Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms(AMNs)are rare tumors originating from mucin-producing epithelial cells of the appendix.They can exhibit both benign and malignant behavior.They are often incidentally discovered during a...Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms(AMNs)are rare tumors originating from mucin-producing epithelial cells of the appendix.They can exhibit both benign and malignant behavior.They are often incidentally discovered during appendectomy.Clinical presentation ranges from asymptomatic to mimicking acute appendicitis.Histologically,noninvasive AMNs are classified as low-grade AMNs(LAMNs)or high-grade AMNs(HAMNs),whereas invasive tumors are categorized as mucinous adenocarcinomas.Although LAMNs and HAMNs are generally nonmalignant,rupture can lead to pseudomyxoma peritonei(PMP).Surgical resection is the primary diagnostic and therapeutic approach,with intraoperative assessment to prevent rupture.Treatment strategies vary based on findings and include appendectomy,right hemicolectomy,and cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.Histological diagnosis relies on mucin detection,and immunohistochemical markers such as cytokeratin 20(diffusely positive),cytokeratin 7(often negative),mucin 5AC,and special ATrich sequence-binding protein 2 assist in characterization.Molecular profiling frequently identifies KRAS,GNAS,and TP53 mutations.KRAS mutations are generally associated with a favorable prognosis,whereas GNAS and TP53 mutations correlate with poorer survival outcomes.These findings highlight the potential role of molecular profiling in guiding treatment strategies for AMN and PMP.展开更多
BACKGROUND Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms(LAMNs)are a class of histolo-gically well-differentiated adenomas that can proliferate outside the appendix in the form of malignant tumours,resulting in the accumul...BACKGROUND Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms(LAMNs)are a class of histolo-gically well-differentiated adenomas that can proliferate outside the appendix in the form of malignant tumours,resulting in the accumulation of external appen-diceal mucus.They may present as an extra-appendiceal mass-like bulge,mucus or polypoid tissue at the appendiceal orifice,or even with abdominal dissem-ination.The surgical approach is usually appendectomy,ileocecal resection or right hemicolectomy.It is essential to raise awareness of LAMNs and choose an appropriate treatment.CASE SUMMARY A 68-year-old man underwent a routine physical examination at our hospital on May 17,2022.The patient had no symptoms of abdominal pain,bloating,or weight loss,and his tumour marker levels were normal.The faecal occult blood test was negative,and no abnormalities were identified on physical examination.Colonoscopy revealed a submucosal protrusion at the appendiceal orifice.During endoscopic ultrasound,uneven echoes were observed in the appendix cavity.A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the abdomen revealed a nodular thickening at the base of the appendix,with a diameter of approximately 1 cm.When all the examination results were considered,we suspected the lesion to be an appendiceal mucinous tumour.Laparoscopic surgery was performed using the double purse-string suture method.Postoperative pathology suggested a low-grade mucinous cystadenoma of the appendix with no involvement of the margins.A repeat colonoscopy 18 months after surgery revealed no significant abnormality at the appendiceal orifice.A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the abdomen suggested only postoperative changes.CONCLUSION This study describes a case of LAMN that was treated by resecting the mass at the appendiceal orifice via the double purse-string suture technique and provides new insights on the diagnosis and treatment of LAMNs.展开更多
BACKGROUND Ileocecal laterally spreading tumors(LSTs)complicated by appendiceal tubular adenoma are rare and challenging to diagnose because of the absence of typical symptoms and specific diagnostic signs.Traditional...BACKGROUND Ileocecal laterally spreading tumors(LSTs)complicated by appendiceal tubular adenoma are rare and challenging to diagnose because of the absence of typical symptoms and specific diagnostic signs.Traditionally,the primary treatment has been laparoscopic appendectomy(LA).CASE SUMMARY A 63-year-old female presented with changes in bowel habits.Colonoscopy revealed an ileocecal LST.The patient underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection.Postoperative follow-up colonoscopy revealed mucosal elevation at the appendiceal orifice,with pathology confirming tubular adenoma.Abdominal computed tomography indicated a suspicious appendiceal tumor,leading to LA with partial cecectomy.The postoperative recovery was uneventful.At the 1-year follow-up,colonoscopy revealed no evidence of tumor recurrence.CONCLUSION Ileocecal LSTs with appendiceal tubular adenomas are traditionally treated with LA.endoscopic submucosal dissection can also yield favorable outcomes.展开更多
BACKGROUND Complete appendiceal intussusception(CAI)coexisting with appendiceal tumor represents an exceptionally rare clinical tumor.This study presented a retrospective analysis of a case involving CAI complicated b...BACKGROUND Complete appendiceal intussusception(CAI)coexisting with appendiceal tumor represents an exceptionally rare clinical tumor.This study presented a retrospective analysis of a case involving CAI complicated by appendiceal mucinous tumor,supplemented by a review of 10 previously reported cases to distill diagnostic and therapeutic insights.CASE SUMMARY A 74-year-old male patient presented with abdominal pain.Abdominal contrastenhanced computed tomography(CECT)initially suggested a colonic tumor with intussusception.Colonoscopy identified a mass in the colon 60 cm from the anus.Intraoperative exploration confirmed CAI secondary to an appendiceal neoplasm.The patient underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with regional lymphadenectomy under general anesthesia.Postoperative recovery was uneventful,and the patient was discharged 9 days post-surgery.Twelve-month follow-up revealed no evidence of recurrence or metastasis.CONCLUSION Plain abdominal computed tomography may underestimate the presence of CAI and appendiceal mucinous tumor,whereas CECT significantly improves diagnostic accuracy.Preoperative suspicion of appendiceal malignancy should be entertained in cases of CAI.In the absence of definitive biopsy results,intraoperative frozen section analysis is recommended to guide radical resection.展开更多
