Objective: this study will analyze the recovery of other patients with lumbar fracture through rehabilitation treatment and the clinical effect of lower limb rehabilitation robot. Methods: a total of 80 patients with ...Objective: this study will analyze the recovery of other patients with lumbar fracture through rehabilitation treatment and the clinical effect of lower limb rehabilitation robot. Methods: a total of 80 patients with spinal cord injury admitted to Jiangbin Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from January 2016 to March 2018 were selected. The control group received routine rehabilitation treatment, while the observation group received training with upper and lower limb rehabilitation robot. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. Results: after intervention, the total effective rate of routine rehabilitation group was 95.0%, while that of robot rehabilitation group was 82.5%, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In addition, after intervention, the ADL of robot rehabilitation group was higher than that of conventional rehabilitation group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: the use of robot rehabilitation group to treat paraplegia patients can not only enhance the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment, but also provide help from daily life. At the same time, it can improve patients' compliance with rehabilitation exercise and improve their life and sports ability, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.展开更多
文摘Objective: this study will analyze the recovery of other patients with lumbar fracture through rehabilitation treatment and the clinical effect of lower limb rehabilitation robot. Methods: a total of 80 patients with spinal cord injury admitted to Jiangbin Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from January 2016 to March 2018 were selected. The control group received routine rehabilitation treatment, while the observation group received training with upper and lower limb rehabilitation robot. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. Results: after intervention, the total effective rate of routine rehabilitation group was 95.0%, while that of robot rehabilitation group was 82.5%, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In addition, after intervention, the ADL of robot rehabilitation group was higher than that of conventional rehabilitation group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: the use of robot rehabilitation group to treat paraplegia patients can not only enhance the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment, but also provide help from daily life. At the same time, it can improve patients' compliance with rehabilitation exercise and improve their life and sports ability, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
