AIM:To compare refractive error and angle of deviation in patients with basic esotropia and basic exotropia.METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of patients with basic-type strabismus.De...AIM:To compare refractive error and angle of deviation in patients with basic esotropia and basic exotropia.METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of patients with basic-type strabismus.Demographic data,refractive error,best-corrected distance visual acuity(BCVA),and the horizontal and vertical angle of deviation between basic esotropia and exotropia patients were compared.RESULTS:Among the 7129 patients(mean age 22.98±14.81y)evaluated,44.7%(3185 cases,54.9%male)exhibited basic-type esotropia,while 55.3%(3944 cases,53.9%male)presented with basic-type exotropia.Basic esotropia cases exhibited more hyperopic spherical equivalent measurements in both eyes(right:0.53±3.07 vs left:0.56±2.98 D)than those with basic exotropia(right eye:-0.33±2.84 vs left eye:-0.24±2.68 D,P<0.001 for both eyes).Patients with basic esotropia had significantly greater horizontal deviation angles(near:36.08±18.87 PD and far:35.56±18.75 PD)compared to those with basic exotropia(near:33.75±16.11 PD and far:33.26±15.90 PD,P<0.001).Conversely,patients with basic exotropia had slightly higher vertical deviation angles(near:1.67±5.80 PD and far:1.72±5.89 PD)compared to those with basic esotropia(near:1.12±4.57 PD and far:1.12±4.58 PD,P<0.001).Patients with basic esotropia underwent surgical intervention at younger ages compared to basic exotropia individuals(19.68±15.99 vs 25.66±13.20,P<0.001).CONCLUSION:Basic esotropia patients present more hyperopic refractive errors,better visual acuity,larger horizontal yet smaller vertical ocular misalignments,and tend to undergo strabismus surgery at younger ages relative to basic exotropia cases.展开更多
:Strabismus is a medical condition that is defined as the lack of coordination between the eyes.When Strabismus is detected at an early age,the chances of curing it are higher.The methods used to detect strabismus and...:Strabismus is a medical condition that is defined as the lack of coordination between the eyes.When Strabismus is detected at an early age,the chances of curing it are higher.The methods used to detect strabismus and measure its degree of deviation are complex and time-consuming,and they always require the presence of a physician.In this paper,we present a method of detecting strabismus and measuring its degree of deviation using videos of the patient’s eye region under a cover test.Our method involves extracting features from a set of training videos(training corpora)and using them to build a classifier.A decision tree(ID3)is built using labeled cases from actual strabismus diagnosis.Patterns are extracted from the corresponding videos of patients,and an association between the extracted features and actual diagnoses is established.Matching Rules from the correlation plot are used to predict diagnoses for future patients.The classifier was tested using a set of testing videos(testing corpora).The results showed 95.9%accuracy,4.1%were light cases and could not be detected correctly from the videos,half of them were false positive and the other half was false negative.展开更多
文摘AIM:To compare refractive error and angle of deviation in patients with basic esotropia and basic exotropia.METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of patients with basic-type strabismus.Demographic data,refractive error,best-corrected distance visual acuity(BCVA),and the horizontal and vertical angle of deviation between basic esotropia and exotropia patients were compared.RESULTS:Among the 7129 patients(mean age 22.98±14.81y)evaluated,44.7%(3185 cases,54.9%male)exhibited basic-type esotropia,while 55.3%(3944 cases,53.9%male)presented with basic-type exotropia.Basic esotropia cases exhibited more hyperopic spherical equivalent measurements in both eyes(right:0.53±3.07 vs left:0.56±2.98 D)than those with basic exotropia(right eye:-0.33±2.84 vs left eye:-0.24±2.68 D,P<0.001 for both eyes).Patients with basic esotropia had significantly greater horizontal deviation angles(near:36.08±18.87 PD and far:35.56±18.75 PD)compared to those with basic exotropia(near:33.75±16.11 PD and far:33.26±15.90 PD,P<0.001).Conversely,patients with basic exotropia had slightly higher vertical deviation angles(near:1.67±5.80 PD and far:1.72±5.89 PD)compared to those with basic esotropia(near:1.12±4.57 PD and far:1.12±4.58 PD,P<0.001).Patients with basic esotropia underwent surgical intervention at younger ages compared to basic exotropia individuals(19.68±15.99 vs 25.66±13.20,P<0.001).CONCLUSION:Basic esotropia patients present more hyperopic refractive errors,better visual acuity,larger horizontal yet smaller vertical ocular misalignments,and tend to undergo strabismus surgery at younger ages relative to basic exotropia cases.
基金funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University,through the Research Funding Program(Grand No.FRP-1440-32).
文摘:Strabismus is a medical condition that is defined as the lack of coordination between the eyes.When Strabismus is detected at an early age,the chances of curing it are higher.The methods used to detect strabismus and measure its degree of deviation are complex and time-consuming,and they always require the presence of a physician.In this paper,we present a method of detecting strabismus and measuring its degree of deviation using videos of the patient’s eye region under a cover test.Our method involves extracting features from a set of training videos(training corpora)and using them to build a classifier.A decision tree(ID3)is built using labeled cases from actual strabismus diagnosis.Patterns are extracted from the corresponding videos of patients,and an association between the extracted features and actual diagnoses is established.Matching Rules from the correlation plot are used to predict diagnoses for future patients.The classifier was tested using a set of testing videos(testing corpora).The results showed 95.9%accuracy,4.1%were light cases and could not be detected correctly from the videos,half of them were false positive and the other half was false negative.
