Spatiotemporal data fusion technologies have been widely used for land surface phenology(LSP)monitoring since it is a low-cost solution to obtain fine-resolution satellite time series.However,the reliability of fused ...Spatiotemporal data fusion technologies have been widely used for land surface phenology(LSP)monitoring since it is a low-cost solution to obtain fine-resolution satellite time series.However,the reliability of fused images is largely affected by land surface heterogeneity and input data.It is unclear whether data fusion can really benefit LSP studies at fine scales.To explore this research question,this study designed a sophisticated simulation experiment to quantify effectiveness of 2 representative data fusion algorithms,namely,pair-based Spatial and Temporal Adaptive Reflectance Fusion Model(STARFM)and time series-based Spatiotemporal fusion method to Simultaneously generate Full-length normalized difference vegetation Index Time series(SSFIT)by fusing Landsat and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS)data in extracting pixel-wise spring phenology(i.e.,the start of the growing season,SOS)and its spatial gradient and temporal variation.Our results reveal that:(a)STARFM can improve the accuracy of pixel-wise SOS by up to 74.47%and temporal variation by up to 59.13%,respectively,compared with only using Landsat images,but it can hardly improve the retrieval of spatial gradient.For SSFIT,the accuracy of pixel-wise SOS,spatial gradient,and temporal variation can be improved by up to 139.20%,26.36%,and 162.30%,respectively;(b)the accuracy improvement introduced by fusion algorithms decreases with the number of available Landsat images per year,and it has a large variation with the same number of available Landsat images,and(c)this large variation is highly related to the temporal distributions of available Landsat images,suggesting that fusion algorithms can improve SOS accuracy only when cloud-free Landsat images cannot capture key vegetation growth period.This study calls for caution with the use of data fusion in LSP studies at fine scales.展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Project Nos.42271331 and 42022060)The Hong Kong Polytechnic University(Project Nos.4-ZZND and Q-CDBP).
文摘Spatiotemporal data fusion technologies have been widely used for land surface phenology(LSP)monitoring since it is a low-cost solution to obtain fine-resolution satellite time series.However,the reliability of fused images is largely affected by land surface heterogeneity and input data.It is unclear whether data fusion can really benefit LSP studies at fine scales.To explore this research question,this study designed a sophisticated simulation experiment to quantify effectiveness of 2 representative data fusion algorithms,namely,pair-based Spatial and Temporal Adaptive Reflectance Fusion Model(STARFM)and time series-based Spatiotemporal fusion method to Simultaneously generate Full-length normalized difference vegetation Index Time series(SSFIT)by fusing Landsat and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS)data in extracting pixel-wise spring phenology(i.e.,the start of the growing season,SOS)and its spatial gradient and temporal variation.Our results reveal that:(a)STARFM can improve the accuracy of pixel-wise SOS by up to 74.47%and temporal variation by up to 59.13%,respectively,compared with only using Landsat images,but it can hardly improve the retrieval of spatial gradient.For SSFIT,the accuracy of pixel-wise SOS,spatial gradient,and temporal variation can be improved by up to 139.20%,26.36%,and 162.30%,respectively;(b)the accuracy improvement introduced by fusion algorithms decreases with the number of available Landsat images per year,and it has a large variation with the same number of available Landsat images,and(c)this large variation is highly related to the temporal distributions of available Landsat images,suggesting that fusion algorithms can improve SOS accuracy only when cloud-free Landsat images cannot capture key vegetation growth period.This study calls for caution with the use of data fusion in LSP studies at fine scales.