BACKGROUND Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are papillary or flat mucinous tumors with low-grade cytologic atypia.They are the most frequent source of pseudomyxoma peritonei.They can be easily misdiagnosed,due...BACKGROUND Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are papillary or flat mucinous tumors with low-grade cytologic atypia.They are the most frequent source of pseudomyxoma peritonei.They can be easily misdiagnosed,due to unspecific symptoms,with acute appendicitis,retroperitoneal tumors or adnexal mass.Cases of huge appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are even more extremely rare.CASE SUMMARY We report a 54-year-old patient who presented with a 10-month history of constant dull distension accompanied by nausea.A surgical procedure of total hysterectomy,bilateral adnexectomy,appendectomy,greater omentectomy and right hemicolectomy was performed as a result of the findings on ultrasound,computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging.Diagnosis was made after the pathological examination,which revealed low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm.The patient received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin and was discharged from the hospital.CONCLUSION Low-grade appendiceal mucinous adenomas are rare tumors that are easily misdiagnosed,and a more thorough clinical workup is required to make a defi-nitive diagnosis.展开更多
Some studies have reported that approximately 50%of appendiceal lesions are sessile serrated lesions(SSLs).Traditionally,surgical intervention has been the preferred method.Endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic muc...Some studies have reported that approximately 50%of appendiceal lesions are sessile serrated lesions(SSLs).Traditionally,surgical intervention has been the preferred method.Endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)serve as alternative treatments for lesions at the appendiceal orifice(AO).However,EMR is not appropriate when the lesion margin within the AO cannot be visualized.When lesions extend into the lumen,extended laparoscopic appendectomy(ELA)or combined surgery can be used to resect the lesions.Compared with traditional surgery and EMR,ELA or combined surgery is a safer and more precise option that preserves the function of the ileocecal region.However,the need for coordination between surgeons and endoscopists,along with the requirement for staged procedures and multiple bowel preparations,increases the complexity of the treatment.In recent years,with the advancement of endoscopic full-thickness resection,endoscopic transcecal appendectomy(ETA)has been used to treat SSLs involving the AO.The use of choledochoscopy in conjunction with ETA can further enhance treatment precision.This integrated approach holds promise for replacing the combined endoscopic and laparoscopic surgical techniques.However,additional data are required to confirm its safety and efficacy.展开更多
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic appendectomy(LA)is the standard treatment for acute appendicitis in children,offering reduced postoperative pain and quicker recovery compared to open surgery.A critical aspect of LA is the sec...BACKGROUND Laparoscopic appendectomy(LA)is the standard treatment for acute appendicitis in children,offering reduced postoperative pain and quicker recovery compared to open surgery.A critical aspect of LA is the secure closure of the appendiceal stump to avoid complications such as leakage and abscess formation.Various closure techniques are employed,including endoloops(ELs),staplers,clips,and energy devices;however,the optimal method remains unclear due to inconsistent evidence.AIM To systematically evaluate and rank the effectiveness and safety of different appendiceal stump closure techniques used in pediatric LA.By assessing outcomes such as postoperative complications,operative time,and length of hospital stay,this analysis seeks to provide evidence-based guidance to clarify clinical decision-making and optimize patient care.METHODS This systematic review and network meta-analysis,conducted according to PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines,compared the effectiveness and safety of stump closure methods in pediatric LA.Databases searched included PubMed,Cochrane Central,Web of Science,and Scopus up to May 1,2025.Eligible studies included both randomized and non-randomized designs reporting surgical outcomes in pediatric patients.Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.A frequentist network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was conducted using R software to evaluate total complications(primary outcome),as well as operative time and hospital stay(secondary outcomes).P-scores were used to rank the effectiveness of treatments.RESULTS Fourteen studies comprising over 50000 pediatric patients were included in the network meta-analysis comparing appendiceal stump closure techniques in LA.No significant differences in total postoperative complications or hospital stay were observed among techniques,including EL,endostapler,polymer clip,LigaSure,harmonic scalpel(HS),and sutures.HS showed a statistically significant reduction in operative time compared to EL(mean difference:-13.5 minutes),while other methods did not demonstrate significant time savings.No technique was associated with a statistically significant increase or decrease in postoperative complications or length of stay.Publication bias was minimal,and the methodological quality of included studies was moderate to good.CONCLUSION While all closure techniques show similar safety profiles,HS offers shorter operating times.These findings support tailoring stump closure method selection based on operative efficiency and resource availability.展开更多
BACKGROUND Primary appendiceal tumors are histologically diverse and have an insidious onset and few specific clinical manifestations.In the majority of cases,these tumors are discovered after appendectomy during path...BACKGROUND Primary appendiceal tumors are histologically diverse and have an insidious onset and few specific clinical manifestations.In the majority of cases,these tumors are discovered after appendectomy during pathological exam of the resected tissue.Treatment may include appendectomy(simple or radical)and right hemicolectomy depending on factors such as histological type,tumor size and lymph node/organ involvement.The aim of this case study is to describe a rare case of a giant appendicular mucocele and raise awareness of this condition and its management options and follow-up protocol.CASE SUMMARY We present the case of a 43-year-old patient who presented to our emergency department with mild right lower quadrant pain.After the initial check-up and imaging exams,he underwent surgery,where a giant 20 cm×13 cm appendicular tumor was found and resected.Appendicular mucocele was suspected due to the macroscopic appearance and was later confirmed by the pathological exam.The patient’s postoperative evolution was uneventful,and after discharge,he was included in our follow-up program.CONCLUSION In conclusion,mucinous appendiceal neoplasms embody a rare pathology;they are asymptomatic or have few,unspecific clinical signs and in many cases are discovered after appendectomy.展开更多
