基于AMSAA模型以研发阶段收集的同类或相似产品故障数据为核心,创新性地引入离散系数最小化原则作为优化标准,用于指导拟合优度检验统计量的选取。在整合平均值与方差等多元信息后,构建了一种全新的时间环境折合系数求解算法,旨在对原...基于AMSAA模型以研发阶段收集的同类或相似产品故障数据为核心,创新性地引入离散系数最小化原则作为优化标准,用于指导拟合优度检验统计量的选取。在整合平均值与方差等多元信息后,构建了一种全新的时间环境折合系数求解算法,旨在对原始故障数据进行有效折算,进而精准估算模型各项参数。对所得折合系数进行求解,并在10种不同置信度设定下,逐一计算产品设计成型时平均无故障工作时间(Mean Time Between Failure,MTBF)的单侧置信下限。实例研究表明,当置信区间位于0.9~0.99之间时,无论同一置信水平如何,该方法始终能得出优于现有文献的结果,即采用该方法对航天产品可靠性增长进行预测,其准确度显著提升。此外,在不同置信水平下,由改进方法求解的时间环境折合系数值并没有改变,即每个试验项目的环境应力和真实环境应力之间的数量关系并没有因为置信度的增加而变化,也从另一个角度证明了该改进方法更接近于工程实践。展开更多
From 1986 to 1991,based on AMSAA model, ZHOU Yuan_quan and WENG Zhao_xi presented AMSAA_BISE model to estimate reliability growth for multiple systems development, for the case that more than one system of the same ty...From 1986 to 1991,based on AMSAA model, ZHOU Yuan_quan and WENG Zhao_xi presented AMSAA_BISE model to estimate reliability growth for multiple systems development, for the case that more than one system of the same type is put into reliability growth test, once a Type B failure mode is seen during test, corrective action will be taken to all systems. It is shown that there is something wrong with AMSAA_BISE model. According to AMSAA_BISE model, the maximum likelihood estimation of MTBF for multiple systems reliability growth test is much larger than that according to AMSAA model for a single system; The more systems is put into test, the larger the estimation of MTBF. An example is given, and an approximate method is presented.展开更多
In this paper, the AMSAA-BISE model with missing data is discussed. The ML estimates of model parameters and current MTBF are given, and the chi-squared test and a plot for cumulative number of failures versus cumulat...In this paper, the AMSAA-BISE model with missing data is discussed. The ML estimates of model parameters and current MTBF are given, and the chi-squared test and a plot for cumulative number of failures versus cumulative testing time are used to test the goodness of fit for the model. This paper concludes with a numerical example to verify the model.展开更多
目的改进基于AMSAA模型成形产品的可靠性综合评估方法。方法采用工程界普遍使用的AMSAA模型,利用同类或相似产品研制阶段试验的故障数据,基于综合利用均值和方差信息这一思路,提出一种通过对拟合优度检验统计量的离散系数进行寻优而确...目的改进基于AMSAA模型成形产品的可靠性综合评估方法。方法采用工程界普遍使用的AMSAA模型,利用同类或相似产品研制阶段试验的故障数据,基于综合利用均值和方差信息这一思路,提出一种通过对拟合优度检验统计量的离散系数进行寻优而确定时间环境折合系数的方法。结果通过这一改进方法计算得到置信度为0.9时,产品成形时的MTBF(Mean Time Between Failure)单侧置信下限提高了17%,优于文献结果,且求得置信度分别为0.95和0.99时,产品成形时的MTBF单侧置信下限依然优于文献结果。结论在不同的置信度下,该方法合理可行,符合工程实际。展开更多
文摘基于AMSAA模型以研发阶段收集的同类或相似产品故障数据为核心,创新性地引入离散系数最小化原则作为优化标准,用于指导拟合优度检验统计量的选取。在整合平均值与方差等多元信息后,构建了一种全新的时间环境折合系数求解算法,旨在对原始故障数据进行有效折算,进而精准估算模型各项参数。对所得折合系数进行求解,并在10种不同置信度设定下,逐一计算产品设计成型时平均无故障工作时间(Mean Time Between Failure,MTBF)的单侧置信下限。实例研究表明,当置信区间位于0.9~0.99之间时,无论同一置信水平如何,该方法始终能得出优于现有文献的结果,即采用该方法对航天产品可靠性增长进行预测,其准确度显著提升。此外,在不同置信水平下,由改进方法求解的时间环境折合系数值并没有改变,即每个试验项目的环境应力和真实环境应力之间的数量关系并没有因为置信度的增加而变化,也从另一个角度证明了该改进方法更接近于工程实践。
文摘From 1986 to 1991,based on AMSAA model, ZHOU Yuan_quan and WENG Zhao_xi presented AMSAA_BISE model to estimate reliability growth for multiple systems development, for the case that more than one system of the same type is put into reliability growth test, once a Type B failure mode is seen during test, corrective action will be taken to all systems. It is shown that there is something wrong with AMSAA_BISE model. According to AMSAA_BISE model, the maximum likelihood estimation of MTBF for multiple systems reliability growth test is much larger than that according to AMSAA model for a single system; The more systems is put into test, the larger the estimation of MTBF. An example is given, and an approximate method is presented.
文摘In this paper, the AMSAA-BISE model with missing data is discussed. The ML estimates of model parameters and current MTBF are given, and the chi-squared test and a plot for cumulative number of failures versus cumulative testing time are used to test the goodness of fit for the model. This paper concludes with a numerical example to verify the model.
文摘目的改进基于AMSAA模型成形产品的可靠性综合评估方法。方法采用工程界普遍使用的AMSAA模型,利用同类或相似产品研制阶段试验的故障数据,基于综合利用均值和方差信息这一思路,提出一种通过对拟合优度检验统计量的离散系数进行寻优而确定时间环境折合系数的方法。结果通过这一改进方法计算得到置信度为0.9时,产品成形时的MTBF(Mean Time Between Failure)单侧置信下限提高了17%,优于文献结果,且求得置信度分别为0.95和0.99时,产品成形时的MTBF单侧置信下限依然优于文献结果。结论在不同的置信度下,该方法合理可行,符合工程实际。
