Objective： CareHPV is a human papillomavirus （HPV） DNA test for low-resource settings （LRS）. This study assesses optimum triage strategies for careHPV-positive women in LRS. Methods： A total of 2,530 Chinese wom...Objective： CareHPV is a human papillomavirus （HPV） DNA test for low-resource settings （LRS）. This study assesses optimum triage strategies for careHPV-positive women in LRS. Methods： A total of 2,530 Chinese women were concurrently screened for cervical cancer with visual inspection with acetic acid （VIA）, liquid-based cytology and HPV testing by physician- and self-collected careHPV, and physician-collected Hybrid Capture 2 （HC2）. Screen-positive women were referred to colposcopy with biopsy and endocervical curettage as necessary. HPV-positivity was defined as _〉1.0 relative light units/cutoff （RLU/CO） for both careHPV and HC2. Primary physician-HC2, physician-careHPV and self-careHPV and in sequential screening with cytology, VIA, or increased HPV test-positivity performance, stratified by age, were assessed for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia （CIN） grade 2/3 or worse （CIN2/3＋） detection. Results： The sensitivities and specificities of primary HPV testing for CIN2＋ were： 83.8%, 88.1% for physician- careHPV; 72. 1%, 88.2% for self-careHPV; and 97.1%, 86.0% for HC2. Physician-careHPV test-positive women with VIA triage had a sensitivity of 30.9% for CIN2＋ versus 80.9% with cytology triage. Self-careHPV test- positive women with VIA triage was 26.5% versus 66.2 % with cytology triage. The sensitivity of HC2 test-positive women with VIA triage was 38.2 % versus 92.6% with cytology triage. The sensitivity of physician-careHPV testing for CIN2＋ decreased from 83.8% at _〉1.0 RLU/CO to 72.1% at _〉10.00 RLU/CO, while the sensitivity of self- careHPV testing decreased from 72.1% at _〉1.0 RLU/CO to 32.4% at _〉10.00 RLU/CO; similar trends were seen with age-stratification. Conclusions： VIA and cytology triage improved specificity for CIN2/3 than no triage. Sensitivity with VIA triage was unsuitable for a mass-screening program. VIA provider training might improve this strategy. Cytology triage could be feasible where a high-quality cytology program exists. Triage of HPV test-positive women by increased test positivity cutoff adds another LRS triage option.展开更多
基金support from the Bill&Melinda Gates Foundationthe National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81402748)Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine(No.2017-I2M-3-005)
文摘Objective： CareHPV is a human papillomavirus （HPV） DNA test for low-resource settings （LRS）. This study assesses optimum triage strategies for careHPV-positive women in LRS. Methods： A total of 2,530 Chinese women were concurrently screened for cervical cancer with visual inspection with acetic acid （VIA）, liquid-based cytology and HPV testing by physician- and self-collected careHPV, and physician-collected Hybrid Capture 2 （HC2）. Screen-positive women were referred to colposcopy with biopsy and endocervical curettage as necessary. HPV-positivity was defined as _〉1.0 relative light units/cutoff （RLU/CO） for both careHPV and HC2. Primary physician-HC2, physician-careHPV and self-careHPV and in sequential screening with cytology, VIA, or increased HPV test-positivity performance, stratified by age, were assessed for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia （CIN） grade 2/3 or worse （CIN2/3＋） detection. Results： The sensitivities and specificities of primary HPV testing for CIN2＋ were： 83.8%, 88.1% for physician- careHPV; 72. 1%, 88.2% for self-careHPV; and 97.1%, 86.0% for HC2. Physician-careHPV test-positive women with VIA triage had a sensitivity of 30.9% for CIN2＋ versus 80.9% with cytology triage. Self-careHPV test- positive women with VIA triage was 26.5% versus 66.2 % with cytology triage. The sensitivity of HC2 test-positive women with VIA triage was 38.2 % versus 92.6% with cytology triage. The sensitivity of physician-careHPV testing for CIN2＋ decreased from 83.8% at _〉1.0 RLU/CO to 72.1% at _〉10.00 RLU/CO, while the sensitivity of self- careHPV testing decreased from 72.1% at _〉1.0 RLU/CO to 32.4% at _〉10.00 RLU/CO; similar trends were seen with age-stratification. Conclusions： VIA and cytology triage improved specificity for CIN2/3 than no triage. Sensitivity with VIA triage was unsuitable for a mass-screening program. VIA provider training might improve this strategy. Cytology triage could be feasible where a high-quality cytology program exists. Triage of HPV test-positive women by increased test positivity cutoff adds another LRS triage option.