The most common appendicular disease is acute appendicitis,with a lifetime risk of 7%–8%.Complicated cases,which can occur in 2%–7%of patients,can signi-ficantly impact the severity of the condition and may require ...The most common appendicular disease is acute appendicitis,with a lifetime risk of 7%–8%.Complicated cases,which can occur in 2%–7%of patients,can signi-ficantly impact the severity of the condition and may require different manage-ment approaches.Nonoperative management with possible delayed appende-ctomy has been suggested for selected patients,however,there is a non-negligible risk of missing an underlying malignancy,which is reported to be as high as 11%.Diagnostic work-up is paramount to achieve optimal treatment with good results.展开更多
Non-carcinoid appendiceal malignancies are rare entities,representing less than 0.5% of all gastrointestinal malignancies.Because of their rarity and particular biological behavior,a substantial number of patients aff...Non-carcinoid appendiceal malignancies are rare entities,representing less than 0.5% of all gastrointestinal malignancies.Because of their rarity and particular biological behavior,a substantial number of patients affected by these neoplasms do not receive appropriate surgical resection.In this report,we describe a rare case of primary signetring cell carcinoma of the appendix with peritoneal seeding which occurred in a 40-year old man admitted at the Emergency Surgery Department with the clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis.After a surgical debulking and right hemicolectomy,the patient had systemic chemotherapy according to FOLFOX protocol.After completion of the latter,the patient underwent cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.This report offers a brief review of the literature and suggests an algorithm for the management of non-carci-noid appendiceal tumors with peritoneal dissemination.展开更多
The need for interval appendicectomy (I.A) after successful conservative management of appendiceal mass has recently been questioned.Furthermore,emergency appendicectomy for appendiceal mass is increasingly performed ...The need for interval appendicectomy (I.A) after successful conservative management of appendiceal mass has recently been questioned.Furthermore,emergency appendicectomy for appendiceal mass is increasingly performed with equal success and safety to that performed in non-mass forming acute appendicitis.There is an increasing volume of evidence-although mostly retrospective-that if traditional conservative management is adopted,there is no need for routine I.A except for a small number of patients who continue to develop recurrent symptoms.On the other hand,the routine adoption of emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) in patients presenting with appendiceal mass obviates the need for a second admission and an operation for I.A with a considerable complication rate.It also abolishes misdiagnoses and deals promptly with any unexpected ileo-cecal pathology.Moreover,it may prove to be more cost-effective than conservative treatment even without I.A due to a much shorter hospital stay and a shorter period of intravenous antibiotic administration.If emergency LA is to become the standard of care for appendiceal mass,I.A will certainly become 'something' of the past.展开更多
AIM: To study the clinical features and computed tomography(CT) findings of appendiceal diverticulitis vs acute appendicitis.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 451 patients who had undergone appendect...AIM: To study the clinical features and computed tomography(CT) findings of appendiceal diverticulitis vs acute appendicitis.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 451 patients who had undergone appendectomy inour in stitution from January 2007 to September 2012. Patient demographics, clinical features, pathological findings, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. We also compared preoperative CT images of 25 patients with appendiceal diverticulitis with those of 25 patients with acute appendicitis.RESULTS: Among 451 patients, 44(9.7%) were diagnosed to have appendiceal diverticulitis and 398(86.9%) to have acute appendicitis. Patients with appendiceal diverticulitis were older(59 vs 37 years, P < 0.001) and had a longer duration of the illness(4.0 d vs 1.0 d, P < 0.001). Perforation rates in patients with appendiceal diverticulitis were higher(68% vs 27%, P < 0.001). The appendix could be visualized in only 13 patients(52%) among the appendiceal diverticulitis cases, but in all acute appendicitis cases. CT findings suggestive of appendiceal diverticulitis included the absence of fluid collection in the appendix(84% vs 12%, P < 0.001), absence of appendicolith(92% vs 52%, P = 0.005), and formation of abscess(68% vs 16%, P < 0.001). Appendiceal diverticula were identified in 6 patients(24%).CONCLUSION: Among patients who had undergone appendectomy, 9.7% had appendiceal diverticulitis. Patients with appendiceal diverticulitis had different clinical features and CT findings from patients with acute appendicitis.展开更多
BACKGROUND Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm(LAMN)is extremely rare and easily misdiagnosed before surgery.CASE SUMMARY We report the treatment of an asymptomatic case of LAMN diagnosed by magnetic resonance ima...BACKGROUND Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm(LAMN)is extremely rare and easily misdiagnosed before surgery.CASE SUMMARY We report the treatment of an asymptomatic case of LAMN diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)and surgical findings.A 70-year-old woman presented with an adnexal mass found by physical examination in July 2020.Gynecologic ultrasonography revealed a cystic mass in the right adnexa,and computed tomography showed a cystic mass in the pelvic cavity.All tumor markers were normal.A further MRI examination suggested mucinous neoplasm in the right pelvic cavity,excluding the possibility of adnexal cyst.Laparoscopic exploration found a huge cystic mass of about 10 cm×7 cm that originated from the apex of the appendix,with spontaneous rupture.LAMN was confirmed by pathological examination.As of May 2021,no disease recurrence occurred after an open appendectomy.CONCLUSION This case indicates that we should pay more attention to female patients who are clinically diagnosed with an adnexal mass at admission,.The physical examination should be done carefully,and the laboratory and imaging examination results should be comprehensively analyzed to avoid misdiagnosis and to ensure prompt diagnosis and treatment,and to improve prognosis.MRI may be a better option for the diagnosis of appendiceal mucinous neoplasm.展开更多
