The various bioacoustics signals obtained with auscultation contain complex clinical information that has been traditionally used as biomarkers,however,they are not extensively used in clinical studies owing to their ...The various bioacoustics signals obtained with auscultation contain complex clinical information that has been traditionally used as biomarkers,however,they are not extensively used in clinical studies owing to their spatiotemporal limitations.In this study,we developed a wearable stethoscope for wireless,skinattachable,low-power,continuous,real-time auscultation using a lung-sound-monitoring-patch(LSMP).LSMP can monitor respiratory function through a mobile app and classify normal and adventitious breathing by comparing their unique acoustic characteristics.The human heart and breathing sounds from humans can be distinguished from complex sound signals consisting of a mixture of bioacoustic signals and external noise.The performance of the LSMP sensor was further demonstrated in pediatric patients with asthma and elderly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)patients where wheezing sounds were classified at specific frequencies.In addition,we developed a novel method for counting wheezing events based on a two-dimensional convolutional neural network deep-learning model constructed de novo and trained with our augmented fundamental lung-sound data set.We implemented a counting algorithm to identify wheezing events in real-time regardless of the respiratory cycle.The artificial intelligence-based adventitious breathing event counter distinguished>80%of the events(especially wheezing)in long-term clinical applications in patients with COPD.展开更多
Algorithms are the primary component of Artificial Intelligence(AI).The algorithm is the process in AI that imitates the human mind to solve problems.Currently evaluating the performance of AI is achieved by evaluatin...Algorithms are the primary component of Artificial Intelligence(AI).The algorithm is the process in AI that imitates the human mind to solve problems.Currently evaluating the performance of AI is achieved by evaluating AI algorithms by metric scores on data sets.However the evaluation of algorithms in AI is challenging because the evaluation of the same type of algorithm has many data sets and evaluation metrics.Different algorithms may have individual strengths and weaknesses in evaluation metric scores on separate data sets,lacking the credibility and validity of the evaluation.Moreover,evaluation of algorithms requires repeated experiments on different data sets,reducing the attention of researchers to the research of the algorithms itself.Crucially,this approach to evaluating comparative metric scores does not take into account the algorithm’s ability to solve problems.And the classical algorithm evaluation of time and space complexity is not suitable for evaluating AI algorithms.Because classical algorithms input is infinite numbers,whereas AI algorithms input is a data set,which is limited and multifarious.According to the AI algorithm evaluation without response to the problem solving capability,this paper summarizes the features of AI algorithm evaluation and proposes an AI evaluation method that incorporates the problem-solving capabilities of algorithms.展开更多
基金supported by the Korea Environment Industry&Technology Institute(KEITI)through Digital Infrastructure Building Project for Monitoring,Surveying and Evaluating the Environmental Health program,funded by the Korea Ministry of Environment(MOE)(2021003330008)supported by the KIST Internal program(2E32851)+1 种基金supported by the Korea Health Technology Research and Development(R&D)Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute(KHIDI)and Korea Dementia Research Center(KDRC),funded by the Ministry of Health&Welfare and Ministry of Science and ICT,Republic of Korea(HU20C0164)the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF)funded by the Ministry of Education(2022R1A6A3A01087298)。
文摘The various bioacoustics signals obtained with auscultation contain complex clinical information that has been traditionally used as biomarkers,however,they are not extensively used in clinical studies owing to their spatiotemporal limitations.In this study,we developed a wearable stethoscope for wireless,skinattachable,low-power,continuous,real-time auscultation using a lung-sound-monitoring-patch(LSMP).LSMP can monitor respiratory function through a mobile app and classify normal and adventitious breathing by comparing their unique acoustic characteristics.The human heart and breathing sounds from humans can be distinguished from complex sound signals consisting of a mixture of bioacoustic signals and external noise.The performance of the LSMP sensor was further demonstrated in pediatric patients with asthma and elderly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)patients where wheezing sounds were classified at specific frequencies.In addition,we developed a novel method for counting wheezing events based on a two-dimensional convolutional neural network deep-learning model constructed de novo and trained with our augmented fundamental lung-sound data set.We implemented a counting algorithm to identify wheezing events in real-time regardless of the respiratory cycle.The artificial intelligence-based adventitious breathing event counter distinguished>80%of the events(especially wheezing)in long-term clinical applications in patients with COPD.
基金funded by the General Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant number[62277022].
文摘Algorithms are the primary component of Artificial Intelligence(AI).The algorithm is the process in AI that imitates the human mind to solve problems.Currently evaluating the performance of AI is achieved by evaluating AI algorithms by metric scores on data sets.However the evaluation of algorithms in AI is challenging because the evaluation of the same type of algorithm has many data sets and evaluation metrics.Different algorithms may have individual strengths and weaknesses in evaluation metric scores on separate data sets,lacking the credibility and validity of the evaluation.Moreover,evaluation of algorithms requires repeated experiments on different data sets,reducing the attention of researchers to the research of the algorithms itself.Crucially,this approach to evaluating comparative metric scores does not take into account the algorithm’s ability to solve problems.And the classical algorithm evaluation of time and space complexity is not suitable for evaluating AI algorithms.Because classical algorithms input is infinite numbers,whereas AI algorithms input is a data set,which is limited and multifarious.According to the AI algorithm evaluation without response to the problem solving capability,this paper summarizes the features of AI algorithm evaluation and proposes an AI evaluation method that incorporates the problem-solving capabilities of algorithms.
