AIM:To evaluate the efficacy of retinal laser photocoagulation and intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(anti-VEGF)for hemorrhagic retinal arterial macroaneurysm(RAM).METHODS:This was a ret...AIM:To evaluate the efficacy of retinal laser photocoagulation and intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(anti-VEGF)for hemorrhagic retinal arterial macroaneurysm(RAM).METHODS:This was a retrospective clinical study.Patients with hemorrhagic RAM were divided into 4 groups defined by different treatments:a retinal laser photocoagulation therapy monotherapy group,an anti-VEGF intravitreal injection monotherapy group,a laser and anti-VEGF combination therapy group,and an observation group.Visual acuity(VA),central macular thickness(CMT),and retinal hemorrhage area(RHA)were collected.RESULTS:Forty-seven eyes of 47 patients were enrolled.VA improved and had a significant difference between baseline and final in each treatment group(logMAR;laser group:1.90±0.53 vs 1.05±0.63,P<0.001;anti-VEGF group:1.75±0.63 vs 1.12±0.54,P=0.009;combination group:1.76±0.38 vs 1.01±0.52,P<0.001);however,VA decreased and had no significant difference in observation group(1.63±0.51 vs 1.76±0.61,P=0.660).CMT decreased and had a significant difference between baseline and final in each group(laser group:815.16±310.83 vs 252.05±83.90μm,P<0.001;anti-VEGF group:725.00±290.79 vs 203.56±69.89μm,P=0.001;combination group:595.50±186.51 vs 253.13±55.06μm,P=0.001;observation group:758.88±195.65 vs 267.00±120.90μm,P=0.001).RHA were 28.99±28.15,25.94±11.58,19.64±8.97,and 27.45±13.76 mm^(2) in laser group,anti-VEGF group,combination group and observation group,respectively.RHA was statistically correlated with final VA(P=0.032)in the observation group.CONCLUSION:Both laser and anti-VEGF treatments are effective for hemorrhagic RAM.Combination therapy reduces the number of injections of anti-VEGF.RHA is a visual prognosis predictor in the natural history of hemorrhagic RAM.展开更多
Objective: the experiment for the patients with branch retinal vein occlusion, and under the inspection found that the western medicine treatment of patients with macular edema, on the choice of scheme for the glass b...Objective: the experiment for the patients with branch retinal vein occlusion, and under the inspection found that the western medicine treatment of patients with macular edema, on the choice of scheme for the glass body cavity injection of compaq heap joint retinal laser photocoagulation for treatment, thus improved compared to the patient, and eyesight state changes. Methods: Patients diagnosed with branch retinal vein occlusion in our hospital and found with macular edema under examination were selected as the study subjects. The diagnosis and treatment time was from January 2018 to December 2020, and 50 patients were randomly divided into groups according to the order of treatment by drawing lots. The control group was treated with fundus laser, while the observation group was treated with intravitreal injection of Compaxerib combined with retinal laser photocoagulation, and the therapeutic effects were compared. Results: From the point of view of treatment, the BCVA index score of the best corrected visual acuity in the observation group was higher than that in the control group at one and three months, and the comparison was statistically significant. Meanwhile, in terms of CMT index of retinal thickness in macular fovea, we compared the efficacy of patients treated for one month, and it was (264.94±101.35) um in the observation group and (344.56±123.48) um in the control group, the difference was statistically significant. In terms of therapeutic efficacy, the observation group was 92.0%, which was higher than the control group's 68.0%. Therefore, it was believed that the observation group was more ideal in the improvement of the condition, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: Intravitreal injection of combocipropionate combined with retinal laser photocoagulation is effective in the treatment of macular edema caused by branch retinal vein occlusion. It has high clinical feasibility and is worthy of wide application.展开更多
AIM： To compare three kinds of fluorescent probes for in vitro labeling and in vivo tracking of endothelial progenitor cells（EPCs） in a mouse model of laser-induced retinal injury.METHODS： EPCs were isolated from ...AIM： To compare three kinds of fluorescent probes for in vitro labeling and in vivo tracking of endothelial progenitor cells（EPCs） in a mouse model of laser-induced retinal injury.METHODS： EPCs were isolated from human umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells and labeled with three different fluorescent probes： 5-（and-6）-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester（CFSE）, 1,1′-dilinoleyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindo-carbocyanine perchlorate linked acetylated low-density lipoprotein（Di I-Ac LDL）, and green fluorescent protein（GFP）. The fluorescent intensity of EPCs was examined by confocal microscopy. Survival rate of labeled EPCs was calculated with trypan blue staining, and their adhesive capability was assessed. A mouse model of retinal injury was induced by laser, and EPCs were injected into the vitreous cavity. Frozen section and fluorescein angiography on flat-mounted retinal samples was employed to track the labeled EPCs in vivo.RESULTS： EPCs labeled with CFSE and Di I-Ac LDL exhibited an intense green and red fluorescence at the beginning; the fluorescence intensity decreased gradually to 20.23% and 49.99% respectively, after 28 d. On the contrary, the florescent intensity of GFP-labeled EPCs increased in a time-dependent manner. All labeled EPCs showed normal morphology and no significant change in survival and adhesive capability. In the mouse model, transplantation of EPCs showed a protective effect against retinal injury. EPCs labeled with CFSE and Di I-Ac LDL were successfully tracked in mice during the development of retinal injury and repair; however, GFP-labeled EPCs were not detected in the laser-injured mouse retina.CONCLUSION： The three fluorescent markers used in this study have their own set of advantages and disadvantages. CFSE and Di I-Ac LDL are suitable for short-term EPClabeling, while GFP should be used for long-term labeling. The choice of fluorescent markers should be guided by the purpose of the study.展开更多