BACKGROUND Appendiceal intussusception is a pathological condition in which the appendix is inverted into the cecum,which may cause symptoms that resemble those of other gastrointestinal disorders and may induce intes...BACKGROUND Appendiceal intussusception is a pathological condition in which the appendix is inverted into the cecum,which may cause symptoms that resemble those of other gastrointestinal disorders and may induce intestinal obstruction.The rarity of this case presentation is the co-occurrence of appendiceal intussusception and cecal adenocarcinoma,a combination that to our knowledge has not previously been reported in the medical literature.This case provides new insights into the complexities of diagnosing and managing overlapping pathologies.CASE SUMMARY A 25-year-old woman presented with persistent periumbilical pain and bloody stools.An initial biopsy showed cecal cancer;however,subsequent colonoscopy and computed tomography findings raised the suspicion of appendiceal intussus-ception,which was later confirmed postoperatively.This unique case was charac-terized by a combination of intussusception and adenocarcinoma of the cecum.The intervention included a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy,which led to the histopathological diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma with appendiceal intussusception.The patient recovered well postoperatively and was advised to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy.This case highlights not only the importance of considering appendiceal intussusception in the differential diagnosis,but also the possibility of appendicitis and the atypical presentation of neoplastic lesions.CONCLUSIONS Physicians should consider the possibility of appendiceal intussusception in cases of atypical appendicitis,particularly when associated with neoplastic presentation.展开更多
BACKGROUND Appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (AMN) is extremely rare. Since the disease does not manifest a characteristic profile of clinical symptoms, it is easy to misdiagnose and still difficult to diagnose without op...BACKGROUND Appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (AMN) is extremely rare. Since the disease does not manifest a characteristic profile of clinical symptoms, it is easy to misdiagnose and still difficult to diagnose without operation. Here, we report a case of low-grade AMN (LAMN) and summarize its clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment. CASE SUMMARY A 63-year-old postmenopausal woman presented with a history of right lower abdominal mass. The patient underwent laparotomy, which showed an appendiceal mucocele originating from the apex of the appendix, and a simple appendectomy was performed. The subsequent histological assessment identified an LAMN with no lymph node involvement and negative surgical margin. The patient received six cycles of chemotherapy after surgery, and to date, more than a year after the surgery, the patient remains in good health. CONCLUSION A unified, standardized, detailed, and accurate pathological diagnosis is needed for LAMN, to facilitate selection of an appropriate surgical plan. In addition, the surgeon should record the details of the tumors in the surgical records in order to facilitate follow-up after surgery.展开更多
AIM:To identify risk factors of actual appendiceal perforation when computed tomography(CT)scans suggest nonperforated appendicitis and accordingly determine surgical priority.METHODS:We collected database of 1362 pat...AIM:To identify risk factors of actual appendiceal perforation when computed tomography(CT)scans suggest nonperforated appendicitis and accordingly determine surgical priority.METHODS:We collected database of 1362 patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis between 2006 and 2013.A single radiologist selected1236 patients whose CT scans were suggestive ofnonperforated appendicitis.Patients were divided into 2 groups:actual nonperforation group and actual perforation group according to intraoperative and pathologic features.Comparison of the 2 groups were made using binary logistic regression.RESULTS:Of 1236 patients,90(7.3%)were found to have actual appendiceal perforation.Four risk factors related with actual appendiceal perforation were identified:body temperature≥37.6℃(HR=1.912,95%CI:1.161-3.149;P=0.011),out-ofhospital symptom duration≥72 h(HR=2.454,95%CI:1.292-4.662;P=0.006),age≥35 years(HR=3.358,95%CI:1.968-5.728;P<0.001),and appendiceal diameter on CT scan≥8 mm(HR=4.294,95%CI:1.034-17.832;P=0.045).Actual appendiceal perforation group showed longer operation time,later initiation of diet,longer use of parenteral narcotics,longer hospital stay,and higher incidence of postoperative complications(P<0.05).CONCLUSION:We proposed here new criteria to select patients with adverse clinical outcomes after appendectomy among the patients with radiologically nonperforated appendicitis.Surgical appendectomy outcomes could be improved by determining the surgical priority according to our criteria.展开更多
New insights emerged last decade that enriched our knowledge regarding the biological behavior of appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors(NETs),which range from totally benign tumors less than 1cm to goblet cell carcinomas ...New insights emerged last decade that enriched our knowledge regarding the biological behavior of appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors(NETs),which range from totally benign tumors less than 1cm to goblet cell carcinomas which behave similarly to colorectal adenocarcinoma.The clinical implication of that knowledge reflected to surgical strategies which also vary from simple appendicectomy to radical abdominal procedures based on specific clinical and histological characteristics.Since the diagnosis is usually established post-appendicectomy,current recommendations focus on the early detection of:(1)the subgroup of patients who require further therapy;(2)the recurrence based on the chromogranin a plasma levels;and(3)other malignancies which are commonly developed in patients with appendiceal NETs.展开更多
We read with great interest the editorial article by Meshikhes AWN published in issue 25 of World J Gastroenterol 2011.The article described the advantages of emergency laparoscopic appendectomy compared with interval...We read with great interest the editorial article by Meshikhes AWN published in issue 25 of World J Gastroenterol 2011.The article described the advantages of emergency laparoscopic appendectomy compared with interval appendectomy as a new safe treatment modality for the appendiceal mass.The author concluded that the emergency laparoscopic appendectomy was a safe treatment modality for the appendiceal mass,and might prove to be more cost-effective than conservative treatment,with no need for interval appendectomy.However,we would like to highlight certain issues regarding the possibility of percutaneous catheter drainage to successfully treat the appendiceal mass,with no need for appendectomy,too.展开更多
Appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors(aNETs)are an uncommon neoplasm that is relatively indolent in most cases.They are typically diagnosed in younger patients than other neuroendocrine tumors and are often an incidental ...Appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors(aNETs)are an uncommon neoplasm that is relatively indolent in most cases.They are typically diagnosed in younger patients than other neuroendocrine tumors and are often an incidental finding after an appendectomy.Although there are numerous clinical practice guidelines on management of a NETs,there is continues to be a dearth of evidence on optimal treatment.Management of these tumors is stratified according to risk of locoregional and distant metastasis.However,there is a lack of consensus regarding tumors that measure 1-2 cm.In these cases,some histopathological features such as size,tumor grade,presence of lymphovascular invasion,or mesoappendix infiltration must also be considered.Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans are recommended for evaluating the presence of additional disease,except in the case of tumors smaller than 1 cm without additional risk factors.Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy or positron emission tomography with computed tomography should be considered in cases with suspected residual or distant disease.The main point of controversy is the indication for performing a completion right hemicolectomy after an initial appendectomy,based on the risk of lymph node metastases.The main factor considered is tumor size and 2 cm is the most common threshold for indicating a colectomy.Other factors such as mesoappendix infiltration,lymphovascular invasion,or tumor grade may also be considered.On the other hand,potential complications,and decreased quality of life after a hemicolectomy as well as the lack of evidence on benefits in terms of survival must be taken into consideration.In this review,we present data regarding the current indications,outcomes,and benefits of a colectomy.展开更多
In this case report,we discuss single-incision laparoscopic cecectomy for low-grade appendiceal neoplasm after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer.The optimal surgical therapy for low-grade appendiceal n...In this case report,we discuss single-incision laparoscopic cecectomy for low-grade appendiceal neoplasm after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer.The optimal surgical therapy for low-grade appendiceal neoplasm is controversial;currently,the options include appendectomy,cecectomy,right hemicolectomy,and open or laparoscopic surgery.Due to the risk of pseudomyxoma peritonei,complete resection without rupture is necessary.We have encountered 5 cases of lowgrade appendiceal neoplasm and all 5 patients had no lymph node metastasis.We chose the appendectomy or cecectomy without lymph node dissection if preoperative imaging studies did not suspect malignancy.In the present case,we performed cecectomy without lymph node dissection by single-incision laparoscopic surgery(SILS),which is reported to be a reduced port surgery associated with decreased invasiveness and patient stress compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery.We are confident that SILS is a feasible alternative to traditional surgical procedures for borderline tumors,such as low-grade appendiceal neoplasms.展开更多
文摘Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms(AMNs)are rare tumors originating from mucin-producing epithelial cells of the appendix.They can exhibit both benign and malignant behavior.They are often incidentally discovered during appendectomy.Clinical presentation ranges from asymptomatic to mimicking acute appendicitis.Histologically,noninvasive AMNs are classified as low-grade AMNs(LAMNs)or high-grade AMNs(HAMNs),whereas invasive tumors are categorized as mucinous adenocarcinomas.Although LAMNs and HAMNs are generally nonmalignant,rupture can lead to pseudomyxoma peritonei(PMP).Surgical resection is the primary diagnostic and therapeutic approach,with intraoperative assessment to prevent rupture.Treatment strategies vary based on findings and include appendectomy,right hemicolectomy,and cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.Histological diagnosis relies on mucin detection,and immunohistochemical markers such as cytokeratin 20(diffusely positive),cytokeratin 7(often negative),mucin 5AC,and special ATrich sequence-binding protein 2 assist in characterization.Molecular profiling frequently identifies KRAS,GNAS,and TP53 mutations.KRAS mutations are generally associated with a favorable prognosis,whereas GNAS and TP53 mutations correlate with poorer survival outcomes.These findings highlight the potential role of molecular profiling in guiding treatment strategies for AMN and PMP.
基金Supported by Jinhua City Science and Technology Plan Projects“Improve the Polarization of Cancer-related Fatigue:Clinical Efficacy Study”,No.2018-4-049.
文摘BACKGROUND Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms(LAMNs)are a class of histolo-gically well-differentiated adenomas that can proliferate outside the appendix in the form of malignant tumours,resulting in the accumulation of external appen-diceal mucus.They may present as an extra-appendiceal mass-like bulge,mucus or polypoid tissue at the appendiceal orifice,or even with abdominal dissem-ination.The surgical approach is usually appendectomy,ileocecal resection or right hemicolectomy.It is essential to raise awareness of LAMNs and choose an appropriate treatment.CASE SUMMARY A 68-year-old man underwent a routine physical examination at our hospital on May 17,2022.The patient had no symptoms of abdominal pain,bloating,or weight loss,and his tumour marker levels were normal.The faecal occult blood test was negative,and no abnormalities were identified on physical examination.Colonoscopy revealed a submucosal protrusion at the appendiceal orifice.During endoscopic ultrasound,uneven echoes were observed in the appendix cavity.A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the abdomen revealed a nodular thickening at the base of the appendix,with a diameter of approximately 1 cm.When all the examination results were considered,we suspected the lesion to be an appendiceal mucinous tumour.Laparoscopic surgery was performed using the double purse-string suture method.Postoperative pathology suggested a low-grade mucinous cystadenoma of the appendix with no involvement of the margins.A repeat colonoscopy 18 months after surgery revealed no significant abnormality at the appendiceal orifice.A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the abdomen suggested only postoperative changes.CONCLUSION This study describes a case of LAMN that was treated by resecting the mass at the appendiceal orifice via the double purse-string suture technique and provides new insights on the diagnosis and treatment of LAMNs.
文摘BACKGROUND Ileocecal laterally spreading tumors(LSTs)complicated by appendiceal tubular adenoma are rare and challenging to diagnose because of the absence of typical symptoms and specific diagnostic signs.Traditionally,the primary treatment has been laparoscopic appendectomy(LA).CASE SUMMARY A 63-year-old female presented with changes in bowel habits.Colonoscopy revealed an ileocecal LST.The patient underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection.Postoperative follow-up colonoscopy revealed mucosal elevation at the appendiceal orifice,with pathology confirming tubular adenoma.Abdominal computed tomography indicated a suspicious appendiceal tumor,leading to LA with partial cecectomy.The postoperative recovery was uneventful.At the 1-year follow-up,colonoscopy revealed no evidence of tumor recurrence.CONCLUSION Ileocecal LSTs with appendiceal tubular adenomas are traditionally treated with LA.endoscopic submucosal dissection can also yield favorable outcomes.
