Austenitic stainless steels(ASSs)are widely used in various in-dustries such as aerospace,nuclear energy,food,and biotechnol-ogy owing to their exceptional combination of corrosion resistance,weldability,toughness,and...Austenitic stainless steels(ASSs)are widely used in various in-dustries such as aerospace,nuclear energy,food,and biotechnol-ogy owing to their exceptional combination of corrosion resistance,weldability,toughness,and formability[1,2].However,a signifi-cant drawback of ASSs is their low yield strength,which limits their applications in extreme environments[3].Grain boundary(GB)engineering plays a crucial role in enhancing the strength of ASSs[4,5].For instance,grain refinement techniques such as cold rolling followed by annealing[6],severe plastic deformation(SPD)[7],and surface mechanical attrition/rolling treatments[8,9]introduce high-angle GBs(HAGBs)into ASSs,thereby improving their strength.However,the high density of HAGBs limits their ca-pacity for dislocation storage and multiplication,leading to a sig-nificant loss of ductility[10,11].Additionally,several studies have shown that twin boundaries(TBs)can simultaneously enhance the strength,toughness,and corrosion resistance of ASSs[12,13].展开更多
The methods used for flow characterization of a powder mass include the angle of repose （AOR）, Carr index （CI）, and powder flow tester （PFT）. The use of nanosilica as a flow modifier （glidant） is very common i...The methods used for flow characterization of a powder mass include the angle of repose （AOR）, Carr index （CI）, and powder flow tester （PFT）. The use of nanosilica as a flow modifier （glidant） is very common in industry. This study aims to compare the glidant effect of hydrophobic and hydrophilic silica on a poorly flowable active pharmaceutical ingredient （ibuprofen） by different flow characterization techniques. Different percentages （0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 wt%） of both types of mixed silica–ibuprofen powders were evaluated by the AOR, CI, bulk density, and PFT. The flow factor, effective angle of friction, and cohesion were determined to explain the bulk powder properties. The results show that different types of silica show different levels of flow property improvement, but the techniques do not equally discriminate the differences. Hydrophobic silica results in better improvement of the flow property than hydrophilic silica, probably because of its better surface coverage of silica on the host particles. Change of the bulk density with applied pressure was significant for the different powders. This study demonstrates that combining several characterization methods provides a better understanding of bulk powder flow properties with respect to powder–process relationships than a single flow indicator.展开更多
基金financially supported by the National Key R&D program(No.2022YFB3707501)the GDAS’Project of Science and Technology(No.2022GDASZH-2022010202)the Guangdong Provincial Project(Nos.2022A0505050053,2021B1515120071,and 2020B1515130007)。
文摘Austenitic stainless steels(ASSs)are widely used in various in-dustries such as aerospace,nuclear energy,food,and biotechnol-ogy owing to their exceptional combination of corrosion resistance,weldability,toughness,and formability[1,2].However,a signifi-cant drawback of ASSs is their low yield strength,which limits their applications in extreme environments[3].Grain boundary(GB)engineering plays a crucial role in enhancing the strength of ASSs[4,5].For instance,grain refinement techniques such as cold rolling followed by annealing[6],severe plastic deformation(SPD)[7],and surface mechanical attrition/rolling treatments[8,9]introduce high-angle GBs(HAGBs)into ASSs,thereby improving their strength.However,the high density of HAGBs limits their ca-pacity for dislocation storage and multiplication,leading to a sig-nificant loss of ductility[10,11].Additionally,several studies have shown that twin boundaries(TBs)can simultaneously enhance the strength,toughness,and corrosion resistance of ASSs[12,13].
文摘The methods used for flow characterization of a powder mass include the angle of repose （AOR）, Carr index （CI）, and powder flow tester （PFT）. The use of nanosilica as a flow modifier （glidant） is very common in industry. This study aims to compare the glidant effect of hydrophobic and hydrophilic silica on a poorly flowable active pharmaceutical ingredient （ibuprofen） by different flow characterization techniques. Different percentages （0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 wt%） of both types of mixed silica–ibuprofen powders were evaluated by the AOR, CI, bulk density, and PFT. The flow factor, effective angle of friction, and cohesion were determined to explain the bulk powder properties. The results show that different types of silica show different levels of flow property improvement, but the techniques do not equally discriminate the differences. Hydrophobic silica results in better improvement of the flow property than hydrophilic silica, probably because of its better surface coverage of silica on the host particles. Change of the bulk density with applied pressure was significant for the different powders. This study demonstrates that combining several characterization methods provides a better understanding of bulk powder flow properties with respect to powder–process relationships than a single flow indicator.
