期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
AMMI analysis of interaction of genotype and environment in chalkiness of indica rice
1
作者 TANG Shengxiang JIANG Yunzhu YU Hangyong WANG Lei CNRRI,Hangzhou 310006,China 《Chinese Rice Research Newsletter》 1997年第1期1-2,共2页
Chalkiness is an unpleasant trait for rice con-sumer,which is known to be controlled geneti-cally and affected by environment during grainmaturing.We used the model of Additive Main
关键词 ammi analysis of interaction of genotype and environment in chalkiness of indica rice CD
在线阅读 下载PDF
Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction and Other Stability Analyses of Tef [<i>Eragrostis tef</i>(Zucc.)Trotter] Grain Yield
2
作者 Alemayehu Balcha 《American Journal of Plant Sciences》 2020年第6期793-802,共10页
<p align="left" style="text-align:justify;"> <span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Tef [</span><i><... <p align="left" style="text-align:justify;"> <span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Tef [</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Eragrostis</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tef</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (Zucc.)Trotter]) is one of the most important cereal crops </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">grown </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">in Ethiopia. Tef production has been partly constrained by low yield and less stability of the genotypes under cultivation. Field experiments were carried out in Halaba, Loka Abaya, Bensa and Areka, South Ethiopia, from August to November, during 2016 and 2017 main cropping seasons, in order to estimate yield stability </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and the association between AMMI analysis and other stability parameters. Experiments were laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> using fourteen improved tef genotypes. Mean yield for Halaba, Loka Abaya2016, Loka Abaya2017, Bensa, Areka2016 and Areka2017 was 0.99, 0.45, 0.48, 1.50, 1.62 and 0.77 tons/ha, respectively. Genotypes A</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">marach, Boset, Simada, and Tseday exhibited high mean yield of 1.09, 1.10, 1.07 and 1.07 tons/ha, respectively. AMMI stability value (ASV) ranged from 0.17 (genotype Lakech) to 1.40 (Amarach);yield stability index (YSI) from 7 (Lakech) to 25 (Quncho);and superiority measure (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) from 0.015 (Boset) to 0.145 (Dega Tef). Rank correlation of yield with </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i></span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.97, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.01), ASV with </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">W</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i>δ</i></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sub>i</sub><sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2</sup></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.85, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.01) and that between </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">W</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i>δ</i></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sub>i</sub><sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2</sup></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></i><span style="font-family:" color:#323e32;background:#917a5f;"=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 1.00, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.01)</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">was high. Rank correlation of </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">YSI with </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">yield (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.57, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.05)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> ASV </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">75</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.0</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1), </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">68</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.0</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1) and </span><i><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">W</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i>δ</i></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sub>i</sub><sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2</sup></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></i><span style="font-family:" color:#323e32;background:#917a5f;"=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 0.67, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.01) was also positive. The present study showed that </span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">genotypes Etsub, Simada and Tseday would be recommended for high yield and wide adaptation, and ASV would be used alone or jointly with YSI, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">W</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i>δ</i></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sub>i</sub><sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2</sup></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></i><i><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">for ranking of genotyp</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">es.</span> </p> 展开更多
关键词 ammi analysis Stability Rank Correlations Grain Yield TEF Eragrostis tef
在线阅读 下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部