Currently,critical peak load caused by residential customers has attracted utility companies and policymakers to pay more attention to residential demand response(RDR)programs.In typical RDR programs,residential custo...Currently,critical peak load caused by residential customers has attracted utility companies and policymakers to pay more attention to residential demand response(RDR)programs.In typical RDR programs,residential customers react to the price or incentive-based signals,but the actions can fall behind flexible market situations.For those residential customers equipped with smart meters,they may contribute more DR loads if they can participate in DR events in a proactive way.In this paper,we propose a comprehensive market framework in which residential customers can provide proactive RDR actions in a day-ahead market(DAM).We model and evaluate the interactions between generation companies(GenCos),retailers,residential customers,and the independent system operator(ISO)via an agent-based modeling and simulation(ABMS)approach.The simulation framework contains two main procedures—the bottom-up modeling procedure and the reinforcement learning(RL)procedure.The bottom-up modeling procedure models the residential load profiles separately by household types to capture the RDR potential differences in advance so that residential customers may rationally provide automatic DR actions.Retailers and GenCos optimize their bidding strategies via the RL procedure.The modified optimization approach in this procedure can prevent the training results from falling into local optimum solutions.The ISO clears the DAM to maximize social welfare via Karush-Kuhn-Tucker(KKT)conditions.Based on realistic residential data in China,the proposed models and methods are verified and compared in a large multi-scenario test case with 30,000 residential households.Results show that proactive RDR programs and interactions between market entities may yield significant benefits for both the supply and demand sides.The models and methods in this paper may be used by utility companies,electricity retailers,market operators,and policy makers to evaluate the consequences of a proactive RDR and the interactions among multi-entities.展开更多
Although intragroup conflict has both multilevel and dynamic natures,less attention has been paid to establishing a holistic model of intragroup conflict that emerges across levels and unfolds over time.To address thi...Although intragroup conflict has both multilevel and dynamic natures,less attention has been paid to establishing a holistic model of intragroup conflict that emerges across levels and unfolds over time.To address this research gap,we extend the multilevel view of intragroup conflict(Korsgaard et al.2008)to develop a multilevel and dynamic model of intragroup conflict that explicitly includes(1)the role of time and(2)the feedback loop to encompass the dynamic aspect of intragroup conflict.We further instantiate the extended model in the context of team decision-making.To achieve this and systematically examine the complex relationships,we use agentbased modeling and simulation(ABMS).We directly investigate how two types of intragroup conflict—task and relationship conflict—interplay with cross-level antecedences,interrelate and develop over time,and affect team outcomes.This study adds to the intragroup conflict research by extending the field with multilevel and dynamic views.展开更多
基金supported in part by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFB0901100)the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1766203)+1 种基金the Science and Technology Project of State Grid Corporation of China(Friendly interaction system of supply-demand between urban electric power customers and power grid)the China Scholarship Council(CSC).
文摘Currently,critical peak load caused by residential customers has attracted utility companies and policymakers to pay more attention to residential demand response(RDR)programs.In typical RDR programs,residential customers react to the price or incentive-based signals,but the actions can fall behind flexible market situations.For those residential customers equipped with smart meters,they may contribute more DR loads if they can participate in DR events in a proactive way.In this paper,we propose a comprehensive market framework in which residential customers can provide proactive RDR actions in a day-ahead market(DAM).We model and evaluate the interactions between generation companies(GenCos),retailers,residential customers,and the independent system operator(ISO)via an agent-based modeling and simulation(ABMS)approach.The simulation framework contains two main procedures—the bottom-up modeling procedure and the reinforcement learning(RL)procedure.The bottom-up modeling procedure models the residential load profiles separately by household types to capture the RDR potential differences in advance so that residential customers may rationally provide automatic DR actions.Retailers and GenCos optimize their bidding strategies via the RL procedure.The modified optimization approach in this procedure can prevent the training results from falling into local optimum solutions.The ISO clears the DAM to maximize social welfare via Karush-Kuhn-Tucker(KKT)conditions.Based on realistic residential data in China,the proposed models and methods are verified and compared in a large multi-scenario test case with 30,000 residential households.Results show that proactive RDR programs and interactions between market entities may yield significant benefits for both the supply and demand sides.The models and methods in this paper may be used by utility companies,electricity retailers,market operators,and policy makers to evaluate the consequences of a proactive RDR and the interactions among multi-entities.
文摘Although intragroup conflict has both multilevel and dynamic natures,less attention has been paid to establishing a holistic model of intragroup conflict that emerges across levels and unfolds over time.To address this research gap,we extend the multilevel view of intragroup conflict(Korsgaard et al.2008)to develop a multilevel and dynamic model of intragroup conflict that explicitly includes(1)the role of time and(2)the feedback loop to encompass the dynamic aspect of intragroup conflict.We further instantiate the extended model in the context of team decision-making.To achieve this and systematically examine the complex relationships,we use agentbased modeling and simulation(ABMS).We directly investigate how two types of intragroup conflict—task and relationship conflict—interplay with cross-level antecedences,interrelate and develop over time,and affect team outcomes.This study adds to the intragroup conflict research by extending the field with multilevel and dynamic views.
