目的探究听觉诱发电位(auditory evoked potential,AEP)检查P1波峰、P1潜伏期与外中耳畸形患儿术后听觉行为分级(CAP)及言语可懂度分级(SIR)的相关性及对听力改善的评估价值。方法选取我院2017年1月~2019年1月外中耳畸形患儿82例,比较...目的探究听觉诱发电位(auditory evoked potential,AEP)检查P1波峰、P1潜伏期与外中耳畸形患儿术后听觉行为分级(CAP)及言语可懂度分级(SIR)的相关性及对听力改善的评估价值。方法选取我院2017年1月~2019年1月外中耳畸形患儿82例,比较术前、术后12个月P1波峰、P1潜伏期、CAP、SIR分级,分析其相关性,采用有意义听觉整合量表(MAIS)评分评价术后12个月患儿听力康复情况,比较患儿临床资料、P1波峰、P1潜伏期,评价P1波峰、P1潜伏期对听力改善的评估价值。结果术后12个月P1波峰低于术前,P1潜伏期短于术前,CAP、SIR分级高于术前(P<0.05);术前、术后12个月P1波峰、P1潜伏期与CAP、SIR分级均呈负相关(P<0.05);不同MAIS评分患儿术前听力损失程度、术前、术后12个月后CAP、SIR分级、P1波峰比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);P1波峰、P1潜伏期联合评估听力改善的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)最大,为0.872,敏感度、特异度分别为74.19%、85.00%。结论P1波峰、P1潜伏期与外中耳畸形患儿术后CAP、SIR分级均存在负相关性,采用AEP检查P1波峰、P1潜伏期在评估人工耳蜗植入术后听力改善方面具有重要价值。展开更多
In the present study, the ROCF test was initially conducted involving 30 healthy young individuals, in a quiet environment as Experiment 1 to examine variations in the score among different methods to memorize the fig...In the present study, the ROCF test was initially conducted involving 30 healthy young individuals, in a quiet environment as Experiment 1 to examine variations in the score among different methods to memorize the figure. In such an environment, no significant differences were observed in the score between the copying and outer speech groups, which suggested the possibility of some of the former groups having used outer speech in a voice too low to be heard or moving their lips without vocalization, achieving the same effect as outer speech, and consequently leading to the absence of differences from the outer speech group. On the other hand, the score markedly varied between the mouthpiece and copying or outer speech groups. As lip movements were suppressed in the former case, the unconscious use of outer speech was also prevented, possibly leading to poor results. Based on these findings, it may be possible to enhance the effects of rehabilitation in a clinical setting by promoting patients’ memorization using outer speech to vocalize the contents of training.展开更多
文摘目的探究听觉诱发电位(auditory evoked potential,AEP)检查P1波峰、P1潜伏期与外中耳畸形患儿术后听觉行为分级(CAP)及言语可懂度分级(SIR)的相关性及对听力改善的评估价值。方法选取我院2017年1月~2019年1月外中耳畸形患儿82例,比较术前、术后12个月P1波峰、P1潜伏期、CAP、SIR分级,分析其相关性,采用有意义听觉整合量表(MAIS)评分评价术后12个月患儿听力康复情况,比较患儿临床资料、P1波峰、P1潜伏期,评价P1波峰、P1潜伏期对听力改善的评估价值。结果术后12个月P1波峰低于术前,P1潜伏期短于术前,CAP、SIR分级高于术前(P<0.05);术前、术后12个月P1波峰、P1潜伏期与CAP、SIR分级均呈负相关(P<0.05);不同MAIS评分患儿术前听力损失程度、术前、术后12个月后CAP、SIR分级、P1波峰比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);P1波峰、P1潜伏期联合评估听力改善的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)最大,为0.872,敏感度、特异度分别为74.19%、85.00%。结论P1波峰、P1潜伏期与外中耳畸形患儿术后CAP、SIR分级均存在负相关性,采用AEP检查P1波峰、P1潜伏期在评估人工耳蜗植入术后听力改善方面具有重要价值。
文摘In the present study, the ROCF test was initially conducted involving 30 healthy young individuals, in a quiet environment as Experiment 1 to examine variations in the score among different methods to memorize the figure. In such an environment, no significant differences were observed in the score between the copying and outer speech groups, which suggested the possibility of some of the former groups having used outer speech in a voice too low to be heard or moving their lips without vocalization, achieving the same effect as outer speech, and consequently leading to the absence of differences from the outer speech group. On the other hand, the score markedly varied between the mouthpiece and copying or outer speech groups. As lip movements were suppressed in the former case, the unconscious use of outer speech was also prevented, possibly leading to poor results. Based on these findings, it may be possible to enhance the effects of rehabilitation in a clinical setting by promoting patients’ memorization using outer speech to vocalize the contents of training.
