<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">During ...<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">During several years, ascorbic acid (vitamin C) played a significant role in the health of periodontal tissues.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The goals of prosthodontics management are to restore the missing teeth, provide the loss of teeth functions, and establish acceptable dental esthetics, and there are some evidence</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">reveal</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ing</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the passive effects of snuff</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">on the results of prosthodontics and periodontal treatment</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> so the present study </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">is </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">performed to evaluate the outcomes of topical application of ascorbic acid solution as an adjunctive method of periodontal therapy among wet sniff users after prosthodontics therapy.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The clinical situation was evaluated in 150 moderate periodontitis patients after conventional periodontal and prosthodontics therapy. They were selected from outpatient clinics, college of dentistry, King Khalid University, and from some hospitals Ministry of Health in Tabuk, Jazan and Aseer regions. The study was conducted from September 2020 to December 2020. The time of post-treatment assessment was one year. The study was included 50 patients </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">who </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">don</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">’</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">t use wet snuff as a group I (GI) (control group), 50 patients wet snuff users as group II (GII), and 50 patients wet snuff users were treated with topical application of ascorbic acid solution as group III (GIII). The participants were aged over 20 years, with a mean age of 35 years. The duration of using wet snuff was at least one year. Plaque index (PLI), gingival index (GI), clinical attachment loss (CAL) were recorded at baseline (first visit), then after 4</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">weeks</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(second visit) and after 6</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">weeks</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(third visit) of conventional periodontal therapy and topical application of ascorbic acid solution. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA test and paired t-test. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">According to statistical analysis, there was the inclination of decrease in the mean and </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">standard deviation of plaque index (PLI) from 2.8</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1.4 to 2.5</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.51, and 2.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">7</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.33 in group II, and decrease from 2.7</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.34 to 2.5</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.23 and 2.6</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.65 in group III. Similarly in the gingival index (GI)</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> there was a decrease in the mean and standard deviation from 2.8</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.52 to 2.3</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.62 and 2.5</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.51 in group II and a decrease from 2.5</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.8 to 2.3</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.58 and 2.4</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.47 in group III. Moreover, there was a decrease in the mean and standard deviation of clinical attachment loss (CAL) from 4.5</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.26 to 3.9</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.83 and 4.2</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.83 in group II and from 4.2</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.31 to 3.8</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.46 and 3.8</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.31 in group III;less than group I without significance differences (p > 0. 05) in all study groups at baseline and after 4</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">weeks, and 6</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">weeks of follow up except CAL. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The results of our study displayed that periodontal parameters vary among wet snuff users after topical application of ascorbic acid solution as an adjunctive method of periodontal therapy</span>展开更多
文摘<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">During several years, ascorbic acid (vitamin C) played a significant role in the health of periodontal tissues.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The goals of prosthodontics management are to restore the missing teeth, provide the loss of teeth functions, and establish acceptable dental esthetics, and there are some evidence</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">reveal</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ing</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the passive effects of snuff</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">on the results of prosthodontics and periodontal treatment</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> so the present study </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">is </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">performed to evaluate the outcomes of topical application of ascorbic acid solution as an adjunctive method of periodontal therapy among wet sniff users after prosthodontics therapy.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The clinical situation was evaluated in 150 moderate periodontitis patients after conventional periodontal and prosthodontics therapy. They were selected from outpatient clinics, college of dentistry, King Khalid University, and from some hospitals Ministry of Health in Tabuk, Jazan and Aseer regions. The study was conducted from September 2020 to December 2020. The time of post-treatment assessment was one year. The study was included 50 patients </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">who </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">don</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">’</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">t use wet snuff as a group I (GI) (control group), 50 patients wet snuff users as group II (GII), and 50 patients wet snuff users were treated with topical application of ascorbic acid solution as group III (GIII). The participants were aged over 20 years, with a mean age of 35 years. The duration of using wet snuff was at least one year. Plaque index (PLI), gingival index (GI), clinical attachment loss (CAL) were recorded at baseline (first visit), then after 4</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">weeks</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(second visit) and after 6</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">weeks</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(third visit) of conventional periodontal therapy and topical application of ascorbic acid solution. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA test and paired t-test. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">According to statistical analysis, there was the inclination of decrease in the mean and </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">standard deviation of plaque index (PLI) from 2.8</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1.4 to 2.5</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.51, and 2.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">7</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.33 in group II, and decrease from 2.7</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.34 to 2.5</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.23 and 2.6</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.65 in group III. Similarly in the gingival index (GI)</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> there was a decrease in the mean and standard deviation from 2.8</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.52 to 2.3</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.62 and 2.5</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.51 in group II and a decrease from 2.5</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.8 to 2.3</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.58 and 2.4</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.47 in group III. Moreover, there was a decrease in the mean and standard deviation of clinical attachment loss (CAL) from 4.5</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.26 to 3.9</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.83 and 4.2</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.83 in group II and from 4.2</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.31 to 3.8</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.46 and 3.8</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">±</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.31 in group III;less than group I without significance differences (p > 0. 05) in all study groups at baseline and after 4</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">weeks, and 6</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">weeks of follow up except CAL. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The results of our study displayed that periodontal parameters vary among wet snuff users after topical application of ascorbic acid solution as an adjunctive method of periodontal therapy</span>
