In this paper, it is shown that there is a gap in the paper [Chidume, C. E., Shahzad, N.： Weak convergence theorems for a finite family of strict pseudo-contractions. Nonlinear Anal., 72, 1257–1265（2010）], consequ...In this paper, it is shown that there is a gap in the paper [Chidume, C. E., Shahzad, N.： Weak convergence theorems for a finite family of strict pseudo-contractions. Nonlinear Anal., 72, 1257–1265（2010）], consequently, the main results of the paper do not hold in uniformly smooth Banach spaces. Meanwhile, it is also shown that the main results（Lemma 3.4, Theorems 3.5–3.6, 3.8–3.9） in the paper [Cholamjiak, P., Suantai, S.： Weak convergence theorems for a countable family of strict pseudo-contractions in Banach spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2010, Article ID 632137, 16 pages（2010）] do not hold in Lpfor p 〉 3. Finally, some modified results are presented in the setting of uniformly smooth and uniformly convex Banach spaces which include Lpfor p ≥ 2 as special cases. Furthermore, our arguments are also different from the ones given by the authors above.展开更多
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.10771050,11071053)
文摘In this paper, it is shown that there is a gap in the paper [Chidume, C. E., Shahzad, N.： Weak convergence theorems for a finite family of strict pseudo-contractions. Nonlinear Anal., 72, 1257–1265（2010）], consequently, the main results of the paper do not hold in uniformly smooth Banach spaces. Meanwhile, it is also shown that the main results（Lemma 3.4, Theorems 3.5–3.6, 3.8–3.9） in the paper [Cholamjiak, P., Suantai, S.： Weak convergence theorems for a countable family of strict pseudo-contractions in Banach spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2010, Article ID 632137, 16 pages（2010）] do not hold in Lpfor p 〉 3. Finally, some modified results are presented in the setting of uniformly smooth and uniformly convex Banach spaces which include Lpfor p ≥ 2 as special cases. Furthermore, our arguments are also different from the ones given by the authors above.