文摘AIM:To evaluate the efficacy of retinal laser photocoagulation and intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(anti-VEGF)for hemorrhagic retinal arterial macroaneurysm(RAM).METHODS:This was a retrospective clinical study.Patients with hemorrhagic RAM were divided into 4 groups defined by different treatments:a retinal laser photocoagulation therapy monotherapy group,an anti-VEGF intravitreal injection monotherapy group,a laser and anti-VEGF combination therapy group,and an observation group.Visual acuity(VA),central macular thickness(CMT),and retinal hemorrhage area(RHA)were collected.RESULTS:Forty-seven eyes of 47 patients were enrolled.VA improved and had a significant difference between baseline and final in each treatment group(logMAR;laser group:1.90±0.53 vs 1.05±0.63,P<0.001;anti-VEGF group:1.75±0.63 vs 1.12±0.54,P=0.009;combination group:1.76±0.38 vs 1.01±0.52,P<0.001);however,VA decreased and had no significant difference in observation group(1.63±0.51 vs 1.76±0.61,P=0.660).CMT decreased and had a significant difference between baseline and final in each group(laser group:815.16±310.83 vs 252.05±83.90μm,P<0.001;anti-VEGF group:725.00±290.79 vs 203.56±69.89μm,P=0.001;combination group:595.50±186.51 vs 253.13±55.06μm,P=0.001;observation group:758.88±195.65 vs 267.00±120.90μm,P=0.001).RHA were 28.99±28.15,25.94±11.58,19.64±8.97,and 27.45±13.76 mm^(2) in laser group,anti-VEGF group,combination group and observation group,respectively.RHA was statistically correlated with final VA(P=0.032)in the observation group.CONCLUSION:Both laser and anti-VEGF treatments are effective for hemorrhagic RAM.Combination therapy reduces the number of injections of anti-VEGF.RHA is a visual prognosis predictor in the natural history of hemorrhagic RAM.
文摘Objective: the experiment for the patients with branch retinal vein occlusion, and under the inspection found that the western medicine treatment of patients with macular edema, on the choice of scheme for the glass body cavity injection of compaq heap joint retinal laser photocoagulation for treatment, thus improved compared to the patient, and eyesight state changes. Methods: Patients diagnosed with branch retinal vein occlusion in our hospital and found with macular edema under examination were selected as the study subjects. The diagnosis and treatment time was from January 2018 to December 2020, and 50 patients were randomly divided into groups according to the order of treatment by drawing lots. The control group was treated with fundus laser, while the observation group was treated with intravitreal injection of Compaxerib combined with retinal laser photocoagulation, and the therapeutic effects were compared. Results: From the point of view of treatment, the BCVA index score of the best corrected visual acuity in the observation group was higher than that in the control group at one and three months, and the comparison was statistically significant. Meanwhile, in terms of CMT index of retinal thickness in macular fovea, we compared the efficacy of patients treated for one month, and it was (264.94±101.35) um in the observation group and (344.56±123.48) um in the control group, the difference was statistically significant. In terms of therapeutic efficacy, the observation group was 92.0%, which was higher than the control group's 68.0%. Therefore, it was believed that the observation group was more ideal in the improvement of the condition, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: Intravitreal injection of combocipropionate combined with retinal laser photocoagulation is effective in the treatment of macular edema caused by branch retinal vein occlusion. It has high clinical feasibility and is worthy of wide application.
基金Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81400403)the International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of Jilin Province(No.20110733)the Technology Program of Soochow City(No.SYS201375)
文摘AIM： To compare three kinds of fluorescent probes for in vitro labeling and in vivo tracking of endothelial progenitor cells（EPCs） in a mouse model of laser-induced retinal injury.METHODS： EPCs were isolated from human umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells and labeled with three different fluorescent probes： 5-（and-6）-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester（CFSE）, 1,1′-dilinoleyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindo-carbocyanine perchlorate linked acetylated low-density lipoprotein（Di I-Ac LDL）, and green fluorescent protein（GFP）. The fluorescent intensity of EPCs was examined by confocal microscopy. Survival rate of labeled EPCs was calculated with trypan blue staining, and their adhesive capability was assessed. A mouse model of retinal injury was induced by laser, and EPCs were injected into the vitreous cavity. Frozen section and fluorescein angiography on flat-mounted retinal samples was employed to track the labeled EPCs in vivo.RESULTS： EPCs labeled with CFSE and Di I-Ac LDL exhibited an intense green and red fluorescence at the beginning; the fluorescence intensity decreased gradually to 20.23% and 49.99% respectively, after 28 d. On the contrary, the florescent intensity of GFP-labeled EPCs increased in a time-dependent manner. All labeled EPCs showed normal morphology and no significant change in survival and adhesive capability. In the mouse model, transplantation of EPCs showed a protective effect against retinal injury. EPCs labeled with CFSE and Di I-Ac LDL were successfully tracked in mice during the development of retinal injury and repair; however, GFP-labeled EPCs were not detected in the laser-injured mouse retina.CONCLUSION： The three fluorescent markers used in this study have their own set of advantages and disadvantages. CFSE and Di I-Ac LDL are suitable for short-term EPClabeling, while GFP should be used for long-term labeling. The choice of fluorescent markers should be guided by the purpose of the study.
