Currently,generative AI technologies and services worldwide are experiencing explosive growth.While driving technological innovation and productivity advancement in the social economy,they also precipitate multiple le...Currently,generative AI technologies and services worldwide are experiencing explosive growth.While driving technological innovation and productivity advancement in the social economy,they also precipitate multiple le-gal risks,ethical breaches in technology,and social governance challenges.Distinct regulatory pathways have emerged internationally:the EU promotes a rigid governance system through a unified regulatory framework and centralized oversight mechanisms,though concurrently exhibiting a trend of deferred legal application;the United States adopts an advocacy-based regulatory strategy combining principled guidance with corporate self-compliance;the United King-dom implements a non-mandatory principled framework establishing a compromise-based governance model.Grounded in China's strategic imperative to engage in global AI competition and informed by international experi-ences,the legal governance framework for generative AI must incorporate practical legislative imperatives,anchored in the dynamic adaptation between technological iteration and legal regulation,alongside the recalibration of developmen-tal efficacy against security risks.This necessitates establishing tiered safety thresholds and controllability require-ments within the governance architecture.Accordingly,there is an urgent need to enhance institutional provision and policy coordination,construct a multi-stakeholder long-term mechanism integrating administrative supervision,indus-try self-regulation,and technical governance,and formulate scenario-specific liability rules covering the entire life cycle from R&D to deployment-thereby avoiding arbitrary legislative uniformity.The ultimate objective is to forge a comprehensive governance ecosystem characterized by trustworthiness and security as its foundation,and prudence,in-clusiveness,and dynamic adaptability as its defining features.展开更多
This research aimed to develop a unique framework to help architects understand and apply architectural management （AM） in their practices. A comprehensive literature review identified several components belonging t...This research aimed to develop a unique framework to help architects understand and apply architectural management （AM） in their practices. A comprehensive literature review identified several components belonging to different specialist fields. A pragmatic methodology for developing the framework was adopted by combining the methodology of Japareen for building conceptual frameworks with the Concept Mapping and Qualitative Met-Synthesis techniques. The resulting framework underwent a series of testing stages aimed at refining the framework further. The testing process targeted two groups （researchers and professionals） by adopting a mixed method approach, which included a facilitated workshop, interviews, and a questionnaire survey. The feedback from the testing phase was used to create the final AM Taxonomy Framework （AMTF）, and served as an original and practical guide for practitioners, further extending their understanding of AM. Further validation and refinement are planned in the long term by applying the framework to selected architectural practices.展开更多
This paper presents the results and analysis from an interview study conducted with practitioners of architectural regionalism in India.The interviews sought to gain indepth understanding of the strategies,mechanisms,...This paper presents the results and analysis from an interview study conducted with practitioners of architectural regionalism in India.The interviews sought to gain indepth understanding of the strategies,mechanisms,and tools they employ to realize contextualized architecture that responds to local needs and potential.A sample composed of nine eminent Indian architects who regularly integrate the ideas of critical regionalism in their designs is selected and subsequently interviewed with regard to the varied aspects of their architectural practice.Findings are useful for practitioners and scholars of contemporary architecture in India for understanding the means employed by leading regionalist architects,while placing their work in the context of local building traditions,urban landscape,sociocultural conditions,technology,and climate.展开更多
基金This Research Was Funded by the Key Project of Humanities and Social Science Study from the Ministry of Education"Research on the Consideration and Promotion of Human Rights Benchmarks in Global Data Competition"(19JJD820009)。
文摘Currently,generative AI technologies and services worldwide are experiencing explosive growth.While driving technological innovation and productivity advancement in the social economy,they also precipitate multiple le-gal risks,ethical breaches in technology,and social governance challenges.Distinct regulatory pathways have emerged internationally:the EU promotes a rigid governance system through a unified regulatory framework and centralized oversight mechanisms,though concurrently exhibiting a trend of deferred legal application;the United States adopts an advocacy-based regulatory strategy combining principled guidance with corporate self-compliance;the United King-dom implements a non-mandatory principled framework establishing a compromise-based governance model.Grounded in China's strategic imperative to engage in global AI competition and informed by international experi-ences,the legal governance framework for generative AI must incorporate practical legislative imperatives,anchored in the dynamic adaptation between technological iteration and legal regulation,alongside the recalibration of developmen-tal efficacy against security risks.This necessitates establishing tiered safety thresholds and controllability require-ments within the governance architecture.Accordingly,there is an urgent need to enhance institutional provision and policy coordination,construct a multi-stakeholder long-term mechanism integrating administrative supervision,indus-try self-regulation,and technical governance,and formulate scenario-specific liability rules covering the entire life cycle from R&D to deployment-thereby avoiding arbitrary legislative uniformity.The ultimate objective is to forge a comprehensive governance ecosystem characterized by trustworthiness and security as its foundation,and prudence,in-clusiveness,and dynamic adaptability as its defining features.
文摘This research aimed to develop a unique framework to help architects understand and apply architectural management （AM） in their practices. A comprehensive literature review identified several components belonging to different specialist fields. A pragmatic methodology for developing the framework was adopted by combining the methodology of Japareen for building conceptual frameworks with the Concept Mapping and Qualitative Met-Synthesis techniques. The resulting framework underwent a series of testing stages aimed at refining the framework further. The testing process targeted two groups （researchers and professionals） by adopting a mixed method approach, which included a facilitated workshop, interviews, and a questionnaire survey. The feedback from the testing phase was used to create the final AM Taxonomy Framework （AMTF）, and served as an original and practical guide for practitioners, further extending their understanding of AM. Further validation and refinement are planned in the long term by applying the framework to selected architectural practices.
基金The authors would like to thank the Government of Indian Ministry of Human Resource Development for funding this manuscript through the IIT-Roorkee Doctoral Scholarship to the main author,grant number 14902005.We sincerely thank the architects who patiently and articulately answered our questions on regionalism and their buildings:Ashok B Lall,Meghal Arya,MN Ashish Ganju,Namita Singh,Pankaj Vir Gupta,Rahoul Singh,Sanjay Mohe,Sourabh Gupta,and Vinod Gupta.Lastly,the authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers of the FOAR journal for their time and effort in providing constructive comments that helped improve the quality of this paper.
文摘This paper presents the results and analysis from an interview study conducted with practitioners of architectural regionalism in India.The interviews sought to gain indepth understanding of the strategies,mechanisms,and tools they employ to realize contextualized architecture that responds to local needs and potential.A sample composed of nine eminent Indian architects who regularly integrate the ideas of critical regionalism in their designs is selected and subsequently interviewed with regard to the varied aspects of their architectural practice.Findings are useful for practitioners and scholars of contemporary architecture in India for understanding the means employed by leading regionalist architects,while placing their work in the context of local building traditions,urban landscape,sociocultural conditions,technology,and climate.