文摘BACKGROUND Complete appendiceal intussusception(CAI)coexisting with appendiceal tumor represents an exceptionally rare clinical tumor.This study presented a retrospective analysis of a case involving CAI complicated by appendiceal mucinous tumor,supplemented by a review of 10 previously reported cases to distill diagnostic and therapeutic insights.CASE SUMMARY A 74-year-old male patient presented with abdominal pain.Abdominal contrastenhanced computed tomography(CECT)initially suggested a colonic tumor with intussusception.Colonoscopy identified a mass in the colon 60 cm from the anus.Intraoperative exploration confirmed CAI secondary to an appendiceal neoplasm.The patient underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with regional lymphadenectomy under general anesthesia.Postoperative recovery was uneventful,and the patient was discharged 9 days post-surgery.Twelve-month follow-up revealed no evidence of recurrence or metastasis.CONCLUSION Plain abdominal computed tomography may underestimate the presence of CAI and appendiceal mucinous tumor,whereas CECT significantly improves diagnostic accuracy.Preoperative suspicion of appendiceal malignancy should be entertained in cases of CAI.In the absence of definitive biopsy results,intraoperative frozen section analysis is recommended to guide radical resection.
基金Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.82204123.
文摘BACKGROUND Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are papillary or flat mucinous tumors with low-grade cytologic atypia.They are the most frequent source of pseudomyxoma peritonei.They can be easily misdiagnosed,due to unspecific symptoms,with acute appendicitis,retroperitoneal tumors or adnexal mass.Cases of huge appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are even more extremely rare.CASE SUMMARY We report a 54-year-old patient who presented with a 10-month history of constant dull distension accompanied by nausea.A surgical procedure of total hysterectomy,bilateral adnexectomy,appendectomy,greater omentectomy and right hemicolectomy was performed as a result of the findings on ultrasound,computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging.Diagnosis was made after the pathological examination,which revealed low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm.The patient received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin and was discharged from the hospital.CONCLUSION Low-grade appendiceal mucinous adenomas are rare tumors that are easily misdiagnosed,and a more thorough clinical workup is required to make a defi-nitive diagnosis.
文摘Some studies have reported that approximately 50%of appendiceal lesions are sessile serrated lesions(SSLs).Traditionally,surgical intervention has been the preferred method.Endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)serve as alternative treatments for lesions at the appendiceal orifice(AO).However,EMR is not appropriate when the lesion margin within the AO cannot be visualized.When lesions extend into the lumen,extended laparoscopic appendectomy(ELA)or combined surgery can be used to resect the lesions.Compared with traditional surgery and EMR,ELA or combined surgery is a safer and more precise option that preserves the function of the ileocecal region.However,the need for coordination between surgeons and endoscopists,along with the requirement for staged procedures and multiple bowel preparations,increases the complexity of the treatment.In recent years,with the advancement of endoscopic full-thickness resection,endoscopic transcecal appendectomy(ETA)has been used to treat SSLs involving the AO.The use of choledochoscopy in conjunction with ETA can further enhance treatment precision.This integrated approach holds promise for replacing the combined endoscopic and laparoscopic surgical techniques.However,additional data are required to confirm its safety and efficacy.
文摘BACKGROUND Laparoscopic appendectomy(LA)is the standard treatment for acute appendicitis in children,offering reduced postoperative pain and quicker recovery compared to open surgery.A critical aspect of LA is the secure closure of the appendiceal stump to avoid complications such as leakage and abscess formation.Various closure techniques are employed,including endoloops(ELs),staplers,clips,and energy devices;however,the optimal method remains unclear due to inconsistent evidence.AIM To systematically evaluate and rank the effectiveness and safety of different appendiceal stump closure techniques used in pediatric LA.By assessing outcomes such as postoperative complications,operative time,and length of hospital stay,this analysis seeks to provide evidence-based guidance to clarify clinical decision-making and optimize patient care.METHODS This systematic review and network meta-analysis,conducted according to PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines,compared the effectiveness and safety of stump closure methods in pediatric LA.Databases searched included PubMed,Cochrane Central,Web of Science,and Scopus up to May 1,2025.Eligible studies included both randomized and non-randomized designs reporting surgical outcomes in pediatric patients.Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.A frequentist network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was conducted using R software to evaluate total complications(primary outcome),as well as operative time and hospital stay(secondary outcomes).P-scores were used to rank the effectiveness of treatments.RESULTS Fourteen studies comprising over 50000 pediatric patients were included in the network meta-analysis comparing appendiceal stump closure techniques in LA.No significant differences in total postoperative complications or hospital stay were observed among techniques,including EL,endostapler,polymer clip,LigaSure,harmonic scalpel(HS),and sutures.HS showed a statistically significant reduction in operative time compared to EL(mean difference:-13.5 minutes),while other methods did not demonstrate significant time savings.No technique was associated with a statistically significant increase or decrease in postoperative complications or length of stay.Publication bias was minimal,and the methodological quality of included studies was moderate to good.CONCLUSION While all closure techniques show similar safety profiles,HS offers shorter operating times.These findings support tailoring stump closure method selection based on operative efficiency and resource availability.
文摘BACKGROUND Primary appendiceal tumors are histologically diverse and have an insidious onset and few specific clinical manifestations.In the majority of cases,these tumors are discovered after appendectomy during pathological exam of the resected tissue.Treatment may include appendectomy(simple or radical)and right hemicolectomy depending on factors such as histological type,tumor size and lymph node/organ involvement.The aim of this case study is to describe a rare case of a giant appendicular mucocele and raise awareness of this condition and its management options and follow-up protocol.CASE SUMMARY We present the case of a 43-year-old patient who presented to our emergency department with mild right lower quadrant pain.After the initial check-up and imaging exams,he underwent surgery,where a giant 20 cm×13 cm appendicular tumor was found and resected.Appendicular mucocele was suspected due to the macroscopic appearance and was later confirmed by the pathological exam.The patient’s postoperative evolution was uneventful,and after discharge,he was included in our follow-up program.CONCLUSION In conclusion,mucinous appendiceal neoplasms embody a rare pathology;they are asymptomatic or have few,unspecific clinical signs and in many cases are discovered after appendectomy.
