, of Santana 2000 was done, and the engineering strain, the thickness distribution and the FLD between the two softwares were compared. It indicates that their results coincide with each other very much and the areas of the wrinkle and failure are the same roughly. Further, the characteristics of the two softwares in geometric model and preprocessing of the finite element were discussed and the questions which need attention provided.
