Objective: To investigate the diagnostic effects of CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with lacunar infarction. Methods: Thirty patients with early lacunar infarction in our hospital were diagnosed by...Objective: To investigate the diagnostic effects of CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with lacunar infarction. Methods: Thirty patients with early lacunar infarction in our hospital were diagnosed by ct and 30 patients were diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging according to the examination time, the average diameter of infarct focus and examination cost. Vascular image quality (siphon segment score of internal carotid artery, petrous segment score of artery, posterior communicating artery score and basilar artery score), and the lesion detection rates of the two inspection methods were compared;Results The detection effect of MRI was superior to that of ct (P < 0.05). Conclusion: patients with lacunar infarction by magnetic resonance imaging technology and ct two ways of diagnosis, can get good diagnosis effect, but the magnetic resonance imaging technology to detect the infarct diameter is larger, the diagnosis effect is better, the detection time is shorter, however, the examination cost is more, can according to the needs of patients in clinical reasonable choice of examination methods.展开更多
文摘Objective: To investigate the diagnostic effects of CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with lacunar infarction. Methods: Thirty patients with early lacunar infarction in our hospital were diagnosed by ct and 30 patients were diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging according to the examination time, the average diameter of infarct focus and examination cost. Vascular image quality (siphon segment score of internal carotid artery, petrous segment score of artery, posterior communicating artery score and basilar artery score), and the lesion detection rates of the two inspection methods were compared;Results The detection effect of MRI was superior to that of ct (P < 0.05). Conclusion: patients with lacunar infarction by magnetic resonance imaging technology and ct two ways of diagnosis, can get good diagnosis effect, but the magnetic resonance imaging technology to detect the infarct diameter is larger, the diagnosis effect is better, the detection time is shorter, however, the examination cost is more, can according to the needs of patients in clinical reasonable choice of examination methods.