文摘The most common appendicular disease is acute appendicitis,with a lifetime risk of 7%–8%.Complicated cases,which can occur in 2%–7%of patients,can signi-ficantly impact the severity of the condition and may require different manage-ment approaches.Nonoperative management with possible delayed appende-ctomy has been suggested for selected patients,however,there is a non-negligible risk of missing an underlying malignancy,which is reported to be as high as 11%.Diagnostic work-up is paramount to achieve optimal treatment with good results.
文摘Non-carcinoid appendiceal malignancies are rare entities,representing less than 0.5% of all gastrointestinal malignancies.Because of their rarity and particular biological behavior,a substantial number of patients affected by these neoplasms do not receive appropriate surgical resection.In this report,we describe a rare case of primary signetring cell carcinoma of the appendix with peritoneal seeding which occurred in a 40-year old man admitted at the Emergency Surgery Department with the clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis.After a surgical debulking and right hemicolectomy,the patient had systemic chemotherapy according to FOLFOX protocol.After completion of the latter,the patient underwent cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.This report offers a brief review of the literature and suggests an algorithm for the management of non-carci-noid appendiceal tumors with peritoneal dissemination.
文摘The need for interval appendicectomy (I.A) after successful conservative management of appendiceal mass has recently been questioned.Furthermore,emergency appendicectomy for appendiceal mass is increasingly performed with equal success and safety to that performed in non-mass forming acute appendicitis.There is an increasing volume of evidence-although mostly retrospective-that if traditional conservative management is adopted,there is no need for routine I.A except for a small number of patients who continue to develop recurrent symptoms.On the other hand,the routine adoption of emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) in patients presenting with appendiceal mass obviates the need for a second admission and an operation for I.A with a considerable complication rate.It also abolishes misdiagnoses and deals promptly with any unexpected ileo-cecal pathology.Moreover,it may prove to be more cost-effective than conservative treatment even without I.A due to a much shorter hospital stay and a shorter period of intravenous antibiotic administration.If emergency LA is to become the standard of care for appendiceal mass,I.A will certainly become 'something' of the past.
文摘AIM: To study the clinical features and computed tomography(CT) findings of appendiceal diverticulitis vs acute appendicitis.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 451 patients who had undergone appendectomy inour in stitution from January 2007 to September 2012. Patient demographics, clinical features, pathological findings, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. We also compared preoperative CT images of 25 patients with appendiceal diverticulitis with those of 25 patients with acute appendicitis.RESULTS: Among 451 patients, 44(9.7%) were diagnosed to have appendiceal diverticulitis and 398(86.9%) to have acute appendicitis. Patients with appendiceal diverticulitis were older(59 vs 37 years, P < 0.001) and had a longer duration of the illness(4.0 d vs 1.0 d, P < 0.001). Perforation rates in patients with appendiceal diverticulitis were higher(68% vs 27%, P < 0.001). The appendix could be visualized in only 13 patients(52%) among the appendiceal diverticulitis cases, but in all acute appendicitis cases. CT findings suggestive of appendiceal diverticulitis included the absence of fluid collection in the appendix(84% vs 12%, P < 0.001), absence of appendicolith(92% vs 52%, P = 0.005), and formation of abscess(68% vs 16%, P < 0.001). Appendiceal diverticula were identified in 6 patients(24%).CONCLUSION: Among patients who had undergone appendectomy, 9.7% had appendiceal diverticulitis. Patients with appendiceal diverticulitis had different clinical features and CT findings from patients with acute appendicitis.
文摘BACKGROUND Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm(LAMN)is extremely rare and easily misdiagnosed before surgery.CASE SUMMARY We report the treatment of an asymptomatic case of LAMN diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)and surgical findings.A 70-year-old woman presented with an adnexal mass found by physical examination in July 2020.Gynecologic ultrasonography revealed a cystic mass in the right adnexa,and computed tomography showed a cystic mass in the pelvic cavity.All tumor markers were normal.A further MRI examination suggested mucinous neoplasm in the right pelvic cavity,excluding the possibility of adnexal cyst.Laparoscopic exploration found a huge cystic mass of about 10 cm×7 cm that originated from the apex of the appendix,with spontaneous rupture.LAMN was confirmed by pathological examination.As of May 2021,no disease recurrence occurred after an open appendectomy.CONCLUSION This case indicates that we should pay more attention to female patients who are clinically diagnosed with an adnexal mass at admission,.The physical examination should be done carefully,and the laboratory and imaging examination results should be comprehensively analyzed to avoid misdiagnosis and to ensure prompt diagnosis and treatment,and to improve prognosis.MRI may be a better option for the diagnosis of appendiceal mucinous neoplasm.
基金the National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.82060440.
文摘BACKGROUND Appendiceal intussusception is a pathological condition in which the appendix is inverted into the cecum,which may cause symptoms that resemble those of other gastrointestinal disorders and may induce intestinal obstruction.The rarity of this case presentation is the co-occurrence of appendiceal intussusception and cecal adenocarcinoma,a combination that to our knowledge has not previously been reported in the medical literature.This case provides new insights into the complexities of diagnosing and managing overlapping pathologies.CASE SUMMARY A 25-year-old woman presented with persistent periumbilical pain and bloody stools.An initial biopsy showed cecal cancer;however,subsequent colonoscopy and computed tomography findings raised the suspicion of appendiceal intussus-ception,which was later confirmed postoperatively.This unique case was charac-terized by a combination of intussusception and adenocarcinoma of the cecum.The intervention included a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy,which led to the histopathological diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma with appendiceal intussusception.The patient recovered well postoperatively and was advised to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy.This case highlights not only the importance of considering appendiceal intussusception in the differential diagnosis,but also the possibility of appendicitis and the atypical presentation of neoplastic lesions.CONCLUSIONS Physicians should consider the possibility of appendiceal intussusception in cases of atypical appendicitis,particularly when associated with neoplastic presentation.
基金Supported by Wu Jieping Medical Foundation of China,No.320.6750.18492the Innovative Talents Fund of Harbin Science and Technology Bureau of China,No.2015RAQYJ103
文摘BACKGROUND Appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (AMN) is extremely rare. Since the disease does not manifest a characteristic profile of clinical symptoms, it is easy to misdiagnose and still difficult to diagnose without operation. Here, we report a case of low-grade AMN (LAMN) and summarize its clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment. CASE SUMMARY A 63-year-old postmenopausal woman presented with a history of right lower abdominal mass. The patient underwent laparotomy, which showed an appendiceal mucocele originating from the apex of the appendix, and a simple appendectomy was performed. The subsequent histological assessment identified an LAMN with no lymph node involvement and negative surgical margin. The patient received six cycles of chemotherapy after surgery, and to date, more than a year after the surgery, the patient remains in good health. CONCLUSION A unified, standardized, detailed, and accurate pathological diagnosis is needed for LAMN, to facilitate selection of an appropriate surgical plan. In addition, the surgeon should record the details of the tumors in the surgical records in order to facilitate follow-up after surgery.
文摘AIM:To identify risk factors of actual appendiceal perforation when computed tomography(CT)scans suggest nonperforated appendicitis and accordingly determine surgical priority.METHODS:We collected database of 1362 patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis between 2006 and 2013.A single radiologist selected1236 patients whose CT scans were suggestive ofnonperforated appendicitis.Patients were divided into 2 groups:actual nonperforation group and actual perforation group according to intraoperative and pathologic features.Comparison of the 2 groups were made using binary logistic regression.RESULTS:Of 1236 patients,90(7.3%)were found to have actual appendiceal perforation.Four risk factors related with actual appendiceal perforation were identified:body temperature≥37.6℃(HR=1.912,95%CI:1.161-3.149;P=0.011),out-ofhospital symptom duration≥72 h(HR=2.454,95%CI:1.292-4.662;P=0.006),age≥35 years(HR=3.358,95%CI:1.968-5.728;P<0.001),and appendiceal diameter on CT scan≥8 mm(HR=4.294,95%CI:1.034-17.832;P=0.045).Actual appendiceal perforation group showed longer operation time,later initiation of diet,longer use of parenteral narcotics,longer hospital stay,and higher incidence of postoperative complications(P<0.05).CONCLUSION:We proposed here new criteria to select patients with adverse clinical outcomes after appendectomy among the patients with radiologically nonperforated appendicitis.Surgical appendectomy outcomes could be improved by determining the surgical priority according to our criteria.
文摘New insights emerged last decade that enriched our knowledge regarding the biological behavior of appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors(NETs),which range from totally benign tumors less than 1cm to goblet cell carcinomas which behave similarly to colorectal adenocarcinoma.The clinical implication of that knowledge reflected to surgical strategies which also vary from simple appendicectomy to radical abdominal procedures based on specific clinical and histological characteristics.Since the diagnosis is usually established post-appendicectomy,current recommendations focus on the early detection of:(1)the subgroup of patients who require further therapy;(2)the recurrence based on the chromogranin a plasma levels;and(3)other malignancies which are commonly developed in patients with appendiceal NETs.
文摘We read with great interest the editorial article by Meshikhes AWN published in issue 25 of World J Gastroenterol 2011.The article described the advantages of emergency laparoscopic appendectomy compared with interval appendectomy as a new safe treatment modality for the appendiceal mass.The author concluded that the emergency laparoscopic appendectomy was a safe treatment modality for the appendiceal mass,and might prove to be more cost-effective than conservative treatment,with no need for interval appendectomy.However,we would like to highlight certain issues regarding the possibility of percutaneous catheter drainage to successfully treat the appendiceal mass,with no need for appendectomy,too.
文摘Appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors(aNETs)are an uncommon neoplasm that is relatively indolent in most cases.They are typically diagnosed in younger patients than other neuroendocrine tumors and are often an incidental finding after an appendectomy.Although there are numerous clinical practice guidelines on management of a NETs,there is continues to be a dearth of evidence on optimal treatment.Management of these tumors is stratified according to risk of locoregional and distant metastasis.However,there is a lack of consensus regarding tumors that measure 1-2 cm.In these cases,some histopathological features such as size,tumor grade,presence of lymphovascular invasion,or mesoappendix infiltration must also be considered.Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans are recommended for evaluating the presence of additional disease,except in the case of tumors smaller than 1 cm without additional risk factors.Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy or positron emission tomography with computed tomography should be considered in cases with suspected residual or distant disease.The main point of controversy is the indication for performing a completion right hemicolectomy after an initial appendectomy,based on the risk of lymph node metastases.The main factor considered is tumor size and 2 cm is the most common threshold for indicating a colectomy.Other factors such as mesoappendix infiltration,lymphovascular invasion,or tumor grade may also be considered.On the other hand,potential complications,and decreased quality of life after a hemicolectomy as well as the lack of evidence on benefits in terms of survival must be taken into consideration.In this review,we present data regarding the current indications,outcomes,and benefits of a colectomy.
文摘In this case report,we discuss single-incision laparoscopic cecectomy for low-grade appendiceal neoplasm after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer.The optimal surgical therapy for low-grade appendiceal neoplasm is controversial;currently,the options include appendectomy,cecectomy,right hemicolectomy,and open or laparoscopic surgery.Due to the risk of pseudomyxoma peritonei,complete resection without rupture is necessary.We have encountered 5 cases of lowgrade appendiceal neoplasm and all 5 patients had no lymph node metastasis.We chose the appendectomy or cecectomy without lymph node dissection if preoperative imaging studies did not suspect malignancy.In the present case,we performed cecectomy without lymph node dissection by single-incision laparoscopic surgery(SILS),which is reported to be a reduced port surgery associated with decreased invasiveness and patient stress compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery.We are confident that SILS is a feasible alternative to traditional surgical procedures for borderline tumors,such as low-grade appendiceal neoplasms.
